57 Comments
User's avatar
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Did a better job weaponizing the jab than they did the bug?

Big E's avatar

The jab was the weapon. It was locked and loaded. The bug was the trigger.

Debra Nolasco's avatar

There is every reason to believe that covid was created so that the "vaccine", which was, as you stated, "locked & loaded", could be deployed. It was waiting in the wings the entire time.

John Hoopingarner's avatar

Covid was created to destroy Trump’s chances of winning a 2nd term. That worked.

Secondly, would it be safe to assume that no trial subjects were elderly, or under 18 or were morbidly obese, or had lung issues or asthma? The coverup and collusion to conceal the vaccines true efficacy is criminal.

Debra Nolasco's avatar

Speaking of asthma, the disparaged repurposed drug, Ivermectin, which could have stopped covid in it's tracks, is also apparently effective in treating asthma. The Independent Medical Alliance, formerly known as FLCCC, has an article available on the internet (especially if you use Yandex as your search engine) titled, "The Remarkable Story of Ivermectin". There is not a link, or I would provide it here. However, I have copied & pasted one section on the many other conditions for which it is helpful. I have just started taking it for asthma & after two consecutive doses of 18mg, I can already sense an improvement. I am not nearly as short-of-breath. Here is the section that I copied & pasted:The safety and efficacy of ivermectin make it an excellent medicine for a wide range of ailments. Here are some more conditions ivermectin is effective against:

Myiasis

Trichinosis

Disease vector control

Malaria

Leishmaniasis

African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness)

American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease)

Schistosomiasis

Bedbugs

Rosacea

Asthma

Epilepsy

Neurological disease

Antiviral (e.g., HIV, dengue, encephalitis)

Antibacterial (tuberculosis and Buruli ulcer)

Onchocerciasis (River Blindness)

Lymphatic Filariasis (Elephantiasis)

Strongyloidiasis

Ascariasis

Trichuriasis

Enterobiasis (Pinworm infection)

Filariases (including Loa loa and Mansonella streptocerca)

Scabies

Pediculosis (Lice infestation)

Cutaneous larva migrans

Gnathostomiasis

John Hoopingarner's avatar

You can add breast cancer and prostate cancer as well to the list. In lieu of taking Orgovyx, an ADT, I am currently taking 36mgs of Ivermectin and 100mgs of Hydroxychloroquine daily to keep my PSA below 0.16. I can thank Dr. Kathleen Ruddy for her valuable assistance.

Debra Nolasco's avatar

Yes, Dr. Kathleen Ruddy is truly wonderful. You can find many similar testimonials for the use of Ivermectin (as well as Fenbendazole & Mebendazole) for cancer at Dr. William Makis' substack (makismd.substack.com). (also known as CovidIntel) So glad to know you are getting good results!

Charles E Robacker's avatar

I concur with stopping Trump, but believe the '2019–2020 Hong Kong protests,

Start date

Mar 15, 2019

Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki

2019–2020 Hong Kong protests - Wikipedia

The 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests',

were an additional impetus to purposefully set the virus free upon all mankind. By all accounts, Trump was going to win (AND DID WIN) the 2020 Presidential election hands down. As I recall, the protests in Hong Kong were quite large and growing. This was something that the CCP could not tolerate.

John Hoopingarner's avatar

Agree, the 2020 election was rigged. US would be a much better place now had he won.

mike's avatar

Interesting how the enemies of truth can get out front with their lies because they know what is real and needs male bovine fece. It was widely broadcast that this was a disease of the unvaccinated and the complete opposite is true. My concern now is of the horizontal spread by shedding from the people as human spike factories. Consumer Reports supports the old CDC recommendations of one or more doses per year for people 6 months to 65 years. The recommendation for 65 years and older is 2 or more doses per year. That is scary to think of the level of deception going on.

LB (Little Birdie)'s avatar

Brother and sister-in-laws are getting them like regular clockwork. I've told my husband I would send them some of these articles, but he nixes it. Says they are too indoctrinated to see reason.

Randall Stoehr's avatar

The Hypnotic selling of (the fear of all dooms) ever recorded on Earth!

A synchronistic Herculean effort of incredible media marketing jargon,

So overwhelming, not even did the highest qualified minds have wiggle room to say nay.

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

“Relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data are poorly understood by health professionals and the public.” ——— this is why i spend a significant amount of time breaking down “statistics” as they falsely represent reality.

Here are a few of those articles:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/weaponized-logichow-correlation-vs

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/statistical-deception-the-great-travesty

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

there is an old booklet, how you can prove anything with statistics. It is still worth reading. Unfortunately I forgot the author. (but trying to find it with AI, even the AI agrees)

Big E's avatar

Could it be this book?

How to Lie with Statistics Reissue Edition

by Darrell Huff (Author), Irving Geis (Illustrator)

https://a.co/d/iR3SxrY

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Yes! that was it. Thank you so much Big E!

Randall Stoehr's avatar

Well when it's legal status is deemed in congress as "unavoidably unsafe".....

all that's left is lies and deceptive Houdini trickery.

Garry Blankenship's avatar

I do not believe informed consent exists today. Injectables are created, manufactured and distributed by repeat convicted felons. The knowledge of the vail content is known to most, not all, health professionals, via the data obfuscated information provided by those same felons. The AMA and subsidiary medical groups, Boards of Health, CDC, FDA, etc. have failed in their overwatch / hippocratic oath responsibilities. All informed consent is controlled by the fox guarding the henhouse.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

all the more reason to avoid all injections if possible. Of course when at a dentist or surgeon there is little choice.

Big E's avatar

We avoided injections when having teeth filled (6 mercury fillings replaced). A good dentist can make most procedures tolerable. Our trick was to use Buteyko breathing (https://buteykoclinic.com/blogs/buteyko-can-help-with/snoring-and-sleep-apnea) and noise cancelling headphones like those used to damp out noise at a shooting range.

Some people have surgery while under hypnosis. No experience with that.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I don't have teeth filled any longer, the 3 I had done all fell out, one in the meantime has been pulled. Never heard of the breathing method and will check it out - thanks for the link. I used to use self-hypnosis with fair result, until I blocked pain and had a way larger surgery than needed if I had not blocked it (well that is what is presumed). Have not used it in 30 years but a former dentist used a form of it, with monotonous talk and gently gestures. Worked well.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Yes, I have used self-hypnosis as well. Drives my dentist crazy.

MrsMc's avatar

i wonder if that breathing method would work during full body mri?

MrsMc's avatar

I have to have one sometime in the next 6 months. Not because anything is wrong but because i have a couple stupid genes that gives me a slightly increased risk with a couple cancers. FYI- Not the scary BRCCA. I was going to say no, but decided to go ahead and get a baseline. I'm thinking about taking a sedative due to potential claustrophobia but don't really want to. I could start practicing this technique now and be a pro before my screening.

Garry Blankenship's avatar

Thank you for forgiving vail and replace with vial.

James Lord's avatar

Gerard Rennick. Pauline Hanson. Malcolm Roberts. Alex Antic. Perhaps a few others. These are the brave and the few Down Under. Rennick is now out of the Senate, I believe. They have fought lonely battles tenaciously.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Since the beginning, I have thanked God for my skepticism. I had Covid in January 2020, before it was even named. Two weeks of exhaustion, another month of a dry cough, but no sore throat, which for me is very unusual. When I get the rare cold, I always have a sore throat, so I knew this was different. It wasn't a fun time, but I got over it and headed south for the rest of the winter.

In March, Fauci gave his "two weeks to flatten the curve" speech. I was suspicious, but thought "okay, let's just wait and see. Maybe there really is something that I'm not aware of." When they extended it, I said, "This is not about health, this is about control." Then I watched the world respond *in lockstep*--when does that ever happen? In the meantime, doctors who are treating it with generic drugs successfully are harassed, deplatformed, ridiculed, and investigated by medical boards for doing their job; and we're told the only way out of this is to get an as-yet undeveleped vaccine, because "natural immunity doesn't exist".

I wondered then, and I wonder with more certainty now, if this wasn't all about depopulation.

Big E's avatar

Many people believe strongly this was about depopulation, in addition to financial greed and totalitarian control.

And, remember, our “safety net” entitlements including Medicare, Social Security, and more are slated to run out of money “soon.” Government and media issued many warnings about this pre-COVID. So it’s not a huge leap to compare or at least conflate gain-of-function experiments, jabs, and depopulation.

mike's avatar

Thank you so much again Dr. Malone.

Dave Slough's avatar

When will people stand trial and go to jail

Big E's avatar

🥶🌞👿 cold day in hell…

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Never. They've all been pardoned.

Travis Ogle's avatar

It was known by most honest people that Biden stole the election. So obvious to those watching in real time as the results were announced. I believe that makes all four years that he occupied the Oval Office, and any actions that were attributed to him, null and void. That’s a fuel storage tank size can of worms.

A.J. Foster's avatar

After 3 jabs we had Covid. Cost us a cruise but trip since it was no longer required for cruise booking we went for test anyhow. Both tested positive and canceled our cruise. We may never know the ACTUAL truth about covid.

Big E's avatar
4hEdited

The truth about COVID is that it is a lie. Also, PCR tests for COVID are wildly inaccurate. Best advice: Do not take another shot. And do not take another COVID test. You’ll go wrong on both accounts.

Be well, A.J. Foster!

Joy Metcalf's avatar

PCR tests were known to be invalid with huge amounts of false positives after a maximum of 35 cycles. Most labs were running at 40-45.

A.J. Foster's avatar

I figured that out already and thank you for justifying my decision.

MrsMc's avatar

I remember a Lancet article telling the truth about relative risk and Covid Vaccines. My elderly aunt had texted me a chart. We thought it would end the vaccine hype. lol I had to google to understand. this is better. I probably still have it on my Evernote but i was not very organized in my approach. thank you for this post.

Anna T's avatar

For some reason I'd blocked Kevin_McKernan. But based on your recommendation, I've unblocked for now.

Deanna L Holmes's avatar

I do believe that we have a small amount of control over ourselves when filling prescriptions or getting vaccinated. (adults) When asked if I had my covid shot I say yes, although it is a lie. When handed a prescription for an antibiotic before dental surgery I take it. I do not fill the prescription but the provider believes I will based on my willingness to accept the script. I then go home and start with my vitamin c nutraceutical to boost my immune system, and Wala! The surgeon is thrilled and amazed at my post op visit with my advanced healing.

KC & the Sunshine's avatar

Some friends were saying how terrible it is to lie.

SOMETIMES, like when Anne Frank is in the attic and the Nazi’s are at the door, lying is the move.

It’s right in the bible— the story of Jael.

A bad guy soldier came to her tent for rest. She said sure, dude! I’ll fix you some warm camel

milk and a pallet. You need your rest! I will take good care of you.

He fell fast asleep and she HAMMERED a TENT PEG into his TEMPLE. She saved a lot of Israelites that day. It’s ok to lie at times when the truth will harm others.

Anne Frank’s “hosts” lied for years.

fast asleep

Deanna L Holmes's avatar

I do not like telling a doctor a lie, but quite frankly, this type of lie can only hurt myself, not them. My spouse does the same thing with prescriptions but after his dental surgery he told the dentist that he did not take any of the rounds of antibiotics they gave him but only used the C. His dentist said I am very glad this works for you but I still have to write the script. My husband said, yes, I know, but I wanted to you know.

M Makous's avatar

I noted the relative risk reduction v absolute risk reduction as soon as these vaccine efficacy studies were published. And of course, public health figures and the corporate media immediately launched their blatantly biased pro-vaccine campaign.

Here's another point about the bias: One often hears an argument that the 'vaccine is safer than disease'. This is utterly fallacious. The correct comparison is to compare the group who got the vaccine v the group who did not get the vaccine. Remember, in these studies -- only about 1 percent of those not getting the vaccine got the disease. Comparing vaccine v disease vastly overstates the value of the vaccine and understates the harms. This is the same approach you'd do for any drug intervention. Vaccine studies don't get special treatment.

Jean's avatar

Thank you for covering this!

Frankly, I don't recall hearing anything about how effective or safe the new vaccines were. My reaction was 1. They are new. 2. I have vulnerabilities, so I'm going to wait to learn if my fears are justified.

On the first day the vaccines were offered a lovely neighbor lady invited me to join her and her mother to go get a shot. Declined and said I was waiting. In the end, I've been justified.

Your point is well taken, however! "Experts" we employ and industries that produce products to assure our health need to be HELD RESPONSIBLE for telling us FULL, meaningful (clear) truths about the products they are offering! "Safe and Effective" should be banned from descriptions of 'vaccines' and drugs from here on out - imo.

Your covering this further is an appreciated start!

These niceties need to be shared with the general public, to arm them to assess and understand assertions about medical interventions and care from here on.

Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

The problem we face with experts is that too many of them are self appointed

Jean's avatar

Gotcha! Experts we id as such (per our guys).

Ana González's avatar

Doctors Malone, I have been looking for a list that I saw back during the pandemic that had over one thousand side-effects of the jab.

Do you or anyone in this group know how I can get to that list again?

I can't seem to find it anymore.

VictorDianne Watson's avatar

Yes, there is little understanding of the difference between relative and absolute risk reduction. My cardiologist and I had a discussion about the risk reduction of statins. I said the absolute risk reduction was less than 2% and he said, “No, the risk reduction is 30%.” It’s baked into their mind.

John Wygertz's avatar

"Clinical epidemiological tools": well-known and well-understood, yet ignored by Pfizer - and worse - by the FDA. Accountability, please.