Risk/Benefit Ratio upside down! So many studies out of England have been massaged and have been bogus. Lancet has been a conduit to spread the bias to push the vaccine narrative. They destroyed Dr. Wakefield's career for reporting the high risk on MMR. He has been vindicated and this has not reached the general public. The push to keep the current vaccination schedule in the US is just the latest effort using a judge to block RFK Jr. ACIP meeting was canceled for this week because of it!
Nice analysis. Propagandist hope that you won't peek behind the curtain or sift through the weeds. Dr. Malone has done both and found (yet again) that the wizards are humbugs. Now if they'd only float away in their balloons!!
Too many young men, athletes, in the prime of their life, dropped dead of or had career ending myocarditis without a “peep” from the biased medical community.
I find the numbers affected to be suspect. There were many, many young people affected. The only ones we heard about in mainstream media were athletes, and then it was "unknown causes", because for goodness sake, don't ask if they were recently vaccinated.
If Jill can see between the lines, (lies) and we can too, what is that makes the study worthwhile for whom. The analysis and the looking deeper for the stats is certainly helpful to us who don't know what to look for in these papers without some direction. Unless the doctors and scientists are astute and not too busy to deal with the "fine print" it will go unnoticed by most. I appreciate the pointing out of what would be obvious to most professionals unless they have something to lose...
It probably was obvious to the more intelligent professionals, but because they were either heavily compromised ( politically) or had other family, they ignored their concerns
Spot on! Skepticism and vetting take effort. We do need to depend on others to distill the facts for us in many instances, but outsourcing the vetting process 100% can be fatal.
As I have mentioned several times, a big problem with peer review in biomedical journals is that often the reviewers are not really peers. The old boy network of review common today is to request reviews from members,within a clique of clinicians who have only limited understanding what what constitutes bench research. Which is,why I say look closely at the methods. And if the results, much less the discussion, does not jibe with what the methods should have produced, then you know you are looking at a piece of fiction.
A while back Dr Malone gave us a lesson on reading and analyzing these sorts of papers. This is an excellent second example. Maybe a good candidate to offer in medical school and continuing education.
Like not supplying a running percentage of survivors, only cases ( and even those were open to question!). Absolutely.! Like you read my mind Doc! 🤣🤣 ( punctuation edit)
Isn’t it the truth when something is built on lies right from the foundation up, and the usual people that are profiting from the scheme continue to lie to keep their grift going, the lies and their actions grow like a cancer. Censorship, social distancing, mandatory masks even on infants, banning travel, forced injections, injecting pregnant women, safe and effective, all lies. And when people ended up in the hospital remdesivir and a ventilator. If you died the hospital got paid, incredible. And if you had a stroke, a heart attack, blood clots, auto immune disease, cancer it was all just a big coincidence. How evil can global government medical establishments be, I think we all know the answer. With the degree of evil this government put us through and the fact no elite pay a price for any horrible offense they do, it’s very easy to question things like Epstein, “his suicide”, C. Kirk’s assassination, this war, the deficit spending, etc. When you have zero trust in the government BS do we even still have a Republic?
Despicable. The "POWERS THAT BE" knew all along that children were NOT in a vulnerable class the same way the elderly with compromised immune systems and fragilities were. Giving the shot to children was for additional PROFITS for the pharmaceutical companies distributing the drug, PERIOD. I repeat....DESPICABLE.
C. G. / The propaganda that was first put out in every conceivable format was to create fear. Don't kill G'ma and keep the elderly safe and it went on and on. Most people were hooked by their own caring; and then the shoe dropped, and then the other one.
Lies of omission or commission. Both are lies. But there is a distinction if the lie is in how you answer a question like "Does this dress make me look fat?" There, you are trying to spare feelings, but it is still wrong because you may be sending her out wearing something that will cause her friends to ridicule her for wearing that garment. In The case of omitting the data
in the conclusion to the covid-19 study it is a dangerous lie of both omission and commission that may / will injure people.
Thank you for pointing out the flaws of this study. You’re right, they start out with a headline to make us believe the narrative of “safe and effective”. So many will leave it at that. The part that doesn’t end up in the conclusion is the important part. For the life of me, I can’t figure out why parents would give the COVID shots to their children when:
1. Children do not usually suffer serious disease with SARS-COV2.
2. There is even a hint of myocarditis.
Other than the fact they were mandated and parents didn’t know.
According to well-published cardiologist Peter McCullough, there is no such thing as "mild" myocarditis, since the result is always scarring of the myocardium. It's astonishing the extent to which "scientists" will go to promote the official narrative--and keep their jobs and research grants.
An intentional omission is the same as a LIE. Period!
Exactly. Common understanding for us common folk.
Try using an omission as a defense in a court of law and see where it gets you.
Risk/Benefit Ratio upside down! So many studies out of England have been massaged and have been bogus. Lancet has been a conduit to spread the bias to push the vaccine narrative. They destroyed Dr. Wakefield's career for reporting the high risk on MMR. He has been vindicated and this has not reached the general public. The push to keep the current vaccination schedule in the US is just the latest effort using a judge to block RFK Jr. ACIP meeting was canceled for this week because of it!
Nice analysis. Propagandist hope that you won't peek behind the curtain or sift through the weeds. Dr. Malone has done both and found (yet again) that the wizards are humbugs. Now if they'd only float away in their balloons!!
Yes it is a lie. That is called cherry picking.
Exactly.
Too many young men, athletes, in the prime of their life, dropped dead of or had career ending myocarditis without a “peep” from the biased medical community.
I find the numbers affected to be suspect. There were many, many young people affected. The only ones we heard about in mainstream media were athletes, and then it was "unknown causes", because for goodness sake, don't ask if they were recently vaccinated.
I call that intentional misrepresentation - a lie.
If Jill can see between the lines, (lies) and we can too, what is that makes the study worthwhile for whom. The analysis and the looking deeper for the stats is certainly helpful to us who don't know what to look for in these papers without some direction. Unless the doctors and scientists are astute and not too busy to deal with the "fine print" it will go unnoticed by most. I appreciate the pointing out of what would be obvious to most professionals unless they have something to lose...
It probably was obvious to the more intelligent professionals, but because they were either heavily compromised ( politically) or had other family, they ignored their concerns
Great write up. Evil liars never stop…twist and distort and we pay them to do so. They should be defunded into irrelevance right where they came from.
Spot on! Skepticism and vetting take effort. We do need to depend on others to distill the facts for us in many instances, but outsourcing the vetting process 100% can be fatal.
As I have mentioned several times, a big problem with peer review in biomedical journals is that often the reviewers are not really peers. The old boy network of review common today is to request reviews from members,within a clique of clinicians who have only limited understanding what what constitutes bench research. Which is,why I say look closely at the methods. And if the results, much less the discussion, does not jibe with what the methods should have produced, then you know you are looking at a piece of fiction.
A while back Dr Malone gave us a lesson on reading and analyzing these sorts of papers. This is an excellent second example. Maybe a good candidate to offer in medical school and continuing education.
Like not supplying a running percentage of survivors, only cases ( and even those were open to question!). Absolutely.! Like you read my mind Doc! 🤣🤣 ( punctuation edit)
Running cases, ah, yes. I saw that as absolute obfuscation from the very beginning.
Isn’t it the truth when something is built on lies right from the foundation up, and the usual people that are profiting from the scheme continue to lie to keep their grift going, the lies and their actions grow like a cancer. Censorship, social distancing, mandatory masks even on infants, banning travel, forced injections, injecting pregnant women, safe and effective, all lies. And when people ended up in the hospital remdesivir and a ventilator. If you died the hospital got paid, incredible. And if you had a stroke, a heart attack, blood clots, auto immune disease, cancer it was all just a big coincidence. How evil can global government medical establishments be, I think we all know the answer. With the degree of evil this government put us through and the fact no elite pay a price for any horrible offense they do, it’s very easy to question things like Epstein, “his suicide”, C. Kirk’s assassination, this war, the deficit spending, etc. When you have zero trust in the government BS do we even still have a Republic?
Despicable. The "POWERS THAT BE" knew all along that children were NOT in a vulnerable class the same way the elderly with compromised immune systems and fragilities were. Giving the shot to children was for additional PROFITS for the pharmaceutical companies distributing the drug, PERIOD. I repeat....DESPICABLE.
C. G. / The propaganda that was first put out in every conceivable format was to create fear. Don't kill G'ma and keep the elderly safe and it went on and on. Most people were hooked by their own caring; and then the shoe dropped, and then the other one.
Lies of omission or commission. Both are lies. But there is a distinction if the lie is in how you answer a question like "Does this dress make me look fat?" There, you are trying to spare feelings, but it is still wrong because you may be sending her out wearing something that will cause her friends to ridicule her for wearing that garment. In The case of omitting the data
in the conclusion to the covid-19 study it is a dangerous lie of both omission and commission that may / will injure people.
Thank you for pointing out the flaws of this study. You’re right, they start out with a headline to make us believe the narrative of “safe and effective”. So many will leave it at that. The part that doesn’t end up in the conclusion is the important part. For the life of me, I can’t figure out why parents would give the COVID shots to their children when:
1. Children do not usually suffer serious disease with SARS-COV2.
2. There is even a hint of myocarditis.
Other than the fact they were mandated and parents didn’t know.
If something is mandated, I'm always suspicious. If it's that good, why do I have to be forced?
Exactly, good point!
According to well-published cardiologist Peter McCullough, there is no such thing as "mild" myocarditis, since the result is always scarring of the myocardium. It's astonishing the extent to which "scientists" will go to promote the official narrative--and keep their jobs and research grants.