Reminds me of the Cleveland Clinic's study on 51k of its own guinea pig employees, which showed that the incidence of COVID illness increased with the number of boosters per employee. Did that mean that the study called the wisdom of vaccination into question? No it did not.
But these are infants. They've never even had the chance to make a wrong decision. And we're not even talking yet about the DNA contamination from the vials that might have been passed on to them.
As these papers come out and then someone like you sees the glaring holes, the legitimacy of the study needs to be addressed; just like you are doing and to encourage others to do the same thing. This is the way that change can happen. Call these "authors" on the carpet. This needs to be done on so many levels, and so few to do the job. Bless you for taking the time to alert us to the lack of accuracy and the gas lighting that has been around since the word hysteria was associated with hysterectomy.
Breast milk is being poisoned and at the same time, the Baby Formula is not quality because they use many cheap ingredients that are not biological active to maximize profit.
I was aware of this when my first son was a baby 40 years ago. When I found out, I made his baby food at home. I would just blend what we were having, but even still, I was not aware of the toxins in our food!
It’s frightening too me that the Trump administration with Bobby Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services has kept the MRNA inoculation on the vaccine schedule for 6 month old infants. Do they not know that this forces the babies body to produce spike proteins which are foreign to the babies system and can cause all sorts of serious irreversible harms to the child. This is insanity too me.
The danger of inoculating children, babies and pregnant women has been covered extensively in Kennedy's online publication, "The Defender". We have to consider the dark forces they're up against. This is going to take time. In the meantime, informed people need to just say no to these vaccines and stick together. Just keep spreading the truth as best we can so more and more people will know the truth and refuse to comply. This will require our active participation on a massive scale. We mustn't wait for the government to do it for us.
I don’t know Dianne, it’s up to Trump and Kennedy now, they are running the show. Having the knowledge of what these chemicals are doing too babies and going on allowing this, too me, is being complicit. And complicity or condoning this too me is stepping over that line and honestly at that point you are becoming an accomplice. Trumps willing to passionately match tariffs to these countries that have been ripping us off, shouldn’t harming babies be more important? Too me everyone on this sub stack should be horrified that these experimental injections, really we know now what it’s doing to people, continue to be administered.
If I took over a building project that was being built in a flawed way, but continued down that same road knowing it was going to fail, wouldn’t I be being complicit and or an accomplice?
“In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot”. Mark Twain
James, Bobby is playing the long game. He could be like Musk - move fast and break things - which would build overpowering opposition, rendering him unable to accomplish any good at all. But Bobby is too savvy and seasoned to employ that method. Cultivate perspective. Let the man work.
Leo not sure if you saw this video, take a look. I like RFK Jr., and I’m sure if it was his decision he would probably pull these mRNA vaccines off the market, but every time babies and children are foolishly injected with these chemicals their bodies are injured for no real reason, it’s insane. They’re no safe and they’re not effective especially for children.
My daughter had a baby a month ago and is breastfeeding her baby. She won’t even take a Tylenol for fear of it getting to the baby through her breast milk. It is common sense that the vax would get into the breast milk. People need to use their brains .
About a year into Covid I got to know a guy whose wife was a neonatal nurse at the hospital in Spotsylvania. They were seeing a lot of problems in pregnant women, bleeding etc that they had never seen before. Women who had previously given birth without any issues were suddenly having miscarriages and such. They also saw toxic breast milk issues. Their pediatricians recommended their new mothers not breast feed. Of course we never heard any of this. Funny how years later science is starting to talk about these things.
Ethics are no longer a component in medical science nor the journals who report out the studies. Reading between the lines of the uncommented on charts is essential. Mothers, infants, and children cannot trust medical science to look after their best interests. Then the popular science media will lead the public further astray. It’s going to be very difficult to survive and thrive all the iatrogenic insult now and in the future.
If you're going to dismiss findings because of unmeasured external factors, then your conclusions are meaningless. If your supposition is in fact correct, you have rendered your entire study meaningless. You're wasting your time and mine.
Thank you for uncovering and sharing this report and ramifications with us!
I have been under the impression that Britain and the EU are still covering for and supporting C19 vaccinations. If so, this reporting fits with their current executive direction. I would note we (US) are still hawking C19 mod-mRNA vaccinations.
On the other hand, it seems to me their article documents facts worth pursuing. Our population has been experiencing numerous attacks on reproduction. We have been trying to regenerate positive attitudes and support for traditional families and reproduction. In that facts imply possible dangers to breast fed (best fed) infants, it seems to me an issue well worth pursuing. As long as C19 mod-mNRA are on our market, its even more pressing. Not to mention dangers from other drugs.
I haven't noted any pickup on this issue from the OBGYN or PEDI folks. So its especially beneficial you caught and are exposing this! Thank you!
I understand that it will likely do little good, but I just thought that I would again warn anyone who is involved in this extremely dangerous and deadly "vaccine epidemic" that they are in fact and by well-established law committing crimes against humanity, and it is extremely likely that they will in time be criminally prosecuted~! Those who have failed to study REAL science have obviously never studied REAL law, however neither tragic mistakes will be accepted as any sort of excuse when it comes time to pay the price for those avoidable mistakes. US Military Tribunals are VERY secret, rarely if ever disclosed to the general public, and those who find themselves as defendants in that ultimate system of justice quickly learn that the US Military Tribunal record has an EXTREMELY high rate of convictions~! I strongly suggest that anyone who is involved in this "vaccine epidemic" IMMEDIATELY backs off, especially in the case of jabbing the infants and children~! Choose wisely~! Sincerely, Mike
Toxic Threads: Allegations that Federal Law Pushes Infertility Chemicals Into Children’s Pajamas...
"When you buy pajamas for your children, you’re probably not thinking about federal regulations or hormone-disrupting chemicals.
But thanks to a little-known fire safety law, millions of American kids are sleeping in potentially toxic fabrics every night, and parents have no idea.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requires under 16 CFR Part 1615 and 1616, that children’s sleepwear either be made with fire-retardant chemicals or be “snug fitting” to reduce the risk of catching fire. On the surface, that may sound like a reasonable safety precaution.
But mounting evidence shows these fabrics and chemicals may pose serious health and fertility risks."
"To meet these regulations, most children’s sleepwear is made not from natural, breathable fabrics like cotton or wool—but from polyester, a synthetic material derived from petrochemicals. Even worse, when flame retardants are used to treat cotton, they introduce an entirely different health risk."
"For a whole year, these groups of dogs were either in 100% polyester, a 50/50 cotton blend, 100% cotton, or 100% wool. One group wore nothing, as a control.
The dogs in the polyester? Almost 75% couldn’t get pregnant — even with artificial insemination."
Flame retardants are well-documented endocrine disruptors, meaning they interfere with hormone production.
These chemicals have been linked to developmental problems, social development problems, thyroid disorders, and long-term toxicity in children. Retardants used in children’s pajamas, including tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), have been linked to hormone disruption, neurological development issues, and increased cancer risk. Pediatricians and researchers have raised the alarm for years—but nothing has changed.
I have been amazed at so many tv commercials pushing the jab on pregnant women! And the posters in pharmacies! This is insane!! Those infants have no choice in this, as in abortion! Yet in this incidence, the mother may want her baby but she is ignorantly harming it.
OK, there is a common thread to all these studies and adverse events reports. Dah, there is a lot of studies and adverse events. A lot of reporting and denials and unsubstantiated scientific documentation. Gee willikers, that's one big flag to me. A tremendous amount of effort and disinformation has been spewed throughout media to steer attention from reality. Too many billboards promoting NGO and govt concerns for me tells me there is a lot of BS going on.
Reminds me of the Cleveland Clinic's study on 51k of its own guinea pig employees, which showed that the incidence of COVID illness increased with the number of boosters per employee. Did that mean that the study called the wisdom of vaccination into question? No it did not.
But these are infants. They've never even had the chance to make a wrong decision. And we're not even talking yet about the DNA contamination from the vials that might have been passed on to them.
As these papers come out and then someone like you sees the glaring holes, the legitimacy of the study needs to be addressed; just like you are doing and to encourage others to do the same thing. This is the way that change can happen. Call these "authors" on the carpet. This needs to be done on so many levels, and so few to do the job. Bless you for taking the time to alert us to the lack of accuracy and the gas lighting that has been around since the word hysteria was associated with hysterectomy.
Time to get all the brain dead medicine men/women out of our Medical institutions both public and private!
Starts with getting rid of those teaching (indoctrinating) them in our colleges and medical schools 🤷🏼♂️
Simpler just to keep the information wheel running at top speed.
04/07/25: We sent this message to these thieves and knaves (along with this article's address): "Your credibility is shot to hell. Shame on you."
Breast milk is being poisoned and at the same time, the Baby Formula is not quality because they use many cheap ingredients that are not biological active to maximize profit.
All part of the depopulation agenda?
Thank heavens HHS seems to be pursuing the baby food problems at least
I was aware of this when my first son was a baby 40 years ago. When I found out, I made his baby food at home. I would just blend what we were having, but even still, I was not aware of the toxins in our food!
Yes indeed. None of this would have happened without these minions carrying out the agenda.
Just what does this tell us about peer review? Obviously, their "peers" reviewed it
It’s frightening too me that the Trump administration with Bobby Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services has kept the MRNA inoculation on the vaccine schedule for 6 month old infants. Do they not know that this forces the babies body to produce spike proteins which are foreign to the babies system and can cause all sorts of serious irreversible harms to the child. This is insanity too me.
The danger of inoculating children, babies and pregnant women has been covered extensively in Kennedy's online publication, "The Defender". We have to consider the dark forces they're up against. This is going to take time. In the meantime, informed people need to just say no to these vaccines and stick together. Just keep spreading the truth as best we can so more and more people will know the truth and refuse to comply. This will require our active participation on a massive scale. We mustn't wait for the government to do it for us.
I guess that’s why I find this insane. I can’t see a HHS Secretary knowingly allowing this poison to be pushed into babies?????
I don't think that's the case. At least that's what I want to believe. The forces they're up against are insane and very dangerous.
I don’t know Dianne, it’s up to Trump and Kennedy now, they are running the show. Having the knowledge of what these chemicals are doing too babies and going on allowing this, too me, is being complicit. And complicity or condoning this too me is stepping over that line and honestly at that point you are becoming an accomplice. Trumps willing to passionately match tariffs to these countries that have been ripping us off, shouldn’t harming babies be more important? Too me everyone on this sub stack should be horrified that these experimental injections, really we know now what it’s doing to people, continue to be administered.
If I took over a building project that was being built in a flawed way, but continued down that same road knowing it was going to fail, wouldn’t I be being complicit and or an accomplice?
“In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot”. Mark Twain
James, Bobby is playing the long game. He could be like Musk - move fast and break things - which would build overpowering opposition, rendering him unable to accomplish any good at all. But Bobby is too savvy and seasoned to employ that method. Cultivate perspective. Let the man work.
I hope you’re doing well Leo!!
Leo not sure if you saw this video, take a look. I like RFK Jr., and I’m sure if it was his decision he would probably pull these mRNA vaccines off the market, but every time babies and children are foolishly injected with these chemicals their bodies are injured for no real reason, it’s insane. They’re no safe and they’re not effective especially for children.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1XjcC6ETE1/?mibextid=wwXIfr
I agree that condoning them, recommending them is over the line for sure.
My daughter had a baby a month ago and is breastfeeding her baby. She won’t even take a Tylenol for fear of it getting to the baby through her breast milk. It is common sense that the vax would get into the breast milk. People need to use their brains .
About a year into Covid I got to know a guy whose wife was a neonatal nurse at the hospital in Spotsylvania. They were seeing a lot of problems in pregnant women, bleeding etc that they had never seen before. Women who had previously given birth without any issues were suddenly having miscarriages and such. They also saw toxic breast milk issues. Their pediatricians recommended their new mothers not breast feed. Of course we never heard any of this. Funny how years later science is starting to talk about these things.
Ethics are no longer a component in medical science nor the journals who report out the studies. Reading between the lines of the uncommented on charts is essential. Mothers, infants, and children cannot trust medical science to look after their best interests. Then the popular science media will lead the public further astray. It’s going to be very difficult to survive and thrive all the iatrogenic insult now and in the future.
If you're going to dismiss findings because of unmeasured external factors, then your conclusions are meaningless. If your supposition is in fact correct, you have rendered your entire study meaningless. You're wasting your time and mine.
Thank you for uncovering and sharing this report and ramifications with us!
I have been under the impression that Britain and the EU are still covering for and supporting C19 vaccinations. If so, this reporting fits with their current executive direction. I would note we (US) are still hawking C19 mod-mRNA vaccinations.
On the other hand, it seems to me their article documents facts worth pursuing. Our population has been experiencing numerous attacks on reproduction. We have been trying to regenerate positive attitudes and support for traditional families and reproduction. In that facts imply possible dangers to breast fed (best fed) infants, it seems to me an issue well worth pursuing. As long as C19 mod-mNRA are on our market, its even more pressing. Not to mention dangers from other drugs.
I haven't noted any pickup on this issue from the OBGYN or PEDI folks. So its especially beneficial you caught and are exposing this! Thank you!
“It’s always about the money.”
I understand that it will likely do little good, but I just thought that I would again warn anyone who is involved in this extremely dangerous and deadly "vaccine epidemic" that they are in fact and by well-established law committing crimes against humanity, and it is extremely likely that they will in time be criminally prosecuted~! Those who have failed to study REAL science have obviously never studied REAL law, however neither tragic mistakes will be accepted as any sort of excuse when it comes time to pay the price for those avoidable mistakes. US Military Tribunals are VERY secret, rarely if ever disclosed to the general public, and those who find themselves as defendants in that ultimate system of justice quickly learn that the US Military Tribunal record has an EXTREMELY high rate of convictions~! I strongly suggest that anyone who is involved in this "vaccine epidemic" IMMEDIATELY backs off, especially in the case of jabbing the infants and children~! Choose wisely~! Sincerely, Mike
Toxic Threads: Allegations that Federal Law Pushes Infertility Chemicals Into Children’s Pajamas...
"When you buy pajamas for your children, you’re probably not thinking about federal regulations or hormone-disrupting chemicals.
But thanks to a little-known fire safety law, millions of American kids are sleeping in potentially toxic fabrics every night, and parents have no idea.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requires under 16 CFR Part 1615 and 1616, that children’s sleepwear either be made with fire-retardant chemicals or be “snug fitting” to reduce the risk of catching fire. On the surface, that may sound like a reasonable safety precaution.
But mounting evidence shows these fabrics and chemicals may pose serious health and fertility risks."
"To meet these regulations, most children’s sleepwear is made not from natural, breathable fabrics like cotton or wool—but from polyester, a synthetic material derived from petrochemicals. Even worse, when flame retardants are used to treat cotton, they introduce an entirely different health risk."
"For a whole year, these groups of dogs were either in 100% polyester, a 50/50 cotton blend, 100% cotton, or 100% wool. One group wore nothing, as a control.
The dogs in the polyester? Almost 75% couldn’t get pregnant — even with artificial insemination."
Flame retardants are well-documented endocrine disruptors, meaning they interfere with hormone production.
These chemicals have been linked to developmental problems, social development problems, thyroid disorders, and long-term toxicity in children. Retardants used in children’s pajamas, including tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), have been linked to hormone disruption, neurological development issues, and increased cancer risk. Pediatricians and researchers have raised the alarm for years—but nothing has changed.
Source:
https://www.hormonespecialist.net/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/toxic-threads-allegations-that-federal-law-pushes-infertility/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18393023/
I have been amazed at so many tv commercials pushing the jab on pregnant women! And the posters in pharmacies! This is insane!! Those infants have no choice in this, as in abortion! Yet in this incidence, the mother may want her baby but she is ignorantly harming it.
How many peer reviewers have skin in the game?
OK, there is a common thread to all these studies and adverse events reports. Dah, there is a lot of studies and adverse events. A lot of reporting and denials and unsubstantiated scientific documentation. Gee willikers, that's one big flag to me. A tremendous amount of effort and disinformation has been spewed throughout media to steer attention from reality. Too many billboards promoting NGO and govt concerns for me tells me there is a lot of BS going on.