The British Home Office has apparently concluded that asylum seekers arriving in the United Kingdom require a tutorial on what should be universal morality.
This week, the government released “Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: A guide for asylum seekers,” accompanied by a series of illustrated posters explaining some of the finer points of British life.
Women are equal to men. Women may work, study and travel without a man’s permission. You may not hit or control your wife. Sex requires consent, including within marriage. Children under 16 cannot consent to sex. Do not follow strangers. Do not block their path. Do not make sexual comments. Do not whistle or make kissing noises at women. Do not photograph people in private situations without permission.
There are even separate government posters devoted to “Age of consent,” “Consent,” “Child abuse,” “Domestic abuse,” “Gender equality,” “Harassment,” and “Photography and filming.”
These are not memes created by some foreign bot account on X. They are official Home Office materials, published by His Majesty’s Government on August 19, 2026.
Which raises the rather obvious question that polite society will presumably regard as impolite:
Why did the British government believe these particular instructions needed to be written down?
Governments generally do not spend taxpayer money designing illustrated educational campaigns reminding newcomers not to rape women, abuse children, beat their wives or sexually harass strangers unless someone, somewhere, has concluded that there is a reason to do so.
Over the last decades, Britons have experienced very large migration flows from profoundly different cultures, which might produce “problems” of assimilation. These were routinely dismissed as xenophobic, racist or simply “far right.”
For years, organized groups of men, disproportionately British Pakistani in several of the towns at the center of the scandal, groomed, trafficked and raped vulnerable girls in places such as Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and Telford. Authorities had repeated warnings, yet victims were ignored, blamed or treated as troublesome teenagers. Subsequent (conservative) official inquiries documented catastrophic failures by police, councils and social services, including reluctance in some institutions to confront the ethnicity of perpetrators for fear of being called racist or inflaming community tensions.
In Rotherham alone, the official inquiry estimated that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. Britain learned, at an appalling cost to thousands of girls, that refusing to discuss cultural differences does not make those differences disappear.
Yet after decades of scandals across numerous English towns, the government’s own 2025 national audit concluded that the data were still so inadequate that Britain could not reliably say how many children had been victimized by grooming gangs nationwide.
So, guess what mainstream media and the liberal parliament had to say about that?
Apparently the Home Office, while not actually addressing the issue of rape gangs head on, has now decided that spelling out a few expectations might be prudent.
Progress, I suppose? Not!
How about actually arresting and deporting immigrants who break the law?
Real progress, as Britain’s Conservative Party and Reform UK have both campaigned on, would mean dramatically reducing the enormous influx of migrants into a country roughly the size of Alabama, but with about 11 times as many people packed into essentially the same land area.
One might imagine that population density, housing, infrastructure and assimilation would eventually enter the conversation. But that doesn’t seem to be in the cards for jolly old England.
JGM
An utter irony of law in blue states. Most of us saw Mass. governor Healy, (former Mass. attorney general) surrounded by over a dozen smiling, joyful, gleeful woman, sign into law her new abortion bill, allowing doctors to murder viable babies right up to the day of birth.
Well there’s a former Stoughton Mass. cop, Matthew Farwell, that has been arrested for the strangulation murder of young pregnant Sandra Birchmore, 23 of Canton Mass. Farwell had been having sexual relations, grooming her, even while on duty, since she was 15 years old.
The irony of this story is Farwell is being charged with the death of Birchmores unborn child. The charge of causing the death of an unborn child in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1841 carries a mandatory sentence of life in prison.
How is it possible that Governor Healy can make killing viable babies legal, while Farwell is being charged with the murder of an unborn child ? Is it me or is murder plain old murder? Or is it OK to murder babies when you have the elite title of “Governor”?
Upon the first doctor assisted murder of an unborn child, especially a viable baby, shouldn’t the doctor be arrested under the same law? And for that matter “Governor” Healy?
There are no offensive or defensive bioweapons. These laboratory catastrophes, which the world has been forced to deal, are funded with taxpayer money, implemented by governments and government appointed officials, who seem to have no problem killing millions of people as part of their research. I think this was made very clear when Fauci’s wife flipped the bird to the world. They lie and do their best to cover up their crimes. Ebola, SARS 1, Covid 19, Lyme disease, I would bet AIDS all came from government funded labs.
This gain of function research is completely illogical and reckless. After its spread to the public, we’re all supposed to depend on these same “scientists” that produced the deadly viruses to produce a vaccine that will save us. As we see it’s all a corrupt racket.
When are we going to demand that our government stop this type of insane experimentation? When are people like Fauci going to be held accountable? How can we allow a phony pardon by elites, exempt an elite mass murderer from justice? It very obvious, investigations and justice will never come from those who participated in the crime, it must come from outside the fed.
As in the French Revolution, a government that fears the people is a government that should understand, the guillotine has an endless thirst for blood.
J.Goodrich