If Pfizer is "delisting" itself it means they know that shareholders are coming after them. So delist yourself, go private and eliminate the shareholders. Simple.
Who would have thought that maybe we should use an inexpensive drug with a long history of lack of toxicity (ivermectin) rather than an expensive drug with no safety record that sometimes has the side effect of renal failure (remdesivir) against a virus whose infectious disease state (COVID-19) most affects people with renal disease.
Oh, and late at the hospitalization stage, instead of when an antiviral works best.
Sigh.
Yeah, don't wait around too long for that apology.
The press jackals who all beat on the same drum are as responsible as the CDC, NIH, the governors and the hospitals who fired doctors and threatened others.
Enjoy your comments; however, we DO look at the personal lives of those disseminating information⦠habits of dishonesty and compromise have a way of changing brain chemistry and informing all our decisions.
from The Real A.F. by R.F. Kennedy starting on page 63 there is an entire chapter dedicated to Remdesivir. It starts with " Anthony Fauci needed to use all his moxie and all his esoteric bureaucratic maneuvers - mastered during his half-century at NIH - to win FDA's approval for his vanity drug, remdesivir. Remdesivir has no clinical efficacy against Covid, according to every legitimate study. Worse, it is deadly poisonous, and expensive a $3000 for treatment."
How many died needlessly because doctors were prevented from using these therapeutics? I was able to find a telehealth practitioner who prescribed Ivermectin and called it in to a compounding pharmacy. This has been a travesty and people must be held accountable.
I sourced an abundant quantity of IVM, from a guy in a motor home, parked in the desert, hiding behind a saguaro cactus . . . . . a very large saguaro. ;-)
Iβd be happy if he would just THINK before speaking. He lacks discipline and self control. Heβs a condescending jerk. I canceled my paid subscription, that was it for me.
One out of every 4,515 adolescents with myocarditis-related hospitalizations after the second dose sure sounds like a lot to me. Thatβs not exactly what I would call a rare adverse reaction.
I'm sorry, but everything related to the lab-made creation of the Covid-19 virus and its vaccines and the suppression of cheap/accessible medications to cure the virus has been psychopathic and homicidal. Why aren't any of these people who are responsible being brought up on charges? Or has the world become that unjust?
Funny thing, I'm not a doctor and I've been favoring IVM since it first came out that it was helping and opposing the jab from the beginning (and I'm not anti vax, I'm just anti this vax). I know a lot of people don't "get it" but if I, just an avid researcher very involved in my personal health care and interested in medical stuff, can deduce these things then that makes the C19 frauds look way worse. Way worse.
Looking at the SEC stuff was interesting when I drilled down through several. Will be curious to see if this turns out to be anything of interest.
Yesterday I heard a radio news spot that claimed people who have had Covid may have neurological issues, impaired cognition and may even have early-onset dementia or some such nonsense. I thought, how useful for them! Now that everyone who has been jabbed has also had Omicron, they can blame Omicron rather than the vaccine AND keep everyone perpetually terrified. π
One of the things I learned is how funding plays a role in which drug gets trialed. If it's under patent and promises Pharma rich rewards, funding a study is easy. If it is a generic reuse, money has to be scraped together from docs and others and the study may never happen.
A footnote to that is studies of HCQ funded by Gates, among others, using 2400mg daily, no zinc and no lung targeting antibiotics, "proving" that HCQ does not work. 6 times the dose of most drugs will end badly and HCQ has a known OD toxicity. Now THAT is obscene.
And other enlightening news this afternoon on FLCCCβS substack exposes how an important early positive ivermectin study that had its conclusions changed that stymied the effective drug's approved use was done by someone with pharma ties to an ivermectin competitor...
Gigi read this. What Fauci did 40 years ago with his AIDS drug AZT (that, too, was killing people) is EXACTLY what he's done with Covid and Remdesivir, what my niece an RN and her cohorts call Rundeathisnear. Exactly. Every step, every word. It's like deja vu
We have GOT to hold them all accountable now or they will continue (and it can't wait until Republicans take back majority....January 2023 is way too long!!).
If you read that long article on what happened with AZT and Fauci et al and how many years it took for the truth to come out - and see Fauci is still head of all.... well, sadly, it doesn't leave much room for hope. Has our govt been THAT corrupt for that long? About 6 years ago I wouldn't have believed it, but now I absolutely do.
The SEC filing is just cancellation of one particular Pfizer debt security which matured this year. The company and its stock seem essentially unaffected.
I recall early on here in Canada our Federal Health Minister Teresa Tam, also a voting member in the WHO and sock puppet for the CCP advised us that the only treatment for COVID in Canada was Remdesivir but it was around 3400.00 per treatment and was also in short supply. At that time the only test data available said it reduced hospital stay times by 15% no mention of the renal failure side effects. I guess in retrospect we were lucky it was in short supply, many lives saved perhaps.
ABC News in the last few days put out a hit piece on IVM I saw on Y-T repeating the same lies about a huge uptick in calls to poison centers for overdoses/adverse reactions to taking IVM (a year-old, debunked story). They had a video clip of some doctor saying there are no studies/trials showing any benefit of preventing/treating CV-19 WITH IVM. I just don't understand why news organizations value their credibility so lightly - it's all they have to sell.
I totally agree on news organizations' foolish credibility risk.
I am a retired manufacturing business executive who has a strong-willed (that's usually a plus) doctor daughter. We have agreed to disagree on IVM's effectiveness after she discounted the research I did to conclude that IVM could be used as a prophylactic and to early treat CV-19. She kept citing CDC and FDA in trying to debunk my claims, and I kept telling her I had 30+ years of experience dealing with Federal agencies (not health related) and knew we were being lied to.
I found a doctor in our area who would prescribe IVM, and I convinced my wife, son, and my two younger brothers to see this doctor as well. A week or so after seeing the doctor both of my brothers came down with CV-19 (late 2021 - Omicron variety was my guess). Both brothers recovered within two days. My son came down with a mild case and recovered in a day after starting the early treatment protocol. My wife stayed on IVM for six months, and I think she came down with CV-19 some 3-4 months after stopping IVM. I put her on the early treatment protocol and she got better in a week or so. My daughter and her family came down with mild cases of it even though they were fully vaxed and boostered, but she continues tacitly to disparage my efforts at self-protection.
I believe that the doctors are so busy treating their patients, they do not take the time to research CV-19 treatments as thoroughly as I have, instead relying on the CDC and FDA for treatment advice on an illness they are not really familiar with. I also believe they see the hospitals and medical review boards sanctioning doctors who "step out of line" and fear for their financial security.
That's what I saw and thought but I'm not expert. Looked like a lot of people in Pfizer were cashing in too but then they do that for paying taxes too and it is tax season....
The truth is coming out and we ππππ hold them accountable!
If Pfizer is "delisting" itself it means they know that shareholders are coming after them. So delist yourself, go private and eliminate the shareholders. Simple.
Its part of going private...but of course that assumes all classes of shares will be delisted.
... and they have a counter-offer: WW3 - beat that!
I sure hope we, as a United people, can!
Damn. Need to start using Burtβs Bees on lips. But substituting Advil will be tough. Helps my back pain.
Motrin for advil.
Who would have thought that maybe we should use an inexpensive drug with a long history of lack of toxicity (ivermectin) rather than an expensive drug with no safety record that sometimes has the side effect of renal failure (remdesivir) against a virus whose infectious disease state (COVID-19) most affects people with renal disease.
Oh, and late at the hospitalization stage, instead of when an antiviral works best.
Sigh.
Yeah, don't wait around too long for that apology.
The press jackals who all beat on the same drum are as responsible as the CDC, NIH, the governors and the hospitals who fired doctors and threatened others.
We simply will not be able to hold them accountable without the media acknowledging the truth.
Shove this up Berensons ass.
I cancelled my paid sub of Berenson and got an annual sub here!
Something fishy about that guy.
I plan to....
Love It. His BS on Ivermectin was the last straw.... I canceled.
You beat me to it ;)
Lmao. I ripped him @ Malone and then ivermectin. Then I left. Someone will pass this on I'm sure. Ugly jew. Lol. Pretty standard quite frankly.
Enjoy your comments; however, we DO look at the personal lives of those disseminating information⦠habits of dishonesty and compromise have a way of changing brain chemistry and informing all our decisions.
from The Real A.F. by R.F. Kennedy starting on page 63 there is an entire chapter dedicated to Remdesivir. It starts with " Anthony Fauci needed to use all his moxie and all his esoteric bureaucratic maneuvers - mastered during his half-century at NIH - to win FDA's approval for his vanity drug, remdesivir. Remdesivir has no clinical efficacy against Covid, according to every legitimate study. Worse, it is deadly poisonous, and expensive a $3000 for treatment."
Excellent !
How many died needlessly because doctors were prevented from using these therapeutics? I was able to find a telehealth practitioner who prescribed Ivermectin and called it in to a compounding pharmacy. This has been a travesty and people must be held accountable.
Simply scan the Total Death count. That's how many.
These psychopathic genocidal criminals KNEW HCQ to be effective against COVID from 2004-2005 Corona virus.
Very early on, many physicians had traction and proven for early outpatient treatment protocols using a host of "re-purposed" off patent drugs.
Just about every single death was preventable.
Iβm surprised more folks didnβt start making their own IVM in trailers like in βBreaking Badβ. I hear it is an easy formula to duplicate.
I sourced an abundant quantity of IVM, from a guy in a motor home, parked in the desert, hiding behind a saguaro cactus . . . . . a very large saguaro. ;-)
Well at least maybe now Berenson will shut his trap.
Don't count on it.
Iβd be happy if he would just THINK before speaking. He lacks discipline and self control. Heβs a condescending jerk. I canceled my paid subscription, that was it for me.
One out of every 4,515 adolescents with myocarditis-related hospitalizations after the second dose sure sounds like a lot to me. Thatβs not exactly what I would call a rare adverse reaction.
I'm sorry, but everything related to the lab-made creation of the Covid-19 virus and its vaccines and the suppression of cheap/accessible medications to cure the virus has been psychopathic and homicidal. Why aren't any of these people who are responsible being brought up on charges? Or has the world become that unjust?
Read the link I posted earlier on AZT and sins of omission. That was Fauci - and he's still head off all....
He is a vile little man
Two tiered justice, you don't know that by now?
Edward Dowd explained it like what happened with the Big Short
Funny thing, I'm not a doctor and I've been favoring IVM since it first came out that it was helping and opposing the jab from the beginning (and I'm not anti vax, I'm just anti this vax). I know a lot of people don't "get it" but if I, just an avid researcher very involved in my personal health care and interested in medical stuff, can deduce these things then that makes the C19 frauds look way worse. Way worse.
Looking at the SEC stuff was interesting when I drilled down through several. Will be curious to see if this turns out to be anything of interest.
I wonder what Edward Dowd take on this.
Yesterday I heard a radio news spot that claimed people who have had Covid may have neurological issues, impaired cognition and may even have early-onset dementia or some such nonsense. I thought, how useful for them! Now that everyone who has been jabbed has also had Omicron, they can blame Omicron rather than the vaccine AND keep everyone perpetually terrified. π
One of the things I learned is how funding plays a role in which drug gets trialed. If it's under patent and promises Pharma rich rewards, funding a study is easy. If it is a generic reuse, money has to be scraped together from docs and others and the study may never happen.
A footnote to that is studies of HCQ funded by Gates, among others, using 2400mg daily, no zinc and no lung targeting antibiotics, "proving" that HCQ does not work. 6 times the dose of most drugs will end badly and HCQ has a known OD toxicity. Now THAT is obscene.
And other enlightening news this afternoon on FLCCCβS substack exposes how an important early positive ivermectin study that had its conclusions changed that stymied the effective drug's approved use was done by someone with pharma ties to an ivermectin competitor...
https://flccc.substack.com/p/who-changed-the-scientific-conclusions?r=12wo6r&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Gigi read this. What Fauci did 40 years ago with his AIDS drug AZT (that, too, was killing people) is EXACTLY what he's done with Covid and Remdesivir, what my niece an RN and her cohorts call Rundeathisnear. Exactly. Every step, every word. It's like deja vu
https://www.spin.com/2015/10/aids-and-the-azt-scandal-spin-1989-feature-sins-of-omission
We have GOT to hold them all accountable now or they will continue (and it can't wait until Republicans take back majority....January 2023 is way too long!!).
If you read that long article on what happened with AZT and Fauci et al and how many years it took for the truth to come out - and see Fauci is still head of all.... well, sadly, it doesn't leave much room for hope. Has our govt been THAT corrupt for that long? About 6 years ago I wouldn't have believed it, but now I absolutely do.
The SEC filing is just cancellation of one particular Pfizer debt security which matured this year. The company and its stock seem essentially unaffected.
I recall early on here in Canada our Federal Health Minister Teresa Tam, also a voting member in the WHO and sock puppet for the CCP advised us that the only treatment for COVID in Canada was Remdesivir but it was around 3400.00 per treatment and was also in short supply. At that time the only test data available said it reduced hospital stay times by 15% no mention of the renal failure side effects. I guess in retrospect we were lucky it was in short supply, many lives saved perhaps.
ABC News in the last few days put out a hit piece on IVM I saw on Y-T repeating the same lies about a huge uptick in calls to poison centers for overdoses/adverse reactions to taking IVM (a year-old, debunked story). They had a video clip of some doctor saying there are no studies/trials showing any benefit of preventing/treating CV-19 WITH IVM. I just don't understand why news organizations value their credibility so lightly - it's all they have to sell.
I totally agree on news organizations' foolish credibility risk.
I am a retired manufacturing business executive who has a strong-willed (that's usually a plus) doctor daughter. We have agreed to disagree on IVM's effectiveness after she discounted the research I did to conclude that IVM could be used as a prophylactic and to early treat CV-19. She kept citing CDC and FDA in trying to debunk my claims, and I kept telling her I had 30+ years of experience dealing with Federal agencies (not health related) and knew we were being lied to.
I found a doctor in our area who would prescribe IVM, and I convinced my wife, son, and my two younger brothers to see this doctor as well. A week or so after seeing the doctor both of my brothers came down with CV-19 (late 2021 - Omicron variety was my guess). Both brothers recovered within two days. My son came down with a mild case and recovered in a day after starting the early treatment protocol. My wife stayed on IVM for six months, and I think she came down with CV-19 some 3-4 months after stopping IVM. I put her on the early treatment protocol and she got better in a week or so. My daughter and her family came down with mild cases of it even though they were fully vaxed and boostered, but she continues tacitly to disparage my efforts at self-protection.
I believe that the doctors are so busy treating their patients, they do not take the time to research CV-19 treatments as thoroughly as I have, instead relying on the CDC and FDA for treatment advice on an illness they are not really familiar with. I also believe they see the hospitals and medical review boards sanctioning doctors who "step out of line" and fear for their financial security.
It looks like Pfizer is just de-listing their 0.250% note due 2022 listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol PFE22 due to:
[ X ] 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(a)(2) That the entire class of this security was redeemed or paid at maturity or retirement on March 07, 2022.
Reference: https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000078003/04b4e12c-c1e2-42cc-b15d-4b4d47ed9b47.pdf
That's what I saw and thought but I'm not expert. Looked like a lot of people in Pfizer were cashing in too but then they do that for paying taxes too and it is tax season....