Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ActualData's avatar

Just to spell out the math a bit for everyone: 7 times the death and 1/4 the population means the 1918 "spanish" flu was 28 times more lethal. Covid was nothing but a bad case of hiccups in comparison. And if early treatment had been publicized and if counting deaths "with" (not "from") had not been incentivised, the "covid deaths" would have been far far lower.

Expand full comment
Grumpy Steve's avatar

Is it just me or do others feel as I do that this is anticlimactic. There was never an emergency in the first place. They had to illegally restrict access to curative medications (hydroxy chloroquine & Ivermectin) and create treatment and hospital protocols that guaranteed the worst outcomes, in order to produce the illusion of an incurable pandemic for which only they had the cure. By "worst outcomes" I mean death. Then they used those deaths as a sledge hammer to pound fear into the public conscientiousness driving them like cattle to new pastures, only to be driven off a cliff. And by cliff I mean a poisonous prick they call a "vaccine" but is clearly bioweapon. You know it's a bioweapon because had this been about public health, they would have treated tracked it's administration like you would a food product. Just a few people simply getting sick from salmonella and the item is identified tracked and pulled from the shelves.

So why not for this? Is it money? Is it power? Is it control? Is it murder?

Yes.

So pardon me Dr. Malone for not getting excited about the prospect of the "officials" "officially" ending a pandemic that never was.

Expand full comment
184 more comments...

No posts