How was cancelling another mRNA vaccine project not a good thing? Rather than depending on jabs to fight respiratory viruses which mutate faster that jab updates why not emphasize development of more,effective,antivirals?
I fully agree having OPPR involved, particularly in relation to a mRNA project seems inappropriate. I don't think we know what it was about but if it had merit, it should have been within some other operation. On the other hand OPPR could be useful in identifying threats and assuring our states and international associates can locate tools and sources needed to effectively, timely respond.
My question too, Michael. Although, I see Doc M's point, which I think is, OPPR could (not sure of the WOULD) help to prevent a crazy WH from screwing up so badly, like they did with covid.
Found this CHD article - May 28, 2025 - the article states, HHS felt the Moderna project no longer met safety standards. It was a positive to be cancelled.
The evidence is that the individual actions of the states was more effective at innovating solutions than the centralized control over the Covid pandemic. Central governments in all western countries abused their citizens. Trust is lost. OPPR in bed with Moderna is unpalatable.
The abusive nature of the Covid response and the corruption that it fomented makes the reaction of throwing out the OPPR baby with the sturgid bathwater unsurprising.
From the public perspective, it's hard to tell the seemingly rare 'good' bureaucratic organization from the rest, whether or not mandated by Congress. Personally, I don't mourn the dismantling of OPPR any more than I would the IRS. Let's downsize the federal machine as much as possible and let the state health agencies do their jobs.
It seems to me that the whole pandemic response was based on what makes money, rather than on what keeps people healthy and what works quickly.
In the covid response, any treatments that worked were prohibited, so that the vaccines could be developed and used as the only preventative and treatment.
For a long time, even before President Trump came on the scene, ways to make people healthier were ignored. These things are still not being explored enough, though RFK Jr is making a start.
Official agencies still officially ignore the substances, like vitamin D, and many others, that make our immune systems better, so that they can do their job of protecting us.
Making our country strong could help prevent terrorists from attacking us with infectious diseases.
Gain of function research should be completely stopped, if it isn't already. It only produces dangerous pathogens, with no quick way to respond to them, or to any other pathogens.
I don't know if a federal agency can work to promote research into preventing pandemics and finding (and following) a way to deal with them if they occur. They generally do whatever is dictated by big money.
Exactly...the sky is falling is the common pseudo science shrill...well the sky it is falling to some degree as they create it....even Gates knows when the next pandemic will hit...as they are carefully planning a multifaceted approach and one of them ought to work. In general, our gov and medical establishment have very little credibility in anything...except knowing how to create chaos. Their bad outweighs the good most times IMO. They are credible manipulators.
Linda, perhaps that is exactly what is being addressed here. The gain of function research still goes on and there is no quick way to respond, hence the OPPR, which has the function to tie all the main agencies into one framework. Read the Third chapter.
This is a shaky time in America to go along with the Iran situation and cyber security breaches and government shutdowns. Liberals demand chaos and this moment in time, they have it!
Your assertion that President Trump's actions with respect to dismantling the OPPR were unlawful is incorrect.
The only things required of him as President are described in his oath of office: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
He promises to follow the instructions found in Article II of the Constitution and to ensure that the Legislative and Judicial branches stay within the limits imposed in Articles I and III.
The Founders were absolutely clear when they drafted the Constitution - a law passed by the legislative branch that assumes powers not granted by the Constitution is no law. It is null and void.
The legislation setting up the OPPR was clearly unconstitutional, and Trump was correct, lawful and in compliance with his oath of office when he instructed the executive branch to dismantle it.
Would that he were as compliant with his duties in other areas. In this one, he was in the right.
Why do we continue to create federal programs to manage the results of adverse health events rather than identify and reverse the root causes. A few examples: Concentrated Animal Farming which allows bird flu, e-coli and C-Diff to raise it's ugly head. Screening immigrants for health issues and either isolating them or refusing entry like China. Malaria, TB and other imported diseases are on the rise because this is not being addressed. Having over 200 Bio Labs where risk of a release of a deadly pathogen exists. Plum Island was ground zero for Lyme Disease. Stopping air travel between countries with a transmissible disease epidemic should be standard. Focus should be on prevention and not exotic treatment like mRNA which has not be proven safe and effective.
i feel confused. Recently, we have been learning of threats posed by worldwide by gain of function studies. Further, nationally we have identified secretive chinese facilities in Nevada and California that contained dangerous pathogens. You've designed a system for analyzing outbreaks.
It seems to me there would be justification for including these issues in your example here. Isn't the threat well beyond bird flu?
The other deficiencies occasioned by the abandonment of OPPR relate to its internal and external coordinations. Particularly those as relates to the Bio-5 Alliance relations and interactions.
It seems to me your multifaceted identification system and a threat readiness system have a relationship. In a world where we are already engaging in a war and where we have both CCP and muslim threats, to me a structured perparedness has a legitimate role to maintain.
Thank you for identifying these vital issues and building the cases for addressing them! Hopefully your analyzes will end up in hands of those capable of recognizing their merits and generating needed actions.
As I have read the three installments on the OPPR, and understand better it's function and necessity, I keep scratching my head about what is Really the reason for the abandonment and lack of enforcement of the mandate? This smells like rotten fish to me, and the smell is getting stronger. This sounds like a warning of vast proportions, sitting ducks we are...
Yes...the sky is falling...again. The gov and all these pseudo medical scientists create more problems than they solve...IMO...let's do less man made/lab modified "medical science" and see what happens for about a hundred years.
If you read between the lines, as I try to do, there are many points that Malone addresses that are actually illegal and the line about "canceling flood insurance because it's been a dry summer" is telling. There are many more.
I have to be honest...I disagree with some of your assessment.
"The practical effect was to move pandemic preparedness coordination from a transparent, congressionally accountable statutory office into an executive office that operates largely outside public view."
This could only be true if the OPPR was actually transparent, which it was not, and if it were actually accountable, which it was not through all of COVID 19. Furthermore, the pandemic was a lab-created bioweapon, not a naturally occurring pandemic. The abuses of power that resulted killed millions of people and destroyed lives and societies across the globe and it cannot be allowed to continue.
I do get your point about Trump diminishing the OPPR, since he, alone, cannot abolish it. However, his deflating it and any other mechanisms of tyrannical control over civilians used since 2020 is exactly what I voted for.
You do make a compelling point that if he leaves that infrastructure in place when he leaves office, it could be filled by the tyrants again, which would be horrible. My hope, and I know it is only my hope, would be that we gain more non-establishment, America first, representatives who do Congressionally abolish this whole pandemic preparedness apparatus. The abuse far outweighed any good it may have been originally intended to do. I would rather take my chances with a pandemic than with the globalist cartel that released the bioweapon on the world to usher in totalitarianism and world government.
In any case, I so respect that you have written this and that you are one of the people you would hope to see call out either or both parties when the need to do so arises. You are unequivocally the best, filled with integrity, and we are all better off to have your wisdom and experience imparted to us near-daily through this Substack and other means.
The OPPR manifested a flawless COVID management failure record. Credentials, backgrounds or experience aside, they not only failed; they failed miserably. Regardless of intent, the OPPR not only failed to mitigate our pandemic damage, they magnified it. Toxic experimental injections mandated, repurposed drugs demonized, natural immunity rejected and a lethal COVID treatment protocol set in place. Greedy health providers happily followed the lethal treatment protocol to capture the Government bribes provided, ( Remdesivir ? ). Make mine a double with a toxic COVID "vaccine" / gene therapy injection with a toxic Remdesivir back.
We have been assured that a pandemic is coming. It appears there is a law in place that was meant to help us be prepared for such an event. The Trump administration cancelled the Global preparedness policy in 2018 and we ended up with an unprepared administration when the COVID pandemic hit. Perhaps we should learn from our mistakes and support pandemic readiness through an already existing law. It appears the OPPR was well planned and organized, Moderna aside. I can’t accept working with that company. Think of preparedness in other areas of our lives, school lockdowns, fire, flood, etc. We lost a lot of people to COVID, both through infection and bad treatments, as well as, the terrible shots( I refuse to call them vaccines). I think we should support pandemic readiness through supporting the existing law. Thanks for laying all this information out, Drs Malone.
I think many of these departments that was wholesale dismantled during the Dodge experiment were done because of the deep state not participating honestly and now the things that are important are starting to show up. Action could be taking now to staff and give a goal properly.
Apologies in advance to be tangential in this thread and it goes broadly to accountability and managing the messaging related to the Covid outbreak and its origins.
It seem clear that the “proximal origins” paper in Nature was a coverup ordered by Fauci to distract by fall guy Morens.
Fauci pardoned by autopen and now a free man with a large pension and presumably “royalties” from Moderna and others to pay the funding boss.
What about Daszak and Baric? Are they being protected by the DoD connection as a matter of national security?
Was the virus designed in Baric’s lab?
I have never seen his name connected with this and yet it seems that this is where is all originated.
Was is intended as a biological weapon?
Is this all just conspiracy theory in the age of post-truth?
Will anyone be held accountable and will the public and the world ever learn the truth of how Covid happened?
As they say, inquiring minds would like to know— in spite of the fact that the 24 hour news cycle has up and moved on and couldn’t give a darn?
Please write the book Robert to address these questions.
How was cancelling another mRNA vaccine project not a good thing? Rather than depending on jabs to fight respiratory viruses which mutate faster that jab updates why not emphasize development of more,effective,antivirals?
I don't think he is saying that cancellation was a bad thing, it just coincides with everything that is valuable not functioning either.
I fully agree having OPPR involved, particularly in relation to a mRNA project seems inappropriate. I don't think we know what it was about but if it had merit, it should have been within some other operation. On the other hand OPPR could be useful in identifying threats and assuring our states and international associates can locate tools and sources needed to effectively, timely respond.
My question too, Michael. Although, I see Doc M's point, which I think is, OPPR could (not sure of the WOULD) help to prevent a crazy WH from screwing up so badly, like they did with covid.
Found this CHD article - May 28, 2025 - the article states, HHS felt the Moderna project no longer met safety standards. It was a positive to be cancelled.
https://childrenshealthdefense.ca/news/u-s-cancels-700m-moderna-bird-flu-vaccine-contract/
Within the link above - is a link to a Substack, detailing the Moderna contract. https://www.malone.news/p/dismantling-by-attrition-part-3/comment/226774562
$566 M was for late stage clinical trials or Moderna's experimental mRNA bird flu jabs..
$176 M to support Moderna developing flu mRNA jabs.
mRNA jabs have NO proven safety record, but a well established unsafety record
The evidence is that the individual actions of the states was more effective at innovating solutions than the centralized control over the Covid pandemic. Central governments in all western countries abused their citizens. Trust is lost. OPPR in bed with Moderna is unpalatable.
As I re-read, my sense is one piece, and an important one, is agreeing to a law and enforcing it versus simply side-stepping it.
The abusive nature of the Covid response and the corruption that it fomented makes the reaction of throwing out the OPPR baby with the sturgid bathwater unsurprising.
From the public perspective, it's hard to tell the seemingly rare 'good' bureaucratic organization from the rest, whether or not mandated by Congress. Personally, I don't mourn the dismantling of OPPR any more than I would the IRS. Let's downsize the federal machine as much as possible and let the state health agencies do their jobs.
It seems to me that the whole pandemic response was based on what makes money, rather than on what keeps people healthy and what works quickly.
In the covid response, any treatments that worked were prohibited, so that the vaccines could be developed and used as the only preventative and treatment.
For a long time, even before President Trump came on the scene, ways to make people healthier were ignored. These things are still not being explored enough, though RFK Jr is making a start.
Official agencies still officially ignore the substances, like vitamin D, and many others, that make our immune systems better, so that they can do their job of protecting us.
Making our country strong could help prevent terrorists from attacking us with infectious diseases.
Gain of function research should be completely stopped, if it isn't already. It only produces dangerous pathogens, with no quick way to respond to them, or to any other pathogens.
I don't know if a federal agency can work to promote research into preventing pandemics and finding (and following) a way to deal with them if they occur. They generally do whatever is dictated by big money.
Exactly...the sky is falling is the common pseudo science shrill...well the sky it is falling to some degree as they create it....even Gates knows when the next pandemic will hit...as they are carefully planning a multifaceted approach and one of them ought to work. In general, our gov and medical establishment have very little credibility in anything...except knowing how to create chaos. Their bad outweighs the good most times IMO. They are credible manipulators.
Linda, perhaps that is exactly what is being addressed here. The gain of function research still goes on and there is no quick way to respond, hence the OPPR, which has the function to tie all the main agencies into one framework. Read the Third chapter.
Complicated. Unclear. Questionable.
Threatening.
This is a shaky time in America to go along with the Iran situation and cyber security breaches and government shutdowns. Liberals demand chaos and this moment in time, they have it!
Frustrating!
Thank you Dr Malone for keeping us updated and informed. These are things that keep me up at night- like at 3AM.
Your assertion that President Trump's actions with respect to dismantling the OPPR were unlawful is incorrect.
The only things required of him as President are described in his oath of office: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
He promises to follow the instructions found in Article II of the Constitution and to ensure that the Legislative and Judicial branches stay within the limits imposed in Articles I and III.
The Founders were absolutely clear when they drafted the Constitution - a law passed by the legislative branch that assumes powers not granted by the Constitution is no law. It is null and void.
The legislation setting up the OPPR was clearly unconstitutional, and Trump was correct, lawful and in compliance with his oath of office when he instructed the executive branch to dismantle it.
Would that he were as compliant with his duties in other areas. In this one, he was in the right.
Executive is bound by congressional law
Executive doesn't have to sign legislative bills into codified law.
I hope Dr. Malone responds to your assertion, the conclusion section addresses some of these concerns.
Why do we continue to create federal programs to manage the results of adverse health events rather than identify and reverse the root causes. A few examples: Concentrated Animal Farming which allows bird flu, e-coli and C-Diff to raise it's ugly head. Screening immigrants for health issues and either isolating them or refusing entry like China. Malaria, TB and other imported diseases are on the rise because this is not being addressed. Having over 200 Bio Labs where risk of a release of a deadly pathogen exists. Plum Island was ground zero for Lyme Disease. Stopping air travel between countries with a transmissible disease epidemic should be standard. Focus should be on prevention and not exotic treatment like mRNA which has not be proven safe and effective.
Thank you for sharing this analysis with us.
i feel confused. Recently, we have been learning of threats posed by worldwide by gain of function studies. Further, nationally we have identified secretive chinese facilities in Nevada and California that contained dangerous pathogens. You've designed a system for analyzing outbreaks.
It seems to me there would be justification for including these issues in your example here. Isn't the threat well beyond bird flu?
The other deficiencies occasioned by the abandonment of OPPR relate to its internal and external coordinations. Particularly those as relates to the Bio-5 Alliance relations and interactions.
It seems to me your multifaceted identification system and a threat readiness system have a relationship. In a world where we are already engaging in a war and where we have both CCP and muslim threats, to me a structured perparedness has a legitimate role to maintain.
Thank you for identifying these vital issues and building the cases for addressing them! Hopefully your analyzes will end up in hands of those capable of recognizing their merits and generating needed actions.
Thank you again for sharing.
As I have read the three installments on the OPPR, and understand better it's function and necessity, I keep scratching my head about what is Really the reason for the abandonment and lack of enforcement of the mandate? This smells like rotten fish to me, and the smell is getting stronger. This sounds like a warning of vast proportions, sitting ducks we are...
Yes...the sky is falling...again. The gov and all these pseudo medical scientists create more problems than they solve...IMO...let's do less man made/lab modified "medical science" and see what happens for about a hundred years.
If you read between the lines, as I try to do, there are many points that Malone addresses that are actually illegal and the line about "canceling flood insurance because it's been a dry summer" is telling. There are many more.
I have to be honest...I disagree with some of your assessment.
"The practical effect was to move pandemic preparedness coordination from a transparent, congressionally accountable statutory office into an executive office that operates largely outside public view."
This could only be true if the OPPR was actually transparent, which it was not, and if it were actually accountable, which it was not through all of COVID 19. Furthermore, the pandemic was a lab-created bioweapon, not a naturally occurring pandemic. The abuses of power that resulted killed millions of people and destroyed lives and societies across the globe and it cannot be allowed to continue.
I do get your point about Trump diminishing the OPPR, since he, alone, cannot abolish it. However, his deflating it and any other mechanisms of tyrannical control over civilians used since 2020 is exactly what I voted for.
You do make a compelling point that if he leaves that infrastructure in place when he leaves office, it could be filled by the tyrants again, which would be horrible. My hope, and I know it is only my hope, would be that we gain more non-establishment, America first, representatives who do Congressionally abolish this whole pandemic preparedness apparatus. The abuse far outweighed any good it may have been originally intended to do. I would rather take my chances with a pandemic than with the globalist cartel that released the bioweapon on the world to usher in totalitarianism and world government.
In any case, I so respect that you have written this and that you are one of the people you would hope to see call out either or both parties when the need to do so arises. You are unequivocally the best, filled with integrity, and we are all better off to have your wisdom and experience imparted to us near-daily through this Substack and other means.
Well stated, Bianca.
The OPPR manifested a flawless COVID management failure record. Credentials, backgrounds or experience aside, they not only failed; they failed miserably. Regardless of intent, the OPPR not only failed to mitigate our pandemic damage, they magnified it. Toxic experimental injections mandated, repurposed drugs demonized, natural immunity rejected and a lethal COVID treatment protocol set in place. Greedy health providers happily followed the lethal treatment protocol to capture the Government bribes provided, ( Remdesivir ? ). Make mine a double with a toxic COVID "vaccine" / gene therapy injection with a toxic Remdesivir back.
We have been assured that a pandemic is coming. It appears there is a law in place that was meant to help us be prepared for such an event. The Trump administration cancelled the Global preparedness policy in 2018 and we ended up with an unprepared administration when the COVID pandemic hit. Perhaps we should learn from our mistakes and support pandemic readiness through an already existing law. It appears the OPPR was well planned and organized, Moderna aside. I can’t accept working with that company. Think of preparedness in other areas of our lives, school lockdowns, fire, flood, etc. We lost a lot of people to COVID, both through infection and bad treatments, as well as, the terrible shots( I refuse to call them vaccines). I think we should support pandemic readiness through supporting the existing law. Thanks for laying all this information out, Drs Malone.
I am very aware of the systematic weaponization of infectious disease fear
I think many of these departments that was wholesale dismantled during the Dodge experiment were done because of the deep state not participating honestly and now the things that are important are starting to show up. Action could be taking now to staff and give a goal properly.
Can the states chip into a non-federal OPPR? Everything the feds touch seems to turn into another tool for tyranny after a few elections.
Apologies in advance to be tangential in this thread and it goes broadly to accountability and managing the messaging related to the Covid outbreak and its origins.
It seem clear that the “proximal origins” paper in Nature was a coverup ordered by Fauci to distract by fall guy Morens.
Fauci pardoned by autopen and now a free man with a large pension and presumably “royalties” from Moderna and others to pay the funding boss.
What about Daszak and Baric? Are they being protected by the DoD connection as a matter of national security?
Was the virus designed in Baric’s lab?
I have never seen his name connected with this and yet it seems that this is where is all originated.
Was is intended as a biological weapon?
Is this all just conspiracy theory in the age of post-truth?
Will anyone be held accountable and will the public and the world ever learn the truth of how Covid happened?
As they say, inquiring minds would like to know— in spite of the fact that the 24 hour news cycle has up and moved on and couldn’t give a darn?
Please write the book Robert to address these questions.
Thank you.