DBC, I would bet that that statement has to do with the constant pressure directed towards Dr. Malone and R. Kennedy concerning an "anti-vax" position. These statements should not be confused with recommending Covid shots. Just my opinion...
"This was documented explicitly in the context of COVID-19: mothers who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection had IgA-dominant antigen-specific antibodies in their breast milk, whereas mothers who received mRNA vaccines produced IgG-dominant responses in their milk.12 Whether breast milk IgG or sIgA provides more meaningful protection for the infant mucosal surface remains an active area of investigation."12
Understood on the nuance of making declarations....
But;
Funeral directors' clot findings with the vaccinated seems significant.
DBC, All of these issues and more can not be addressed in one essay. Dr. Malone has addressed these issues in various ways, numerous times. I believe this current essay has direct relevance to areas of ACIP that are being investigated and the needed data for review.
Me too! That sentence seemed to drop in outta nowhere - It was not supported by the body of the essay! What the heck am I missing? (I have read DD and Doc M's comment ... Ok I get it. Still, it makes me nuts as we're having to play games now? There are commenters here, sharing this with their young daughters! )
Link - Using the references, this PubMed study was likely used to make this Make-My-BP-Rise statement in this essay. This study, of course, INCLUDES covid vaccines! and how about it, it was produced in 2022 - exactly when the Evil Ones were REALLY pushing the jabs on pregnant women. Personal note- MY first gchild was born in 2022. And likely the OB was reading this BS. Note to the "researchers" - this little man got covid a bunch of times, and AS DID HIS MOTHER (jabbed during pregnancy). Also, he was WAY underweight, for many months, yrs, still is ,... failure to thrive anyone? Time for a glass of wine, but it's Ash Wednesday. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382412/#sec0013 To find it - go to pubmed .com, enter C9382412 - you can read the whole study.
Subscribers are so helpful here. Weighing out all that is said to make personal decisions is always best practice. Hopefully, what's already been written, when read carefully, will ease any concerns.
The basic fact that needs to be recognized that is not stated is that when pregnant, all toxic substances that are found in our food, drink and environment must be avoided. In addition all nutritional deficiencies should be identified and reversed. Top of the list are Vitamin D which in it's active form within the body is a hormone and controls the correct expression of around 3000 gene expressions, including the ability for the new mother to be able to deliver rich important breast milk to the new born. Vitamin D deficiency will stop this from happening. Also, magnesium, folate and key minerals are important. Deficiencies should be identified and reversed. The technology for doing this exists. You can't stimulate an immune system to react properly if it is compromised and not whole. If whole, the need for vaccines is greatly diminished.
We tell pregnant women to limit any chance of drugs and medications could have negative effects on baby yet we have this idea that vacs and their trash chemicals and fragment are “ok”? Given how studies in the past by big pharma were configured and included limited pregnant persons and their desire to hide for 75 yrs the covid vac info…I do not believe any of past or even current data. Simply I submit that all vacs should not be administered…too risky to develop nerves and baby in general.
Thank you Dr. Malone for sharing this information! I am very grateful for you really digging into all the medical research for us common citizens. As a I am currently 30 weeks into my pregnancy with my first child.
Thank you Dr. Malone for this information, it is helpful. I did forward this to my Daughter-in-Law, as she & my son are expecting their first child this July, & I felt this would be helpful for them.
Technical sophistication beyond my pay grade. My anecdotal world tells me that injecting pregnant mothers and infants, ( anyone really ), with toxic substances is ill advised unless irrefutable evidence of benefit exists. It is interesting to realize the extent to which we implement prophylactic measures to prevent illness and/or death when both are inevitable.
This highly academic analysis reveals how elementary is our current understanding of the human immune system, and especially how it relates to embryological and fetal development. This utterly complex ancient system is far beyond the capability of rational understanding. Therefore for now, a system that has been perfected by millennia of trial and error evolution, should not be disturbed by well-meaning but yet unknown interference. Also in the article the advantages of breast feeding are properly mentioned with respect to neonatal passive transfer of antibodies, however there is no mention of the important transfer of the maternal microbiome to the fetus during labor and vaginal birth.
Ha. This may explain something I have noticed before,i.e., that infants born here of parents from India seem to have a higher incidence of asthma and I wondered if not due to mom offering an immune repertoire raised against an antigen menu contrary to that the infant encounters here.
This extends to all the people migrating from eastern and western regions to flyover country. Their inability to tolerate our pollen drives some of them back to the cities.
I believe that innumerable, direct injections of semi-purified biological materials are also affecting human responses to their natural environment.
The type and number of jabs needs to be modulated towards addressing highest risk, and individual situations.
Conclusions: "We identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest."
Yes hormones change the immune response. "Modulation", can be accurate and "nuanced". And with its soft "m" it has become a terrific marketing word for selling both pharma products and natural-product supplements. :-D
It became standard of care for women to live on exogenous hormones from the appearance of their first zit, until the tomb. Then, for awhile, there was a respite for the menopausal ladies, but with Makary, that's going to be over.
How do the exogenous hormones affect the response to all of the jabs? I don't think very many people are interested in that.
However, anyone who looked could observe that hormones affected blood coagulation, as does COVID and the mRNA jabs.
As for the pregnant women, of course the COVID and the mRNA jabs impinged upon their already increased propensity for thrombosis.
Little did I know about the neg effects of these hormones, I just never wanted to use birth control hormones or anything besides herbs and homeopathy for menopause and have reservations about even bio-identical hormone use.
While this information is invaluable, especially concerning breast milk and vaginal birth benefits from the strength of extra immune support; there is something to be said about the natural wisdom and intuition available to women carrying those babies. I was young (21) when I had my first baby and mostly let my natural knowing guide me. The only imbalance my son had was too much mucus at birth due to my diet containing too much dairy because I was vegetarian. After I gave birth (I had to reject numerous attempts at pain meds.) I said "I could do that again!" What a Joy.
Today is a CHDtv Must watch - A helpful update on AAP vs HHS in the first segment of Polly's Good Morning Show. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D, CHD's Senior Research Scientist, reports on the GROWING AAP - Pediatrician "schism" concerning vaccines. We all know of this, but he also provides details on the crazy of the studies being used. Big money (for ex., Walmart $$) is pouring into articles, and "studies". Rochelle Walensky's name is mentioned - she's pushing HepB birth dose. Of course, she's now publishing in the AAP's journal.
Thank you for sharing this paper with us. Given it's complexity, one assumes the primary audience is family practitioners, obgyns and pediatricians. It seems to me that it would be valuable information to share with pregnant women, including as a part of informed consent for vaccinations and decisions on whether to breast feed. Of course for patients, it would be simplified.
As an aside, for those plotting fetal development in an artificial womb, the full course of development seems implicated and in need of being addressed.
This well sets out the need for further study and the merits for funding.
When I read, back in the COVID times, that pregnant women were getting the mRNA shots, I was mortified by that! I was always under the belief that pregnant women should avoid ALL medications and injections to prevent dangerous damage to the unborn baby.
I then read about all of the miscarriages, premature births and then the stillborn births described by an OB nurse and was saddened and mortified once again. I delivered my second baby,a stillborn daughter, and to this day remember my profound loss and sadness. I never cry but cried for weeks and weeks after her loss. I can imagine how those mothers and fathers felt at the loss of their highly anticipated birth of their babies only to result in devastating loss and death! Why would the medical establishment want to mess with Mother Nature and expose pregnant mothers and their unborn babies to such an unstudied and unknown “gene vaccine”?
I always felt healthy during my pregnancies. My hair was thicker, my nails grew stronger. I didn’t get sick. I ate healthy foods, drank 4 glasses of milk a day, took no drugs not even Tylenol except one in my last pregnancy. I had my first baby at 20 and my last baby at age 46. During my last pregnancy my Dr told me I needed a flu shot. I told him I had never had a flu shot. I also asked him about the effects on the baby. He said it was “ safe and effective “. I took it. I got some virus which gave me bronchitis. I took an antibiotic or the bronchitis. I became allergic to to the antibiotic and broke out in hives the day before my scheduled c section. My baby was breach with the cord around her neck and chest. I was given an antibiotic before the c section. I developed serum sickness and I am now allergic to most antibiotics. It makes me wonder if it all stems from the flu shot.
"Vaccines during pregnancy remain protective and are recommended"
That claim, is a surprise to me.
The covid shots are DNA altering, right?
The spike protein lingers for a few years... might it not pass through to the fetus?
Robert, please elaborate.
DBC, I would bet that that statement has to do with the constant pressure directed towards Dr. Malone and R. Kennedy concerning an "anti-vax" position. These statements should not be confused with recommending Covid shots. Just my opinion...
Yes, I'd like to have him elaborate.
I cannot discuss what is going on. Embargoed.
Dr. Malone said specifically "... and are recommended" and of course, they are by most of the medical establishment.
He did NOT say "...I recommend them".
good point
Read carefully "Natural Infection vs Vaccination".
D D You reference ( i think);
"This was documented explicitly in the context of COVID-19: mothers who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection had IgA-dominant antigen-specific antibodies in their breast milk, whereas mothers who received mRNA vaccines produced IgG-dominant responses in their milk.12 Whether breast milk IgG or sIgA provides more meaningful protection for the infant mucosal surface remains an active area of investigation."12
Understood on the nuance of making declarations....
But;
Funeral directors' clot findings with the vaccinated seems significant.
Spike protein and fertility....?
long covid, reinfections, transmissions, etc
Heart issues
and
Informed Consent
First do no harm
Looking forward to transparency and resolution.
DBC, All of these issues and more can not be addressed in one essay. Dr. Malone has addressed these issues in various ways, numerous times. I believe this current essay has direct relevance to areas of ACIP that are being investigated and the needed data for review.
I've followed Robert for ~4 years now. He says, embargoed... and I understand clearly.. ACIP areas... ok. Complexity for sure.
Me too! That sentence seemed to drop in outta nowhere - It was not supported by the body of the essay! What the heck am I missing? (I have read DD and Doc M's comment ... Ok I get it. Still, it makes me nuts as we're having to play games now? There are commenters here, sharing this with their young daughters! )
Link - Using the references, this PubMed study was likely used to make this Make-My-BP-Rise statement in this essay. This study, of course, INCLUDES covid vaccines! and how about it, it was produced in 2022 - exactly when the Evil Ones were REALLY pushing the jabs on pregnant women. Personal note- MY first gchild was born in 2022. And likely the OB was reading this BS. Note to the "researchers" - this little man got covid a bunch of times, and AS DID HIS MOTHER (jabbed during pregnancy). Also, he was WAY underweight, for many months, yrs, still is ,... failure to thrive anyone? Time for a glass of wine, but it's Ash Wednesday. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382412/#sec0013 To find it - go to pubmed .com, enter C9382412 - you can read the whole study.
The "conclusion" from your link
"....but during the pandemic, it became more evident, opening precedents to be explored for other incident diseases in childhood."
"evident"
"precedents"
"explored"
Doesn't give me a warm, fuzzy confidence in their conclusion....
Aaargh. You think a beer is ok on Ash Wednesday? I'm thinking yes.
Had a few last night.... halo over my head tonight.
Subscribers are so helpful here. Weighing out all that is said to make personal decisions is always best practice. Hopefully, what's already been written, when read carefully, will ease any concerns.
The basic fact that needs to be recognized that is not stated is that when pregnant, all toxic substances that are found in our food, drink and environment must be avoided. In addition all nutritional deficiencies should be identified and reversed. Top of the list are Vitamin D which in it's active form within the body is a hormone and controls the correct expression of around 3000 gene expressions, including the ability for the new mother to be able to deliver rich important breast milk to the new born. Vitamin D deficiency will stop this from happening. Also, magnesium, folate and key minerals are important. Deficiencies should be identified and reversed. The technology for doing this exists. You can't stimulate an immune system to react properly if it is compromised and not whole. If whole, the need for vaccines is greatly diminished.
We tell pregnant women to limit any chance of drugs and medications could have negative effects on baby yet we have this idea that vacs and their trash chemicals and fragment are “ok”? Given how studies in the past by big pharma were configured and included limited pregnant persons and their desire to hide for 75 yrs the covid vac info…I do not believe any of past or even current data. Simply I submit that all vacs should not be administered…too risky to develop nerves and baby in general.
Thank you Dr. Malone for sharing this information! I am very grateful for you really digging into all the medical research for us common citizens. As a I am currently 30 weeks into my pregnancy with my first child.
Thank you Dr. Malone for this information, it is helpful. I did forward this to my Daughter-in-Law, as she & my son are expecting their first child this July, & I felt this would be helpful for them.
Technical sophistication beyond my pay grade. My anecdotal world tells me that injecting pregnant mothers and infants, ( anyone really ), with toxic substances is ill advised unless irrefutable evidence of benefit exists. It is interesting to realize the extent to which we implement prophylactic measures to prevent illness and/or death when both are inevitable.
This highly academic analysis reveals how elementary is our current understanding of the human immune system, and especially how it relates to embryological and fetal development. This utterly complex ancient system is far beyond the capability of rational understanding. Therefore for now, a system that has been perfected by millennia of trial and error evolution, should not be disturbed by well-meaning but yet unknown interference. Also in the article the advantages of breast feeding are properly mentioned with respect to neonatal passive transfer of antibodies, however there is no mention of the important transfer of the maternal microbiome to the fetus during labor and vaginal birth.
Outstanding review of complex, and some would say, subtle aspects of maternal - infant immune sustem operation. Thanks Dr Malone.
Ha. This may explain something I have noticed before,i.e., that infants born here of parents from India seem to have a higher incidence of asthma and I wondered if not due to mom offering an immune repertoire raised against an antigen menu contrary to that the infant encounters here.
This extends to all the people migrating from eastern and western regions to flyover country. Their inability to tolerate our pollen drives some of them back to the cities.
I believe that innumerable, direct injections of semi-purified biological materials are also affecting human responses to their natural environment.
The type and number of jabs needs to be modulated towards addressing highest risk, and individual situations.
Last night on Brannon Howes Live, three breaking developments that strike at the heart of the modern vaccine and regulatory regime:
"A 2,657% higher death count linked to MMR/MMRV vaccination vs. measles infection since 1995
A natural experiment showing 98% of excess deaths were NOT from COVID
A bill from Rand Paul that could dismantle the 1986 liability shield protecting vaccine manufacturers.
Our new study examined reported deaths in VAERS following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States.
We found:
A serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination.
60.9% of deaths occurred in children under age 2.
Approximately 40% of deaths occurred within one week of injection.
The majority of deaths occurred within two weeks of vaccination, demonstrating strong temporal clustering.
24% of deaths were classified as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).
Frequently reported clinical presentations included cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis."
https://zenodo.org/records/18671462?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Conclusions: "We identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest."
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/major-mmr-death-signal-exposed-covid?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=smi2v&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
This sentence right here is everything!! That it is so!!
"A bill from Rand Paul that could dismantle the 1986 liability shield protecting vaccine manufacturers."
I believe it is the only industry that has a legal shield from the products they provide.
This really cool. Danka!
My daughter just had her second child on Dec31@855 pm.(A tax item win!) Haha
My daughter in law is expecting her first in aprox 23 weeks.
My newest daughter in law,
has had a fertilized egg place in some odd frozen state of residence that I know nothing about
This info will be forwarded in the hope they gain a much higher insight moving forward.
Can you say Diapers? I knew you could......Fred Rogers aka Mr. Rogers
Yes hormones change the immune response. "Modulation", can be accurate and "nuanced". And with its soft "m" it has become a terrific marketing word for selling both pharma products and natural-product supplements. :-D
It became standard of care for women to live on exogenous hormones from the appearance of their first zit, until the tomb. Then, for awhile, there was a respite for the menopausal ladies, but with Makary, that's going to be over.
How do the exogenous hormones affect the response to all of the jabs? I don't think very many people are interested in that.
However, anyone who looked could observe that hormones affected blood coagulation, as does COVID and the mRNA jabs.
As for the pregnant women, of course the COVID and the mRNA jabs impinged upon their already increased propensity for thrombosis.
Little did I know about the neg effects of these hormones, I just never wanted to use birth control hormones or anything besides herbs and homeopathy for menopause and have reservations about even bio-identical hormone use.
I'd bet you saved yourself a lot of side effects. Of added interest is that the hormones do affect the choice of mates.
Very likely going on and off the hormones has drastically affected marriages and even fueled divorces.
There is a trend to get everyone on exogenous hormones again. Progesterone for all. And testosterone. I'm not going along with this fad.
Good food and using individualized herb selection are a milder and sane way to go.
While this information is invaluable, especially concerning breast milk and vaginal birth benefits from the strength of extra immune support; there is something to be said about the natural wisdom and intuition available to women carrying those babies. I was young (21) when I had my first baby and mostly let my natural knowing guide me. The only imbalance my son had was too much mucus at birth due to my diet containing too much dairy because I was vegetarian. After I gave birth (I had to reject numerous attempts at pain meds.) I said "I could do that again!" What a Joy.
Today is a CHDtv Must watch - A helpful update on AAP vs HHS in the first segment of Polly's Good Morning Show. Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D, CHD's Senior Research Scientist, reports on the GROWING AAP - Pediatrician "schism" concerning vaccines. We all know of this, but he also provides details on the crazy of the studies being used. Big money (for ex., Walmart $$) is pouring into articles, and "studies". Rochelle Walensky's name is mentioned - she's pushing HepB birth dose. Of course, she's now publishing in the AAP's journal.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/growing-schism-between-pediatricians-and-aap--the-peoples-study--murdered-by-the-state/
Thank you for sharing this paper with us. Given it's complexity, one assumes the primary audience is family practitioners, obgyns and pediatricians. It seems to me that it would be valuable information to share with pregnant women, including as a part of informed consent for vaccinations and decisions on whether to breast feed. Of course for patients, it would be simplified.
As an aside, for those plotting fetal development in an artificial womb, the full course of development seems implicated and in need of being addressed.
This well sets out the need for further study and the merits for funding.
When I read, back in the COVID times, that pregnant women were getting the mRNA shots, I was mortified by that! I was always under the belief that pregnant women should avoid ALL medications and injections to prevent dangerous damage to the unborn baby.
I then read about all of the miscarriages, premature births and then the stillborn births described by an OB nurse and was saddened and mortified once again. I delivered my second baby,a stillborn daughter, and to this day remember my profound loss and sadness. I never cry but cried for weeks and weeks after her loss. I can imagine how those mothers and fathers felt at the loss of their highly anticipated birth of their babies only to result in devastating loss and death! Why would the medical establishment want to mess with Mother Nature and expose pregnant mothers and their unborn babies to such an unstudied and unknown “gene vaccine”?
It’s beyond my comprehension.
I always felt healthy during my pregnancies. My hair was thicker, my nails grew stronger. I didn’t get sick. I ate healthy foods, drank 4 glasses of milk a day, took no drugs not even Tylenol except one in my last pregnancy. I had my first baby at 20 and my last baby at age 46. During my last pregnancy my Dr told me I needed a flu shot. I told him I had never had a flu shot. I also asked him about the effects on the baby. He said it was “ safe and effective “. I took it. I got some virus which gave me bronchitis. I took an antibiotic or the bronchitis. I became allergic to to the antibiotic and broke out in hives the day before my scheduled c section. My baby was breach with the cord around her neck and chest. I was given an antibiotic before the c section. I developed serum sickness and I am now allergic to most antibiotics. It makes me wonder if it all stems from the flu shot.