180 Comments

I suggest we dismantle all letter words, starting with UN, WHO and CIA and FBI. And then all the rest.

Expand full comment

As long as the enemies of America control the msm, the premeditated "illusion" of hate speech will always be a weapon used to divide America. I believe "hate" is a verb, not a noun.

Expand full comment
Jun 24·edited Jun 24

It is really an one sided affair.

The far left has no limit to obvious hate speech. Some clips on THE VOICE and late night entertain with Hate.

Not my venue. Nor any MSM.

Hate is a verb. The violence is dreadful in our cities. That is hate.

Not our interest to join the overreach of Globalism.

Expand full comment

Agreed. There are many spokes in the "manufactured" wheel of destruction. I continue to question why so many so-called informed people participate in the destruction of their own country. How much to sell your soul?

Whatever these traitors think they have to gain will be short lived and quickly disappear "if" their team wins or loses.

Hate and fear are their weapons of choice. Again, history repeats itself.

Expand full comment

The more we study the more we discover our Ignorance! It is a true Fact

Expand full comment

Yeah, they declined rather than conjugated. It was trans-grammatical. However, it could have been an adjective, but back to "1984", New Speak or from "My Fair Lady", "new small talk" (current slang).

Expand full comment

I completely burned out on the U.N. way back when I heard what their powder blue helmeted guys liked to do to children in the various countries where they were "peace keeping".

My legislators know what I think of the UN and WHO.

Unfortunately the U.S. government has now sunk to the UN level. Very sad.

Expand full comment

I'm afraid the tail is wagging the dog.

Expand full comment

Seen the movie, "Wag the Dog" with Ms. DeNiro and Dustin Hoffman?

Expand full comment

I remember all the chatter around the water cooler, around the time of the conflict with Serbia. But I never saw the movie.

Expand full comment

It is a thinly veiled take on our government/media manufactured distraction and reality based loosely on Clinton-Lewinsky, but applicable to much, much more, like THE GULF OF TONKIN, with LBDeputy Dawg. Clever, but if we're on the same page, cynicism/reality-wise, no surprises.

Expand full comment

Take DC down to the studs and make State Rights dominate again!

Expand full comment

Convention of States - please look them up online.

Expand full comment

will save a lot of money, too. DC are the big spenders ! confiscate all their assets to pay off the country;s debts and start clean, with states again. And in Europe - dismantle the terrible EU and back to separate countries again. I t was not heaven, but it certainly was less closer to hell.

Expand full comment

First, totally defund them. Then leave them in the dust. Tell all their employees to get real jobs. Oh, wait, all the jobs are now being done by AI bots? Never mind…

Expand full comment

A step in the Right direction.

Expand full comment

I say we eradicate the UN.

Expand full comment
founding

Be sure and include the WHO

Expand full comment

Especially the WHO

Expand full comment

Same pants, different pocket.

Expand full comment

Agreed... however... when you demolish a rotten structure you have to do something with the pieces!!

Unless you do something about the insanity... tearing down rat-infested institutions will simply disperse the resident creatures into the environment and allow them to regroup and re-infest later!!

Expand full comment

Well.... They'll be able to do a heck of a lot less damage without our money. I wouldn't be surprised to see them collapse without our money.

Probably one of the best things that could happen to improve life on this planet.

Expand full comment

Once the Nazis were dispersed, they were relatively easy to mop up or they didn't cause trouble.

Expand full comment

Nazis actually are everywhere. They just call themselves something else, like “scientists.” Look at all the actions taken before, during and after Covid. Human experimentation on every level — masks, social distancing, censorship, jabs, and more.

Just as the Nazi takeover of Germany occurred over many years prior to WWII, a Nazi (and communist/socialist) takeover has been brewing here in America for many years. Covid simply brought it out into the open — the final solution, so to speak. Except that it wasn’t final enough for them so they continue to pull out all the stops.

I wrote the following in 2021…it’s still timely:

Remember the Nazi Legacy that inspired the poem below…

“First they came …” by Martin Niemoller 1946

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.

/~~~~~~~~~

Now, for 2021, replace Socialist with Trump Supporter, Trade Unionist with Unmasked, and Jew with Unvaccinated. Or substitute whatever other non-favored group that you wish.

/~~~~~~~~~

Expand full comment

Yep!! In fact... Shortly after he invaded... Putin said he had three goals/reasons for his actions...1- Protect the ethnic Russians of the Donbass who had voted to secede. 2- Eliminate the bio-labs (which the Biden Admin said didn't exist... until they said they did...but they weren't making bad stuff) and 3- "De-Nazify Ukraine" (which had been Nazified by Obama in 2014)

"Dispersing" the WWII Nazis is kind of like scraping off all the termite tubes on your house foundation and thinking you've solved the problem!!!

Expand full comment

Well said, WRE!

Expand full comment

It would be nice if that were true... however... look up "Operation Paperclip" wherein they transferred several thousand full fledged Nazis around the world, many of whom were ensconced in the recently formed CIA, which was shortly thereafter headed up by... wait for it... George H.W. Bush!! While you're at it look up Otto Skorzeny!! Here's a start for you... https://realityroars.com/history/american/otto-skorzenys-deathbed-confessions.html

Expand full comment

Think a few still kicking in Argentina

Expand full comment

There's strong evidence (including pictures and witnesses) that Adolph himself went there after they killed his body double!!

Expand full comment

I didn’t realize that my first amendment rights had no jurisdiction in this new world order. As an American I consider Antonio Guterres planned infringement on my first amendment rights, a form of hate speech. His ultra tolerance has become complete intolerance of me. Should we not consider this communist a criminal of America and our constitution?

Expand full comment

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-great-america-show-with-lou-dobbs/id1594728054?i=1000659494386

Shelley this is a lot off topic but I think you’ll be amazed at cia connections, I was… I will probably repost this on Dr. Malones S S at some point when it fits…

Expand full comment

Thanks for the link James. Willy Barr did all sorts of cover ups even when he was not AG. He spent his own time and $s protecting those who performed murders on Ruby Ridge.

Expand full comment

That’s unreal, I was surprised every recent president and opposing candidates were all connected to the CIA in some way

Expand full comment

Shelley fixed post, check it out!!

Expand full comment

https://share.icloud.com/photos/001tI31NpSlk-H3jJfxvW2g2Q

Thanks governor Healy!!!!

This is in my town. A buddy of mine said he doesn’t want to see me circling around the neighborhood there🤔🤔.

Expand full comment

Sorry I’ll try again

Expand full comment

James, those are my thoughts, too! Seems to me those words are hate words...

Expand full comment

Amazing we pay them to attempt to take away our free speech.

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

The word ‘socialist’ appears 39 times in Guterres’ Wikipedia page. Leopards don’t change their spots.

Expand full comment

Free speech means all speech and includes hate speech . One persons hate may be another persons need ,therefore allowed . IMO

Expand full comment

How can the founders of this great nation be so astute, and how have we allowed our political leadership take us down the road to socialism and beyond? I believe all elected officials should not only place their hand on a bible, but on the Constitution and pledge allegiance to the flag. The Ten Commandants in my view are non-denominational, and are a guide for maintaining the health and welfare of a society for the common good. They feared that we could evolve into the current miss guided mess. My view.

Expand full comment

As I have opined before I believe the Founders erred in creating SCOTUS. Those damned judges are whittling away our Republic by obvious failure to understand or deliberate denigrating of our Constitution and specifically by weakening the individual states. Ken Paxton just issued a angry rebuttal to a recent decision regarding the states usage of water. An agreement by Texas, N. Mex. and Colo. that took 10 yrs to reach, approved by a SCOTUS ppointed special master was recently overturned by SCOTUS at the request of the DOJ who it appears they consider their employer and not us. And why I wonder did the DOJ feel a need to interfere? The states need to fight back and that could start by their senators no longer voting for fed judges appointed at any level and particularly SOTUS that are products of ivy league law schools as they continuously demonstrate a horrible ignorance of our Constitution.

Expand full comment

I like what Louisiana did - made a law that they can reject anything coming out of the UN and WHO (and WEF?). All states should follow their lead and quickly.

Expand full comment

Yes!! Been hollering for the states, at least those that care, to resuscitate the poor old 10 th amendment

Expand full comment

America’s first Constitution, the Articles of the Confederation, had no Executive branch or judicial branch. The main issues with it then were no common currency and lack of timely responses- no longer a problem. Sure wish we could delete Articles II and III and get rid of a big part of the central government!

Expand full comment

Agree wholeheartedly

Expand full comment

We agree on 95% of items, Dr. Nash, but here we diverge. The problem is not the idea of SCOTUS, the problem is their performance and the intellectual fallout resulting from the War Between the States. States' rights have never recovered their rightful place in the minds of Ivy League elitists, and, as you point out, from where are SCOTUS nominees found? No, the principle for the existence of a body to maintain legislative fidelity to the Constitution is both sound and necessary. The Constitution is our only guard against tyranny and must be restored to its rightful, preeminent position. Look how far Harvard and Yale, et al, have fallen! They have abandoned their raison d'être and have wandered pridefully into the wilderness, yet unaware of their demise. But they are diverse. And inclusive. And tolerant, particularly of federal power at the expense of the states. If we are going to look for a bogeyman to our current ills, the SCOTUS decision to incorporate the Bill of Rights to the states would be a biggie, as would completely dismantling the education lobby that gives us the appalling performance of public schools. While we’re at it, let’s defund state-supported Colleges of Liberal Arts. Worse than useless.

Expand full comment

Sadly hubris is all too common an ailment with lawyers. And the ivies merely exaggerate that condition. They are more a club than a law school and membership entry to the upstairs. But they stink at law. Dershowitz claimed Cruz was his brightest student at Harvard and he shined as the Texas AG but I bet if he and KenPaxton with his Univ. of Va. degree were pitted against each other in one of those mock trials law schools have that Paxton would mop the floor with Cruz.

Expand full comment

And here we are w/ Missouri v Biden, 6-3. How is it not 9-0 since it is obviously, in Alito's words so "blatantly unoonstitutional?" Maybe you're right that the lawyers are the problem. Lack standing? Oh, please.

Expand full comment

Those three are more familiar with the little red book than they are our Constitution.

Expand full comment

Those three, yes, but Barrett, Kavanaugh and Roberts? Taken the blue pill?

Expand full comment

Idaho, too, is fighting water wars (Magic Valley, Jervois cobalt mine, Meta data centers, vs farmers with “senior” and “junior” water rights). And Idaho (including its DC representatives) is literally railing and tilting against windmills (Lava Ridge)! We’re fighting against the feds and corporate interests. How can a puny state like Idaho win against the big meanies in D.C.?

Expand full comment

What little I know of the 10th amendment tells me the states can fight like wildcats....but they rarely do.

Expand full comment

Agreed. Also, Tennessee has been working on nullification (https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/model-restoring-state-sovereignty?r=14nzxn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web).

So far, the states that fight like wildcats — especially their Attorneys General and a Governor here and there — are having some limited success, but so many have given up or are taken over by leftists. If only we could clone AGs Paxton (TX) and Labrador (ID), plus Govs. Landry (LA) and DeSantis (FL). Some others, too, but these men stand above the rest.

American citizens must take some or most of the blame. Many whine and complain, but then avoid thinking seriously about politics or taking action. (I used to be among them, so am authorized to criticize.)

American citizens have been lazy, taking their liberty for granted. They have failed to learn about issues and candidates in depth — before they vote for or against them. Instead, many just listen to mainstream and social media propaganda, slogans slung about during campaigns, shady mailers, and their weird uncle / aunt / whatever Billie Joe Bob.

Over the past 4 years, I have been assembling a voting guide to help people learn their way around. It’s an ongoing project indeed. Some content is Idaho specific, but much could work for any state (short link): https://tinyurl.com/yh8jhppm

Feel free to share if you consider this a worthy guide — but please don’t share it with weird uncle / aunt / whatever Billie Joe Bob. He/ she/ it/ they/ them might not understand 🤣.

Expand full comment

Biggie, Very impressive voting guide! I sent it to an Idaho friend. Wish our state had one like it. Good educational points.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

The lack of public participation is so deplorable. The internet has brought our representatives to us if only we would avail ourselves. They will listen if the urgency is made manifest.

Expand full comment

Yes, SOME will listen. Others -- especially at the Federal level -- are used to ignoring and do. But many at the State level ARE close to "We the People" and many WILL listen. But we have to demand that they lend us their ears (nicely, of course, not Mike Tyson style). 👂👂🥊

Expand full comment

There is Madison on the matter... The judicial is "the last bulwark against tyranny", but also, that even it fails. The SCOTUS has only continually increased "first amendment rights" for corporations. I think we need to bear in mind that all 3 branches are failing, which includes all the agencies. CT got to the SCOTUS as a Monsanto lawyer. There is always Monsanto in the president's cabinet. There is always Monsanto lobbying in the legislature. (Note: is now merged into Bayer AG)

Underneath the WEF lies private, corporate interests. This is actually why I think Mr. Malone could, under the circumstances, go back to quoting Mussolini, saying fascism is at heart corporatism. In this article, we move to calling it communism, saying, "The UN takes money from wealthy countries to give to poor countries". If that is ostensibly the case, then that is a communist sales pitch, but I question if these corporatists even bother to say it. What I feel I know, underneath it all, is that they have no intention of giving money to poor countries. I think they do come up with ways of getting money from all countries, and all peoples, and it goes to them.

I actually thought about the reference to fascism, and I could see it work as a way of saying what we're going through, just by moving from, in actuality, Mussolini's nationalism (from fasceo), to a Western group - to globalism or transnationalism, and primarily corporatism.

Communism would work as a pitch, today, although I have to say, I think they tend to describe themselves as the guiding force, and they don't even bother with the proletariat spiel. I think it's seriously lacking, from a marketing point of view, but also that a communist spiel would line up well with what they're doing. I digress.

Now, I look to existing organizations to maybe talk about getting together. This is about communities networking into something nationally organized: "Building Communities"

https://markgmeyers.substack.com/p/complete-introduction-to-building

And this is the latest addition, which provides for independent coalitions under one roof:

https://markgmeyers.substack.com/p/coalitions-and-existing-organizations

Cheers, Mark

Expand full comment

"Corporatism" is a good term, it gets attention because it raises a red flag since many people don't know the definition, let alone the effect . Communism on the other hand is kind of a tired term, and everyone thinks they already know all about it.

Expand full comment

I see street communists when I look to the East, like in the Donbass in Ukraine. They say, "We're all good people", and I think they don't know much when it comes to political architecture.

They're supposed to pretend to care about us, and rally and indoctrinate all of us brothers and sisters in a room and in some Orwellian fashion, to think and do right. I feel like a really unattended member of the proletariat right now. Cheers.

Expand full comment

To add: I suppose an example of a spiel would be... Having a public mask-training program, to go with the masks, would pretend to care. These guys are sloppy. They're slopunists.

Expand full comment

Our justices can also be bias. That’s why there are 7? No ties.? Maybe they are blind to the fact that we have lost a balance between state rights and federal becoming dominate and bureaucratic. The crux of our problem today!

Expand full comment
founding

Or maybe the perspectives theyve learned/developed from which they can presume their authority to impose their biases.

Expand full comment

Maybe. They are poison whatever their incentives.

Expand full comment

I agree, Micheal. What is the DOJ doing interfering in such matters? I have watched the water “fights” in the West the entire 50 years I lived in CO. Have been out of the loop since I moved to TN. This was informative.

Expand full comment

I’ve been waiting for an opportunity to post this. Thanks Micheal! Defending our democracy before the election as found here -

https://www.foxnews.com/us/law-school-deans-sign-letter-championing-constitution-call-students-disagree-respectfully

Expand full comment

Noticed 2 ivies there so the word hypocrisy applies I'm afraid

Expand full comment

We may not want to be realistic about that question because it did not happen yesterday.

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

Tolerance, diversity and inclusivity must be enforced. But first they must be identified. Maybe by a new government agency, the HSIA, Hate Speech Irradication Agency. But we really can't afford it with a $35 trillion national debt. So, we could borrow the money directly from the CCP. In fact, maybe they would give us the dough. So, problem solved. Why worry? And that free speech thing is so outdated and was thought up by a bunch of racist, homophobic, capitalistic, slave-owning white guys who are long dead. So yesterday.

Expand full comment

Very funny!

Even MORE funny is the guy (actually TWO guys) that are DIRECTLY responsible for the political INSANITY overwhelming planet earth today - Karl Marx & Frederich Engels - are BOTH DEAD WHITE males! - and BOTH were also Jews born in Germany - which apparently the TOTALITY of the JEW-HATING COLLEGE STUDENTS in the USSA are OBLIVIOUS of.

Expand full comment

Great point! But don't forget the god of the liberal establishment, Friedrich Nietzsche, another dead, white, straight, although sexually-liberated male.

Expand full comment

Absolutely!

Expand full comment

LOL - that's the answer to whatever they want us to do: "Sorry, we can't afford it - the debt thing, you know..."

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

The larger issue remains hidden. The purpose of blocking, censoring "hate speech" or any other type of speech is not to block the speaker -

The purpose of censorship is to block the listener. "Only truths are censored "

If someone has an important message or information that certain powers don't want to be heard, what to do? Find some "hate speech" in their content. That's not hard, hate speech is defined loosely enough that anyone can be accused.

Once accused, the speech can be censored, but more important, the speaker can be censured.

And voila! Nobody can hear them speak, nobody car read what they write.

Hating hate speech is a powerful tool for "disappearing" opposing voices.

Expand full comment

Yep, as Frederick Douglass once stated:

"To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker."

Expand full comment

The purpose of censorship is to stop the formation and growth of communities of opposition. Isolate the voices of truth by accusation. Generate fear in listeners that they too might be isolated and attacked. Destroy the community by focusing on anyone who dares to speak. Think freely, speak freely, listen freely, write freely, read freely - cooperate freely.

Expand full comment

The Constitution of the United States of America came as a gift from God. It protects its citizens from tyranny. We all know who is fighting with his minions to eradicate the Constitution. We must stand for truth. We must stand for freedom. We must stand together.

Expand full comment

Amen!

Expand full comment

IF ONLY the trumpets of HEAVEN would SOUND around the world to herald the second Coming!

Expand full comment

I’m with you on that!

Expand full comment

I hate the "United Nations".

Expand full comment

This article caused me to envision humans absurdly wearing some "World" mandated form of a face bridle so we may all be speech controlled. Then it occurred to me this had already happened when Governments had us take those first bridle baby steps with "pandemic" face masks. Hate is now joining the mis, dis and mal information list of things we cannot be allowed to say. The obvious problem with all of it is who is to be the arbiter of hate, mis, dis and mal information ?, I do not see sanctioned speech and free speech as compatible. My comment here might be UN deemed hate speech.

Expand full comment

Trudeau the Great has already sent down Legislation re: the Internet, presuming in the first section to protect children from on-line harms, second to control the pornographic content, third to stop and punish mis, dis, mal information and lastly (of course so they sell it using the first section) HATE SPEECH.

In answer to your question of ‘how’ - the U.N./WEF use their puppets currently in Gov’t like Trudeau the Great to implement their dirty work. Trudeau said he would appoint 5 people in a new 3 letter Agency (which will have to hire 5,000 more bureaucrats) to decide what hate speech is. 🧐🧐 He intends to have his 5,000 fools sift through present and PAST X, Twitter, FB, Substack, Rumble posts and comments. If you say or said something they perceive as ‘hateful’ you will be punished. Now HERE’S the truly insane part. Trudeau the Great has, in this legislation, that people whose comments indicate they MIGHT say or do something hateful in the future can be visited in the home, have a tracking footlet or be limited to the home and have devices taken away. Canada and Australia have the most dystopian, authoritarian and delusional governments in power, both run by the WEF so let’s take these Globalists DOWN. U.N., WHO, WEF. But first, Canadians will take Trudeau the Great down.

Expand full comment

Yeow! Beyond belief...

Expand full comment

Yes. And true.

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

So the fundamental changing g of America, Obama's words, is in full display. Obama never should have been elected but too many did not realize his Hope and Change bulls--- was so sinister. Agree Trump MUST get America out of the UN. Suggest Trump throws the UN out of America along with the WHO, and even BHO and HRC and even the DNC as they are communists! Complete power is all they want.

Expand full comment

Never forget that - Barry Soterio- aka- Barrack Hussein Obama - is a crypto MARXIST; who as a chum smoking teen in Hawaii, had a personal MENTOR named - Frank Marshal Davis - who JUST COINCIDENTALLY, was a card carrying member of the CPUSA (Communist Party USA). "Frank" was a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER - as his pupil - Obama - turned out to be also.

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

I copied this into a separate file and named it, "Freedom of Speech--Malone. I'm going to keep it as a reference piece to share with others. It is short enough that most folks will read it, and it makes the critical points necessary for a sound argument. It also names the enemy and proposes a solution. Maybe I'll make it into a handy brochure and keep copies in my purse so it is readily available for sharing. We must all act intentionally to get the word out, or, like Washington says, we go silently like sheep to the slaughter." Thank you, Dr. Malone for this little (but important) tutorial.

Another idea---if any reader wants a pdf of the brochure, just let me know how to send it and I'll be happy to share.

Expand full comment
Jun 24Liked by Robert W Malone MD, MS

I remember people talking a long time ago about how the UN was trying to control the world. I thought it was a little silly. Now - I think "the UN" is just one of the front-operators for "Mr Global", whoever he is. "You will own nothing." Mr Global will own everything.

Expand full comment

David, it is the same dynamic now - people don't believe it is true..."a little silly"...so dismiss the truth.

Expand full comment

There is a reason that our lives on earth are short. We would otherwise loose our minds at the depths of depravity we see with our own eyes as we become more aware of how things really work in this world. Reminds me of some good Shakespeare "To be or not to be...". Let's continue to fight. One day, we will all perchance dream of a peaceful world in harmony with all around us.

Expand full comment

I'm older now, but I've never lost touch with what bullying can be like. It can be miserable, even hellish, especially for young people. But it also teaches lessons that need to be learned.

It's a funny thing. Secularists such as those infesting the UN have labored for generations to kill God and persuade us that we're just Darwin's social animals. But then those same secularists exploit historical evidence of our animal nature (tribalism, competition, conflict) for the present purposes of shaming and demoralizing entire nations. It smacks of dissembling.

When all the trials and tribulations of youth are stripped away; when standards are lowered; when we don't have to go to P.E. class any more; when we've never learned what it's like to get or give a bloody nose; when everyone gets a trophy...... we've become soft, fragile, and removed from the reality and struggle of life that has existed since the advent of single celled organisms.

And such a soft people is a people easily controlled by internationalist tyrants.

Expand full comment
author

The question of minors and the 1st amendment is an interesting one. An issue that the courts have addressed from time to time, with mixed results. Basically, it's complicated...

Expand full comment