Have to wonder how many jabs on the kiddy schedule would pass that rigorous test of comparing frequency/fatality from the bug vs adverse rxn to the jab? Also would love to see a study where autoimmune disorders, both collectively and individually are tabulated over the last 50 or so yrs and ranked with the kiddy jab schedule. Bet that would be an eye opener
“ This is a textbook case of selective rigor: demanding the highest evidentiary bar for safety signals while accepting the lowest standard for positive efficacy claims.”
All vaccine trials need more transparency and investigation of all deaths. This was one of the issues with the mRNA shots for COVID that I noticed and that was before going more deeply into immunology and vaccinology. It’s just common sense that we have a right to this info before deciding on a shot for ourselves or family member.
It would seem prudent for the ACIP to deny every drug application temporarily until the ACIP members can thoroughly investigate all the data presented as well as the data not presented, because it is obvious you will never be able to believe or trust even one statistic given to you by Big Pharma and all it's captured bureaucratic cronies at the 3 letter agencies. They have never presented reliable information that can be trusted. We know this because what they are trying to prove as "safe and effective" cannot be made safely. This has already been proven in courts of law. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (2011) decided that no vaccine could be guaranteed to be safe. They are inherently "unsafe". Not another infant should be injected with these products in an attempt to prove a vaccine safe. We have more than enough evidence to prove it cannot be done.
Maybe breast feeding will protect newborns, and later on when their immune systems are more developed, exposure to infections will add to its robustness.
Much respect for your lucid and dogged work. I am left wondering WHO ON EARTH would actually volunteer their child for a clinical trial of a vaccine that doesn’t protect from a lethal disease? I’m happy to donate my organs (after death!) and offer up my health info for big-data analysis, but I cannot imagine saying, ‘OK, jab my baby and let’s see if this concoction is safe.”
Hopefully the points she makes will be a part of clearly needed revisions in FDA and CDC practices. Committees need complete and adequate reporting to reach gold standard recommendations!
Power to Kennedy and all of you!
Now how best to deal with the immediate future, while pursuing reforms.
Going forward, how can the left hand (ACIP) know what the right hand (CDC) is doing? How can ACIP ensure they are getting accurate and thorough information before voting, and there should be a longer period of review before voting, perhaps a two-week period. Otherwise, this trickery by the CDC will continue.
Having read this I now more fully understand, and applaud and echo, the respect shown by Dr. Malone for the acumen and professionalism of Yaffa Shir-Raz . How fortunate, indeed, blessed, we are to have both of them not just shouting in the wilderness, (as so many have done for so long…we see you Dr. Malone) but now, to be in positions to chart what is to be done in those critical matters. Real Science. Which never stops inquiring. While having no experience/training in such pursuits, the truth is, it requires nothing but reading, (and I confess, re-reading), the intelligent, thoughtful, unemotional, and focused paper presented here, to know what is happening, and how grateful we should be to have such champions for all of us. Thank you. For the clarity, the care, the honesty. Take Care. God Bless You Both.
From someone who is super skeptical, I have hope that the good fight has reached and is being expressed/reflected somewhere where it counts and the public can see the effect on the agencies! 👏👏👏👏👏
"the ACIP was not given the full picture" So what's the Save-the-Children from the FDA's Evils recourse? Does ACIP have to sue the FDA to get the faulty decision retracted?
The AAP Cult is, of course, promoting it. btw- They also note on their site, they still agree with the WHO, that thimerosal is fine and dandy. I have no clue how anyone, from the unknowing parent to HHS Dir RFKjr, can trust AAP peds to NOT use the multi-dose vials.
Are we done with capitulating with the evil continuing to kill our children? Or, shall we stand up and say "NO MORE"? The big Pharma, whose big love is money, and the CDC, FDA and NIH who likewise love money and power more than life, going to continue to sway not just the population, but the politicians, Google, lobbyist? Will Fauci continue to sit in his 'king' chair pretending he is so innocent, while he should be sitting in prison for crimes against humanity, and all those like him? Or, will the ones left remaining, who have buried their loved ones, proclaim "They are not yours. and we will fight for the right of them to live a full and healthy life. Yes, we all have a free will, but we have to fight for the free will of the young and the elderly.
Have to wonder how many jabs on the kiddy schedule would pass that rigorous test of comparing frequency/fatality from the bug vs adverse rxn to the jab? Also would love to see a study where autoimmune disorders, both collectively and individually are tabulated over the last 50 or so yrs and ranked with the kiddy jab schedule. Bet that would be an eye opener
On behalf of infants everywhere, thank you.
“ This is a textbook case of selective rigor: demanding the highest evidentiary bar for safety signals while accepting the lowest standard for positive efficacy claims.”
Yep. Every time.
Thank you and bless you!
All vaccine trials need more transparency and investigation of all deaths. This was one of the issues with the mRNA shots for COVID that I noticed and that was before going more deeply into immunology and vaccinology. It’s just common sense that we have a right to this info before deciding on a shot for ourselves or family member.
It would seem prudent for the ACIP to deny every drug application temporarily until the ACIP members can thoroughly investigate all the data presented as well as the data not presented, because it is obvious you will never be able to believe or trust even one statistic given to you by Big Pharma and all it's captured bureaucratic cronies at the 3 letter agencies. They have never presented reliable information that can be trusted. We know this because what they are trying to prove as "safe and effective" cannot be made safely. This has already been proven in courts of law. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (2011) decided that no vaccine could be guaranteed to be safe. They are inherently "unsafe". Not another infant should be injected with these products in an attempt to prove a vaccine safe. We have more than enough evidence to prove it cannot be done.
One death from the shot is too many.
It's about time these agencies got a good shake down.
Keep up the good work Docs.
The focus should be on what causes susceptibility to viral infections, rather than vaccines or monoclonal antibodies.
For instance, multiple studies have shown that exposure to heavy metal toxins increases viral transmission and disease susceptibility…
https://open.substack.com/pub/healthuncensored/p/the-truth-about-viruses-the-link?r=1yb5g0&utm_medium=ios
Maybe breast feeding will protect newborns, and later on when their immune systems are more developed, exposure to infections will add to its robustness.
Much respect for your lucid and dogged work. I am left wondering WHO ON EARTH would actually volunteer their child for a clinical trial of a vaccine that doesn’t protect from a lethal disease? I’m happy to donate my organs (after death!) and offer up my health info for big-data analysis, but I cannot imagine saying, ‘OK, jab my baby and let’s see if this concoction is safe.”
Thank you for sharing this excellent response.
Hopefully the points she makes will be a part of clearly needed revisions in FDA and CDC practices. Committees need complete and adequate reporting to reach gold standard recommendations!
Power to Kennedy and all of you!
Now how best to deal with the immediate future, while pursuing reforms.
I'm so glad that people like this are out there, persevering on these important points.
Thank you!
Going forward, how can the left hand (ACIP) know what the right hand (CDC) is doing? How can ACIP ensure they are getting accurate and thorough information before voting, and there should be a longer period of review before voting, perhaps a two-week period. Otherwise, this trickery by the CDC will continue.
Having read this I now more fully understand, and applaud and echo, the respect shown by Dr. Malone for the acumen and professionalism of Yaffa Shir-Raz . How fortunate, indeed, blessed, we are to have both of them not just shouting in the wilderness, (as so many have done for so long…we see you Dr. Malone) but now, to be in positions to chart what is to be done in those critical matters. Real Science. Which never stops inquiring. While having no experience/training in such pursuits, the truth is, it requires nothing but reading, (and I confess, re-reading), the intelligent, thoughtful, unemotional, and focused paper presented here, to know what is happening, and how grateful we should be to have such champions for all of us. Thank you. For the clarity, the care, the honesty. Take Care. God Bless You Both.
From someone who is super skeptical, I have hope that the good fight has reached and is being expressed/reflected somewhere where it counts and the public can see the effect on the agencies! 👏👏👏👏👏
"the ACIP was not given the full picture" So what's the Save-the-Children from the FDA's Evils recourse? Does ACIP have to sue the FDA to get the faulty decision retracted?
The AAP Cult is, of course, promoting it. btw- They also note on their site, they still agree with the WHO, that thimerosal is fine and dandy. I have no clue how anyone, from the unknowing parent to HHS Dir RFKjr, can trust AAP peds to NOT use the multi-dose vials.
The whole medical system is corrupt.
Are we done with capitulating with the evil continuing to kill our children? Or, shall we stand up and say "NO MORE"? The big Pharma, whose big love is money, and the CDC, FDA and NIH who likewise love money and power more than life, going to continue to sway not just the population, but the politicians, Google, lobbyist? Will Fauci continue to sit in his 'king' chair pretending he is so innocent, while he should be sitting in prison for crimes against humanity, and all those like him? Or, will the ones left remaining, who have buried their loved ones, proclaim "They are not yours. and we will fight for the right of them to live a full and healthy life. Yes, we all have a free will, but we have to fight for the free will of the young and the elderly.