367 Comments
User's avatar
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

For years, Dr. Willie Soon and his colleagues at Ceres have fought against the windmills to prove the climate nuts wrong. He has got a few really good presentations on their website. One is a film from several tens of scientists (real ones) who have been treated like dung by the TMs. They lost jobs, were considered crazy... I hope they find relief that the scam is finally coming to an end.

Expand full comment
Danielle pentecost's avatar

The chem trails in the sky will be exposed too. Evil people spraying chemicals into our atmosphere to make us sick & big Pharma rich. 🤑 they will answer to God for your evil.

Expand full comment
HillsideFarmer's avatar

Today Is a bright, sunny day here in Maine. Under (what used to be) ordinary circumstances, the sky would be deep, pretty blue - but I'm looking at milky, smeary chemtrail residue. Thinking about breathing in aluminum and other metallic substances. Thinking about the gardens I'll plant in a couple months, knowing they will be less beautiful and less productive than they would be if the soil weren't contaminated by the chemtrails.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Yesterday, I was reading the comments on a Peggy Hall "Healthy American" video. The comments were from all over the continental U.S. They all talked about the chemtrails that they were seeing nearly everyday - from Florida to California, & everywhere in-between. This needs to be exposed & stopped. With the rising incidence of Alzheimers & Parkinson's disease, it would not surprise me that there is a connection. And, as you mentioned, what they are spraying in our skies, will ultimately fall to the earth, contaminating everything.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Aluminum does cause Dementia/Alzheimer's.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Yes, it does. I recommend the book, "Crooked: Man-Made Disease Explained, by Forrest Maready.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Well, here in central Minnesota the sky is nice and blue and not milky, cirrus clouds with no chemtrails or contrails or any trails.

I DO understand that there are planes that "make" chemtrails but believe the following at this point in time:

-- Most of the bad nano-sized and toxic contaminants are not likely anymore, to any WIDE extent, being dumped on us; It could be that those dropping this crapp are starting to be aware the jig is up.

-- most of the chemtrails that ARE visible are likely to be cloud seeding for rain effects vs purposeful toxic spewing to purposefully harm Americans

-- any contrail that disappears soon after the plane passes is a simple CONtrail with only water vapor in it; this could even be true of many that retain their visibility. How? Because, it could very well be that particular atmosphere conditions of humidity and temperature keep any plane's contrail visible longer.

-- a CHEMtrail IS likely really occurring if you see the typical smearing and dissipation over wide areas and visibility for over an hour after; another obvious marker is criss-cross and serpentine patterns. THAT is just too obvious.

When I use such specifications it is hard to "see" a lot of this happening any more.

Expand full comment
David Emery's avatar

Come to Florida and watch as these SOB's block out the sun. Huge fiftty mile long trails are laid in an X pattern for maximum coverage.

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

Mesa Az southern skies near sunset almost daily.

Same upsetting views.

Too many planes.

Not enough sky for it all to dissipate rapidly downward.

Expand full comment
Reuven Yatrofsky's avatar

Yup, same in Arizona where we just watched them cover the entire sky, creating flash winter storms coming from the south??? with fog, multiple accidents on their toxic surfactant filled snow that creates bubbles when it melts. Followed by odd whiplash warmth coming from the northwest??? Meanwhile Alaska had unseasonably warm weather and the gulf coast had unexpected snow. All this followed by unseasonable tornadoes and fires? Nothing to see here… move along … AI’s got you covered!!!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Don't get me wrong; I believe it is still happening. . . just not yesterday.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/

If you are seeing it a lot, it may be useful to do some tracking and see if you can find correlations. . .

Expand full comment
Vanessa's avatar

Was in Cocoa Beach last year and took pictures of all the trails.

Expand full comment
Mtone's avatar

Do all your planes fly the same route, even though they begin and end in different places?

Expand full comment
Reuven Yatrofsky's avatar

No, they have different patterns depending on what they intend to create

Expand full comment
David Emery's avatar

The aircraft crisscross the sky often making an X pattern. This I believe is to cover a wider area as the aerosols unfurl in opposite directions.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Don't get me wrong; I believe it is still happening. . . just not yesterday.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/

If you are seeing it a lot, it may be useful to do some tracking and see if you can find correlations. . .

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Unfortunately, the vast majority of those commenting about the chemtrails were seeing the criss-crossing, wavy, & serpentine lines. There were a few pictures where you could easily see the patterns. These were not contrails, by any stretch of the imagination. There needs to be an investigation.

Expand full comment
GK's avatar

They criss-cross because planes are flying in all directions across the sky. There are an enormous number of civilian airliners in the sky at all times. They all produce contrails when conditions are right.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

What people are reporting is not consistent with contrails. I've seen the pictures & would agree with their assessment. Some of the chemtrails are actually wavy. I have seen them in our area too, but not as often. I live in a flight path area, with planes flying overhead all day long, so am familiar with contrails. At this point, I believe that an investigation is warranted.

Expand full comment
Reuven Yatrofsky's avatar

Sure… then they turn into clouds and cover what used to be the blue skies of Arizona most of the time…

Trust AI… Big Brother is not only watching but he’s there to take good care of you.

Rest peacefully and breathe deep the gathering gloom!

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

They're still CHEMtrailing here. Maybe not quite as much, but it's not Spring planting time yet.

Expand full comment
GK's avatar

Airplanes have been "pulling contrails" since the jet engine was invented. Yes that's a chemical you see spread out all over the sky. It's called water vapor.

Expand full comment
David Emery's avatar

BULLSHIT!!! The trails are over fifty miles long. The unfurn into a mist that leaves the sun in a fog. Of note, USAF aircraft are equipped with engines that do NOT leave contrails. Wake up dude they are spraying us regardless of your personal beliefs.

Expand full comment
C FEDOR's avatar

You don't know what is going on do you.

Expand full comment
Mtone's avatar

WWII high altitude 4 engine bombers created contrails before the advent of the jet engine.

Expand full comment
Reuven Yatrofsky's avatar

Nice try… see “The Dimming “ for free on geoengineering.org

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

For years I woke early morning 3:00 to 3:30 depending on natural sleep cycles I suppose, bathroom, then sit close to large Livingroom window and start my prayer and meditations. Usually in late spring till late summer I most often found Orion star pattern and watch him slowly move across part of the sky while meditating until dawn.

Last summer not a single early morning showed stars. I assumed we only having a long period of hazy clouds and that it will pass. By mid-summer I started to wonder if chem-trails, days often were sunny but the night starless.

Remember train fire in Palestine OH that poisoned all the farmland, people, animals, water? Some living there were likely people that moved to get away from the insanity and poisons in cities and near them, and that happens as if planned as part of destruction of local farming food access, and of course the heavy-metal toxic poisons sprayed over them and us all.

To think our mothers did not want use to eat lead-paint, now she would have to say "stop breathing were Government is poisoning us!"

They hate us and want us and loved ones all suffering ever worse until they kill us. Why else such Satanic insanity?

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

after making this post a few weeks ago(before seeing yours, here) I was doing some search and came upon an odd reference to how Bill Gates is profiting from all this. I will try to be concise here.

The concept he has is to sell software that enables guiding jets towards certain paths that optimally create more cloud cover. Through forensic cloud, temperature, and dew point sensing of a region it is apparently possible to PREDICT cloud cover and mitigate or create it. Cirrus clouds are created by jet passing (contrails, not chemtrails) optimally with a range of best dew point and Temp. (ever wondered why a jet contrail is huge in one area and zero in others as it passes over?) Software, then, proposes new flight paths to pass through this area at NIGHT as opposed to DAY, redirection. Why Night? because it is less easily observed by terrestrial watchers(us). Planes re-directed to cause more cirrus clouds.

SO, not chemtrails, but contrails intentionally created by commercial jets. WHY? Government wants more cloud cover and will pay for Gate's software. Gates wins.

Confused? me too. More clouds mean higher temps overall, more global warming . . . so WHY would they do this? Got me.

Expand full comment
Alan Fogle's avatar

And less nutritious which in the long run effects your health/

Expand full comment
Marta Nelson's avatar

Central Cali is daily covered in toxic chemicals via air dispersion from contracted airplanes and their pilots. What used to be a decent wage from spraying pesticides over farmland (still outrageously toxic), some have replaced with a more lucrative gig, laying (at a much higher altitude) toxins which include Aluminum oxide (nano and micro forms), Barium and strontium salts, Titanium dioxide, Cadmium and selenium, Silicon-based fibers (possibly polymer or nanotech), as well as countless other ingredients.

Expand full comment
Vanessa's avatar

Yep here too in central Texas milky white "clear skies" and winds off the chain caused by pressure differentials in the upper atmosphere.

Expand full comment
Reuven Yatrofsky's avatar

Thank you for sharing reality vs AI generated propaganda

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 22
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Irene Williams's avatar

Only an idiot disputes the evidence. Only the indoctrinated refuse to acknowledge they've been scammed.

Expand full comment
Ken Oz's avatar

Your “sound and fury signifies nothing”. And your comment reinforces the opposing view. Try presenting reputable data if you expect any respect.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 22
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Danielle pentecost's avatar

Elon did not do the study. Dr Malone had it in his substack. I did thorough research of reputable scientific not Bill Gates or Al Gore, reputable scientists & they all claimed climate change was a hoax. When Amsterdam is killing cows to save the earth, there’s definitely something way wrong as you need carbon to sustain life. Having zero carbon would kill the planet. All these windmills are killing a lot of whale’s & dolphins.

Expand full comment
Steven Work's avatar

First reason to suspect fraud - international propaganda media saturation, mind-raping younger students, peer pressure of new Religious Cult with punishment to question, clearly corporate and investor re-positioned to profit, powerful liars controlling research funding, carbon-tax exchanges created, .., population control and making us all poorer and remove more of our liberties, ...

Any suggestion that I as retired career scientific researcher that have so many peer-review publications, know good data and analysis, and looked into what actual science exits for 'climate Change' and found too much fraud, and a few decent trust worthy climate researchers that report no significant changes outside of normal bounds, all quietly work-on and rarely try to counter what the mind-raped and abusive public believes .. remember those in real power that hate us and even though they want us all reality-warped and destroying our neighbors gas vehicle, panic driven by their false data and 'science' but behind it all those in real power still need the true reality, while warping ours.

So, a few climate scientists are still funded despite they refuse to lie for them to get it. One lab has Satellite microware temperature measuring system data from 1970s covering entire world and no significant change once the 11-year solar cycle in factored in. No flashing unicycling kitten juggling clown-scientist say it, no autistic HS student suggesting we true believers of climate change and child sexual mutilations believers start stomping on gonads of deniers, no long lines of skin-worm, rat-smell, child bogger-size studying researchers - so perhaps you missed it.

.. any suggestion of deviation from 'holy narrative' gets attacked by the religious cult because they clearly know more because morning talk show guests say it is real, and some HS spectrum student did also. "How dare you!" Can't you see it changing?! Everyday even.

Expand full comment
Vasile's avatar

Jew troll alert. Vilifying Carbon - the very foundation of life. It is the globalist cabal, the jews, and their neocons who are evil in fact, and enemies of humankind.

Expand full comment
Travis Ogle's avatar

Amen

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

I have known this forever. The whole climate change is nothing but a money grab from Uncle Sam and any other government official willing to pay There is nothing they will not lie about to raid the public treasury and the politicians have used it to gain political power too.

Expand full comment
Steven Boyd's avatar

"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full. "

John 10:10

Expand full comment
Travis Ogle's avatar

Amen

Expand full comment
Mathew Sydney Herndon's avatar

Amen 🙏🏼

Expand full comment
Alan Fogle's avatar

It is also a huge power grab.

Expand full comment
Robert Wistedt's avatar

SAME PEOPLE WHO MURDERED "JFK" ARE BEHIND THIS

YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN !

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 23
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Ken Klassy's avatar

Nick stick up your pie hole. A real cunt name calls when faced with scientific facts but resorts to name calling. Pound sand with your face little man

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

They steal from the rest of the worlds governments to fund their lies. the Germans are the worse of the bunch given their past history of excellence in the engineering arts.

Expand full comment
George O'Har's avatar

It doesn't matter. Global warming, or whatever they are calling it now, is a religion. We are not dealing with rational people. All the evidence in the world won't change their minds. Have you ever tried to talk to them? The scam, bar none the greatest fraud in scientific history, will not come to an end until all the people who ardently believe in it are dead and gone. And that is many years away.

Expand full comment
Christine Summerson's avatar

For a thoroughgoing deconstruction of climate-change alarmism, you might be interested in this Substack in The Menelaus Gambit https://ernestdlieberman.substack.com/p/climate-change-alarmists-ignore-how

Expand full comment
IMustQuestion's avatar

I expect that we'll start seeing Soros-funded attacks on AI-centers soon. Can't have any challenges to the climate orthodoxy!

Expand full comment
Katherine Kromer's avatar

I wouldn't doubt that. They will probable start calling anyone who is anti-climate, an anti-$emitic!

Expand full comment
DAVID STEELE's avatar

To much Fluoride in the drinking water, maybe?

Expand full comment
Brien's avatar

The Europeans have already changed horses. They still give lip service to the Green Energy revolution, but it is DOA in 2025. They were counting on it to drive economic growth throughout Europe for decades to come. No more. What, might you ask, has replaced it? The answer: Re-militarization and the creation of Europes own Military-Industrial complex. The Whoops and War cries are like watching Humpty Dumpty dancing on the top of the wall.

Expand full comment
JS Powell's avatar

Funded with ‘unused’ savings. I wonder how they will eventually define, unused.

Expand full comment
Blake Smedley's avatar

Finally!!! 🙌🏼 this has been decades over due!

Expand full comment
Dwight Hogg's avatar

Not in the Net Zero world of Mark Carney. If he becomes the “elected” leader Alberta will not put up with his destructive policies. I can see Alberta voting to separate. Then Saskatchewan.

Expand full comment
Blake Smedley's avatar

No doubt they will fight hard against it! This subject matter has been glorified to religious status in the cult of scientism, so this pill will not be easily swallowed. In time, as knowledge continues to squeeze out of the grip of global censorship, the people will come to realize the truth can be found by following any of the 3 golden roads that always lead to their junction in the corruption capital that is Rome. i.e. data, money and power.

It is very easy to disprove though, since their underlying thesis is most prominently contradicted by industrial agriculture practices. Should they be earnest about their claims, they would have been promoting the transition to decentralized small to midsized regenerative organic permaculture & agriculture practices from the start. That alone is evidence enough of it being a farce, let alone all this overwhelming evidence in this paper. As a fellow holistic scientist, I am very pleased to see common sense returning to science! 🫶🏼

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

or, just vote to join Alberta as the 51st state, the heck with Saskatchewan and the rest. . . You guys have all the good farm and hunting land anyway!

Expand full comment
Baltimoracle's avatar

... AND all the boreal forest oil sands

Expand full comment
reality speaks's avatar

Come join us in the United States

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

I still can't believe you didn't get rid of Trudeau sooner.

Expand full comment
Dwight Hogg's avatar

I can’t believe it either….he lost the popular vote to the Conservatives in the last two elections but was

Expand full comment
Victorine Warner's avatar

Coalition with the ndp. Unholy alliance. And now jagmeet is going to lose his seat and maybe the entire party. And he could have been leader of the opposition. He's shown himself to be a very poor political strategist. And now he's being shown the door. 👋 Good ridance

Expand full comment
Big E's avatar

Why do we need “artificial” intelligence to irrefutably “prove” what our own intelligence — native born within our own brains — figured out years ago? Shall we simply leave our own human brains at the door and let the AIs do all the thinking for us? Grrrrrr!

Expand full comment
BayouKiki's avatar

I’m scared to death of AI but one thing it seems to do well is synthesize massive amounts of information in a short period of time. What scares me, though, is that some human can tip that scale somewhere and then all hades can break loose

Expand full comment
Garry Weil's avatar

Dr Malone, I agree in principle but AI is only as good as their training sources. You could have a situation where others could use another AI and get different results. In fact, some organizations could create their own LLM to get different results to support their vested interests based on how the AI is trained. You're on the right track, but a little more thought might be able to account for the issue I raised.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

I completely agree. Which is why standards need to be written ASAP.

And yes, they will be corrupted.

Expand full comment
MrsMc's avatar

"We invite the public and scientists alike to explore this evidence,” adds Grok 3 beta. “Let’s question what we’ve assumed and dig into what the data really say.”

Maybe I am naive but at least Grok 3 encourages questioning the assumptions, and discourse, something that has not been allowed with "climate writers"

Expand full comment
FlyoverCountry's avatar

It's still GIGO, caveat emptor. Original raw data so important, but serious gamers can corrupt that, too. Low tech reigns in the end.

Expand full comment
Joelle's avatar

This time, Grok 3, did not have Garbage put in but real solid facts. One can tell they are solid facts by looking at the authors. Legates and The Soons are well known REAL scientists who have been persecuted by the UN via the IPPC for some 15-20 years.

Expand full comment
BL Collins's avatar

When you keep asking AI to dig deep and look for the answer, on two occasions, it did. It gave me the correct answer to climate change. I was shocked that it knew!

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

yup, like a "yellow" standard, at least.

Expand full comment
John Siegrist's avatar

Is this finally enough evidence to stop weather modification? Like solar radiation shading (I.e. geoengineering spraying toxic nanoparticle heavy metals in our atmosphere?). I can’t get anyone in our government to address this. At yhus point, I’d take one politician to tell me it’s a conspiracy theory.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

The short answer is no. Climate change modification isoften being done for big Ag. To control when crops get water, or don't get water. It is also being used to mitigate drought conditions at a regional level.

In my opinion - Those regional issues - governments will still wish to control...

Expand full comment
John Siegrist's avatar

Thank you for the response. Is solar radiation shielding a part of controlling weather for rain to support agriculture, in your opinion? I’ve read many times aluminum is actually toxic to everything living and spoils our soil for growing crops. In fact, it’s been reported that aluminum is in the food chain now. (I have no receipts of authority that I can provide). What can you, as research scientist which I respect greatly, weigh in on those concerns? Thank you Dr. Malone.

BTW, I followed you throughout the COVID years and did not get the jab due in no small part to the information you shared. Thank you for that!

Expand full comment
Blake Smedley's avatar

Watch the documentaries, “what in the world are they spraying” and “why in the world are they spraying” on YouTube or elsewhere and much of your questions here will be answered.

They document how geoengineering aka chemtrails have evolved from their simple cloud seeding origins for military warfare purposes, to self admittedly putting metal dust into the skies to “reflect back the sun to combat global warming” and aluminum is among the many metals in the mix. These metals fall to earth, making the soil more basic by more than 1 ph unit, which kills 90% of the soil critters, fungi and bacteria, and then the plants and trees begin to die because that’s how they get all their nutrients.

And then, to bring it full circle, you find out Monsanto has patents for GMO’d aluminum resistant seeds, so their crops will still grow, and they don’t need the immune system of the soil that plants rely on anyway since they artificially supplement with petroleum based fertilizers anyway and make themselves some more money. All of it is one very well thought out decades long business plan of how to make as much money as possible and continue the shift of power from the many, to the few.

But always remember, “it’s nothing personal, just business.” So dont take it personally, just get down to business and join the peaceful resistance by getting a piece of land you can take care of and start a regenerative homestead you can self sustain and run a business from! 🙃✌🏼 haha

Expand full comment
John Siegrist's avatar

Yes, I agree completely. It is hard to get anyone in government to address this issue. And I’ve tried local government in Ohio, and our federal government under the current administration. Mr. Malone suggested a regional local government might be close to climate engineering via big ag. I have a response back from the Ohio agriculture department that they do not participate in such activities ( I have that receipt now ). They referred me to Ohio State university for questions about hybrid crop development. So, this is a data point that indicates a federal government leading the effort. Plus the fact Tennessee banned the spraying, with 5 or so other states, to no avail. I’ve not been impacted by TDA or MS-13 gang members yet, but my family feels harmed everyday by the heavy aerial spraying. We grow and preserve lots of our own food. We buy beef from local ranchers. I also feel the world cabal and big ag does not want that kind of self reliance. So again to your point, I agree fully. Thanks for your response.

Expand full comment
Blake Smedley's avatar

https://substack.com/@mitchsantell1/note/c-103986392?r=1eqilu&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Thought you would find this interesting if you hadn’t seen it already. Surprised to see him distinguishing between geoengineering and solar radiation management, and calling for more research and discussion on it. The lady in the background and her reactionary faces are hilarious too.

Expand full comment
John Siegrist's avatar

Thanks Blake. Very interesting. I think any weather modification is suspect. But solar radiation shielding is harmful to everything living. I still can’t determine what government agency is responsible.

Expand full comment
Alan Fogle's avatar

For me Climate change has been over, actually never started. It has been a bunch of lies from the start. And I do not believe the powers that be will stop pushing climate change. They have much power and control riding on keeping it going.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

And $$$$$$.

Expand full comment
Paul Fischer's avatar

Debunked? We dismantled the original report back in 1990—it was riddled with mathematical and scientific errors from start to finish. We even found mathematical expressions that divided by zero. The computer models were no better, featuring absurd parameters like negative cloud cover and water that would not freeze. It was junk science through and through.

Expand full comment
53rd Chapter's avatar

Rush Limbaugh was the lone, courageous voice against this scheme for decades. I thought he was wrong. Shame on me.

Expand full comment
KaiteeO's avatar

I remember listening to him talk about it from early on. It was to be used to gain riches for the elites and drive the average joe into poverty…oh, wait…

Expand full comment
Kathleen Vee's avatar

This is great news! Hope to see it all over main stream media soon (highly doubtful). And when will we see a similar Grok report that the Covid jabs were all a big scam too? It would find so many resources to pull from especially this new study:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/

Expand full comment
John Reynolds's avatar

While this article downplays human driven CO2 as the cause of climate change, it does not address the issue of CO2 being essential to all life on planet Earth. CO2 is not bad and we actually need more of it to provide more plant growth to produce more food to feed humanity.

Expand full comment
Seismic7's avatar

Bingo!

Expand full comment
Amy's avatar

I am happy to see this. I have a question, though. One of the reasons we are in this mess is that the IPCC used bad computer models to promote a false climate crisis. Why we would trust AI to confirm this. It is all provable without AI.

Expand full comment
Barbara Byrd's avatar

Wonderful, conscise report with scientific backing debunking what we already knew was a farce. It is nice to know we have a current administration that will make natural resources the priority... Again!

Expand full comment
California Girl's avatar

I have been appalled by the climate change story, and long to see it shot down in flames. Interesting that AI may be the death of climate change. I distrust AI, and realize I cannot pick and choose what to believe. It would be unfortunate if the climate change naysayers would be dismissed and/or forgotten simply bcause AI is more sexy.

Expand full comment
Rul's avatar

Science is the opposite to consensus. Professional scientific researchers need to discuss theories. Those who censor the possibility to watch said discussions are criminals and enemies of knowledge and humanity.

Expand full comment