When I think of all things an enemy might do to gradually corrode and subvert a civilization, I see that they're doing them, and for a very long time. The pace is quickening; perhaps they're trying to make a 2030 deadline.
I think we’re stopping them though! I think they’ve been getting away with it for a while, but now that we’re aware of it, we’re pushing back — and hopefully pushing that timeline back as well!
Dr. Money was a psychopath putting his own fame ahead of his patient's well being. My guess is Money was deemed the 'expert', much like Hitler's Dr. Josef Mengele.
They deemed him "America's Doctor" much the same as Josef Mengele was "Germany's Doctor". He is a narcissistic sociopath, and should be treated as one.
When I was in college, in one if those large auditoriums with hundreds of allied health students, and a speaker down there on the stage, I remember an elderly oncologist defining an expert as, "some son-of-a-bitch from out of town with a slide show!"
I remember it as being someone more than 20 miles from home with a brief case, but I was in college 1969 - '71. In an earlier generation it would likely be a guy who pulls into town with a horse and wagon with posters on the sides selling health elixirs made from snake oils and opium.
I hope Fauci lies in Congress again. It would be a new crime and not covered by his auto pen pardon. We are certainly headed for a 1984 dystopian society. People who have those Amazon Alexa’s or Google Nest’s in their homes are just like the mirrors in the book. Always listening but not yet the threat they were in the story and not barking out morning calisthenics. I have never subscribed to this “gender” theory crap. It’s elitist groupthink and I reject it. It’s also a social media issue and since I don’t do social media it’s not something that gets pounded into me. I’ve said it before and will continue to say it. Social media is the downfall of society. The most evil thing man has created with AI next and most likely the last.
I do not think auto pen pardons are valid. There is no chain of evidence that the President ever saw it or was involved. Sort of like mail in ballots that come in after an election or have no folds to indicate they were ever mailed.
I agree unfortunately there’s no way to really challenge the pardon. Biden can recall what he had for breakfast and the Supreme Court isn’t going to touch ruling against a presidential pardon.
I agree that they are not likely to do anything about it. Auto pens are meant for signing thank you letters and proforma things that would take up the President's time. But, for a number of these auto pen pardons Biden wasn't even in the Country. Notice that Trump always signs pardons and executive orders on camera.
The president's real signature, is identifiable, the auto pen, is just that automatic every time, the FBI could do a simple test to see which auto pen the signature matched up to! It would be so simple to see a forensic line up of real signatures and that of the auto pen!
A pardon only protects Fauci criminally, it does not protect him from civil liability if a civil suit was brought against him, therefore I predict he will not answer questions.
Update: "Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped a huge bombshell last night, days after former White House COVID advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci’s private thoughts during the COVID pandemic were revealed to the entire world: the wicked doctor hid a life-threatening complication after publicly taking the COVID shot."
"But the newly released diaries also reveal something even more disturbing: Fauci suffered a major vaccine injury months after taking the COVID shot, right after it was first made available!"
Agree with this, especially the social media part. I was only ever on Facebook, but got kicked off a couple years ago for reasons I was never made aware of (I had basically stopped posting and only commented and "liked" on friends posts and comments). I realized I was much happier not being on it, so I've never gone back to any social media (never had accounts on X, or Instagram, or any of the others).
Hate crime and hate speech laws are thought crime laws.
The idea of hate crime laws is that, rather than simply charging people for their heinous acts, we will decide what they must have been thinking and charge them for that as well. It's a real crime to which is added the charge of being hateful, or at least out of step with the official narrative. It's a way of undermining the rule of law, and is used to further controls over people as well. How in fact is a jury, or anyone else, supposed to determine what the feelings were of the defendant? Are they supposed to just believe the prosecutor?
Hate crime laws are not the same as hate speech laws, in which the crime is saying something objectionable while not committing an actual crime. Here you are just being charged for your thoughts, or at least for expressing them, maybe hateful or again at odds with the official narrative. It's better to just lump them together as thought crimes.
Hate crimes do not exist. They are just crimes. If it's just words, it's not a crime short of openly threatening violence against a person or group, or encouraging others to do violence against a person or group. I think it's important to always remind people and media of this at every opportunity.
This goes back to the big problem of how to handle criminals in our world.
The world is full of them, and they create all kinds of problems. One of the most devious things they are capable of is getting OTHER people to turn to violence. So you get violent people sometimes being arrested and charged with crimes, but seldom the one behind the scenes who actually incited the violence.
The concept of "thought crimes" was probably invented by such a being as a way to keep us fighting each other and ignoring the true source of our problems.
There is a real social problem to be solved here. But our traditional system of laws (also created by psychopaths?) is not up to the task of solving it. The only solution would lie in a system of information where truth and lie could be accurately separated. And that's very difficult to do!
I can completely understand why the rift between men and women is growing. We older folks remember when we were young…..guys were shy and afraid to ask a girl out that they liked for fear of rejection…remember? Dances at school after the game were strained. Those pairs who were “going steady” danced, while single girls and guys lined up on opposite side of the dance floor and stared at each other. Loving to dance, I once walked over to the line of boys and started asking each one, in turn, if they would like to dance. They turned white with fear! :-)
But after about a dozen “nos” I came across a “yes”. Over the years, guys have been mistreated by girls who are just nasty in their negative responses. No one wants to go through that. I have never understood why girls felt the need to berate a guy asking a simple, polite question. Nowadays, things are worse. Guys have to figure out if the girl’s short, purple haircut means she’s gay, or just stylish? Or if her masculine attire is the signal? Are the two girls together as a gay pair? It’s like walking through a mine field. Is it any wonder that men are not as aggressive as they used to be? For me, I ask the same question whenever I see a “man bun” or long, long hair on a guy. Gay? Or can’t afford a haircut?
It's good to hear a viewpoint from someone of "that" age. I had a terrible time as a teenager, because I was interested in girls as a child and had to deal with the social fallout from that. When I was old enough to where I was " supposed" to be interested in girls, I had had enough and coasted through my teens as a "loner."
My parents didn't know what to do, and I think that's part of the problem. Parents don't know what to do, and they are the ones in charge of the social education of their children. In my school days, social issues were never brought up or taught in class. But they weren't brought up or taught at home, either! There has to be SOME system for helping kids grow up socially. And I can see that whatever system was in place has been under attack for quite a long time.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!" (Sir Walter Scott). May we return to the wisdom of the Bible so that we can become like the Sons of Issachar and understand our times.
Thank you Wendy for your clear explanation about gender speak. Many of us are swimming in it and don't even know it. Gynocentrism allows it to be basically invisible.
Thank you Robert for running this piece. The amazing theft of our language is tied to the denigration of men. Without creating a space that automatically devalued men and masculinity none of this could have happened. We have been hoodwinked.
To deconstruct the oft-heard declaration, "Trans women are women." 'Trans women' are men whose gender identities are women. 'Women' are biological females. This assertion conflates mutable gender identity with immutable sex. One might say "Men are women." based on the same fallacious thinking. A classic case of newspeak/genderspeak. The scary part is that many people believe this nonsense. And worse, getting laws written to enforce this stupidity.
For several decades, hearing the word 'gender' used in lieu of 'sex' has been a teeth grinding experience for me. The word gender belongs in grammar and linguistics, not as a synonym of sex.
depends on what meant by meaning. Like Bill Clinton saying It depends on what the meaning of "Is" is. That is the art of the lawyers and politicians. = obfuscation.
Oh yes. RE-defining is the game now, and not just lawyers... Dr Malone give a great history here. Karlyn Borysenko investigates all manner of antifa/socialist/activist groups documenting what their words MEAN; how they use words; what they INTEND. Words do matter. We are needing to catch up on their sleight-of-hand redefining.
Yes, the secret identity of words (and those crazy acronyms). I will tell my secret. When my guys started texting me after I finally resorted to a cell phone just prior to Covid, they would text LOL a lot. I was so pleased and smiley because I thought they were expressing their hearts with Lots Of Love. Turns out they were laughing at their poor mom with Laugh Out Loud. Sigh.....I know they Do love me, but they also think mom has a lot of goofy ideas.
Mr. "I am the science" is an egotistical psychopath. He is competing among his peers Adolf Hitler, Genghis Kahn, Joseph Stalin and Mao ZeDong for the top spot. Psychopaths must be the best. Morality, humanity or ethics are insignificant side shows to a psychopath. My hope is our State A.G.s will find justice for Fauci because his preemptive auto-pen pardon is immutable. The complexities of sex and gender are an overwhelming challenge on the journey to adulthood. I hold no doubt teaching our youth they may have been born in the wrong body is an obstructionist roadblock to that journey. Sexual orientation, preferences and choices are all personal. Nobody else's business; particularly Government.
Gender used to be a grammatical term. Words were classified as masculine and feminine in the romance languages, emanating from Latin.
It's tragically fitting that experimental failure accompanies the very inception of this word being used to describe perception of sex role rather than acknowledging biological reality.
Kids must be protected from the frankenstein doctors.
When I think of all things an enemy might do to gradually corrode and subvert a civilization, I see that they're doing them, and for a very long time. The pace is quickening; perhaps they're trying to make a 2030 deadline.
PS: Hat tip to Paul Harvey.
I think we’re stopping them though! I think they’ve been getting away with it for a while, but now that we’re aware of it, we’re pushing back — and hopefully pushing that timeline back as well!
You know history James, it tends to repeat itself ad infinitum. Slow as a snail to move towards the Light.
Dr. Money was a psychopath putting his own fame ahead of his patient's well being. My guess is Money was deemed the 'expert', much like Hitler's Dr. Josef Mengele.
And fauci, another deadly expert
They deemed him "America's Doctor" much the same as Josef Mengele was "Germany's Doctor". He is a narcissistic sociopath, and should be treated as one.
He and company made expert a 4 letter word
Definition of expert: Someone who used to be pertinent.
When I was in college, in one if those large auditoriums with hundreds of allied health students, and a speaker down there on the stage, I remember an elderly oncologist defining an expert as, "some son-of-a-bitch from out of town with a slide show!"
I remember it as being someone more than 20 miles from home with a brief case, but I was in college 1969 - '71. In an earlier generation it would likely be a guy who pulls into town with a horse and wagon with posters on the sides selling health elixirs made from snake oils and opium.
Devil Bill Rockerfeller!
Some of those elixirs were damn potent and actually worked!
I hope Fauci lies in Congress again. It would be a new crime and not covered by his auto pen pardon. We are certainly headed for a 1984 dystopian society. People who have those Amazon Alexa’s or Google Nest’s in their homes are just like the mirrors in the book. Always listening but not yet the threat they were in the story and not barking out morning calisthenics. I have never subscribed to this “gender” theory crap. It’s elitist groupthink and I reject it. It’s also a social media issue and since I don’t do social media it’s not something that gets pounded into me. I’ve said it before and will continue to say it. Social media is the downfall of society. The most evil thing man has created with AI next and most likely the last.
I do not think auto pen pardons are valid. There is no chain of evidence that the President ever saw it or was involved. Sort of like mail in ballots that come in after an election or have no folds to indicate they were ever mailed.
I agree unfortunately there’s no way to really challenge the pardon. Biden can recall what he had for breakfast and the Supreme Court isn’t going to touch ruling against a presidential pardon.
I agree that they are not likely to do anything about it. Auto pens are meant for signing thank you letters and proforma things that would take up the President's time. But, for a number of these auto pen pardons Biden wasn't even in the Country. Notice that Trump always signs pardons and executive orders on camera.
We all know Biden wasn’t running the country. It was a cluster fuck of criminals who helped destroy it.
Yup.
The president's real signature, is identifiable, the auto pen, is just that automatic every time, the FBI could do a simple test to see which auto pen the signature matched up to! It would be so simple to see a forensic line up of real signatures and that of the auto pen!
Supreme Court won’t touch This. Presidential pardons won’t face scrutiny.
A pardon only protects Fauci criminally, it does not protect him from civil liability if a civil suit was brought against him, therefore I predict he will not answer questions.
It also doesn’t protect against state prosecution. Where are you DeSantis?
That was my thought too. I’m betting we get a bunch of “I plead the fifth amendment”
Update: "Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dropped a huge bombshell last night, days after former White House COVID advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci’s private thoughts during the COVID pandemic were revealed to the entire world: the wicked doctor hid a life-threatening complication after publicly taking the COVID shot."
"But the newly released diaries also reveal something even more disturbing: Fauci suffered a major vaccine injury months after taking the COVID shot, right after it was first made available!"
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/07/whoa-hhs-secretary-rfk-jr-reveals-dr-anthony/
Agree with this, especially the social media part. I was only ever on Facebook, but got kicked off a couple years ago for reasons I was never made aware of (I had basically stopped posting and only commented and "liked" on friends posts and comments). I realized I was much happier not being on it, so I've never gone back to any social media (never had accounts on X, or Instagram, or any of the others).
I did Facebook like 12 years ago and after dealing with some keyboard cowboys I knew this wasn’t going to be something that adds to my life and quit.
Hate crime and hate speech laws are thought crime laws.
The idea of hate crime laws is that, rather than simply charging people for their heinous acts, we will decide what they must have been thinking and charge them for that as well. It's a real crime to which is added the charge of being hateful, or at least out of step with the official narrative. It's a way of undermining the rule of law, and is used to further controls over people as well. How in fact is a jury, or anyone else, supposed to determine what the feelings were of the defendant? Are they supposed to just believe the prosecutor?
Hate crime laws are not the same as hate speech laws, in which the crime is saying something objectionable while not committing an actual crime. Here you are just being charged for your thoughts, or at least for expressing them, maybe hateful or again at odds with the official narrative. It's better to just lump them together as thought crimes.
https://drp314.substack.com/p/copy-hate-crimes
But both are wrong think.
True
Hate crimes do not exist. They are just crimes. If it's just words, it's not a crime short of openly threatening violence against a person or group, or encouraging others to do violence against a person or group. I think it's important to always remind people and media of this at every opportunity.
Indeed
This goes back to the big problem of how to handle criminals in our world.
The world is full of them, and they create all kinds of problems. One of the most devious things they are capable of is getting OTHER people to turn to violence. So you get violent people sometimes being arrested and charged with crimes, but seldom the one behind the scenes who actually incited the violence.
The concept of "thought crimes" was probably invented by such a being as a way to keep us fighting each other and ignoring the true source of our problems.
There is a real social problem to be solved here. But our traditional system of laws (also created by psychopaths?) is not up to the task of solving it. The only solution would lie in a system of information where truth and lie could be accurately separated. And that's very difficult to do!
I can completely understand why the rift between men and women is growing. We older folks remember when we were young…..guys were shy and afraid to ask a girl out that they liked for fear of rejection…remember? Dances at school after the game were strained. Those pairs who were “going steady” danced, while single girls and guys lined up on opposite side of the dance floor and stared at each other. Loving to dance, I once walked over to the line of boys and started asking each one, in turn, if they would like to dance. They turned white with fear! :-)
But after about a dozen “nos” I came across a “yes”. Over the years, guys have been mistreated by girls who are just nasty in their negative responses. No one wants to go through that. I have never understood why girls felt the need to berate a guy asking a simple, polite question. Nowadays, things are worse. Guys have to figure out if the girl’s short, purple haircut means she’s gay, or just stylish? Or if her masculine attire is the signal? Are the two girls together as a gay pair? It’s like walking through a mine field. Is it any wonder that men are not as aggressive as they used to be? For me, I ask the same question whenever I see a “man bun” or long, long hair on a guy. Gay? Or can’t afford a haircut?
It's good to hear a viewpoint from someone of "that" age. I had a terrible time as a teenager, because I was interested in girls as a child and had to deal with the social fallout from that. When I was old enough to where I was " supposed" to be interested in girls, I had had enough and coasted through my teens as a "loner."
My parents didn't know what to do, and I think that's part of the problem. Parents don't know what to do, and they are the ones in charge of the social education of their children. In my school days, social issues were never brought up or taught in class. But they weren't brought up or taught at home, either! There has to be SOME system for helping kids grow up socially. And I can see that whatever system was in place has been under attack for quite a long time.
Derangement syndrome runs amuck in the medical world!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!" (Sir Walter Scott). May we return to the wisdom of the Bible so that we can become like the Sons of Issachar and understand our times.
How many of these Josef Mengelas still walk among us today?
#1 at this time would Fauci.
Thank you Wendy for your clear explanation about gender speak. Many of us are swimming in it and don't even know it. Gynocentrism allows it to be basically invisible.
Thank you Robert for running this piece. The amazing theft of our language is tied to the denigration of men. Without creating a space that automatically devalued men and masculinity none of this could have happened. We have been hoodwinked.
To deconstruct the oft-heard declaration, "Trans women are women." 'Trans women' are men whose gender identities are women. 'Women' are biological females. This assertion conflates mutable gender identity with immutable sex. One might say "Men are women." based on the same fallacious thinking. A classic case of newspeak/genderspeak. The scary part is that many people believe this nonsense. And worse, getting laws written to enforce this stupidity.
For several decades, hearing the word 'gender' used in lieu of 'sex' has been a teeth grinding experience for me. The word gender belongs in grammar and linguistics, not as a synonym of sex.
Words have meaning. Thank God.
depends on what meant by meaning. Like Bill Clinton saying It depends on what the meaning of "Is" is. That is the art of the lawyers and politicians. = obfuscation.
Oh yes. RE-defining is the game now, and not just lawyers... Dr Malone give a great history here. Karlyn Borysenko investigates all manner of antifa/socialist/activist groups documenting what their words MEAN; how they use words; what they INTEND. Words do matter. We are needing to catch up on their sleight-of-hand redefining.
Yes, the secret identity of words (and those crazy acronyms). I will tell my secret. When my guys started texting me after I finally resorted to a cell phone just prior to Covid, they would text LOL a lot. I was so pleased and smiley because I thought they were expressing their hearts with Lots Of Love. Turns out they were laughing at their poor mom with Laugh Out Loud. Sigh.....I know they Do love me, but they also think mom has a lot of goofy ideas.
Thanks for responding. I agree with you completely.
Annnndddd the little pipsqueak will never pay for what he did. That, above all, just pisses me off!!!!!
Oh no, not another "Bruce" thing.
What were my parents thinking.........
Mr. "I am the science" is an egotistical psychopath. He is competing among his peers Adolf Hitler, Genghis Kahn, Joseph Stalin and Mao ZeDong for the top spot. Psychopaths must be the best. Morality, humanity or ethics are insignificant side shows to a psychopath. My hope is our State A.G.s will find justice for Fauci because his preemptive auto-pen pardon is immutable. The complexities of sex and gender are an overwhelming challenge on the journey to adulthood. I hold no doubt teaching our youth they may have been born in the wrong body is an obstructionist roadblock to that journey. Sexual orientation, preferences and choices are all personal. Nobody else's business; particularly Government.
Gender used to be a grammatical term. Words were classified as masculine and feminine in the romance languages, emanating from Latin.
It's tragically fitting that experimental failure accompanies the very inception of this word being used to describe perception of sex role rather than acknowledging biological reality.
Kids must be protected from the frankenstein doctors.
The truth is, I still get an F in sex according to my AZ drivers license. I am cool with that.