134 Comments
User's avatar
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Make no mistake! Islam is their and our most violent and barbarian foe.

Israel is the canary in the coal mine for the civilized world.

They need a free hand when it comes to their own self defense because if Islam is allowed to destroy Israel, the rest of the world may follow.

Tom Potts's avatar

Russia is not our problem, Islam is our major threat both internally and externally. China wants Islam to defeat the USA since Islam has mostly conquered Europe. Ukraine and Russia are a sideshow. The vast gusher of extreme oil wealth in the Middle East is funding much of the college campus insurrection, the DSA, the progressive Democrats, and the media. Saudi Arabia and the GCC monarchies are pleased that the USA and Israel have mostly neutralized the IRGC. Last week the Saudis, Turkeye, and Pakistan created a new mutual defense pact focused on containing what is left of the IRGC, and soon will focus on completing the conquest of Europe , not through direct military attacks, but through other mechanisms. The tens of millions of Muslims that are now in Europe are their Army. The wombs of muslim women are their future. The largest military in NATO in Europe is Turkeye, and they will direct the local islamic warriors. The Saudi’s, the GCC Monarchies, Turkeye, and Pakistan are not allies of the USA. They are mobilizing for domination to build a global Caliphate. A progressive Democrat/DSA power structure in the USA would invalidate the US Constitution, join the ICC, and send hundreds of Americans to The Hague for soviet styled show trials. And then, sharia law in America.

May the Lord protect us.

Gail Benton's avatar

Who would want the Muslims and Christians to kill each other, so they can try to take over the world? Who have infiltrated governments, including the U.S. government?

Muslims have been bombed out of their countries, and who is paying for them to go into the West as refugees?

The US Constitution has been invalidated long before Democrat/DSA has come along, by both Parties by the puppet masters.

Yes, may the Lord protect us.

Elaine H's avatar

And who wants the Christian’s and the Jews to abandon each other? Hmmmm. The Muslims.

Gail Benton's avatar

Israel is doing a good job of abandoning Christians.

Christians, as well as Jews, have been living among Muslims for hundreds of years...until Zionists came along in mid 20th century.

For those that don't have tunnel vision:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Br916Vy5uuA

mspring's avatar

Absolutely agree! We must finally come to the realization that the arab/Islam world view is antithetical to the west, its history, philosophy and survival. It must be restrained. I doubt it can be eliminated, because from what i read, it is so deeply ingrained in the totality of the population, and is taught to each generation by actions and the cullture. Communist China also has an antithetical philosophy, but we seem to manage/contain it better. Perhaps because young chinese aren't taught from infancy that the US is the Great Satan.

Gail Benton's avatar

There are billions of Muslims.

Wouldn't they have taken over by now.

Who are the "minority" religion infiltrating governments around the world, including the U.S.?

Elaine H's avatar

Who Gail? The Muslims promised years ago that they would take over without lifting a weapon. And they are through asylum and birth rate.

Gail Benton's avatar

Asylum because the "Christian" and Zionist nations are bombing their countries?

Birthrates among another religion, as well.

For those that don't have tunnel vision:

overview of the corruption, including up to 16/17 children while on welfare ("it's legal") in first few minutes.

It could come to your town, as well

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cubO0lhOMcs

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

You may be correct, but is the problem solved by being overly aggressive in retaliation and creating a new generation of Muslims that hate the Jewish state? This problem has been formenting for many centuries. I wish I had the solution.

Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

I don't think we have any choice but to eradicate Islam, not just for the Jewish state, but or all of Mankind. The basic seventh century ideology is antithetical to preserving the basic liberties that free men and especially free women have a right to.

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

How many Muslims are there in this world? Billion +????

Gail Benton's avatar

Right.

The rest of the world would have been taken out LONG ago if that was the goal.

It's gone from fighting communism to fighting a religious war.

Profits galore

Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Too many!

But seriously, that figure has ballooned from 200 million in 1900 at 12-13% of world population to 2.06-2.07 billion at 25-26%, more than double the percentage of world population.

Obviously, a general lack of info displayed by the general public on these numbers is cause for concern.

More importantly, the ignorance among world leaders is even more concerning.

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Spot on! Lack of understanding history and reality!

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Spot on! Lack of understanding history and reality.!

Gail Benton's avatar

When a country is committing genocide in their region, they aren't well liked

Elaine H's avatar

Correct. Those Muslims have committed genocide for centuries.

Gail Benton's avatar

You have to read the comment I am replying to

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Empathy for fellow humans run amuck.

Richard's avatar

Hi Pristine Partiot.

Islam is no problem if the West was truly believing and living Catholic family life (Christian's). If so, we would not have had the Demographic Bomb, ie, Baby boomer's NOT having more than 1 or two children. That we are now facing

Islam will die slowly as it defies logic and rational thinking. What matters is the amount of damage we let them do within that period.

Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

After what Catholic Charities and various other religious based NGOs did for profit by enabling millions of illegal invaders to cross our borders, I'm not a fan.

Deb's avatar

Extremely interesting analysis. Thank you for doing the heavy lifting! God bless you both!

Michelle Demers Mynier's avatar

These essays have been SO informative! It occurred to me, while reading this, that it’s likely most of our elected representatives do NOT understand these current relationships! Thank you for unveiling this complicated system.

The Other Street's avatar

Great analysis. To make it simple, we subsidize the Defense industry and give $3.3bn in equipment to Israel. We do this because Israel serves our interests in the region. Latest example is Israel using their equipment and ours in bombing Iran in preparation of Epic Fury which otherwise would have been impossible. Another example is Israel destroying Hezbollah allowing the US to claim peace making in Lebanon.

Problem occurs when the US injects our other interests in the region. Rafah is very good example. Kamala “read the map.” In fact, she prevented Israel from finishing the job. The same thing in 2025 when my President told Israel to stand down. Clearly, the motivation was different but the result was the same. But in this case, there probably was a grand plan that led to Epic Fury, I assume so, different motivational indeed. In Harris case it was plain obstruction, here it was planning. But it remains that as long as we “give” Israel a few billions in equipment, they remain our satellite. And the perverse consequence is that it requires that we maintain the concept of US boots on the ground.

In other words, if Israel was “simply” buying $3bn from us, and was self-sufficient, we would have zero say. But we would still need Israel to defend our interests. The dependency would be reversed. Much like what is happening with Ukraine and its drone industry. We are now asking for their help. Ironic.

James Schwartz's avatar

It’s great that you’ve gone in depth on the Israel/US relationship. It is a very delicate subject and I would love to expound with a comment but it’s hard to do without angering someone or sounding one way or another. Thanks Doc. It has been a great topic.

Joewrite's avatar

Hi James, I appreciate your post. I think we must sound one way or another. The lives of our children, our country, our culture is at stake. Freedom is at stake.

James Schwartz's avatar

Big trouble is already here. There’s a word if uttered might lead to a visit from men in black suburbans. Heavily armed too. I’m afraid the time is now.

Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

There will never be peace in that region until all the,radical fundamental clerics are neutralized. And that includes strong arming communist movements there. I remember the Iranians who came here for higher ed back in the days,of the Shah....a,much more secular islamic republic. Then the communists started their down with the Shah nonsense (he was paying tor the,education of most of them), got taken over by knuckle walking clerics stood against the wall and we have iran today.

Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

I don;t think it's just the clerics.

The word on the street is that radical muslims want to kill the infidel and moderate muslims are OK with that.

It would take generations to change that fact ......... if we started now.

I don't think the West is at that point yet.

Barbara Charis's avatar

We have problems here in America in a number of states right now with radical muslims ..and in our Congress, too. Obama's favorite memory from Indonesia was the sound of the Muslim wake up call in the morning. He is responsible for bringing in many Muslims who have no desire to assimilate...They are out to bring their 'culture'?' here.

Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

They are here to bring Islam, at the point of a weapon if need be.

mspring's avatar

Agree, as I said in previous comment, there is ample literature by folk who have lived in the area that describes how deep the cultural principles are are.

Alan Dieringer's avatar

Dear RWM/JGM,

I have been perplexed by this one sided view of the Palestine topic and finally just assumed that you had been somehow "brainwashed" into believing the official story, like I was after watching some ~72 hours of the 9/11 live coverage. It took me some 8 years to snap out of it.

Below are two books, that provide sufficient evidence of Israel's human rights violations and provide historical evidence that your assessments in this series need to be re-examined. Luring people you define as an enemy into attacking you is a time honored military tactic. They attack and you spring the trap which wreaks devastating losses on them while incurring only minor ones on yourself. Remember, that since WWII and the firebombing of German and Japanese cities, America and its allies there is no distinction between military and civilian personnel. Today, Israel military forces target Palestinian famine victims at food distribution points run by the UN and other aid groups. Current estimates of those killed in this manner must be close to over two thousand.

War is not the answer, unless you are willing to accept the spiritual harm to yourself of eradicating your enemies.

Thank you for all your efforts,

Alan

1. ASSAULT ON THE LIBERTY: The True Story of the Israeli Attack on American Intelligence Ship

by James M. Ennes, Jr.

https://www.amazon.com/Assault-Liberty-Israeli-American-Intelligence/dp/0394505123/ref=sr_1_1?crid=LAVM0FWO2NF3&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.rPV6JwckRtbD2Ut8ncRuwAtcTjfLzO4V7hS-D4OsAznGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.4UYrlcDKPjveUbqWZZLOTD536UA9lEfllmTZMSdSmtA&dib_tag=se&keywords=assault+on+the+liberty+james+ennes+jr&qid=1786188625&sprefix=assault+on+the+libert%2Caps%2C724&sr=8-1

2. THE GENERAL'S SON: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine by Miko Peled

https://www.amazon.com/Generals-Son-Journey-Israeli-Palestine/dp/1682570029/ref=sr_1_1?crid=PDTM8UABF0QP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.J3jWUvvsfxAQp5yArekZW7jKSuyQ5Hz_Ap5oIFwC7-Y-XGgdqEMiyvjcHK3itWp_.S1kjMbrUPss3jUjQ5RDPukU-qZ0qed_KJWkeX7B5qt8&dib_tag=se&keywords=THE+GENERAL%27S+SON%3A+Journey+of+an+Israeli+in+Palestine+by+Miko+Peled&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1786188836&sprefix=the+general%27s+son+journey+of+an+israeli+in+palestine+by+miko+peled+%2Caps%2C1291&sr=8-1

mspring's avatar

It is fascinating to see those who continually repeat reports of "human rights violations" by Israel in defending against a group whose every action is a human rights violation as if those likely unavoidable actions invalidate Israel's soverignty, military actions or goals.

Hamas: hijacks aid trucks soon as they pass border, kills anyone who protests or tries to "steal" the aid, then sells it to palistinians. They maintain weapons in hospitals, homes stores all civilian places, they indiscriminately launch ballistics to Israel with no concern for the people they sometimes kill in Gaza when they misfire. They diverted the mind boggling UN aid to building tunnels only they can use that could have been used to build a thriving country. They execute their own "citizens" indiscriminately. I could go on ad nauseum...

Gail Benton's avatar

Sounds like war propaganda.

Israel needs an enemy so the world is "ok" with their crimes on humanity.

Developing and funding Hamas is just the ticket.

They knowing bombed the U.S.S. Liberty so they could start a war with the Arabs back in 1967.

The sailors can talk now, and their story is heroic.

Others are cowards.

Here's someone saying exactly what they do, as the world is their stage.

"Through deception we will war."

From 60 Minutes news program.

https://youtu.be/FLUUUZWjfGk?t=166

Elaine H's avatar

60 minutes? lol. Now I see where you are coming from.

Gail Benton's avatar

Seems like you have tunnel vision

Dave Slough's avatar

Good Lawd another one spewing jibberish 👆👆👆

Laney's avatar

The Gaza famine story is unraveling: New UN data just sank the case against Israel

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7nPA2A-yY6Q&pp=ugUHEgVlbi1VU9IHCQnECwGHKiGM7w%3D%3D

Alan Dieringer's avatar

UN's World Food Program says Israeli tanks and snipers opened fire on a crowd seeking aid in Gaza

World Jul 21, 2025 11:49 AM EDT

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/uns-world-food-program-says-israeli-tanks-and-snipers-opened-fire-on-a-crowd-seeking-aid-in-gaza

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — The U.N. food agency accused Israel of using tanks, snipers and other weapons to fire on a crowd of Palestinians seeking food aid, in what the territory's Health Ministry said was one of the deadliest days for aid-seekers in over 21 months of war.

READ MORE: U.S. envoy to Syria doubles down on support for new government and criticizes Israel's intervention

The World Food Program in a statement Sunday condemned the violence that erupted in northern Gaza as Palestinians tried to reach a convoy of trucks carrying food. The Health Ministry in Gaza said at least 80 people were killed in the incident. The Israeli military has said it fired warning shots "to remove an immediate threat," but has questioned the death toll reported by the Palestinians.

The accusation by a major aid agency that has had generally good working relations with Israel builds on descriptions by witnesses and others, who also said Israel opened fire on the crowd.

The bloodshed surrounding aid access highlights the increasingly precarious situation for people in Gaza who have been desperately seeking out food and other assistance, as the war that has roiled the region shows no signs of ending. Israel and Hamas are still engaged in ceasefire talks, but there appears to be no breakthrough and it's not clear whether any truce would bring the war to a lasting halt.

As the talks proceed, the death toll in the war-ravaged territory has climbed to more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians but the ministry says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is part of the Hamas government, but the U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.

Israel has meanwhile widened its evacuation orders for the territory to include an area that has been somewhat less hard-hit than others, indicating a new battleground may be opening up and squeezing Palestinians into ever tinier stretches of Gaza.

WFP condemns violence at food distribution points

In northern Gaza on Sunday, the Health Ministry, witnesses and a U.N. official said Israeli forces opened fire toward crowds who tried to get food from a 25-truck convoy that had entered the hard-hit area.

The WFP statement, which said the crowd surrounding its convoy "came under fire from Israeli tanks, snipers and other gunfire," backs up those claims. The statement did not specify a death toll, saying only the incident resulted in the loss of "countless lives."

After Sunday's incident, a photographer cooperating with The Associated Press counted 31 bodies at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City and 20 others in the courtyard of Sheikh Radwan clinic.

"These people were simply trying to access food to feed themselves and their families on the brink of starvation," it said, adding that the incident occurred despite assurances from Israeli authorities that aid delivery would improve. Part of those assurances, it said, was that armed forces would not be present nor engage along aid routes.

"Shootings near humanitarian missions, convoys and food distributions must stop immediately."

READ MORE: Pope Leo XIV renews his call for immediate ceasefire after Israeli attack on Gaza church

The Israeli military declined to comment on the WFP claims...

Full Article is at

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/uns-world-food-program-says-israeli-tanks-and-snipers-opened-fire-on-a-crowd-seeking-aid-in-gaza

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Is it a human rights violation for Hamas to call for the extermination of Israel? Is it a human rights violation for Hamas to use women and children as shields? How about the education system in Gaza in which children are taught from infancy that Israel and the Jews must be obliterated?

And btw, please learn how to make a clean link. Anything after the ? can be deleted; it's all tracking and marketing information. Right clicking on any URL (at least with Brave) will give you the option of copying a clean link without you having to do it yourself.

Gail Benton's avatar

I've seen Israelis use Gazan children as shields.

If Gazans used them as shields, wouldn't Israelis using them be stupid since Gazans wouldn't care if they shoot those they supposedly use as shields, to get to the Israelis?

CaptD's avatar

You witnessed it? So you have been there?

Gail Benton's avatar

Journalist snuck out video.

He may have been killed by now

LB (Little Birdie)'s avatar

War is not the answer and yet war is inevitable, so war becomes the answer. It will not end while Power is the Final Prize. Within war are the expendable ones, the fighters - trained to kill or else, be killed, and the populous - increasingly trained to become the fighter (to survive) or else a martyr or used as a decoy. We can all fervently pray (and I have) for an awakening and no more power mongers. Meanwhile....we get to decide which of the above we ultimately will become. Most will end as decoys. Sitting out there keeping the enemy from reaching the fighters who are out there keeping the enemy from reaching the power mongers.

Toni Headen's avatar

Listened to 2 survivors talk about their experiences with the attack on the Liberty and it was heartbreaking. Not only were they physically, mentally and emotionally traumatized but then gaslit and told never to speak of it. That they SOS’d and our forces were sent to help them but then those forces were told to stand down and turn around. Criminal.

John Guy's avatar

Lyndon B. Johnson - Remover all of the JFK anti-nuclear policies against Israel. Had an affair with an Israel spy Mathilde Krim during the USS Liberty attack.

Toni Headen's avatar

He was absolutely diabolical. Read “The Man Who Killed JFK”. Jaw dropping. The amount of treachery and blood shed just for a couple of years of power and glory. I can’t even imagine what level of hell he must be in now.

John Guy's avatar

Yes, I have read this book. LBJ murder his way into Texas politics. They called it the good old boys network.

Gail Benton's avatar

The U.S. didn't want to embarrass Israel.

So they stuck it to Americans.

Those that died and were injured, and putting a gag order on those that couldn't believe, or expose, the treasonous government.

Dick Atlee's avatar

I'm really puzzled by the approach here. It appears the Malones are talking about the section in the NDAA currently under debate that would integrate Israeli military and intelligence into our own. It has been very clear in the discussion I have heard that this will remove any of that activity from Congressional oversight, and will in an ongoing sense make it increasingly difficult for that process to be reversed if later so desired. This with a country that has been long deemed an enemy by our own intelligence services. The measure has been characterized as unconstitutional and even a treasonous threat to the Republic. How it is possible for two insightful people, who have demonstrated that insight time and again, to get heavily into details and lose sight of the overarching issue here is hard for me to figure.

Gail Benton's avatar

Is Israel talking about not "taking our money" because they'll have access to the $1.5 trillion if the traitors in DC give our sovereignty away, with unconstitutionally passing this bill that the traitors in the House has done?

mspring's avatar

In the article Dr Malone notes that the oversight rather than being eliminated, shifts from one account/committee to another, you might want to re read.

Dick Atlee's avatar

As I understand it, the shift from aid (subject to Congressional votes and thus theoretically to control by American citizens) to administrative details in the DoW would put any input outside the purview of Americans (who do you call in the Pentagon?). And because that can be decentralized over endless contracts and procurement arrangements, there's no maximum on it. There's the further problem of data fusion and network integration. As I understand it, there is no clear definition of these terms, and it sounds oddly like Israel will have access to information that in the past subjected those who did it to espionage trial and conviction (and ultimately release and a hero's welcome in Israel). I can't see this as anything but a surrender of sovereignty, which would seem to be an anathema to the philosophy of the Malones. (Again, I have tremendous respect for them; I just don't understand this.)

Gail Benton's avatar

Plus, they'll have access to intelligence including all surveillance on Americans.

From the ones we can't criticize?

mspring's avatar

From the article: "In Washington budget language, this is partly a shift from the 150 account, which covers international affairs and foreign assistance, toward the 050 account, which covers national defense. Congress does not lose its authority. It can still impose restrictions, and American export controls and arms-transfer laws remain. But the existing machinery of conditionality was built around foreign assistance. Change the funding structure and some of those legal hooks change with it."

To answer your first concern, Congress doesn't lose all control (unless they screw up and forfeit it), but control shifts from intl affairs comittees to national defense comittees. As to the "integration" concern, i think it is pretty ovbious that Israel has moved from client state to relative equal in some measures (not raw $$, power, etc but in engineering/defense capabilities) and they want the relationship to reflect that. I for one hope that this changes our paradigms from geewhiz tech$$$$ to practical warfare tools for which Israel is famous. All that tech hasn't won us any wars since ww2, though i admit the most basic reason for that is lack of our leaders' will to finish the job. When there are no more rockets and launchers in Iran, they won't endanger hormuze shipping. If Israel helps us with our will that will also be a benefit. Remains to be seen if that happens, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Gail Benton's avatar

We're going to chance that Congress won't forfeit controls...as it has up until now? Delegating powers they have no authority to delegate?

Hasn't Trump said that he doesn't care about the outcomes of the midterms because he'll use executive orders and pardons to get what he wants?

Dick Atlee's avatar

I *think* (and perhaps am wrong) that the point here is that aspects of foreign aid are often discussed in detail in Congress, but the thousands of DoW procurement instances are not. Congress doesn't get involved in that. Not that it couldn't, but that — for all kinds of reasons — they don't. And the Pentagon is notorious for its opacity, and the fact that it has NEVER had a successful audit. ---- In terms of "not finishing things," you are apparently unaware of the fact that we have used virtually all of the defensive missiles and a large part of the offensive missiles available in that theater (and, to an extent, in the Asia/Pacific theater from which missiles have been borrowed). It is clear to everyone watching this clear-headedly that the Iranians have the capability to make missiles in large numbers, of an increasing technical capability, and that we have been unable to knock out a significant proportion of their underground launchers. We don't dare go near the Gulf, and I'm sure the Chinese are enjoying watching us disable ourselves for any future conflict. We *can't* "finish" this, and the longer we persist in not reaching an agreement, the worse the economic disaster for us and the rest of the world will be when strategic reserves (particularly of heavy/sour crude for diesel/aviation) run out and remaining supplies become prohibitively expensive.

Someone else's avatar

We have hardly ever put constraints on the enormous aid we've given Israel for over 70 yrs, and hence our country is totally responsible for the indecent way that govt and their supporters have been treating the rest of the population in the middle east, including many many Christians. The new arrangements continue our aid and take away any way we might have had in the past over how they use it. I, for one. strongly object to all of the unconditional support we've given them, let alone the new arrangements in which our hands are tied. It's one more example, like the covid mandates, of how our "representatives" don't actually care what their constituents want or need.

Joewrite's avatar

It's hard to believe that any westerner thinks we can live in peace with the Islamic people.

Gail Benton's avatar

The mind control is effective.

Who are the ones paying for refugees from countries they're bombing in the Middle East, into the West?

Who are those that are trying to destroy the West in order to attempt to bring in the NWO?

Are they communists? Or, technocrats?

Looks to me that the globalists use China as their technical arm, the U.S. as their military arm, and London as their financial one.

Saying that the U.S. needs to compete with China, building the infrastructure (surveillance centers, 6G, etc.) so that all the globalists have to do is flip a switch to their technology? Chinas isn't communist, they're a technocracy.

Controlled demolition of the American empire, being sold as saving it?

Alison Cipriani's avatar

It is hard to believe you read this nor the previous articles as you are spouting nonsense. When Bethlehem was under Israeli administration there was a robust Christian presence. once the PA took over the Christians were forced to convert or leave. Most left. Israel has hefty Muslim Christian and other minorities. And the Arab countries? Close to zero. So your claim is clearly untrue.

Someone else's avatar

These are the western narratives, and you can't learn the truth by visiting Israel and only listening to western narratives.

Alison Cipriani's avatar

I'm Israeli. I live in Netanya. Nice try.

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

Nor can you necessarily learn the truth by living in Israel and only listening to western narratives.

Alison Cipriani's avatar

I am well aware of the leftist bias in the Israeli press. There are many sources besides msm just like in the US

MarKe's avatar

Perhaps someone else is in control of your conversation, when someone should be.

MarKe's avatar

You haven't read the foregoing articles, obviously. Shameful that you comment here anyway.

Stephen Korn, MD's avatar

Are you comparing aid to Israel with Covid mandates? If so, you’re an imbecile!

Someone else's avatar

No, I'm comparing the govt issuing covid mandates with the govt making the new arrangements with Israel. In both cases, huge numbers of people understand that the politicians aren't listening to anyone outside their uniparty echo chamber. Even the politicians who disagree with them are run out of office, as happened with Tom massie.

Stephen Korn, MD's avatar

Covid mandates were a form of socialism! The US’s joint program with the only democratic country in the Mideast is a result of our shared values and being on the side of GOOD vs evil! You seem to be on the side of evil!! Perhaps, you would like to live Somewhere else like Gaza Lebanon Iran Syria Iraq or Dearborn, MI?

Joy Metcalf's avatar

We have certainly forgotten George Washington's admonition in his farewell address to "avoid entangling alliances", haven't we?

Gail Benton's avatar

Profits and resources.

We're still not civilized

ComeQuicklyLord's avatar

Thank you for the Cup of Tea this morning!

The business model is much better for Israel and the United States, than the MOU model. Israel needs sovereignty over its nation’s survival, and under cutting them with leverage that ties their hands against their enemies should not be an option.

Without Israel, we would be blind and deaf in the ME. Nothing compares to their intel apparatus, which they share with us—I believe it was Israel that took out the 1st and 2nd tier leadership during this war**cough** I mean “conflict”with Iran. We need them, and they need us.

The Islamic ideology that is deeply imbedded in the ME, is Israel’s greatest enemy—I’ll go as far as including the United States—it’s a political death cult wrapped up in religious garb.

Continue the strong relationship with Israel for many reasons, and may Israel thrive as a nation while protecting herself with the help of the United States.

Loretta's avatar

Excellent analysis, you present an insight needed that outlines the complex relationship between the US and Israel.

I wonder who is replacing Lindsey Graham, in my opinion, our watchful and excellent statesman?

Joy Metcalf's avatar

You mean Lindsay Graham, one of the greatest hawks and neocons ever? That Lindsay Graham? I can only hope whoever replaces him is a little more thoughtful and a lot more interested in a peaceful world.

Loretta's avatar

Touche to you! We don't agree obviously. I will continue to believe in peace thru strength. Have a good day my dear peaceful friend! Hope you find a way for all of the world to cast their weapons and carry pockets full of rose petals.

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

Do you mean Lindsey Graham the pedophile?

Elaine H's avatar

Isn’t everyone a pedo in your head? Maybe you are, too???

Sonia Nordenson's avatar

How kind of you, Elaine. You remind me how the truth stings some folks.

Elaine H's avatar

It’s ok Sonia. The little people have their thoughts too.

Barbara's avatar

You are both remarkable human beings!! How in the world do the two of you find the time for such in-depth research! Gratitude for your time and energy. But do not forget to find time to "play". All of us need to realize that we are not always required to stand guard. Let your day be a sweet one. Best regards,

Mark Stephens's avatar

Sickening how the worst times for humanity are the best times for the military-industrial complex. War and high-intensity conflict create the throughput they need—munitions get expended, stocks must be refilled, factories stay humming, and profits soar. Burning through bombs and munitions is the business model.

The 2024 flex was a real expenditure (I wonder how well calculated) of a scarce asset. It bought short-term influence and domestic breathing room at the price of speeding Israel’s exit from the pure-grant dependency that made the asset so clean. The U.S. system appears to have judged that the resulting structural adjustment will make the new equilibrium still heavily tilted in its favor. Whether that judgment proves correct remains to be seen I guess.

It reminds me of my situation where my neighbour owns a piece of property, a 10 ft wide piece of land he lets me cross to access the lake. We've been friends a long time and I'm easy to lend him a hand whenever or lend him a tool etc. but he's discovered our politics don't align and he's lately been storing equipment in my path sending a clear message . . . the path exists at his pleasure. My wife’s instinct to sell is the rational response to that demonstrated vulnerability — remove the dependency rather than keep living under a potential veto. The most complex high level situations can so often be reduced down to completely predictable human nature.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Are you sure he's been a friend? Seems to me a friend doesn't have to agree with you and doesn't set out to punish you for disagreeing.

Mark Stephens's avatar

He was more a friendly neighbour ;) Everyone's got a friendly neighbour story - such nice people . . . until . . . Basically the same dynamic as friendly countries lol

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Yeah, I remember a neighbor in Illinois that was friendly until I wanted to put up a fence to keep my dogs in. She was all in, ready to pay for half, until she found out the survey put my boundary 6 feet into what she thought was hers. She wanted me to get (and pay for) a new survey, and when I refused, the cost was all mine and don't set one toe onto her property while the fence goes up.

Gary Driscoll's avatar

What Biden did (and Trump has continued) is to highlight what should have been obvious to both parties all the time. The supply of your weapons is control of your policies. It applies to policies other than warfare. Israel has a fundamental problem: they do not have a large enough economy and population to sustain the military that is necessary to their survival. In my opinion, they have the technical, intellectual, and motivation (looking in the mirror here) for survival. Their political fragmentation (looking in the mirror again) works against them. If I am correct in my judgment that they do not have the economic and population prowess to be completely independent, the obvious solution for them is to diversify their supply sources. That is an uncomfortable solution for the USA as well as for Israel--i.e. it fundamentally changes the leverage. That is what I would do in their situation.