It appears to me that the jab industry is on the cusp to admit cardio damage to distract from the more serious outcomes such as turbo cancers. And totally ignores the now well established fact this jab neither prevents infection nor virus passage from jabbed. In other words another useless money tree for pharma like the SSRIs
Pfizer trashed their name with a product that does not do what it was suppose to do (and advertised as doing), and puts people at risk for unknown long-term risk (over 2 months), that no one wants their vaccine. I am not sure this is an effective long-term strategy for growth.
Proud to be a paid supporter of your work. Thank you for your scientific expertise, and rational and balanced analysis. I also enjoy the updates about the homestead!
Thank you for your rigorous analysis of Pfizer’s myocarditis study and the tweets maligning it. It is comforting to me to have someone such as yourself capable of putting emotion aside when evaluating these issues and looking into the actual details.
From the very beginning of the mRNA saga I have appreciated your level headed, well reasoned approach. I still remember being struck by your calm demeanor and careful analysis during that early Weinstein interview with Steve Kirsch.
Thank you for your service with ACIP and for providing a calm shelter throughout all the storms.
Thanks to the Malones and many other courageous patriots, we know so much about the massive atrocities committed by the establishment government against "We The People". Will there ever be any justice for the the millions who are suffering, permanently injured and apathetically killed??? Are there to many intentionally created judicial loopholes for the guilty to "squirm" though??? Is there enough time, money and man power to hold them "all" accountable??? Never forget or forgive what these criminals did to our country and it's citizens for "money and power".
I am so glad to be a part of supporting you and Jill through my measly $5.00 a month. The constant important information you provide is necessary for me to be able to keep up with what is happening on so many fronts. There are so many reasons why I look to you for accurate, up to date knowledge. so, Thank You for your time, focus and ability to admit an error. There are very few people I trust as much as you two.
Frankly, Pfizer IS just pushing the egg down the road for as long as they can... expect them to delay everything. Pfizer KNEW their jab screwed with the heart from basically DAY 1.
The original Pfizer jab study (with the 20k in jab, 20k in no treatment group) has MORE people die in the jab group. YEP, more died with the treatment (jab) and those additional deaths were heart attack. That is not even looking at the adverse reactions which also highlighted a massive heart set of issues. Frankly, giving the jab when it is shown their product kills more than saves and then harms many... the correct classification is attempted murder and those with Myocarditis are the "lucky" ones.
But it is even worse, the CDC did the most impressive cover up than seemingly no one pressed. That same main jab study had one person in the jab group die from COVID even with all the restrictions on the classification of fully vax'ed. For the CDC then say that you couldn't get covid if you were jabbed... when more than a few in the study contracted COVID and one Died in that jab group is just complicit in... attempted murder.
Worse... when the COVID virus was first announced on mainstream media, the reporter noted along with the fear of this novel virus that there were no known treatments. I thought that was really an odd thing to say as respiratory viruses have many many known treatments though will vary in effectiveness on each virus... but here there are no known treatments? Heck, they wouldn't have had time then to even try more than a few as this was very early... but then it hit me. The first main public mainstream media announcement had special text from the Emergency Use Authorization clause to authorized fast track of jab development. So heck, they didn't even bother to try any of the hundreds of respiratory viral treatments and going straight to the legal clause of jab development approval. No wonder Pfizer is pushing all the legal eggs down the road as long as they can because if the general public knew many were killed (per the Study stats as a baseline of just the near term deaths) and many harmed (per the study adverse reactions stats), then that legal concern goes from payment damages to attempted murder in quantities that would populate some countries.
The CDC/FDA simply made up the modeling which showed all the "lives saved" when the clinical trial did not show (at 2 months) any deaths prevented. The CDC ad FDA are accomplishes in the ongoing fraud of the COVID vaccines.
I read your article with interest. You mention that your business life was destroyed by speaking out about Covid etc and I admire you for that and I am grateful. But this is nothing new, people's lives have been ruined by 'Big Pharma', the medical profession and governments for years and it needs to change.
I had to retire in 2008 because I could no longer function, all thanks to the mercury used in dental products which again was 'safe and effective' !!! I did not take the Covid Shot or as it is known the clot shot. Why? because an English doctor told me that in patients like me, they always got worse after any vax. She said never have another vax and this was pre covid. So I didn't take the shot. I have never taken the flu shot either as I found a herbal/supplement support in a book 20 years ago, which my husband called the 'cure' and we just took that when we felt a bug coming on, it contained zinc, vitamin C among other things.
The Doctor's thanks for treating people and exploring real treatments for the chronically ill was to be investigated 30 times by the General Medical Council and each time she was found not guilty! She finally had enough and surrendered her licence. A good doctor, who cared and used her brain was not what the estabishment wanted.
I am lucky, my husband stuck by me and at 69 is still working to pay for my medical bills. I get zero support from the government and this has cost us a fortune. I don't have a 'normal' life but thanks to all the work and therapies I have tried/do, I am no longer bedridden and my pain levels are manageable.
We need things to change and yes I know you are up against really powerful interests and you have to follow the science but just remember five years is a very long time when you are ill! Every number is a human being who is suffering and if their experience is anything like mine, get zero help from the medical profession. Bless you and the work you do.
I just did a quick search of Covid mRNA doses administered so far. It showed over 3.5 billion doses. Shouldn’t these questions of heart damage, strokes, cancers, heart attacks, blood clots, etc. have been answered before they proceeded to administer 3.5 billion injections, I’m sure many into children and pregnant women? Just a thought.
Unbelievable. My mother in law has been in the hospital for 5 days now. She was given 3 Covid shots. She has 3 blood clots, one in her mesenteric artery, a couple in her spleen, and they found another one today, not sure where. She’s got vasculitis and after nearly 100 tests they still don’t know what’s going on with her. I think I know what’s causing these blood clots!! Of coarse it’s not the experimental Covid clot shot!!
The government and industry are fighting hard to keep vaccines in Medical Care without touching on the subject of... what items are patents hiding in these vaccines? The Medical Industry is about the promotion of products and making sure billions keep flowing in. The government is not adverse to getting its share of the profits either. The only ones being left in the cold are the consumers being injected with toxic items that destroy the human body.
Since perfect is the enemy of good, and I remain skeptical, I will retain doubts about the Pfizer study. Your arguments in favor of the delay are almost certainly valid and correct. One still worries that the study was designed to be so rigorous, that it would ultimately fail to show any significant results other than “observational”. I am saddened and mystified to learn that despite the huge amounts of money paid to Dr. Fauci and his cohorts your critical position is a voluntary one without subsidy.
I have a problem calling clinical studies scientific because you are dealing with so many variables simultaneously. A mob of outbred individuals each with a unique medical history is hardly comparable to cages of highly inbred lab rodents.
Large study populations should control for individual variables. The real problem with modern "science" is the ability of those involved to manipulate the interpretation and presentation of results given the conflict of interest for those doing the study. Pfizer is a business first. Human health is a far secondary concern especially when they can hide behind immunity.
The initial trial with 20,000 people in each group was sufficient to answer questions about safe and efficacy if it had been allowed to proceed for 2 years (the original study design). When Pfizer ended the trial at 2 months (allowing crossover to occur), their "product" should never have received approval (it should have stayed as an EUA). They ended the trial prematurely because they were concerned what might be found if it proceeded as originally planned, possibly due to results from animal trials or DOD's preliminary results.
Which, back to by original comment hardly smacks of what can be done in a lab with a few hundred rodents,i.e. scientific. I believe an effort to separate the two words scientific and medical should be made with fauci serving as a prime example of why.
To anyone: To what extent, though, is this particularly-designed study needed in order to show scientifically, almost perfect, study design? Shouldn't the study design decision depend upon, and vary accordingly to, the practical needs from the study, not just to have an almost-perfect design performed with the lowest p-value? Is the purpose of the study design to create a research paper that is absolutely unassailable in any way? I hope that's not the first priority, here. These are children and their parents, and we all know the games the pharmaceutical industry plays.
Warp speed was one of their games. Any newly xeveloped bioweapon would likely have done its damage long before a vaccie could be designed, made and timely administered. If pharna truly was concerned about natl.security they would be working on virucides.
I am grateful that you publish your substack, which is packed with sourced information and critical analysis, and very happy to be a paid subscriber. Hard to think of a better community to be involved in!
Also a proud subscriber. No lack of appreciation for your knowledge of and in clinical trails. However, this lay person, having emersed himself in the incredibly unjust and corrupt "pandemic" experience, has learned a healthy skepticism of any data generated by or with pharma in addition to previously captured Federal regulators. As Doctorate degrees go, these repeat convicted felons have a PHD in data obfuscation. I'm relegated to mostly anecdotal evidence. As that goes, I have never before or since COVID "vaccines" witnessed prime specimens of human health dropping on courts and fields of play in such unprecedented and concentrated numbers. Additionally there are the Coroner and embalmer accountings of again unprecented in size and abundance blood clots. The most abhorrent "pandemic" practice was our Government offering a COVID treatment kill, ( death by Remdesivir injection and more ), protocol with bonus incentives in which hospitals, administrators and medical practitioners were willingly complicit. The current administration is accomplishing amazingly impressive progress in undoing the corruption in our health care and for that I am eternally grateful. You, RWM, are are no small part of that progress and appreciation.
Well thought out and explained to us high school graduates.
Thanks.
On another note, I have been following the Autism/vax debate and from what I've gathered, pharma is saying that they feel that by denying vaccines to a control group, they would be ethically guilty of withholding protection. (As if they were ethical about the effectiveness of the mRNA injections during Covid.)
My question to you is, why are the powers that be not approaching the perfect control group, the AMISH.
...you know the answer. Yes, the Amish and the Orthodox Jews that do not vaccinate are the healthiest people in America. But no researcher would "dare" to look into this... they would end up losing their job or worse. When can people comprehend that we are exploited by a global, trillion dollar sized fascist (private/public) enterprise legalized (run by our own government) who mandated their product for you that you paid for with your taxes. This kind of abuse only happened to a society where indoctrinated minds lost touch with reality, or should I say lost their common sense. Certainly, this new religion of science, will not be sustainable, because it brings a negative sum to society. It's a self-cannibalizing phenomena, the likes of the religion of communism was.
I'd be curious to see his answer as well, but even more interested to ask about why not to do a simple study of overall mortality of mRNA vaccinated population vs. the unvaccinated population during the last four years. First, we just want to know how deadly it was overall, so we can stop injecting people with it.
It appears to me that the jab industry is on the cusp to admit cardio damage to distract from the more serious outcomes such as turbo cancers. And totally ignores the now well established fact this jab neither prevents infection nor virus passage from jabbed. In other words another useless money tree for pharma like the SSRIs
Pfizer trashed their name with a product that does not do what it was suppose to do (and advertised as doing), and puts people at risk for unknown long-term risk (over 2 months), that no one wants their vaccine. I am not sure this is an effective long-term strategy for growth.
Proud to be a paid supporter of your work. Thank you for your scientific expertise, and rational and balanced analysis. I also enjoy the updates about the homestead!
And, the Sunday funnies. Great way to start my week.
Thank you for your rigorous analysis of Pfizer’s myocarditis study and the tweets maligning it. It is comforting to me to have someone such as yourself capable of putting emotion aside when evaluating these issues and looking into the actual details.
From the very beginning of the mRNA saga I have appreciated your level headed, well reasoned approach. I still remember being struck by your calm demeanor and careful analysis during that early Weinstein interview with Steve Kirsch.
Thank you for your service with ACIP and for providing a calm shelter throughout all the storms.
Thanks to the Malones and many other courageous patriots, we know so much about the massive atrocities committed by the establishment government against "We The People". Will there ever be any justice for the the millions who are suffering, permanently injured and apathetically killed??? Are there to many intentionally created judicial loopholes for the guilty to "squirm" though??? Is there enough time, money and man power to hold them "all" accountable??? Never forget or forgive what these criminals did to our country and it's citizens for "money and power".
I am so glad to be a part of supporting you and Jill through my measly $5.00 a month. The constant important information you provide is necessary for me to be able to keep up with what is happening on so many fronts. There are so many reasons why I look to you for accurate, up to date knowledge. so, Thank You for your time, focus and ability to admit an error. There are very few people I trust as much as you two.
So agree! The Malones are my go to resource! Such impressive people! 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
If Confucius was alive and writing today,
His new tidbit might ver well read....
One Honorable Substack reading.....Worth a thousand words!
Frankly, Pfizer IS just pushing the egg down the road for as long as they can... expect them to delay everything. Pfizer KNEW their jab screwed with the heart from basically DAY 1.
The original Pfizer jab study (with the 20k in jab, 20k in no treatment group) has MORE people die in the jab group. YEP, more died with the treatment (jab) and those additional deaths were heart attack. That is not even looking at the adverse reactions which also highlighted a massive heart set of issues. Frankly, giving the jab when it is shown their product kills more than saves and then harms many... the correct classification is attempted murder and those with Myocarditis are the "lucky" ones.
But it is even worse, the CDC did the most impressive cover up than seemingly no one pressed. That same main jab study had one person in the jab group die from COVID even with all the restrictions on the classification of fully vax'ed. For the CDC then say that you couldn't get covid if you were jabbed... when more than a few in the study contracted COVID and one Died in that jab group is just complicit in... attempted murder.
Worse... when the COVID virus was first announced on mainstream media, the reporter noted along with the fear of this novel virus that there were no known treatments. I thought that was really an odd thing to say as respiratory viruses have many many known treatments though will vary in effectiveness on each virus... but here there are no known treatments? Heck, they wouldn't have had time then to even try more than a few as this was very early... but then it hit me. The first main public mainstream media announcement had special text from the Emergency Use Authorization clause to authorized fast track of jab development. So heck, they didn't even bother to try any of the hundreds of respiratory viral treatments and going straight to the legal clause of jab development approval. No wonder Pfizer is pushing all the legal eggs down the road as long as they can because if the general public knew many were killed (per the Study stats as a baseline of just the near term deaths) and many harmed (per the study adverse reactions stats), then that legal concern goes from payment damages to attempted murder in quantities that would populate some countries.
Here, here, for very much of what you wrote.
The CDC/FDA simply made up the modeling which showed all the "lives saved" when the clinical trial did not show (at 2 months) any deaths prevented. The CDC ad FDA are accomplishes in the ongoing fraud of the COVID vaccines.
I read your article with interest. You mention that your business life was destroyed by speaking out about Covid etc and I admire you for that and I am grateful. But this is nothing new, people's lives have been ruined by 'Big Pharma', the medical profession and governments for years and it needs to change.
I had to retire in 2008 because I could no longer function, all thanks to the mercury used in dental products which again was 'safe and effective' !!! I did not take the Covid Shot or as it is known the clot shot. Why? because an English doctor told me that in patients like me, they always got worse after any vax. She said never have another vax and this was pre covid. So I didn't take the shot. I have never taken the flu shot either as I found a herbal/supplement support in a book 20 years ago, which my husband called the 'cure' and we just took that when we felt a bug coming on, it contained zinc, vitamin C among other things.
The Doctor's thanks for treating people and exploring real treatments for the chronically ill was to be investigated 30 times by the General Medical Council and each time she was found not guilty! She finally had enough and surrendered her licence. A good doctor, who cared and used her brain was not what the estabishment wanted.
I am lucky, my husband stuck by me and at 69 is still working to pay for my medical bills. I get zero support from the government and this has cost us a fortune. I don't have a 'normal' life but thanks to all the work and therapies I have tried/do, I am no longer bedridden and my pain levels are manageable.
We need things to change and yes I know you are up against really powerful interests and you have to follow the science but just remember five years is a very long time when you are ill! Every number is a human being who is suffering and if their experience is anything like mine, get zero help from the medical profession. Bless you and the work you do.
The "clot shot"? It's really the "kill shot".
I just did a quick search of Covid mRNA doses administered so far. It showed over 3.5 billion doses. Shouldn’t these questions of heart damage, strokes, cancers, heart attacks, blood clots, etc. have been answered before they proceeded to administer 3.5 billion injections, I’m sure many into children and pregnant women? Just a thought.
And, I believe, they didn't even finish their first human trial because of either very bad reactions and/or deaths. They discontinued the trials.
Unbelievable. My mother in law has been in the hospital for 5 days now. She was given 3 Covid shots. She has 3 blood clots, one in her mesenteric artery, a couple in her spleen, and they found another one today, not sure where. She’s got vasculitis and after nearly 100 tests they still don’t know what’s going on with her. I think I know what’s causing these blood clots!! Of coarse it’s not the experimental Covid clot shot!!
I'm so sorry about your mother in law.
Really terribly sad James. It’s worse when it’s family and nothing can be said.
Tragic! 💔💔💔
Of course, if human health were the objective
That seems to be a very level headed discussion and conclusion - thank you Dr Malone.
The government and industry are fighting hard to keep vaccines in Medical Care without touching on the subject of... what items are patents hiding in these vaccines? The Medical Industry is about the promotion of products and making sure billions keep flowing in. The government is not adverse to getting its share of the profits either. The only ones being left in the cold are the consumers being injected with toxic items that destroy the human body.
Thank you sir for still writing your substack. My world would be much less and far more concerning without you.
💯‼️
Since perfect is the enemy of good, and I remain skeptical, I will retain doubts about the Pfizer study. Your arguments in favor of the delay are almost certainly valid and correct. One still worries that the study was designed to be so rigorous, that it would ultimately fail to show any significant results other than “observational”. I am saddened and mystified to learn that despite the huge amounts of money paid to Dr. Fauci and his cohorts your critical position is a voluntary one without subsidy.
study design criticism is valid, but that is how "science" is supposed to work
I have a problem calling clinical studies scientific because you are dealing with so many variables simultaneously. A mob of outbred individuals each with a unique medical history is hardly comparable to cages of highly inbred lab rodents.
Large study populations should control for individual variables. The real problem with modern "science" is the ability of those involved to manipulate the interpretation and presentation of results given the conflict of interest for those doing the study. Pfizer is a business first. Human health is a far secondary concern especially when they can hide behind immunity.
Think it would take a whale of a bigger cohort than pharma willing to pay for
The initial trial with 20,000 people in each group was sufficient to answer questions about safe and efficacy if it had been allowed to proceed for 2 years (the original study design). When Pfizer ended the trial at 2 months (allowing crossover to occur), their "product" should never have received approval (it should have stayed as an EUA). They ended the trial prematurely because they were concerned what might be found if it proceeded as originally planned, possibly due to results from animal trials or DOD's preliminary results.
Which, back to by original comment hardly smacks of what can be done in a lab with a few hundred rodents,i.e. scientific. I believe an effort to separate the two words scientific and medical should be made with fauci serving as a prime example of why.
Here, here
To anyone: To what extent, though, is this particularly-designed study needed in order to show scientifically, almost perfect, study design? Shouldn't the study design decision depend upon, and vary accordingly to, the practical needs from the study, not just to have an almost-perfect design performed with the lowest p-value? Is the purpose of the study design to create a research paper that is absolutely unassailable in any way? I hope that's not the first priority, here. These are children and their parents, and we all know the games the pharmaceutical industry plays.
This study will fade away in time with no definitive conclusions (that is the intent)...and hopefully, Pfizer will as well.
Agree. It's the "wrong" study to do, if you want to help injured people live better, longer, or receive compensation.
The best interests of people are not the concern when Pfizer and the DOD partner up.
Warp speed was one of their games. Any newly xeveloped bioweapon would likely have done its damage long before a vaccie could be designed, made and timely administered. If pharna truly was concerned about natl.security they would be working on virucides.
I am grateful that you publish your substack, which is packed with sourced information and critical analysis, and very happy to be a paid subscriber. Hard to think of a better community to be involved in!
Also a proud subscriber. No lack of appreciation for your knowledge of and in clinical trails. However, this lay person, having emersed himself in the incredibly unjust and corrupt "pandemic" experience, has learned a healthy skepticism of any data generated by or with pharma in addition to previously captured Federal regulators. As Doctorate degrees go, these repeat convicted felons have a PHD in data obfuscation. I'm relegated to mostly anecdotal evidence. As that goes, I have never before or since COVID "vaccines" witnessed prime specimens of human health dropping on courts and fields of play in such unprecedented and concentrated numbers. Additionally there are the Coroner and embalmer accountings of again unprecented in size and abundance blood clots. The most abhorrent "pandemic" practice was our Government offering a COVID treatment kill, ( death by Remdesivir injection and more ), protocol with bonus incentives in which hospitals, administrators and medical practitioners were willingly complicit. The current administration is accomplishing amazingly impressive progress in undoing the corruption in our health care and for that I am eternally grateful. You, RWM, are are no small part of that progress and appreciation.
Well thought out and explained to us high school graduates.
Thanks.
On another note, I have been following the Autism/vax debate and from what I've gathered, pharma is saying that they feel that by denying vaccines to a control group, they would be ethically guilty of withholding protection. (As if they were ethical about the effectiveness of the mRNA injections during Covid.)
My question to you is, why are the powers that be not approaching the perfect control group, the AMISH.
...you know the answer. Yes, the Amish and the Orthodox Jews that do not vaccinate are the healthiest people in America. But no researcher would "dare" to look into this... they would end up losing their job or worse. When can people comprehend that we are exploited by a global, trillion dollar sized fascist (private/public) enterprise legalized (run by our own government) who mandated their product for you that you paid for with your taxes. This kind of abuse only happened to a society where indoctrinated minds lost touch with reality, or should I say lost their common sense. Certainly, this new religion of science, will not be sustainable, because it brings a negative sum to society. It's a self-cannibalizing phenomena, the likes of the religion of communism was.
Yes. All that is true, but to start the conversation, I queried Dr Malone.
If the obvious choices are the Amish and Orthodox Jews, what is holding back the "new sheriff in town" from starting this study?
I'd be curious to see his answer as well, but even more interested to ask about why not to do a simple study of overall mortality of mRNA vaccinated population vs. the unvaccinated population during the last four years. First, we just want to know how deadly it was overall, so we can stop injecting people with it.
This is why I am a subscriber. I want to hear well thought out and substantiated truth. Thank you Dr. Malone. Keep up the great work!
Well done, as always. I tell as many as I can to sign up. Hope that helps.