Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rhinoskerous's avatar

There is another possible element that you may not have considered. Many years ago I was the subject of a political FBI prosecution. At one point a person that we believe was an FBI agent, called my codefendent on the phone pretending to be his attorney, and told him that the government said if we would just do X, the case would be dropped. However, when he talked with his attorney about it the following week, he denied ever making that call. We proceeded to do X, and the government then indicted us. As it turned out their key witness had refused to cooperate unless X. So, they tricked us into satisfying the condition of their star witness so they could indict us.

The point of sharing that episode is that the feds are not beyond calling you and pretending to be someone that you trust, whom you might not know well enough to discern their identity by voice alone. In this case Karen claims she was fed these hysterical claims by the security agent she had recently hired. But when her brother called the same company they denied ever making those claims. It makes her sound insane.

I would give it a 60% probability that she did talk to someone on the phone whom she THOUGHT was her security firm, but was not. It was a federal agent who proceeded to terrify her and also plant the seed for internal dissension in the resistance by claiming that Malone and RFK were federal agents who put a termination order on her. The other 40% probability is that the "security company" that she hired were either feds or an intelligence agency that fed her the crazy claims and then denied ever saying it. Either way, she was fed this misinformation. Most private security companies and private investigators are ex police officers, most of whom still have ties to their former employers.

The reason that I believe she was fed the misinformation rather than making it up in a state of delusional schizophrenia is that the misinformation itself is extremely on point for the agenda of the deep state and Big Pharma. It maligns and casts suspicion on two of the most effective voices against the plandemic agenda, not to mention making Karen look crazy. So it kills three birds with one stone.

The sad thing for her is that if or when she learns the company denied making that call, she will question her own sanity, or think her security company was lying. Either way, the damage of sowing division and strife in the resistance movement has been done. They hit a home run with this one.

Expand full comment
John Richardson's avatar

Dr Malone (and Dr/Mrs Malone), you have shown amazing patience and compassion in the case of Karen Kingston. Reaching out to her brother was an act of honor and nobility, and hopefully her family can resolve this unfortunate situation. Like Gulliver vs the Lilliputians, your challenge is to suffer insults of tiny fools while understanding that 2 million worldwide citizens trust you immensely.

Expand full comment
257 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?