122 Comments
User's avatar
Elaine H's avatar

Boy that song took me back to my childhood. Good one Doctor M! So disappointing that these groups can’t funnel their energies into doing good for this nation instead of being bleeding hearts for illegals.

Expand full comment
Sherri's avatar

Thanks for your post.

Lol, I'll have to relistRELISTEN to it because I'm thinking - what song?😆😆 and yes even I can laugh at myself, which is a gift.

It's a brain fog day, so the animals will get more attention, I will get more rest and maybe even crochet ❤️

Expand full comment
Sherri's avatar

Never mind, I found it. When I doubt scroll down, after the fourth review of the article❤️

Expand full comment
Jennifer Beebe's avatar

Tragic really!

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Isn’t ACL funded by US Government? Cut the funding! The financial community sees President Trumps policies as positives for the growth of our economy. Class actions takes time to move through the courts! Desperation on the part of the naysayers!

Expand full comment
Greg Spung's avatar

Interestingly, the DNC was suddenly broke after their USAID / Grant money laundering schemes were cut off…. 🤷‍♂️

I knew it didn’t make sense when many on the left claimed the $1BN Harris campaign was primarily funded by small individual donations averaging $50. It doesn’t take a mathematician to tabulate that as fiction.

Expand full comment
Charlotte's avatar

Exactly, we were funding lawfare through our taxes. Who is going to fund this legal octopus now? I fully believe Stephen Miller and Russ Vught will stop any taxpayer money going there again.

Expand full comment
News Do's avatar

Those lawsuits take a long time to pass thru the courts, and that same long time keeps the members of the classes—Tren de Aragua, MS-13, and loads of other far-from-innocents in the US sponging off Sanctuary States’ and Cities’ nationally funded, billion dollar handouts.

Expand full comment
Greg Spung's avatar

We allowed the system to rot for decades under a facade of representative government.

It will take time, patience, and perseverance to restore or rebuild it.

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

The hapless John Roberts famously claimed "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts said in a statement. "What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

Oh yeah? If that were so, how is it that we can predict with uncanny accuracy what the Court's Three Witches will decide as they chant over their bubbling cauldron? Especially the DEI hire Katangi and the unwise Latina.....

Expand full comment
LEA7's avatar

These legal gymnastics only hurt the citizens of America. Dare I mention that doctors are not trusted as they once were, and now lawyers; so grand…

Expand full comment
Jean's avatar

Just as one person with a lifetime awareness of lawyers, I don't recall any point where they were generally well thought of or unquestionably trusted.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Their role of lawyers historically is to protect the have of the haves from the have-nots

Expand full comment
LEA7's avatar

We agree. I should have said Justices. I recall respecting them ‘back in the day’.

Expand full comment
An Ol' LSO's avatar

Unfortunately, trust in government, media, judiciary, law, medical (especially) have all gone the way of the Dodo bird. Us peons/minions in America are waking up to the corruption of those with any power. It is money and power then power and money. There is no focus on "making America great again". Hard to swallow.......sometimes reality really sucks!

Expand full comment
Barbara Lee's avatar

I have the fix : let politicians and bureaucrats propose spending but ONLY citizen taxpayers should approve funding. Every bill. Every day. Every year! With Doge reporting on efficiency and effectiveness, I think we can stop this fraud, waste and graft ourselves, one citizen at a time!

Expand full comment
Eugene H's avatar

Lawyers are you kidding?

Expand full comment
LEA7's avatar

Lol! I meant write Justices. Lawyers have never “been my favorite”.

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Any way you slice it, the lawyers seem to win.

That needs to change.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

They have virtually taken justice out of the courtroom and replaced it with the rules for the games they have invented to play at in the courts.

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

It's a rigged system when all the judges come from the ranks of scumbag lawyers.

All the law teachers come from the same source.

It only takes one less than honest law school teacher to begin a cascading effect that results in what we have now.

Ethics class in law school???

What an oxymoron.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

They also teach logic, another oxymoron in relation to today's courtroom. In the good old days law was learned by o.j.t.. Studied under a mentor who was a working stiff not an academic

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

What also needs to change is giving any power to the leftist "American" Bar Association - which represents only 14% of all attorneys.

Expand full comment
Dianne Stoess's avatar

Everything the deep state does is to wreak havoc and make money while they're doing it. Lawyers are making TONs of money today!

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

An adjunct to lawfare is the addition of"conspiracy" to the list of attack words. Now, anytime some one or some group rises up to object to unwanted excessive interference by gov, pharma or whatever the C word comes out to whitewash the perceived problem.

Expand full comment
Science is Political 2.0's avatar

I have to go.. here. :) good discussion

Expand full comment
PGrabow's avatar

Unfortunately I think that you are correct. However, yesterday's decision was muscular and from six justices in chorus who see through the left's tactics. And KJB was speaking alone.

Expand full comment
James Lord's avatar

I don't see Bondi-Patel-Bongino acting at a pace commensurate with the threats facing the republic. The clock is ticking. One might argue (as Bongino and Patel told Maria Bartiromo) that we're still only months into the new administration. Ok. But I've noted a series of announcements from them that something really big is about to happen/to be revealed, complete with timetable and a request that we be patient just a little longer, with no follow-through on commitment.

I see and have been seeing billionaire internationalists fomenting a toxic, unconstitutional revolution in life as we have known it, while the three branches of government watch passively. How hard can it be to tie communist lawfare to the money? Are there standing orders not to step on toes?

Great new interview between Tucker and Marjorie Taylor Greene. The Left, our limited timeframe, and the Republicans' camouflaged contempt for Trump are discussed. She is the best.

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-marjorie-taylor-greene

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Saw recent report that millionaires now considered middle class. What doe that say about the fed printing presses?

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

But despite the rise in house prices, mortgage interest deductions are still limited to a home price not exceeding $1 million. Which used to be a mansion but now is a modest 1960s raised ranch in many communities.

Expand full comment
James Lord's avatar

I think the hemorrhaging of wealth has been willfully induced.

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

I disagree. Worse would be for them to go off half cocked, without evidence or a strategy and then predictably go down in flames.

Expand full comment
James Lord's avatar

But as I noted, when you announce a timetable for specific actions, you need to follow through. Otherwise credibility is lost, and for good reason.

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

I agree with that, too.

Expand full comment
Brandy's avatar

Yes, I have yet to see that interview, but it's on my list. I just watched TCN with Liz Collins. That was also good

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

Was that case A.A.R.P. As in the American Association of Retired Persons? The Association who supposedly champions looking out for those who get Social Security? If that is them anyone who has paid them membership dues should immediately stop. I’m aware they are all about left wing politics but they now are involved in something they shouldn’t be. Using money to bring a lawsuit over citizenship that has not one damn thing to do with being retired and social security. In fact I’d argue they have now misrepresented themselves and should be open to a lawsuit just by being involved in this case. If it isn’t them then no reason to follow my logic here. Comey-Barret slammed her junior member over her singular dissent which shows this DEI hire isn’t qualified to sit on this high court. Her ideals and opinions are how these activist judges now rule which has nothing to do with upholding the constitution and case law. It’s all about doing everything they can to stop Trump from implementing his agenda. If they are going to now bring the same cases as class action suits the Supreme Court will go and narrow down ever further these federal judges. The left just can’t stop and TDS is going to hurt them even more. He knows they would do this which is only going to give us even more of our country back.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

"The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) is not involved in suing the Trump administration over illegal immigrants. The confusion appears to stem from the use of the pseudonym "A.A.R.P." for a Venezuelan plaintiff in a prominent immigration lawsuit, A.A.R.P. v. Trump (later known as W.M.M. v. Trump), not from the organization itself being a party to the case."

Expand full comment
Sherri's avatar

Thank you for sharing, and unfortunately you are absolutely correct and this also goes for our American Red Cross, our American Cancer Society the Alzheimer's Society and etc. People must understand that if they contributed and believed in these agencies they did it innocently. Transparency these days is showing that they are captured agencies And there are other front line agencies now in DOCTORS that can help them with Safer, less expensive and more accessible sources. The reason they don't know about all of these sources is because they work and are the biggest threat to the monopolized corruption that is captured our whole world for hundreds of years. I truly wish, but this wasn't or isn't true because nobody wants to be betrayed by those which we have been trained to trust, by those that were supposed to protect us were actually doing the opposite knowingly for their own gain regardless of the cost on humanity❤️

Always praying for transparency so we can see both sides of all stories so we can make healthier choices for ourselves and our loved ones as well as our planet

❤️🙏❤️

Thank you for sharing again, I've always wanted to share this but I just can't find the words these days ❤️

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Charity is big business here and has been for many moons.

Expand full comment
Sherri's avatar

You mean camouflaged charity. And of course we need to add in all of the foundations with a really big names. Robin Williams had it right in his movie where he said politicians should have jumpsuits like the race car drivers with their sponsors on them. Thank you for sharing, it's nice to know we're not alone And are thinking or should I say in the resources that we follow that prove this And having the courage to continue to read/listen to the transparency and share it when opportunities arise❤️

❤️🙏❤️

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Once worked as a tech for major cancer treatment center and was sent to man a booth for a natl. cancer symposium. Listening to the professionals there talk about the various charities they worked for made it pretty clear this was big business. Suspect same true for all of them.

Expand full comment
Sherri's avatar

Yes, this is so insane and totally disgraceful. When all of these well-meaning people have been victimized again and betrayed by those that they thought were helping them and their loved ones.

Unfortunately this is also true of our whole medical model, educational system, media, government and policy agencies (usually all instigated by upper management and get the kickbacks )

I knew the agencies that you talk about were corrupt, but not this corrupt Where they would knowingly withhold treatments for cancer, diabetes Alzheimer's, autism, diabetes, heart conditions and etc. knowingly and even sabotage those treatments, propagandize, gaslight, kill and destroy the livelihoods of those that have the answers or go against their narrative to continue their monopoly on it.

They've gotten away with it for hundreds of years, and I pray this new administration can finally make a difference in all areas and change history forever.

I have so much gratitude to all of the front line doctors researchers and humanitarians that are trying to help humanity and expose this Worldwide monopoly and insane way of thinking that is torturing our children, humanity and our planet knowingly because they can and the past few years it's become blatantly obvious what they are doing and they're so confident that they just don't care again because they believe they are still in control.

. Thank you for sharing, and it's really hard sometimes to share these days because the victims that were talking about, don't wanna hear it.

I honor that, and just say a lot of silent prayers because if they do hear it,

they realize they've been victimized again and that is maybe too much trauma that can put them over the edge🥲🥲🥲🥲

Be well, and truly thank you for sharing it's nice to know we're not alone in what we know, as it gives us strength to journey on and do the best that we can to help in whatever capacity we can do for humanity in our planet ❤️

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Worms are turning. Just have to hope they do not end up as fish bait

Expand full comment
53rd Chapter's avatar

James, when one thinks of the legal profession in generational terms, we are definitely in trouble. What law school today could be considered conservative? What gibberish these people have been taught when exiting the likes of Harvard and Yale.

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

There are still “Red” states left where lawyers reside and become DA’s and the such. I know it’s not much but at least a little hope as the left has infiltrated every bastion of higher learning and is doing its best to grab the high schools plus grammar schools. The fact that you seriously couldn’t pull your own children out of classes that force fed education you don’t believe in is crazy. Regardless of religious beliefs. These are OUR children and these educators think they have a right to indoctrinate them. I’m thankful my kids are through Al that but it wasn’t without facing it myself too. My daughter went to a school outside Boston and had that gender studies crap forced onto her and they succeeded for awhile but since she has gotten a little older and into the workforce more she is coming around again to how she was raised but there was a time that I couldn’t talk to her without an argument and it was just stupidity over things she was taught there to feel strongly about. I have to believe though I’m a lucky one as most of these kids don’t come back.

Expand full comment
53rd Chapter's avatar

Agree, but the newly minted crop, unless they just held their nose and put up with it because they already had a firm foundation, will be even worse indoctrinees than their predecessors.

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

They started this indoctrinating decades ago. I can see the lineage clearly now. It started with Earth Day. I was a kid and we would have to do projects and learn about how oil and plastics were poisoning our air and water. Teachers would put on PBS documentaries and it would last at least a week with the Friday of that week spent cleaning some local park the we would get “rewarded” with pizza or sandwiches and a can of soda. Of course making sure all the trash went into the correct bins afterwards. That was damn near 50 years ago for me now. They just changed the subject material as the years went on. The teachers union should be broken up as it’s way too liberal and pushing this crap has become just beyond dangerous.

Expand full comment
53rd Chapter's avatar

My mother was a teacher for a time after graduating college in three years. When the teachers' union movement started, she would exclaim, "But what about the children?" Prescient then, and even more so today. The unanswered question.

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

It’s a damned shame. I’m a retire union carpenter and they always pushed the democrat candidate. I have a fondness for the unions for what they did for me but their political views have been misguided for decades now.

Expand full comment
ComeQuicklyLord's avatar

Psalm 36:1-4 tells us why the battle is not over—it’s talking about the heart of the ungodly.

“The words of his mouth are wickedness and deceit;

He has ceased to be wise and to do good. HE PLANS WICKEDNESS UPON HIS BED.

He sets himself on a path that is not good; He does not despise evil.”

They literally stay up at night planning how to remain in their lawless state—the Left, etc., Hate America and they Hate God—hate in the sense that they stand diametrically opposed to Him and His righteous standard. They probably hate God emotionally too—it shows as they speak about Trump and those wanting Law and Order in America.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

Bongino would always say things haven’t got bad enough yet. Many people don’t remember Rudy Giuliani in his first bid to be mayor of New York lost. As bad as things were in 1994, I guess, they weren’t bad enough. Things continued to deteriorate and in 1997 he won overwhelmingly in his race over Democrat David Dinkins.

The fear I have in these blue cities populations have so changed the people don’t understand America and American values and could these cities be lost for decades or longer where it won’t matter how bad it gets?

These grand divisions in our country, independence verses dependence, freedom verses the state, are illuminated by the remarks of Justice Brown and Justice Barrett’s written remarks. These district court judges were never supposed to have the power to halt the work of a dually elected president from using his constitution powers, but yet we have a large percentage of judges, elected officials and citizens who don’t really care.

A federal district court judge in Boston had put an injunction on Trump stopping him from deporting groups of illegal aliens. Even after the Supreme Court ruling Judge Talwani said if Trump continues his deportations he would begin to issue arrest warrants for Trump officials. So this is where we are. God only knows where this will end. The divisions are so great in this country, I sometimes feel if the communists want to run their cities into anarchy let them, and freedom loving people want to live without fear of being mugged, robbed, beaton in the streets, we will run our cities. I can’t help but think ultimately these divisions brought on by our own government will split this country into pieces. I wonder sometimes why should my values stop people in New York City from destroying themselves.

My sister hates Trump, and the last few elections she has not voted for a president. I asked her yesterday why should you have to live under a president you hate with a passion? Just a question that runs through my mind. She said that’s democracy, but this judicial tyranny is not.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

The big cities are depositories for foreign residents, both legal and not, who immediately reestablish their native culture in situ and pretty well ignore ours. There are remedies.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

There are I’m just not sure if, honestly, the republicans have the stones to do what needs to be done. The evidence is piled, stacked, high to prosecute all of these horrible crimes, but yet nothing, not one high profile traitor, thief, child molester, inside traitor, etc. has even had a hint of being prosecuted. But yet a grandmother gets 14 years for walking into the capital taking a picture and immediately leaves when asked. Without prosecutions and jail sentences, including for these judges, this will go on until it completely falls apart. The right is too weak, at least up until now.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

For one thing James, we have way too damn many laws which allows lawyers to play silly games in the courts. How many ways can you be dead, yet there are like a dozen different charges that can be brought against a murderer. And that is but one example out of a gazillion. We desperately need to clean out the legal closet.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

I 1000% agree with you. These sanctuary states are creating sanctuary for much more than illegal aliens, even ones convicted of murder rape and children molesters. They are harboring treasonous/communist governors mayors judges state reps state senators and on. I love Trump and all he’s done and trying to do, BUT, he has to push Bondi, Patel and Bongino to start arresting these obvious crimes. Watergate today would be a hysterical joke of a crime. We have mass murderers (crimes committed against humanity), lists of child molesters ignored, open treason against our Constitution, and not 1 prosecution, not one arrest??? We keep putting republicans in power to fix this and it never gets fixed. AE, who was that brilliant man that said something about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result?

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

The guy who helped build the a:bomb. Suspect there is a double entendre there somewhere

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

AE (Albert Einstein)

Expand full comment
Sonia Nordenson's avatar

James, the American decline didn't start a few months ago, and it's going to take more than a few months to drain the swamp. It IS happening all the time, though—mainly behind the scenes under legal military aegis. The times truly are changing.

Expand full comment
Barbara Lekowicz's avatar

Excellent posting Dr Malone and the song brought such a smile to my face!

I was pleased to see someone finally call out one of the DEI Justices, and to have it be ACB was perfect!

Expand full comment
Tom Daniel's avatar

Great news that SCOTUS Justice - Amy Coney Barrett - is again thinking constitutionally rather than her former bias against DT - who nominated her to the Bench. Barrett intellectually deconstructed Ketanji Brown Jackson ( who doesn't know what a "woman" is)- and her idiotic view of the Constitution in NO uncertain terms.

Lets hope Barrett continues to lambast the three Marxist "justices" - especially Sotomayor who it appears has never even READ the U.S. Constitution she "swears to uphold." Ditto Jackson & Kagan.

Another good sign that the Democrat cat is now out of the COMMUNIST bag is that more people are actually starting to call (AMERICAN) Socialists and Communists ( SAME DAME THING) SOCIALISTS and COMMUNISTS - Including President Trump - which is exactly what they are!

The "end-game" of socialism & communism is now and always has been absolute "PARTY" control of the "means of production" (a term coined by KARL MARX) - meaning (globally) - ALL LAND and water; ALL of humanity; and MONEY in whatever form: precious metal, paper money or DIGITAL, to be "administered" by ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT via the United Nations.

The hell of it is, there are millions of AMERICA Communists & Socialists who will VOTE for their OWN SLAVERY!

The less than DISMAL history of ALL communist and socialist utopias on planet earth is completely IGNORED by 21st century imbeciles posing as "intellectuals."

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

Good to see your back Tom! We missed you.

Expand full comment
Tom Daniel's avatar

You being "we" meaning one, James...Lol!

Expand full comment
Science is Political 2.0's avatar

I will also restack that and consider actually posting your analysis on X or LinkedIn. Bob, that is one of the most articulate and well written analysis of the recent Scotus rulings i have read. I would like to add like you so brilliantly noted and other people have also "mentioned" this will lead to a spate of 'CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS" lead the by left wing ACLU or other groups with their usual ax to grind. I don't want to under estimate the power of the the CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS but it is my OPINION that Class Action Law Suits are both a way to basically SCAM the UNITED STATES and any or all of its so called BENEFICIARIES and is a way (all the attorneys will hate me for this) is a HIGH LEVEL FORM OF WELFARE for the OVER ABUNDANCE of ATTORNEYS, para-legals we have in this country. Yes, there are good attorneys (I have rarely met one) like there are good doctors.. (I have met more good doctors) but I have actually been involved w/ many lawsuits including a large class action law suit (which was minor in my life but I did understand what went on and collected pittance of money but I joined because of the principle as well the experience).

I also agree w/ your thoughts on Amy Coney Barrett scathing commentary... very interesting. You are so right about it ain't over until its over. The LEFT WING LAWFARE "AGENCY" formerly known as the DNC will stop at nothing. For some reason it is the SCOTUS's rulings which the LEFT DNC find especially appalling to them and it is my opinion that the LEFT WING DNC is of the opinion that the WEAK LINK in the Checks and Balances system of the three Branchs of Govt is the JUDICIARY BRANCH. I won't back that up now but let's face it.. the direct "PROTESTS" at the homes of the JUDGEs, the threats.. etc.. and to a certain extent they are right because the back when Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett were being confirmed it was absolutely outrageous.. as bad as the HIGH TECH LYNCHING uttered by Clarence Thomas.. for which he will never be forgiven.

There are Federal laws about this which need to be applied if this happens again and under this administration (TRUMP) those so called protestors should be prosecuted.

I WOULD SAY MORE.. BUT ENOUGH SAID.. YOU SAID IT ALL SO WELL... THANK YOU.. take care..

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

"Sounds like civil war is breaking out among the ranks of the Supremes…"

Stop, in the name of Love...Think it over.

Expand full comment
pmj216565's avatar

As Andrew Jackson said, "The Court has made their decision, now let them enforce it". If the Communists in the legal profession insist on continuing the lawfare, they will force Congress to eliminate inferior courts, which they have the absolute right to do under Article I of the Constitution. Congress may also impeach judges for "bad behavior". They do not have the higher bar of "high crimes and misdemeanors. They have absolutely no power of enforcement, and without the Executive giving the DOJ and Federal Marshals enforcement capabilities, they are howling at the moon, which most of them do anyway in their off time. If they proceed with this will be ignored, and rightfully so.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Been saying same for yrs. Have never understood why states have not told interfering out of state judges to take long walks off short piers.

Expand full comment
53rd Chapter's avatar

Someone would call OSHA...

Expand full comment