105 Comments
User's avatar
Matthew Koch's avatar

You mean that vaccines are really about money…

I’m so freaking shocked…

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Fauci knew how to grow NAIAD to a 6 billion dollar bureaucracy and dole out money to the Universities that agreed with his views on research goals and expand the biolabs to

create GOF's and search for antidotes like mRNA injections for profit. That's why the Universities are suing HHS and why mRNA are still being pushed. Since PERK is controlling until 2029 thanks to the Biden administration, the push to inject humans will continue. Humans are now lab rats. Bioethics rings hollow! Same in hospitals where the goal is to protect the hospital from lawsuits. My view.

Expand full comment
Bianca Kennedy's avatar

Make Execution Great Again!

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

Are executions covered under pardons?

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Loop hole?

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

Here I go again, Bianca. "Does killing a murderer, thus causing another murder, compensate in the consciousness of the soul? I think not." This was an answer to a question about capital punishment, Emmauel's Book/ Pat Rodegast 1985.

Expand full comment
Bianca Kennedy's avatar

It's not about compensating in the consciousness of the soul. If so, I might agree with you. It is about removing mass-murdering predators from civilized society, so no one else is harmed or killed by said predator. This in turn, in some cases, provides a secondary benefit, in creating a deterrence for some would-be criminals.

In any case, I do appreciate your respectfully asked question.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Deterrence would be more effective if they were not as likely to die of old age on death row before being executed. And for many, the method of execution is the final end many would ultimately inflict on themselves. The rope was more effective.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Nope, statistically it has been shown not to deter criminals. (Perhaps because the criminals don't plan on being captured.)

Expand full comment
Bianca Kennedy's avatar

Which is why I wrote the word "some" - an accurate statement.

Expand full comment
Karen Bracken's avatar

I go with God's book....an eye for an eye

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

Mathew 5:38-42 Romans 12:17-21 You might want to study a little deeper about the meaning and the evolution that Jesus and Paul took this phrase to, a higher level of reinterpretation.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

What a way to create a financial windfall. If you can perfect a safe and effective vaccine for a virus that doesn’t exist. Now that’s a scam Bill Gates and the Fauci’s could really get behind!!!

Expand full comment
LB (Little Birdie)'s avatar

I'm going to have to come back to read this. I can't even stand to look at his face! And reading more on her is adding to that creepy, queezy, sick feeling I get.

Expand full comment
John Guy's avatar

The Zika virus has been around for more than 70 years, and it was originally harvested, isolated and turned into a research product by none other than the Rockefeller Foundation.

Name of Depositor

J. Casals, Rockefeller Foundation

Source

Blood from experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey, Uganda, 1947

Year of Origin

1947

References

Dick GW, Kitchen SF, and Haddow AJ. Zika Virus. I. Isolations and Serological Specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46: 509-520, 1952. PubMed: 12995440

Zhu Z, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of pre-epidemic and epidemic Zika virus strains for virological factors potentially associated with the rapidly expanding epidemic. Emerge Microbes Infect 5: e22, 2016.

You can buy the Zika virus from, ATCC: ATCC is the premier global biological materials resource.

******************

The evidence linking Zika to microcephaly is circumstantial. The real reason may be a case of mercury or another toxin poisoning. Most of Brazil’s microcephaly cases are in the northeast. Brazilian love eating fish and gold mining, and off shore drilling. Check your water systems, rivers and food supplies.

The media and WHO threw up their hands and are yelling, danger, danger, "Mosquito." Correlation and using adjectives are not a causation. The good researchers said their study, published in the Journal Cell Stem Cell, that their tests did not prove directly that Zika causes microcephaly. The news folks are not reporting the facts correctly.

It’s a global scandal. Brazil has created a worldwide panic,” said Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Sao Paulo, one of the most-respected universities in Latin America. “I’m not saying that Zika is not causing microcephaly, but I am saying that the ministry has yet to present any scientifically credible evidence to support that conclusion

Why haven’t they also shown up in proportional numbers in other countries hit hard by Zika, such as Colombia? How many normal babies also have the Zika virus? It was found in 1947, may have been here for a 100 years or more, no one knows.

See: The National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science website.

Knowledge about the extreme vulnerability of the fetus to methylmercury began with the Minamata Bay, Japan experience. Eating the fish, pregnant mothers did not only burden themselves, but methylmercury was transferred in utero to the fetus. This caused severe neurological complex symptoms and severe birth defects. While the mothers were usually without symptoms of mercury poisoning, their babies were born severely damaged with microcephaly, cerebral palsy, severe mental retardation.

See news reports: November 22, 2015

A wave of toxic mud travelling down the Rio Doce river in Brazil from a collapsed mining dam has reached the Atlantic Ocean, amid concerns it will cause severe pollution.

The contaminated mud, tested by the water management authorities, was found to contain toxic substances like mercury, arsenic, chromium and manganese

What is not being reported by the media, is how South Amerikan doctors blame patient harm on the prolific herbicide, fungicide and pesticide spraying being done in their countries (especially in Brazil). These doctors point to these Monsanto chemicals as being the cause of fetal abnormalities.

See: The National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science website.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096006/

See: news about collapsed mining dam.

See: Brazil dam toxic mud reaches Atlantic via Rio Doce estuary

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-34892237

.

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

That was good reporting analysis, John. It just blows my mind that so many fallacies are missed, skipped or paid off at the expense of the poor, woman and children, and the money from these "projects" just keeps flowing. This is at the core of our demise as humans; lack of ethics. Lying as a child, a little shoplifting, a little vandalism, and the stage is set.

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

You got it right! Too bad they are brain dead in DC!

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Also, the Rio area pipes their sewage directly into the ocean close to shore.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

the fact that a wife has to control the work of her husband already should be a no-no. That both are in their eighties now, another no-no. And if you combine their wages, paid for by us, the taxpayers. that is NO-NO. Offering her a job in Alaska is outrageous. I am sure lots of Alaskans would rather have that job! Force these people to stop working - and stop their privileges. They have been privileged all of their sorry lives.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

They couldn't fire her directly - so they had to reassign her. Which they did - to Alaska. Where she would have to move to, at that point, she chose to resign.

Frankly, I thought it was a brilliant move by the HHS office to get rid of her without a lawsuit.

Expand full comment
Matthew Koch's avatar

You could drive off any employee if you push the right buttons.

Expand full comment
Dianne Stoess's avatar

I agree. Love it!

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Absolutely! They are "public servants", after all!

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

They couldn't fire her directly - so they had to reassign her. Which they did - to Alaska. Where she would have to move to, at that point, she chose to resign.

Frankly, I thought it was a brilliant move by the HHS office to get rid of her without a lawsuit.

Expand full comment
Dianne Stoess's avatar

Presidents' wives do it all the time. Jill took over meetings after Biden's mental facilities declined to the point he could no longer function. It's no secret that Hillary had control of Bill Clinton. Many other presidents' wives "ran" them and thus the country.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

true, but that is different IMO. They do not get paid for the job. I know Mrs. Reagan did the same, and I remember Eleonor Roosevelts saying, behind a strong man stands a strong woman.

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

I looked up Grady and she was said to be born in 1951/52, don't know why the imprecise dates. In any case, I thought she was surely more or less the same age as Fauci, but she's not, she just looks kinds of old for her age. She's 73 or 74. So she could keep going if she chooses to.

Expand full comment
Beau's avatar
Apr 12Edited

Within an hour of the 'Zika outbreak' around Oct/Nov 2015(?), I found a lab where a qualified person could buy a Zika virus sample for $500, listing a profile that characterized it as relatively benign and non-threatening.

A little more sleuthing revealed that women in the area had been mandated to receive a vaccine in the 1st quarter of that year - the cases of microcephaly began showing up among newborn children of said women in the 4th quarter of that year - do the math.

Creative psychopathy at its finest!!

Expand full comment
Swabbie Robbie's avatar

How come is it that Bill Gates name appears in all these outrageous "vax development looking for a disease" scams?

Expand full comment
Marago's avatar

Swabie—It must be because Gates is trying to line his pockets to the hilt.

IMHO he doesn’t look very healthy in the present day.

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

He's addicted to power, he just can't help himself.

Expand full comment
Meemanator's avatar

I like to think of it as a little god complex. Seems to be epidemic in the elite's world.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

$$$

Expand full comment
Melanie Reynolds's avatar

Money is the name of the con game. It is all about the money and power. Thank you for this info!

Expand full comment
Marlene Mc's avatar

Shameful! And no wonder she does not answer to Mrs. Fauci. There must be no conscience in both of them to be able to sit back and enjoy their mountains of money at the expense of millions of people globally. No wonder he wanted Secret Service protection.

Expand full comment
Mary Matthews's avatar

And with all their money they can pay for their own protection!!

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Why would we expect anything different from a man who funded cruel "research" on defenseless beagles in multiple locations, by trapping their heads in devices with sand flies who proceeded to gorge themselves on their muzzles. There isn't a word in the English language that even comes close to my level of absolute disgust in regard to this so-called "doctor". Not to mention what he did to AIDS patients in the 1980s, by disparaging the drug Bactrim, which would have effectively treated their pneumocystis carinii, & instead pushing the failed cancer drug AZT on them, which only further sickened them & hastened their demise.

Expand full comment
VictorDianne Watson's avatar

Fauci needs to be held accountable for all the harm he’s done.

Expand full comment
Meemanator's avatar

Just because there is a hot place in hell waiting for him doesn't mean he shouldn't experience the hell of losing everything he has so maliciously gained while still here.

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

Prosecute him!!

Expand full comment
Philip Coles's avatar

The observation that vaccines are doing more harm than good, if any good at all, is more than a hundred years old and physicians throughout the history of vaccines, have noted spikes in other health problems like cancer and weakened immune systems, as the result of mass vaccines for whatever plague “THEY” are saving us from then and now. Vaccines do not kill or deactivate anything, they are designed to help our immune system prepare for whatever pathogen(s) they are injecting. This model is gone and now altering genetic code is the new Trojan trick. They will apologize eventually saying they were trying to do their best, trying to help save us. We need to be smarter and that starts with mistrust of the medical profession and bureaucracy that argues for “vaccine hesitancy being a bad thing”.

Expand full comment
LibertyAffair's avatar

Thank you for this Dr. Malone.

As a society we are in deep trouble if our government/s are unable to protect us from slick cheating, lying and grifting players like Gates, Fauci and his wife. Brazil figured it out which can only mean that too many in government are complicit... part of the grift... even worse.

Expand full comment
David Merrill's avatar

Can't wait for the Sunday Funnies!!

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Have long carried big time distrust of so- called bioethicists. Remember one and bet Dr. M. does too who had a big time bias against gene therapy and made a ruling involving a U of Penn proposal that virtually denied performing any experimental protocol on infants. P.U. then demonstrated a poor ethical lapse by performing the protocol designed for terminally ill infants on a healthy teenager who died as a result. Seem to recall that same ethicist made some other outlandish calls all involving or skirting gene therapy

Expand full comment