Why would we ever want to put any trust in vaccines again ! - I have two grand kids inured by the MMR vaccines, we never trusted the Covid Vac, and none ever took the jab even though, threaten, with Job loss!
I know. Part of it is that Medicine pushed out other healing practices that got results. Such as homeopathy. If medical doctors had not cooperated with some larger unspoken plan to make us all dependent on medicine (drugs), we would have a more reasonable and workable health system today. We constantly have to deal with the criminal mind stepping in and messing up our lives.
This degree of obfuscation may be the reason why some resort to vigilantism, particularly in physical & sexual abuse cases. Though not to be condoned, some see this as their only recourse, when our judicial system continually leaves one perennially frustrated & demoralized. It is akin to being victimized twice - once by the perpetrator & again by the judicial system/courts. When up against a pharmaceutical company, whatever the product may be, their resources are vast & few have the means to pursue or finance such litigation. I think that the entire system needs to be re-evaluated.
Vigilantism is one inevitable consequence of justice being the baby tossed out with the bathwater when lawyers usurped the law and made it their sole domain.
Ya Think? I really can't see why people who have a loved one killed by these schmucks don't demand an eye for an eye. But then again Im a barbarian and not as civilized as the Israeli Zionists.
My father in law had the proper words for all such advocations.
Nothing in this legal world happens, until one of the most important aspects of the pursuits of it are established. It is five words that ring all bells!
"THOSE MOST ABLE TO PAY"! Nothing happens till that gets the green light go ahead.
No Law Firm takes on any pursuant Lawsuits, nor things of Federal Construction projects....
Think about the BILLS that congress and senate sign off on and pass.
What comes first? Yeah....now we're on to something hugely! YOU and ME!
It has occurred to me that law in general, and English law specifically, stems from disposition of the king's property which includes his subjects. Consider that the king did not speak the common language so all his declarations needed to be translated into common speech and you can be sure that those translations proved most beneficial to the translators, i.e., the vestigial lawyers. We did not need to bring this mess to our shores.
Recall that back in the 1970s era, the so-called "Trial Lawyers" in the US began an onslaught of class action suits against the ubiquitous "family Doctors" which resulted in the skyrocketing costs of family health care due to "malpractice" insurance premiums; the beginning of "specialists" only doctors and the end of "family" doctors as we knew them.
There is another aspect of this that can plague plaintiffs vs Big Buck defendants with stables of expert lawyers on retainer. An effective plaintiff"s attorney needs basic knowledge on topic and a capacity to engage in research, analysis even above the efforts Dr Malone describes here and use in both in technical and administrative litigation.. These are rare supply of these for the private sector. The 'Bigs' stables are formidible.
No, the take-home lesson here is that Big Pharma can't suppress the other side's expert testimony in civil litigation.
This is a sharp contrast to what Big Pharma has managed to do to the federal and state regulatory, public health, and medical research bureaucracies, to clinical researchers and higher education administrators, to medical journals, to the legacy news media, and to social media. In all these other institutions, the opinions of people like Dr. Malone have been suppressed and pro-Big Pharma propaganda has been manufactured because they were systematically corrupted or otherwise warped by Big Pharma.
The crookedness at UC Davis, for example, wasn't just simply in connection with the gain-of-function work. Davis researchers actually helped the Wuhan "Bat Lady" collect the original wild-type coronavirus to perform the gain-of-function work on, and they signed off on the safety of the Wuhan lab so the NIH money could keep flowing to it. Instead of holding these researchers accountable for their complicity in crimes against humanity, the University of California bureaucracy promoted the lead researcher involved, who is now a Vice Provost at UC Davis. UC won't clean up its own house voluntarily--by all means we need to unleash the lawyers on these people.
It seems like there is no fast train to heaven or hell. As I scanned the information and the years it takes to litigate, it became more clear how the arguments on both sides take a linguist to interpret. This current issue of litigation around the misdeeds of so many, can take years and by the time anything is resolved, most of the affected people concerned will be dead. That doesn't mean that nothing should or can be done, just that only in unusual cases does a ruling create a reversal of a dangerous substance. Because of your experience in the past, and how you were duped many times, has certainly increased your BS meter. Having guilt is a waste of time, only going forward with more wisdom has merit. / My son's school tried to say he needed a missed booster and I knew the dangers of a teen getting mumps. I was able to get an exemption (religious, I believe). I was young and didn't know much about any of this, but my inside voice was very clear that this action of a booster was a big NO. Listening to my inner self has saved me many times, as well as not listening has caused me much pain and suffering. Such is life.
RFK Jr is correct to challenge the combo shots; When Japan separated out the 3 as individual shots, they increased encephalitis when they tried a combo of two of the three. Sorry I can't find that link at the moment, but these are interesting:
Two studies indicate that for every 10,000 children who get their first MMR and varicella vaccines as separate shots when they are ages 12-23 months, about four will have a febrile seizure during the 7-10 days following vaccination. Children of the same age who get the combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) vaccine as their first vaccine against these diseases are twice as likely to have a febrile seizure during the same time period.12
Another observation; This seems to be the same situation with the measles as with mumps. If waning protection is proven, it will show the dangers of people thinking they are protected, when they are not. Look what has happened with the notion that masking, social distancing and the vaccine make people safe, when in fact, they don't! Thank god I got the mumps and measles and chicken pox!
Noting, I am concerned with limited available space on my cell phones, I haven't downloaded and read the PDF re your testimony yet.
That noted, having traveled through the Covid experience with you and fellow experts with concerns, I stand with a position that Merck's assertions re effectiveness of it's mumps vaccine are well short of acceptable.
IMO potential recipients of 'vaccines' are entitled the full disclosure of all relevant facts as related to effectiveness and safety of the prescribed products. It is only with such disclosures the potential recipients can give their "informed consent." I would consider declining effectiveness and implications for impact of disease with increasing age thereafter a meaningful concern to be divulged.
I am looking forward to reading your analysis assuming my computer can manage the download.
Thank you for sharing this timely relevant discussion and record for consideration!
As a potential recipient of Government approved medicines, vaccines and therapeutics, I am currently unwilling to accept HHS/WHO direction as definitive. I'm hopeful Secretary Kennedy and his teams will be able to restore a 'Gold Standard efficacy' to the Office. Even with a restoration, 'informed consent' needs to be a part of protocol.
IMO, it is a failure of government regulation, and the legal system, that we have such a thing called the Noerr-Pennington immunity, a "doctrine" that can protect an entity from anti-trust charges under law when they petition the government.
Just an up suggestion. This is a very good reveal. Although if you are not familiar with legal documents and proceedings.The value can be diluted. Is it possible to give a short summary for all of us that are not so inclined??
So many important decisions have been made that negatively impact the health of millions
have been made in the DARK in a series of twisted and destructive illegal maneuvers. Thank You for bringing it out into the light. The spiritual principle at Revelation 12:9 holds true.
You can download and read a copy of that report, originally filed in 2018, at this location.
Here are my main findings found in the report regarding the mumps component of Merck’s MMR vaccine:
SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
1. Merck’s AIGENT assay failed to provide a reliable or clinically relevant measure of protection against mumps.
2. Merck’s wild-type mumps ELISA assay failed to provide a reliable or clinically relevant measure of protection against mumps.
3. Merck misrepresented the AIGENT results in its submission to the FDA of the preliminary subset analysis.
4. Merck misrepresented the Protocol 007 results in its Supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA to lower the mumps end-expiry potency specification for M-M-R II.
5. Merck misrepresented the wild-type ELISA results in its Biologics License Application to the FDA for ProQuad.
6. Merck misrepresented the wild-type ELISA results in its Supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA for M-M-R II formulated with rHA.
7. Merck has conducted no clinical studies that demonstrate or support how well M-M-R II (as of 2005) or ProQuad protect against mumps.
8. The M-M-R II and ProQuad package inserts are inaccurate, false and misleading in claiming and/or suggesting Merck has conducted clinical studies demonstrating these vaccines afford protection against mumps.
From all that was made available above, here is what I gleaned. Any child getting vaccinated with MMRII will only have immunity for a set period as vaccine diminishes with time and thereafter will, unless revaccinated on an ongoing basis, be vulnerable because they have no built in immunity. Likewise, any adult who was vaccinated with the MMRII between late 1970's and into 1990's is now vulnerable as their vaccines wore off (unless revaccinated numerous times) during early childhood. Most adults in that age category probably have not been consistently revaccinated because mumps have not been prominent as a threat, but it could certainly be considered one if mumps takes off as measles is due to what has been a growing illegal alien population.
Am I getting it? Catch 22? Adults of certain age are now pretty much going to have to get boosters if mumps (or measles) break out nationwide? And each successive generation being vaccinated further dilutes the natural immunity until all humans MUST depend on an ongoing vaccine regiment to survive these diseases? Sounds calculated to me. How long will/would it take for generations to get back to natural immunity if a majority of the people wean off these vaccines? Or should we just consider vaccines of this type to be the norm now, even tho they provide less than wonderful results?
If more fences can be built we are going to hear about how corrupt it is to "hurt the poor people suffering from lesser opportunity than here". I don't want people to suffer and many over our history in USA have families who arrived here from poor circumstances. I just want them to do it legally.
On another note, I came home from my walk the other day in a tizzy. Had stopped to say "hi" to couple of neighbor ladies in my age group. Vaccine talk came up (uh oh). One (who's daughter is a 'scientist?' told me she won't get near me since I wasn't 'up to speed' with mRNA and would 'shed' all over her, and "what was I going to do about bird flu? Sheesh. The other didn't get all demo crazed with me, but said her family was fully vaxed cause her brother (doctor) said they should. This is the way it seems the vast majority respond - either they are incredulous or hostile. And they are teaching this to the young. Which is why I feel so strongly about education going the other direction. We really need some GOOD, SOLID information to get out there and shock some of these people. Some way to get rid of this notion of mis-information. This is such a vast and rocky mountain to climb.
Is Trump going to get rid of the immunity that the drug companies have on vaccines. This would help to stop the fraud. If the drug companies are held responsible for their failure to produce safe and effective medicine then “maybe” we could get medicines and vaccines that might just work without the harmful side effects that we have right now.
Again, I'm glad someone is keeping track of this. It goes too deep in the weeds for me, with all the technical lingo and competing interests. But we really do need someone there making sure our medicines are safe (at least relatively safe). The next step - which I don't think HHS is really ready to do - is to look beyond medicines and biology to what else is going on that makes people sick.
I was in the Salk Wahl Gene Expression Laboratory for 11 years as a survivor patient/research advocate, until I retired when I moved to to a very red state 2 1/2 years ago. I knew Inda Verma, so it is fascinating to know you worked with him. My experience at Salk was very, very positive all up until the bioweapon in 2020 and beyond. Dr. Wahl was the most kind and gracious scientific mentor a person could have. I could not bear to tell him that I left Salk because of the way science was weaponized against millions of people after the bioweapon. The scientists there were not just too close to the forest to see the trees, they were living in the trees. They universally accepted the mandates for unproven treatments and masking. The other thing was that Salk became so political in the last several years I was there. I hated to see it, because I could only imagine that a substantial portion of their donor base were likelky conservatives like me who were completely turned off by how political Salk became. They put politics front and center, only taking the left's view of every event. I hope it has gotten better since I left.
In any case, it's a small world...as they say.
Regarding this post, you are, without a doubt, a bonified hero. You and Jill have made incalculably valuable contributions to the fight for truth and freedom, as well as to humanity. Thank you for your heroic efforts and accomplishments in this monumental fight.
These actions took place in a period when the FDA was very strict about approving new drugs or vaccines, not the joke it is today. Therefor a lot of lying had to take place to get approval. I sold Veterinary vaccines for 35 years and it took forever and a fortune to get an animal vaccine approved. I sold a rabies vaccine that protected 99% against rabies. The original seed came from the Pasteur Institute. It is the same vaccine that is used in humans and for the human treatment of rabies. It is also used in bait to inoculate wildlife. At that time a rabies vaccine had to protect 87 % of trial subjects in order to get approval. I competed against Pfizers rabies vaccine that protected only 87%. "Dr. do you want 13 dogs and cats out of 100 to potentially get rabies?"
When Covid first hit I remembered that mRNA was never able to get close to use in vaccines. That and the fact that it didn't take 4-5 years to get approved is the reason I didn't take it.
With Dr. Malone knowing what he knew before Covid ever hit makes me wonder why he took the vaccine. The propaganda was very strong and I wavered a couple of times. about taking it but I never did. BTW when I did get Covid I had acquired some human Ivermectin and took that as soon as I started feeling really bad. A day and a half later I was out of bed and back to normal with no lingering effects.
Do you see what is wrong with the picture? The Salem municipal courts and City Hall are on a federal enclave! No Home Rule. The only thing making sense, I knew would be there (Talmudic Law) is the altar:
Did I hear you correctly, Robert? Fourteen years and the court is thinking that maybe the Court is ready to hear an Argument? That does it! I'm lighting the stink bomb!
P.S. It is like the old vinyl - if you get a scratch deep it will set you back into a sound loop. I found the scratch! All the states are redeeming lawful money by demand, just like us (we, Redeemed People outside the scope of the national debt). But the main bank is the Federal Reserve Bank of New York - my claim as a descendent of Patroon heritage, and confluence with Christopher WREN (mother's side).
The States and I both enjoy being outside the scope of national debt, except NY:
Scroll down to 16 of 46 pages or the last hit on "New York". https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pl3_xlJIcgmbffbrDMgYYamE8Y5AzlCh Notice how with the other states, we see current law. With NY there is a bill before the Senate that has apparently never made it to the Floor! New York is only pretending to be redeemed.
Do you suppose that NY fills out a 1040 Form? For its use of private credit from the Fed? That might be exactly what is going on. The compendium is intellectual property of my brain trust so I, and now you may be the only people aware of this.
Brilliant article, but it's just too long and in-depth for my brain right now and I really can't afford to go back on the steroids. I wouldn't want the article any other way, but crib notes would really be great for the interim. Please please forgive me, but
WTF,
AnRFK interview with Dr. Phil, it made sense when he said the measles VAX alone is safe and he would recommend it, he said that the combo MMR does not have any safety testing and there are problems with it, then he went on to promote it Stating that Hhs recommends it? Did I miss that he said just a certain age group.
I have been so impressed at all of the education, facts, resources, alternatives to the MMR especially for children due to the risk benefit problems with all of the explanation and educations from
Humphries, KORY, CHD, Tenpenny and more. Just reaching out in case my dyslexic brain switched information around, but I watched that segment a few times that they aired RFK promoted the MMR??? I really hope I am wrong, and if anybody can explain it I would be grateful. Please stick to the fax FTS❤️ FATS FACTS I hate this voice to text❤️🙏❤️
The Report and any mention of Robert Wallace MALONE has been scrubbed from, or never entered into the docket report. However beginning with Robert's Report apparently there are a boatload of sealed documents - Robert's is probably in there.
Thank you for sharing it! You write very informative and edifying material, Jill and you.
Why would we ever want to put any trust in vaccines again ! - I have two grand kids inured by the MMR vaccines, we never trusted the Covid Vac, and none ever took the jab even though, threaten, with Job loss!
I know. Part of it is that Medicine pushed out other healing practices that got results. Such as homeopathy. If medical doctors had not cooperated with some larger unspoken plan to make us all dependent on medicine (drugs), we would have a more reasonable and workable health system today. We constantly have to deal with the criminal mind stepping in and messing up our lives.
Good point!!
My take home from this is we have way too much lawyering in our lives. This reeks of legalese obfuscation. Do we really need it? I doubt that we do.
This degree of obfuscation may be the reason why some resort to vigilantism, particularly in physical & sexual abuse cases. Though not to be condoned, some see this as their only recourse, when our judicial system continually leaves one perennially frustrated & demoralized. It is akin to being victimized twice - once by the perpetrator & again by the judicial system/courts. When up against a pharmaceutical company, whatever the product may be, their resources are vast & few have the means to pursue or finance such litigation. I think that the entire system needs to be re-evaluated.
Vigilantism is one inevitable consequence of justice being the baby tossed out with the bathwater when lawyers usurped the law and made it their sole domain.
Ya Think? I really can't see why people who have a loved one killed by these schmucks don't demand an eye for an eye. But then again Im a barbarian and not as civilized as the Israeli Zionists.
My father in law had the proper words for all such advocations.
Nothing in this legal world happens, until one of the most important aspects of the pursuits of it are established. It is five words that ring all bells!
"THOSE MOST ABLE TO PAY"! Nothing happens till that gets the green light go ahead.
No Law Firm takes on any pursuant Lawsuits, nor things of Federal Construction projects....
Think about the BILLS that congress and senate sign off on and pass.
What comes first? Yeah....now we're on to something hugely! YOU and ME!
It has occurred to me that law in general, and English law specifically, stems from disposition of the king's property which includes his subjects. Consider that the king did not speak the common language so all his declarations needed to be translated into common speech and you can be sure that those translations proved most beneficial to the translators, i.e., the vestigial lawyers. We did not need to bring this mess to our shores.
Recall that back in the 1970s era, the so-called "Trial Lawyers" in the US began an onslaught of class action suits against the ubiquitous "family Doctors" which resulted in the skyrocketing costs of family health care due to "malpractice" insurance premiums; the beginning of "specialists" only doctors and the end of "family" doctors as we knew them.
and a dubious promise that specialists were able to do much better than family doctors.
Black's law Publications would no doubt agree about that.
As would West Publishing.
But made large sums of money for decades.
Trying to explain the depth of it in upgraded editions as case law advanced.
We are little more than chattel to this day.
Even words and ideas are considered often, as registered intellectual property.
Right! And the costs of litigation are FORMITABLE!
Shakespeare opined on "lawyers" long ago.
There is another aspect of this that can plague plaintiffs vs Big Buck defendants with stables of expert lawyers on retainer. An effective plaintiff"s attorney needs basic knowledge on topic and a capacity to engage in research, analysis even above the efforts Dr Malone describes here and use in both in technical and administrative litigation.. These are rare supply of these for the private sector. The 'Bigs' stables are formidible.
No, the take-home lesson here is that Big Pharma can't suppress the other side's expert testimony in civil litigation.
This is a sharp contrast to what Big Pharma has managed to do to the federal and state regulatory, public health, and medical research bureaucracies, to clinical researchers and higher education administrators, to medical journals, to the legacy news media, and to social media. In all these other institutions, the opinions of people like Dr. Malone have been suppressed and pro-Big Pharma propaganda has been manufactured because they were systematically corrupted or otherwise warped by Big Pharma.
The crookedness at UC Davis, for example, wasn't just simply in connection with the gain-of-function work. Davis researchers actually helped the Wuhan "Bat Lady" collect the original wild-type coronavirus to perform the gain-of-function work on, and they signed off on the safety of the Wuhan lab so the NIH money could keep flowing to it. Instead of holding these researchers accountable for their complicity in crimes against humanity, the University of California bureaucracy promoted the lead researcher involved, who is now a Vice Provost at UC Davis. UC won't clean up its own house voluntarily--by all means we need to unleash the lawyers on these people.
It seems like there is no fast train to heaven or hell. As I scanned the information and the years it takes to litigate, it became more clear how the arguments on both sides take a linguist to interpret. This current issue of litigation around the misdeeds of so many, can take years and by the time anything is resolved, most of the affected people concerned will be dead. That doesn't mean that nothing should or can be done, just that only in unusual cases does a ruling create a reversal of a dangerous substance. Because of your experience in the past, and how you were duped many times, has certainly increased your BS meter. Having guilt is a waste of time, only going forward with more wisdom has merit. / My son's school tried to say he needed a missed booster and I knew the dangers of a teen getting mumps. I was able to get an exemption (religious, I believe). I was young and didn't know much about any of this, but my inside voice was very clear that this action of a booster was a big NO. Listening to my inner self has saved me many times, as well as not listening has caused me much pain and suffering. Such is life.
RFK Jr is correct to challenge the combo shots; When Japan separated out the 3 as individual shots, they increased encephalitis when they tried a combo of two of the three. Sorry I can't find that link at the moment, but these are interesting:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-17509/Why-Japan-banned-MMR-vaccine.html
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/vaccines/mmr.html#cdcreference_1
Two studies indicate that for every 10,000 children who get their first MMR and varicella vaccines as separate shots when they are ages 12-23 months, about four will have a febrile seizure during the 7-10 days following vaccination. Children of the same age who get the combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) vaccine as their first vaccine against these diseases are twice as likely to have a febrile seizure during the same time period.12
Another observation; This seems to be the same situation with the measles as with mumps. If waning protection is proven, it will show the dangers of people thinking they are protected, when they are not. Look what has happened with the notion that masking, social distancing and the vaccine make people safe, when in fact, they don't! Thank god I got the mumps and measles and chicken pox!
Noting, I am concerned with limited available space on my cell phones, I haven't downloaded and read the PDF re your testimony yet.
That noted, having traveled through the Covid experience with you and fellow experts with concerns, I stand with a position that Merck's assertions re effectiveness of it's mumps vaccine are well short of acceptable.
IMO potential recipients of 'vaccines' are entitled the full disclosure of all relevant facts as related to effectiveness and safety of the prescribed products. It is only with such disclosures the potential recipients can give their "informed consent." I would consider declining effectiveness and implications for impact of disease with increasing age thereafter a meaningful concern to be divulged.
I am looking forward to reading your analysis assuming my computer can manage the download.
Thank you for sharing this timely relevant discussion and record for consideration!
As a potential recipient of Government approved medicines, vaccines and therapeutics, I am currently unwilling to accept HHS/WHO direction as definitive. I'm hopeful Secretary Kennedy and his teams will be able to restore a 'Gold Standard efficacy' to the Office. Even with a restoration, 'informed consent' needs to be a part of protocol.
IMO, it is a failure of government regulation, and the legal system, that we have such a thing called the Noerr-Pennington immunity, a "doctrine" that can protect an entity from anti-trust charges under law when they petition the government.
Just an up suggestion. This is a very good reveal. Although if you are not familiar with legal documents and proceedings.The value can be diluted. Is it possible to give a short summary for all of us that are not so inclined??
So many important decisions have been made that negatively impact the health of millions
have been made in the DARK in a series of twisted and destructive illegal maneuvers. Thank You for bringing it out into the light. The spiritual principle at Revelation 12:9 holds true.
I just added the following into the document
You can download and read a copy of that report, originally filed in 2018, at this location.
Here are my main findings found in the report regarding the mumps component of Merck’s MMR vaccine:
SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
1. Merck’s AIGENT assay failed to provide a reliable or clinically relevant measure of protection against mumps.
2. Merck’s wild-type mumps ELISA assay failed to provide a reliable or clinically relevant measure of protection against mumps.
3. Merck misrepresented the AIGENT results in its submission to the FDA of the preliminary subset analysis.
4. Merck misrepresented the Protocol 007 results in its Supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA to lower the mumps end-expiry potency specification for M-M-R II.
5. Merck misrepresented the wild-type ELISA results in its Biologics License Application to the FDA for ProQuad.
6. Merck misrepresented the wild-type ELISA results in its Supplemental Biologics License Application to the FDA for M-M-R II formulated with rHA.
7. Merck has conducted no clinical studies that demonstrate or support how well M-M-R II (as of 2005) or ProQuad protect against mumps.
8. The M-M-R II and ProQuad package inserts are inaccurate, false and misleading in claiming and/or suggesting Merck has conducted clinical studies demonstrating these vaccines afford protection against mumps.
From all that was made available above, here is what I gleaned. Any child getting vaccinated with MMRII will only have immunity for a set period as vaccine diminishes with time and thereafter will, unless revaccinated on an ongoing basis, be vulnerable because they have no built in immunity. Likewise, any adult who was vaccinated with the MMRII between late 1970's and into 1990's is now vulnerable as their vaccines wore off (unless revaccinated numerous times) during early childhood. Most adults in that age category probably have not been consistently revaccinated because mumps have not been prominent as a threat, but it could certainly be considered one if mumps takes off as measles is due to what has been a growing illegal alien population.
Am I getting it? Catch 22? Adults of certain age are now pretty much going to have to get boosters if mumps (or measles) break out nationwide? And each successive generation being vaccinated further dilutes the natural immunity until all humans MUST depend on an ongoing vaccine regiment to survive these diseases? Sounds calculated to me. How long will/would it take for generations to get back to natural immunity if a majority of the people wean off these vaccines? Or should we just consider vaccines of this type to be the norm now, even tho they provide less than wonderful results?
Building better fences would sure as blazes help
If more fences can be built we are going to hear about how corrupt it is to "hurt the poor people suffering from lesser opportunity than here". I don't want people to suffer and many over our history in USA have families who arrived here from poor circumstances. I just want them to do it legally.
On another note, I came home from my walk the other day in a tizzy. Had stopped to say "hi" to couple of neighbor ladies in my age group. Vaccine talk came up (uh oh). One (who's daughter is a 'scientist?' told me she won't get near me since I wasn't 'up to speed' with mRNA and would 'shed' all over her, and "what was I going to do about bird flu? Sheesh. The other didn't get all demo crazed with me, but said her family was fully vaxed cause her brother (doctor) said they should. This is the way it seems the vast majority respond - either they are incredulous or hostile. And they are teaching this to the young. Which is why I feel so strongly about education going the other direction. We really need some GOOD, SOLID information to get out there and shock some of these people. Some way to get rid of this notion of mis-information. This is such a vast and rocky mountain to climb.
Is Trump going to get rid of the immunity that the drug companies have on vaccines. This would help to stop the fraud. If the drug companies are held responsible for their failure to produce safe and effective medicine then “maybe” we could get medicines and vaccines that might just work without the harmful side effects that we have right now.
Again, I'm glad someone is keeping track of this. It goes too deep in the weeds for me, with all the technical lingo and competing interests. But we really do need someone there making sure our medicines are safe (at least relatively safe). The next step - which I don't think HHS is really ready to do - is to look beyond medicines and biology to what else is going on that makes people sick.
I highly recommend Steven Krahling’s talk on this topic below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1n7KDv9-kuwSj3e-w1A6iUp5rWIukjorH/view
The movie, Protocol 7, is based on his story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-NyF2d_hVY
I was in the Salk Wahl Gene Expression Laboratory for 11 years as a survivor patient/research advocate, until I retired when I moved to to a very red state 2 1/2 years ago. I knew Inda Verma, so it is fascinating to know you worked with him. My experience at Salk was very, very positive all up until the bioweapon in 2020 and beyond. Dr. Wahl was the most kind and gracious scientific mentor a person could have. I could not bear to tell him that I left Salk because of the way science was weaponized against millions of people after the bioweapon. The scientists there were not just too close to the forest to see the trees, they were living in the trees. They universally accepted the mandates for unproven treatments and masking. The other thing was that Salk became so political in the last several years I was there. I hated to see it, because I could only imagine that a substantial portion of their donor base were likelky conservatives like me who were completely turned off by how political Salk became. They put politics front and center, only taking the left's view of every event. I hope it has gotten better since I left.
In any case, it's a small world...as they say.
Regarding this post, you are, without a doubt, a bonified hero. You and Jill have made incalculably valuable contributions to the fight for truth and freedom, as well as to humanity. Thank you for your heroic efforts and accomplishments in this monumental fight.
These actions took place in a period when the FDA was very strict about approving new drugs or vaccines, not the joke it is today. Therefor a lot of lying had to take place to get approval. I sold Veterinary vaccines for 35 years and it took forever and a fortune to get an animal vaccine approved. I sold a rabies vaccine that protected 99% against rabies. The original seed came from the Pasteur Institute. It is the same vaccine that is used in humans and for the human treatment of rabies. It is also used in bait to inoculate wildlife. At that time a rabies vaccine had to protect 87 % of trial subjects in order to get approval. I competed against Pfizers rabies vaccine that protected only 87%. "Dr. do you want 13 dogs and cats out of 100 to potentially get rabies?"
When Covid first hit I remembered that mRNA was never able to get close to use in vaccines. That and the fact that it didn't take 4-5 years to get approved is the reason I didn't take it.
With Dr. Malone knowing what he knew before Covid ever hit makes me wonder why he took the vaccine. The propaganda was very strong and I wavered a couple of times. about taking it but I never did. BTW when I did get Covid I had acquired some human Ivermectin and took that as soon as I started feeling really bad. A day and a half later I was out of bed and back to normal with no lingering effects.
The "full" pdf version is lacking PACER court markings.
Thank you for at least attempting to explain the proceedings under the Rules of Court. We cannot afford for me to become confused.
I figured out how to make God pull His Sword and light the entire House of Israel on fire.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-1sUPexQA1vjU6RimabzczWJl3IlCIAd/view?usp=sharing
Do you see what is wrong with the picture? The Salem municipal courts and City Hall are on a federal enclave! No Home Rule. The only thing making sense, I knew would be there (Talmudic Law) is the altar:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SohxNK69I_UPOxx6eVFzUzt4bM5NlAOT/view?usp=sharing
So I told Carrie Lynn in a Bible Study and she explained it all to me. https://youtu.be/GXQWgC2qw-k I thought it was more like this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImN2EyZTM2MmMtMDBjOC00ZTRiLWI4NDEtODU3MGE3MjUyYjNm But I would trust anybody right now! https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1EaV_bU7VImV2VFTm1jMkFEZ2M
Did I hear you correctly, Robert? Fourteen years and the court is thinking that maybe the Court is ready to hear an Argument? That does it! I'm lighting the stink bomb!
P.S. It is like the old vinyl - if you get a scratch deep it will set you back into a sound loop. I found the scratch! All the states are redeeming lawful money by demand, just like us (we, Redeemed People outside the scope of the national debt). But the main bank is the Federal Reserve Bank of New York - my claim as a descendent of Patroon heritage, and confluence with Christopher WREN (mother's side).
Article VI - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eUN97OKReUAh38-LrOA0BQKRSDAHA5zY
https://youtu.be/gFuFX3zY8Sg
The States and I both enjoy being outside the scope of national debt, except NY:
Scroll down to 16 of 46 pages or the last hit on "New York". https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pl3_xlJIcgmbffbrDMgYYamE8Y5AzlCh Notice how with the other states, we see current law. With NY there is a bill before the Senate that has apparently never made it to the Floor! New York is only pretending to be redeemed.
Apparently for over fifteen years now, NY pretends to be redeemed by somehow publishing a proposal. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S37
Do you suppose that NY fills out a 1040 Form? For its use of private credit from the Fed? That might be exactly what is going on. The compendium is intellectual property of my brain trust so I, and now you may be the only people aware of this.
Brilliant article, but it's just too long and in-depth for my brain right now and I really can't afford to go back on the steroids. I wouldn't want the article any other way, but crib notes would really be great for the interim. Please please forgive me, but
WTF,
AnRFK interview with Dr. Phil, it made sense when he said the measles VAX alone is safe and he would recommend it, he said that the combo MMR does not have any safety testing and there are problems with it, then he went on to promote it Stating that Hhs recommends it? Did I miss that he said just a certain age group.
I have been so impressed at all of the education, facts, resources, alternatives to the MMR especially for children due to the risk benefit problems with all of the explanation and educations from
Humphries, KORY, CHD, Tenpenny and more. Just reaching out in case my dyslexic brain switched information around, but I watched that segment a few times that they aired RFK promoted the MMR??? I really hope I am wrong, and if anybody can explain it I would be grateful. Please stick to the fax FTS❤️ FATS FACTS I hate this voice to text❤️🙏❤️
Signed on March 13, 2018 the next entry is briefly described to be Stipulations about Expert Witness Testimony. So it looks like you have been mixing it up for a long while, Robert! https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kxwdduz974ID2n9U4mmjsILk2X6OPrfF/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jtc9FUyEFLQFSoJDrEX1x4-K5gkq_olZ/view?usp=sharing
Download pdf Final Report: (already linked by Robert) - https://static1.squarespace.com/static/61910a2d98732d54b73ef8fc/t/6813925277fa401074a2ed3f/1746113108253/FINAL_Malone+Report.pdf
The Report and any mention of Robert Wallace MALONE has been scrubbed from, or never entered into the docket report. However beginning with Robert's Report apparently there are a boatload of sealed documents - Robert's is probably in there.
Thank you for sharing it! You write very informative and edifying material, Jill and you.