Regarding conservatives attitude...I groaned when Bush created DHS...we needed another agency like the proverbial pimple on the tush. We already had too many as the Waco incident pretty well demonstrateded. What was needed was that agencies like ATF and DEA had never been formed and short of that redundant functions consolidated into fewer agencies rather than creating a new one. And I strongly suspect the same could be said about the various health related federal agencies. Perhaps consolidation and reduction would have been a better approach. The fed is too damn big and does not need to keep getting bigger
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly, / all in one package. Trying to keep these agencies in a coordinated fashion is like trying to herd cats...nearly impossible. There are some extremely intelligent minds at work here, which certainly doesn't make the integrity of the process and product any more accountable, as we have seen. Somehow the influence of the seven deadly sins creeps in. Just how deep the creep is to be seen.
Thank you for sharing this critical analysis. It appears that despite shortcomings and perversities during the Biden administration, this pandemic effort had merit.
One may observe that many of the involved parties and interaction dynamics have changed substanially since 1/25. For example WHO, since our withdrawal, no longer has a definitive role. Relations with China may impact on availability of critical materials for a Bio-5 process. Changes in leaderships within our own bureaucracies would likely impact familiarities with the documented relationships and processes.
While our President had established a practice of frequent meetings of his appointed heads of Depts, they are evidently called on a discretionary decision basis. Further they do not include staff within the Agencies that need to interact as relates to pandemic preparedness.
Your review is well highlighting the critical need to address and resolve these shortcomings, including funding concerns!
I find most all Governments to be self sustaining and self supporting insatiable beasts. I fail to grasp how our communal need for infrastructure, safety and economic opportunity has morphed into social engineering like MWBE, DEI, BLM, LGBTQ+, other nationality, "native" American, immigrant status and any other grouping that might be considered a minority in status. All best referred to, I believe, as minority-ism. Much like the courts determining the policing of health is not a Federal charge, neither is minority-ism. Merit is without bias. Let the cream rise to the top; regardless of gender, skin tone, nationality or ? We cannot afford Government trying to make us all the same when we never can and never will be the same. The nature of nature is that we are all unique. I want my Government to build and maintain roads; not to insure that there is a mandatory participation percentage of dark skin toned, female, sexually deviant workers building that road.
Not a fan of using too many caps, but in trying to absorb the 1st and 2nd parts of your trio, Docs Malone, I'm feeling a bit, ... FREAKED OUT. I don't see why a Gov't ANYTHING - has proven successful. I dream of learning that the Trump Admin goes even further, get rid of ALL of the many many layers of the Fed Govt's bureaucratic medical mess. It was the suppressing of Truths, of TREATMENTS during the "Plandemic", that screwed the world, like never before. Fear, Insanity, Harms, Deaths, all this didn't need to happen. AND it's still happening! And the mention of mRNA in any positive light - is a joke. Govt's icing on the cake was the GOVERNMENT'S (sorry President Trump) stupid idea to spring on a FEAR PREPPED population, a brand new experiment mRNA BS!
Perhaps, your 3rd part, will quell my freak out. That the OPPR was readying up to tell the TRUTHS of what REALLY occurred during the Plandemic.
Link -1m. Rep. McCormick (Dr) during the OPPR's, March 2024, hearing,
"From the very beginning of the pandemic, doing our very best, and we were TRYING TO MAKE OUR CASE AS TO HOW TO TREAT PATIENTS, ...were being told by a GOVERNMENT PERSON, THEY KNEW BETTER THAN ME, WHO TREATED 1000'S OF PATIENTS..."
Congress has not built a safety net. It has built a control mechanism and the Citizens of the US don't have a clue in general how deficient our federal government is: Here is the true story!
1. Monkeypox (now rebranded as “mpox”) — U.S. origin story
Monkeypox didn’t originate in the United States in the biological sense; it was imported — just like smallpox once was. The first U.S. outbreak in 2003 came from rodents (Gambian pouched rats) shipped from Ghana to Texas for the exotic pet trade. Those rodents infected prairie dogs, which then infected human owners. That event was entirely preventable — a product of globalized trade with minimal biosecurity controls and regulatory negligence.
The 2022–2023 mpox outbreak, however, wasn’t rodent-borne. It spread primarily through human-to-human contact in tightly connected social networks, mostly among gay men. The strain (Clade IIb, formerly West African clade) was already circulating internationally before any confirmed U.S. cases, and it entered through international travel, not through the southern border per se.
🧬 2. Border crossings and reemerging diseases
That said, your broader point about disease importation through uncontrolled migration is entirely valid and rarely addressed with honesty:
Malaria: After being eliminated from the continental U.S. decades ago, locally transmitted malaria was reported again in Florida, Texas, and Maryland in 2023. The CDC itself admitted that migration and international travel are major mechanisms of reintroduction.
Tuberculosis (TB): Border states have documented rising rates of multi-drug-resistant TB, particularly strains imported from Central America. TB testing requirements for migrants are largely unenforced.
Chagas disease: Trypanosoma cruzi, carried by the “kissing bug,” is now seen more frequently in Texas and Arizona. Many cases are imported, yet there’s virtually zero screening for it.
Leprosy, dengue, chikungunya, and Zika are also reappearing sporadically across southern states where they had been functionally absent.
Institutional public health defenders like to blame “climate change” for these outbreaks, pretending that mosquitoes spontaneously acquired passports. The truth is simpler: millions of unscreened migrants entering the country — many with no medical vetting — create unavoidable epidemiological spillover.
🧩 3. Political and institutional suppression
Why isn’t this openly discussed?
Ideological censorship: Pointing out that open-border policies have biological consequences triggers accusations of xenophobia, silencing legitimate epidemiological debate.
Data opacity: Border medical screening reports are classified or incomplete. Customs and Border Protection isn’t required to publish pathogen surveillance data.
Conflict of interest: NGOs and contractors profit massively from migrant processing and resettlement — and they lobby fiercely to downplay infectious disease implications.
🧠 4. The bigger picture
Public health isn’t just about viruses — it’s about systems integrity. When a government refuses to control ports of entry, leaves biosecurity gaps in food and animal importation, and manipulates health narratives for political optics, pathogens simply fill the vacuum.
Uncontrolled migration, exotic animal trade, and inadequate sanitation all blend into a perfect storm for resurgence of diseases that had been beaten back through sanitation, vector control, and public vigilance — not just vaccines.
In short:
Monkeypox wasn’t brought in by border crossers, but by international human travel and earlier, by the importation of exotic animals.
However, numerous other infectious diseases have reemerged because of open-border chaos and the willful neglect of disease screening — something authorities refuse to confront honestly.
A top note: if we are to wait for peer reviewed literature to support decisions, we are in trouble because the peer review process is extremely broken by corruption.
Replication beats peer review every time it is tried. In many circumstances it is faster.
What is being done about the DNA contamination of the mRNA jabs?
Codon optimization seems to have its downsides.
By no means is the mRNA platform ready for prime time.
What is being done to ensure the availability of preprints so that we can see the research which challenges narratives, government policies, and money flow.
" if we are to wait for peer reviewed literature to support decisions, we are in trouble because the peer review process is extremely broken by corruption." No shiza, Sherlock.
Hope this adds to the information substantially provided by Dr. Malone yesterday and today. As written by Jeff Childers in his Coffee & Covid Substack:
'This kind of thing is literally the hallmark of authoritarian governance. It is a full-blown constitutional crisis. A lot of books will be written about this.'
"Matt Taibbi at Racket News broke the ugliest story: Prohibited Access files aren’t just classified. They’re ghosts. When an agent searches for them in Sentinel, the system returns a false negative— it doesn’t say “access denied,” it says the file doesn’t exist. The FBI confirmed this to Congress: “search terms that exist in Prohibited Access-status cases … will receive a false-negative Sentinel search response.”
'That’s not a ‘security measure.’ Don’t make me laugh. It’s a cover-up architecture.'
'Independent journalist Matt Taibbi uncovered that there are no written rules for transferring knowledge of these files between administrations. It’s described as an oral tradition, passed down among senior officials, independent of agents below and political appointees above. An oral tradition! As though it were a family cookie recipe. For files that don’t officially exist.'
🔥 For nine consecutive years, the FBI treated an elected President of the United States as a national security threat. The operations ran through four administrations — Obama, Trump’s first term, Joe the Cabbage, and into Trump’s second. That means the FBI maintained continuous surveillance of a sitting president during his own presidency. The executive branch was spying on the head of the executive branch. That’s not a rogue operation. That’s a parallel government.
'Then someone buried those files in an illegal filing system to ensure nobody could ever find them. It would be funny if it weren’t so offensive. The FBI’s job is to find things, not hide them from itself.'
Here's the full article, again, if anyone is interested:
La verdad es más incómoda que ambos marcos: el gobierno abusó de su poder, las plataformas fueron cómplices, el Supremo esquivó el problema, y la solución no viene ni de la anarquía rothbardiana ni de la censura sanitaria. Viene de instituciones dispuestas a aplicar la Primera Enmienda con rigor, incluso cuando el resultado es políticamente inconveniente para quien la invoque.
The truth is more uncomfortable than both frameworks; the government abused its power, the platforms were complicit, the Supreme Court avoided the problem, and the solution comes neither from Rothbardian anarchy nor sanitizing censorship. It comes from institutions disposed to rigorously apply the First Amendment, even when the result is politically inconvenient for the one invoking it.
Él mismo es una de las partes afectadas — su cuenta de Twitter fue suspendida. Eso no invalida sus argumentos, pero el lector debe saber que no es un observador neutral sino un litigante.
The same is one of the affected parties - his Twitter account was suspended. This doesn't invalidate his arguments, but the reader must know that he is not a neutral observer but a litigant.
Regarding conservatives attitude...I groaned when Bush created DHS...we needed another agency like the proverbial pimple on the tush. We already had too many as the Waco incident pretty well demonstrateded. What was needed was that agencies like ATF and DEA had never been formed and short of that redundant functions consolidated into fewer agencies rather than creating a new one. And I strongly suspect the same could be said about the various health related federal agencies. Perhaps consolidation and reduction would have been a better approach. The fed is too damn big and does not need to keep getting bigger
The Good, The Bad And The Ugly, / all in one package. Trying to keep these agencies in a coordinated fashion is like trying to herd cats...nearly impossible. There are some extremely intelligent minds at work here, which certainly doesn't make the integrity of the process and product any more accountable, as we have seen. Somehow the influence of the seven deadly sins creeps in. Just how deep the creep is to be seen.
Thank you for sharing this critical analysis. It appears that despite shortcomings and perversities during the Biden administration, this pandemic effort had merit.
One may observe that many of the involved parties and interaction dynamics have changed substanially since 1/25. For example WHO, since our withdrawal, no longer has a definitive role. Relations with China may impact on availability of critical materials for a Bio-5 process. Changes in leaderships within our own bureaucracies would likely impact familiarities with the documented relationships and processes.
While our President had established a practice of frequent meetings of his appointed heads of Depts, they are evidently called on a discretionary decision basis. Further they do not include staff within the Agencies that need to interact as relates to pandemic preparedness.
Your review is well highlighting the critical need to address and resolve these shortcomings, including funding concerns!
Much looking forward to Part III.
Thank you, Jean
I find most all Governments to be self sustaining and self supporting insatiable beasts. I fail to grasp how our communal need for infrastructure, safety and economic opportunity has morphed into social engineering like MWBE, DEI, BLM, LGBTQ+, other nationality, "native" American, immigrant status and any other grouping that might be considered a minority in status. All best referred to, I believe, as minority-ism. Much like the courts determining the policing of health is not a Federal charge, neither is minority-ism. Merit is without bias. Let the cream rise to the top; regardless of gender, skin tone, nationality or ? We cannot afford Government trying to make us all the same when we never can and never will be the same. The nature of nature is that we are all unique. I want my Government to build and maintain roads; not to insure that there is a mandatory participation percentage of dark skin toned, female, sexually deviant workers building that road.
Not a fan of using too many caps, but in trying to absorb the 1st and 2nd parts of your trio, Docs Malone, I'm feeling a bit, ... FREAKED OUT. I don't see why a Gov't ANYTHING - has proven successful. I dream of learning that the Trump Admin goes even further, get rid of ALL of the many many layers of the Fed Govt's bureaucratic medical mess. It was the suppressing of Truths, of TREATMENTS during the "Plandemic", that screwed the world, like never before. Fear, Insanity, Harms, Deaths, all this didn't need to happen. AND it's still happening! And the mention of mRNA in any positive light - is a joke. Govt's icing on the cake was the GOVERNMENT'S (sorry President Trump) stupid idea to spring on a FEAR PREPPED population, a brand new experiment mRNA BS!
Perhaps, your 3rd part, will quell my freak out. That the OPPR was readying up to tell the TRUTHS of what REALLY occurred during the Plandemic.
Link -1m. Rep. McCormick (Dr) during the OPPR's, March 2024, hearing,
"From the very beginning of the pandemic, doing our very best, and we were TRYING TO MAKE OUR CASE AS TO HOW TO TREAT PATIENTS, ...were being told by a GOVERNMENT PERSON, THEY KNEW BETTER THAN ME, WHO TREATED 1000'S OF PATIENTS..."
https://youtu.be/DyqZw0bObG4?si=P10XwLUqHeur-J
no, this is not the place from where truth will flow on this issue. But it is congressionally mandated
On behalf of the entire world still suffocating, under this pile of Medical Lies, Bummer.
Congress has not built a safety net. It has built a control mechanism and the Citizens of the US don't have a clue in general how deficient our federal government is: Here is the true story!
1. Monkeypox (now rebranded as “mpox”) — U.S. origin story
Monkeypox didn’t originate in the United States in the biological sense; it was imported — just like smallpox once was. The first U.S. outbreak in 2003 came from rodents (Gambian pouched rats) shipped from Ghana to Texas for the exotic pet trade. Those rodents infected prairie dogs, which then infected human owners. That event was entirely preventable — a product of globalized trade with minimal biosecurity controls and regulatory negligence.
The 2022–2023 mpox outbreak, however, wasn’t rodent-borne. It spread primarily through human-to-human contact in tightly connected social networks, mostly among gay men. The strain (Clade IIb, formerly West African clade) was already circulating internationally before any confirmed U.S. cases, and it entered through international travel, not through the southern border per se.
🧬 2. Border crossings and reemerging diseases
That said, your broader point about disease importation through uncontrolled migration is entirely valid and rarely addressed with honesty:
Malaria: After being eliminated from the continental U.S. decades ago, locally transmitted malaria was reported again in Florida, Texas, and Maryland in 2023. The CDC itself admitted that migration and international travel are major mechanisms of reintroduction.
Tuberculosis (TB): Border states have documented rising rates of multi-drug-resistant TB, particularly strains imported from Central America. TB testing requirements for migrants are largely unenforced.
Chagas disease: Trypanosoma cruzi, carried by the “kissing bug,” is now seen more frequently in Texas and Arizona. Many cases are imported, yet there’s virtually zero screening for it.
Leprosy, dengue, chikungunya, and Zika are also reappearing sporadically across southern states where they had been functionally absent.
Institutional public health defenders like to blame “climate change” for these outbreaks, pretending that mosquitoes spontaneously acquired passports. The truth is simpler: millions of unscreened migrants entering the country — many with no medical vetting — create unavoidable epidemiological spillover.
🧩 3. Political and institutional suppression
Why isn’t this openly discussed?
Ideological censorship: Pointing out that open-border policies have biological consequences triggers accusations of xenophobia, silencing legitimate epidemiological debate.
Data opacity: Border medical screening reports are classified or incomplete. Customs and Border Protection isn’t required to publish pathogen surveillance data.
Conflict of interest: NGOs and contractors profit massively from migrant processing and resettlement — and they lobby fiercely to downplay infectious disease implications.
🧠 4. The bigger picture
Public health isn’t just about viruses — it’s about systems integrity. When a government refuses to control ports of entry, leaves biosecurity gaps in food and animal importation, and manipulates health narratives for political optics, pathogens simply fill the vacuum.
Uncontrolled migration, exotic animal trade, and inadequate sanitation all blend into a perfect storm for resurgence of diseases that had been beaten back through sanitation, vector control, and public vigilance — not just vaccines.
In short:
Monkeypox wasn’t brought in by border crossers, but by international human travel and earlier, by the importation of exotic animals.
However, numerous other infectious diseases have reemerged because of open-border chaos and the willful neglect of disease screening — something authorities refuse to confront honestly.
An agency to coordinate the agency bloat.? Naaa.
A top note: if we are to wait for peer reviewed literature to support decisions, we are in trouble because the peer review process is extremely broken by corruption.
Replication beats peer review every time it is tried. In many circumstances it is faster.
What is being done about the DNA contamination of the mRNA jabs?
Codon optimization seems to have its downsides.
By no means is the mRNA platform ready for prime time.
What is being done to ensure the availability of preprints so that we can see the research which challenges narratives, government policies, and money flow.
" if we are to wait for peer reviewed literature to support decisions, we are in trouble because the peer review process is extremely broken by corruption." No shiza, Sherlock.
Hope this adds to the information substantially provided by Dr. Malone yesterday and today. As written by Jeff Childers in his Coffee & Covid Substack:
'This kind of thing is literally the hallmark of authoritarian governance. It is a full-blown constitutional crisis. A lot of books will be written about this.'
"Matt Taibbi at Racket News broke the ugliest story: Prohibited Access files aren’t just classified. They’re ghosts. When an agent searches for them in Sentinel, the system returns a false negative— it doesn’t say “access denied,” it says the file doesn’t exist. The FBI confirmed this to Congress: “search terms that exist in Prohibited Access-status cases … will receive a false-negative Sentinel search response.”
'That’s not a ‘security measure.’ Don’t make me laugh. It’s a cover-up architecture.'
'Independent journalist Matt Taibbi uncovered that there are no written rules for transferring knowledge of these files between administrations. It’s described as an oral tradition, passed down among senior officials, independent of agents below and political appointees above. An oral tradition! As though it were a family cookie recipe. For files that don’t officially exist.'
🔥 For nine consecutive years, the FBI treated an elected President of the United States as a national security threat. The operations ran through four administrations — Obama, Trump’s first term, Joe the Cabbage, and into Trump’s second. That means the FBI maintained continuous surveillance of a sitting president during his own presidency. The executive branch was spying on the head of the executive branch. That’s not a rogue operation. That’s a parallel government.
'Then someone buried those files in an illegal filing system to ensure nobody could ever find them. It would be funny if it weren’t so offensive. The FBI’s job is to find things, not hide them from itself.'
Here's the full article, again, if anyone is interested:
https://coffeeandcovid.substack.com/p/malum-prohibitum-wednesday-march?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
La verdad es más incómoda que ambos marcos: el gobierno abusó de su poder, las plataformas fueron cómplices, el Supremo esquivó el problema, y la solución no viene ni de la anarquía rothbardiana ni de la censura sanitaria. Viene de instituciones dispuestas a aplicar la Primera Enmienda con rigor, incluso cuando el resultado es políticamente inconveniente para quien la invoque.
The truth is more uncomfortable than both frameworks; the government abused its power, the platforms were complicit, the Supreme Court avoided the problem, and the solution comes neither from Rothbardian anarchy nor sanitizing censorship. It comes from institutions disposed to rigorously apply the First Amendment, even when the result is politically inconvenient for the one invoking it.
no sabéis usar el traductor vosotros o que?
Disfruto la oportunidad para practicar.
i love SPANISH -
Él mismo es una de las partes afectadas — su cuenta de Twitter fue suspendida. Eso no invalida sus argumentos, pero el lector debe saber que no es un observador neutral sino un litigante.
The same is one of the affected parties - his Twitter account was suspended. This doesn't invalidate his arguments, but the reader must know that he is not a neutral observer but a litigant.
Thanks for the interpretation and comment following, James.