120 Comments
User's avatar
Rob B.'s avatar

Unfortunately, 'the science' doesn't explain the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) other than truly a simple case of ... mentally nutz!

Expand full comment
Michael Heath's avatar

Actually, REAL science does explain the TDS that you so wisely point out~!

What you are looking for is the widely available and documented information and evidence on the CIA MK Ultra process of brainwashing~! It is in fact VERY real, has been in place within our own governmental system for well over 70 years, and literally EVERYONE has been exposed to it. The only difference is between those who, for one reason or another, have begun the process of breaking their chains of brainwashing VS those who have not. A VERY small number of "us" (Americans) identified this brainwashing matrix very early in life, and we have managed to resist it successfully. Everyone else is very FAR behind the "8 Ball" and they are all playing "catch up" on whatever level of knowledge and understanding that they currently have (or not ;-) I began the process of breaking the brainwashing matrix at about 5 years old believe it or not, which was FAR from "pretty", and I am in my late 60's now. It was indeed an EXTREMELY lonely life because as far as I knew I was completely alone! It is much like that 5 year old "child prodigy" who can play concert level piano or hit golf balls like a pro, I just knew that "we" (Americans) were being played for fools in a number of ways, and by Individuals who were somehow in THE power positions. I could explain much more because by the age of 9 years old I had very quietly without anyone ever knowing, decided to dedicate my life to figuring ou=t what was really going on, where "we" were being driven against our free will, and exactly who was doing it~! Unfortunately, the vast majority of Americans are STILL "not able to handle the truth" as Jack Nicholson once said in a famous movie. So, it would do little to no good to explain any more to anyone, because nearly everyone has completely dysfunctional ego's that keep them brainwashed and/or just believing that they could not possibly be SO wrong in their understanding of life, America, and the world. When you have spent over 60 years working on this very subject, which an enormous task that is quite beyond anyone, including myself, then you realize that this life is an endless learning experience~! These words only communicate to the level of the Individual hearing them, depending upon just how "Enlightened" they truly are (or not so much ;-) My guess is that fewer than 1 out of a thousand Americans realized that "we" (Americans) were being played for fools before the age of 18, probably WAY fewer, but the good news is that folks today have the unbelievable opportunity to quickly learn what it took me to learn over many decades~! IF they are intelligent, truly open minded, and honorably humble enough~! Good luck~! Sincerely, Mike

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun's avatar

He has endured many years of chronic stress and it is effecting him.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Sadly we can see the wear in his face now. How some are so consumed by TDS is beyond me.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

He is a hero.

Expand full comment
Faz's avatar

Good article. Response by Paul Offitt not surprising - he has so many conflicts of interest when it comes to vaccines it's a joke. Follow the money - his cash register rings with every shot. The comment on AI is right on. I use ChatGPT and Gemini every day on chemical research, and I have formulated the following rule (for simple stuff like the pH of a acid, base and a dissolved metal), a rule which is probably good for any search: 1) ask another WAY 2) ask another DAY. In the course of getting to an answer I usually get 10 or so apologies from AI as I challenge the last response by asking another WAY. Then back at it tomorrow with a string of different answers. AI can be so authoritatively incorrect it's scary to think about people using it when they don't have a clue what the answer should be.

Expand full comment
GR B's avatar

I relate to the observation on AI. To use it effectively, one must be aware of its limitations. I describe it as being a good search engine on steroids prone to many errors unless the question or directive is phrased precisely. I, too, use multiple nested queries to uncover the details I'm seeking.

Expand full comment
David Lang Wardle's avatar

I often ask AI about median lifespans. I always have to remind them after they give me a range of numbers that the median is ONE NUMBER. Some day they may be smart all by themselves; not just yet.

Expand full comment
Faz's avatar

Have you noticed how well trained they are at semi-apologizing and generating a bunch of excuses? In that regard, they are a lot like people.

Expand full comment
David Lang Wardle's avatar

Not always. I was asking the first version of ChatGPT about the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion on 6 Mar 70 and it referred to the "tragic" deaths of Weathermen Ted Gold, Diana Oughton, and Terry Robbins who were building bombs, one of which was intended for my graduation ceremony at Columbia. I could not get the AI to back off of the "tragic" description, while I thought it was Karma and absolutely wonderful that they died, and was only sorry that two others, Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson, escaped. Live by the bomb, die by the bomb.

Expand full comment
Faz's avatar

I tend to stick with chemistry questions for AI tools. I know I will get nonsense if I ask about vaccinations, 6 Mar 70 or 6 Jan 2020. My favorite AI example is when I was trying to get some new information for my website and ChatGPT cited my website as the authority on the subject. True story ... I took a screenshot.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

ALL these doctors that say this is wrong need to be scooped out of medicine. NO pregnant woman should take any meds at all. Doctors who do not respect that, are not worth of being listened to.

This is good, old common sense science. Everything a pregnant woman ingests goes into that baby. Meds, vaxxines, spicy foods, anything.

As to Dr. Profit, his name says it all. could not have chose a better one.

Expand full comment
Nancy Benedict's avatar

As a nurse, having studied the Thalidomide travesty and DES controversy in school, there was no way I was taking any pharmaceutical when pregnant five times. I didn't even drink caffeinated coffee. The general public is vastly uninformed. This is criminal.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

I thought everyone new that - including stopping drinking wine!

Expand full comment
Nancy Benedict's avatar

I went into the hospital with false labor with our second child and the nurse told me to go home and "take a warm bath and drink a glass of wine." I was appalled. So no, not everyone is cautious.

Expand full comment
Diana Woodward's avatar

Same with me, the doctor that did my pregnancy test, July 1980, when positive, told me to go home and have a glass of wine in celebration.

Expand full comment
Nancy Benedict's avatar

Unbelievable. Surely medical professionals don't do that anymore......right??

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Good grief!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Almost all women know to stop drinking wine, and when I was pregnant in the early 80s, that's all I heard from doctors, or anyone, for that matter. Nothing about coffee or pain killers.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Healthy natural wine is probably the least of the bad things you could do. But wine nowadays is kind of a chemical soup, too.

Expand full comment
Wanjing Kuang's avatar

I really liked spicy food when I was pregnant though 😅

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I suppose the baby will like it too! I remember a Hindu family, they cooked very spicy, and the kid loved it from very early on, and detested the bland jar food she sometimes got when they traveled!

When mom was pregnant with me she only liked bananas and one type of meat! Until I was in my 30s I detested bananas and still don't eat the meat LOLOL.

Expand full comment
lakegirl's avatar

I had 4 children between 1982 and 1990 - every doc I had said to take NOTHING - no aspirin, tylenol, etc. I have 4 beautiful children. WHEN did it become OK to take tylenol?

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

Same here....my daughter was born in 1970 and at that time pregnant women were told to avoid any and all drugs as well as alcohol. I don't remember if I had headaches at that time, but I do know I knew to not take anything like Tylenol, if it existed then.

Expand full comment
lakegirl's avatar

exactly, no coffee, no alcohol, just a clean home for baby! That is what we all did. Somehow, sometime later, they got soft and lazy...

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Where did you live? Did you hear the caution from medical personnel or from friends/acquaintances/family?

Expand full comment
CMCM's avatar

This was actually in Seattle, where I was living at the time. The cautions were from my doctor most specifically, but it was generally known and talked about. Even my husband knew about not drinking alcohol while pregnant.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

I think it's the variation in doctors. Mine never mentioned Tylenol and I hadn't heard that back then, either. Plus, even though I was an intellectually savvy lawyer, in terms of practical things that I hadn't heard about, I was amazingly stupid.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

And doctors need to inform women they must begin titrating off some meds for months ahead of any pregnancy.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I was a young woman in the 70s and 80s and the doc told me if I wanted children, I might think of getting one or two vaccinations for illnesses that can harm the baby. But grown up in a time when vaxxines were non-existant or scarcely used, I had had everything and had natural immunity. We were told in school to not take any drugs legal or illegal when pregnant. I was amazed when I came to the States, to see the dire number of injections for immigrants - and then I fell over when I saw those for children! What a terrible thing to do to your kids. Europe barely has any mandated ones, I think 2 or 3, given just once, and in my time orally. The one given very young I think was pox and I was hospitalized shortly for a bad reaction to it (too young to remember myself, mom told me later on not to get that one again).

The urge to medicate has gotten way worse there too, I hear from family. A pill for everything seems to be the motto nowadays. Even after a tooth extraction, I was told to take 2 pain killers! Never heard of in Europe, it is not THAT sore!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

So you were not in excruciating pain after the extraction, just bothered by it?

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

barely. I felt it, of course, but had never taken any meds after extraction, we just don't do that in Europe. I was amazed the dentist here told me to medicate (and with some bad med LOL)

Expand full comment
Jo Dee Preston's avatar

Logical, "makes sense"; how many times did Pres. Trump say that about the issues..."I am not a doctor, but this makes sense..."?

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

unfortunately it takes a person with common sense to use it.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Teens should be taught this in health class!

Expand full comment
Love Activist's avatar

Anyone that does their research at all knows that Tylenol causes liver toxicity. I am 69 years old and it has never been in my home or my body. Full Stop. I have recommended against taking it to many clients. None of this is news. But thank the Goddess above that we are about to listen to Mothers. And realize the possibly vast factors which might be contributing to ASD. Thank you Mr. President, for hiring RFKJ, Jay and Marty. Heroes.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

I have never understood why, in God's name, physicians recommend Tylenol over other NSAIDs (which all carry some risk).

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

And whatever happened to aspirin in the PDR? I know of no better or safer treatment for fever or pain. I quit taking it because of gout, tylenol was useless (as per 40%of us) and celebrated advil because it worked (for pain). But since fetus unlikely to contract Reyes syndrome and unless really, really sensitive mom not to have gastric bleed, why not aspirin? As posted yesterday the big problem we have likely due to overdosing as 50 mg the adult dose given in India

Expand full comment
Donna Dixon's avatar

Speaking as someone who has chronic kidney disease, NSAIDS are not safe. I cannot use NSAIDS; no one who has Chronic Kidney Disease can use NSAIDS. I have to use Tylenol/acetaminophen.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

I was told this too after my kidney cancer appeared. I have taken only one Advil in the 14 years since the surgery. Fortunately, all my labs have been good these 14 years.

Expand full comment
Donna Dixon's avatar

That is wonderful news about your labs. I got CKD from becoming severely dehydrated, after the prep for colonoscopy. I don't think they use those pills for prep any more, and was not recommended. You take like a total of 32 pills before procedure. I was sick for 3 months before Dr drew blood and figured out what was wrong. My creatinine was 1.7 at that time; always before it was .05. I kept telling her, I got sick right after colonoscopy.

The most common cause of CKD is diabetes.

God bless you, and hope you stay well.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

I am someone who nearly had same for same reason. My opt. advil dose is 2 and sports doc had me on 4 3X/day for sever inflammation prob. My ppo got concerned and ordered blood test and found I was 1-2 ticks off CKD. Luckily my numbers recovered...she was worried they might not. Tylenol does absolutely nothing for me and hi dose aspirin might trigger gout.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

I had rarely taken Advil before I was diagnosed. I'm glad your numbers returned to normal after what sounds like a horrendous amount of Advil. My sports doctors are Rebound (they treat the Portland, OR Spurs, I think), and except for one foot problem, they have been fast to get me seen and excellent. They helped me immensely with a spinal slipped disc that was causing a piercing nerve pain every 5 seconds down my left front leg that was like a hot needle. I am currently visiting them for a rotator cuff injury and they scheduled me for an appointment that was in less than a week. So, if you have a Rebound where you live, you might want to keep them in mind.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Thanks. My sports doc once treated the Astros so probably o.k. Thing is what I have mentioned before...docs and tables. I run 6'2" and 210-220 lbs so the was the 2nd to look at me and say I could tolerate 800mg dose. But my optimum dose was actually 400. Knew that and stupidly took the 800. My bad

Expand full comment
Pat (asshole, asshole’s)'s avatar

Could it be $$$$?

Expand full comment
Donna Dixon's avatar

Speaking as someone who has chronic kidney disease, NSAIDS are not safe. I cannot use NSAIDS; no one who has Chronic Kidney Disease can use NSAIDS. I have to use Tylenol/acetaminophen.

Every drug has some virtues, but with every drug there are side effects resulting in unintended consequences . Aspirin an NSAID was used during the "Spanish Flu" which was cause by Rockefeller Vaccines. Aspirin (NSAID) supposedly caused many deaths.

HTTPS://ROBSCHOLTEMUSEUM.NL/RUSS-WINTER-THE-TRUTH-REVEALED-ABOUT-THE-DEADLY-1918-SPANISH-FLU-IT-WAS-ACTUALLY-BACTERIAL-PNEUMONIA/

Paxlovid one of the quickly developed COVID treatments, causes blood clots for people taking blood thinners. For people who take statins it causes liver damage. I know two different people, who were given that and one died of liver damage the other of uncontrolled blood clots. However, it is still on the market. Just slap a warning label on it, and who reads those and pays attention. People ignore them because every product does have warning labels, some pretty long.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11307139/PAxlovid-Pfizers-Covid-drug-cause-deadly-blood-clots-study-warns.html

Expand full comment
Fred's avatar

Seems I recall an old study that showed acetaminophen was only marginally better than placebo for pain relief.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Is one or two aspirin a better choice over Tylenol and NSAIDS if one absolutely needs a one-time something for excruciating pain?

Expand full comment
Love Activist's avatar

That's my choice when it is absolutely necessary. Breathing, rest, quiet, lots of hydration and some gentle stretching and acupressure points help too!

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

RFK, Jr. and President Trump deserve medals for their courage.

Expand full comment
oldguy52's avatar

Indeed!

They're peeing in the rice bowls of some seriously powerful($$$$) people this week.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

It is only in recent decades that the medical system is advocating for pregnant women to take pharmaceuticals. The medical system can no longer be trusted.

Expand full comment
Aldo Zovich's avatar

The Trump administration could tell people not to light themselves on fire, you might get burned, and MSM would argue there is no science backing up this theory.

Expand full comment
BonnieMae's avatar

Or, more likely, a new TikTok challenge would erupt. Any of you hear about people defiantly using Tylenol, even some who apparently are expecting? Simply because they're NOT going to fall in line with Trump's recommendations! So sad and insane...

Expand full comment
oldguy52's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Dr. WHO's avatar

I wrote this morning to Carl Canon at Real Clear Politics:

Carl, I so often enjoy your measured and even-handed comments and musings, that it surprises me to vehemently disagree with your comments about Trumps medical advice on acetaminophen for pediatric and pregnant patients. Read Dr. Robert Malone’s blog today and then review the many clinical articles on the potential links between acetaminophen and neurotoxicity before you disparage Trump’s remarks. Pull up the original research and review the statistical data and the analysis first. I have - and I am never going to recommend Tylenol or paracetamol again for pediatric or pregnant women until we have more and better understanding of these multiple potentially valid links to neurotoxicity.

BTW, I agree with you that “Trump never fails to disappoint” but remind myself that were it not for his propensity to shoot himself in the foot every time he opens his mouth, he might become Emperor for Life of our battered but wonderful Republic.

William H. Olson, MD, MMM, FAAFP, blah, blah…, (retired)

Expand full comment
Chuck's avatar

President Trump is surrounded by some of the best minds in medical science along with RFK Jr., who has a brilliant legal mind. Given this, the blob thinks all of this was just pulled out of thin air and announced to the world. Most of our opposition is beyond help.

Expand full comment
Aegean's avatar

Thank you for your research. I am disgusted too. First we had pandemic gaslighting, vaccine revelry, mandates, condemnation of the unvaccinated, and now we have this! I am so angry. Why are these people defending Tylenol/acetominophen in pregnant women or their babies? It reminds me of the FB profile pictures "I got my Covid Vaccine!" Do these people all profit from drug companies??? Or they are afraid to admit that for years their pathetic solutions to minor illnesses may actually cause life-long harm?

What news shows are you going on and when? I want to watch. It will give me satisfaction to see an intelligent physician-scientist set the record straight. Bravo!

Expand full comment
Aegean's avatar

Roger Seheult, critical care physician, posted an excellent video on tylenol, autism, and sunlight. It's posted on the Medcram channel on YouTube. I highly recommend it.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Anything to oppose Trump. But there are fewer now as the pendulum swings.

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Finally......Finally, some sanity from the people that are supposed to guide us as to how to become and stay healthy.

Thank you Dr Malone for keeping us abreast of these developments.

Expand full comment
Ned B.'s avatar

Yes, "twenty years ago" was the time that Donald and Melania Trump were about to become parents. Barron Trump is currently 19 years old and some suspect that he is on "the spectrum." I wonder if Barron was vaccinated on the childhood vaccine schedule recommended at the time.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

Melanie Trump said he is not in her book. I know the President has a nephew or cousin who has a serious debility.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

He doesn't strike me as having any stage of autism. He was raised by Melania, an extreme introvert, who is exceedingly quiet and rarely speaks. Baron's speech has been normal the few times I've heard him speak.

Expand full comment
Thomas Marsh's avatar

It has been known for AGES that maternal health and drug use during pregnancy can cause serious harm to the fetus one must look at what the mother is doing during term to begin a true review of why autism is exploding! All drugs used…everyone one must be completely reviewed once again..Tylenol included. In addition , everything given to the baby from birth forward must too be reviewed completely. With what we have seen with the mass death, disability and children injuries with the covid vac being hidden from the public the prior reviews of autism must be re-opened. I use to trust the CDC and FDA as a provider of care in the past..NOT NOW. In a way I would compare to what I have seen with the total antifa of these organizations…on purpose to harm as this group does in the street. These agencies need a complete overhaul.

Expand full comment
Betsy Shanley's avatar

Dr. Malone, I have dug deeper, and the acetaminophen theory doesn’t make sense. Acetaminophen came out in the 1950s whereas autism rose rapidly in the 1990s. What did come out in the 1990s was glyphosate, which disrupts the making of proteins in us rich in cysteine, an amino acid crucial for MT protein production. MT proteins are the main protection of toxic metals at the blood/brain barrier, such as aluminum from vaccines. This could explain the vaccines connection. There are many other functions as well, such as aiding in the production of the enzymes that digest gluten! I have many more listed in this post.https://open.substack.com/pub/betsyshanley/p/glyphosate-and-its-disruption-of?r=5okhkn&utm_medium=ios Please read and tell me what you think.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

I have written extensively about glyphosate and ASD/other neuro-associated issues.

My believe has always been that the compounded effects of environmental toxins, vaccines, medications, etc -is multifactorial.

https://www.malone.news/p/low-level-chronic-glyphosate-harms?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
Desdichado's avatar

Certainly there must be multiple factors at play.

However, I’m concerned that the research highlighted in today’s essay seeks to sheet the blame for ASD to acetaminophen use in pregnancy.

Early on, the statistic is given that acetaminophen is widely used by 50% of the world’s population. Then the suggestion is made that acetaminophen use in pregnancy could account for up to 90% of cases of ASD.

If so, then why isn’t ASD as common in the rest of the world as it is in the US?

One glaring factor is the insanely high number of vaccines given to US babies vs the rest of the world. And as others have pointed out, the prevalence of glyphosate in US food supply.

It’s possible that acetaminophen use in pregnancy is a culprit, and perhaps the difference lies in whether women outside the US avoid acetaminophen during pregnancy.

My concern is that this research about acetaminophen looks awfully like a convenient scapegoat, one in which the “blame” is so widespread and so diffuse, that no one will ever be held accountable.

No doubt the pHarma has a “new and improved”, “safe and effective” replacement waiting in the wings.

Expand full comment
Betsy Shanley's avatar

If glyphosate disrupts MT proteins in us, it explains all the health issues which took off after we began consuming it. Another function they have is to regulate T cells, which we need to fight off cancer and protect us from autoimmune disease.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 23Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Betsy Shanley's avatar

Thank you, but still, I think it has to do with the glyphosate disrupting our MT proteins and allowing the aluminum from vaccines to cross the blood/brain barrier.

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

Acetaminophen wasn't recommended for pregnant women until the late 1970s and really, the 1980s.

It wasn't until the late 1980s, when the link between Reyes syndrome and aspirin became evident, that the FDA stopped recommending aspirin. That is when Tylenol's usage took off.

Expand full comment
Betsy Shanley's avatar

But autism and chronic disease didn’t take off in the 70s or 80s. It was the late 1990s.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Synergism. Not merely additive but greater than. And difficult to calculate for merely 2 agents. Virtually impossible for the godawful cocktail of compounds our bodies are being subjected to. Why I will always support less rather than more.

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

Autism began increasing significantly shortly after 1986.

Expand full comment
Betsy Shanley's avatar

Where did you get your information? I was born in 1964 and didn’t see it happening then.

Expand full comment
GR B's avatar

Many thanks for relaying this information and the supporting studies/ findings. You enable us to stay "plugged in" to the details and the context of what's going on with this incredibly important issue. I very much appreciate the time and effort you take, Robert, to keep us apprised. The alternative would be to rely on the news . . . ;-)

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

I will never stop reading Dr. Malone's work. His is the #1 Sustack.

Expand full comment
M Makous's avatar

In 1998 a study published in JAMA found an increased risk of over-anticoagulation in patients using acetaminophen. This surprised many physicians (including me0, because the received wisdom was that "Tylenol has no drug interactions". An honest scientifically-based clinician should keep an open mind that there may be non-obvious serious side effects even for a seemingly benign drug such as acetaminophen.

Expand full comment
Vincent M  Tedone MD's avatar

You left out a very important fact. The incidence of ALS was so high after the first Gulf War that the DOW declared ALS compensable. S H set fire to oil wells. Toxic fumes in the air suppressed the immune system, and those who had latent Borrelia developed ALS.

More proof: Diesel truck drivers and Canadian airline pilots also have an increased incidence of ALS

Three school teachers who taught in a Massachusetts classroom WITH ASBESTOS consecutively for 20 years developed ALS.

CTE post-concussion.

Why don't all those who are in contact with the toxin or trauma develop ALS? The answer is Immune suppression plus activation of the latent pathogen.

Vince Tedone MD

Medical director WFND

winningthefight.org

Expand full comment