Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax

Physicist, meteorologist testify that the climate agenda is ‘disastrous’ for America

Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’

Physicist, meteorologist testify that the climate agenda is ‘disastrous’ for America

By Kevin Stocklin

8/12/2023, updated: 8/14/2023

Published first at the Epoch Times:

Two prominent climate scientists have taken on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) new rules to cut CO2 emissions in electricity generation, arguing in testimony that the regulations “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”

Citing extensive data (pdf) to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong. 

“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.”

“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”

Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times.

Below is the cover letter, followed by the summary pages of that document supporting their testimony to the EPA.

Summary:

This 47 page scientific document is a powerhouse of information, I urge everyone to read and distribute it widely.

For more information and scientific facts about the importance of CO2, please visit the CO2 Coalition.

---

---

As many remember, Gavin de Becker penned a guest essay on July 25th, titled “Population Control and Official USG Policy” This led to a second essay called “A Conversation with Chat GPT re Population Control and the lies an AI will tell to protect US Government policy”.

So, last week, Gavin was at the farm in Virginia and we ventured into DC so that he could sit down with Jan Jekielek of Epoch Times to do an interview. For those that are interested in watching, the information on the premiere is listed below.

[PREMIERING 8/15, 7:30PM ET] Gavin de Becker: The Psychology of Fear and How Fear Is Weaponized Globally to Control Populations

If you don't have an account with The Epoch Times, you will automatically receive another email with a link that gives you free access.

---