Similar view. A lot of show casing for technology and creating new band aid approaches and not addressing the root causes dominated. Using AI to created new chemical entities in warp speed is not the answer. Prevention was used as the in word that says they are in support of MAHA, but their individual agendas speak otherwise. It was not what what was said, but what they avoided discussing. The fraud that has been created and perpetuated that is finally being addressed is a positive. The fact that NIH keeps funding RNA initiatives just makes no sense. A number of times it was stated "We have two years" meaning it will all be reversed with what little progress has been made when Trump leaves office. Then we can go back to doing what we have been doing. A lot of generalization and rhetoric. No real discussion of root causes. Bottom line: Maintaining a sick care system masquerading as a healthcare system is the most profitable way to go. Not for good health but ROI for the investors. The American way.
One last thought. The medical money boys run the system and the drive is to continually increase ROI to the investors. Equity investors are going all out to control the medical system. AI I have found is a positive. I have used Alter AI to validate my views and facts. Comes back positive most of the time. Tells the truth over the mainstream fake news. Used it in writing my book. Seven Innocents Tylenol Trail of Death. Author Braun Opened doors that connected events that were never identified as being related. Who controls AI will control the direction of mankind.
Exactly, the moneyed interests own AI....and I am afraid it will be more of the same...and the world will continue on its path downward. Money does not guarantee intelligence....AI providers are not philanthropists.. It's most likely, they .are looking for ways to make more.
So I am going to have to stand up against my PCP again in December! No poison! My body my choice. I’m disappointed the real fighter doctors weren’t part of today’s MAHA. Thanks Dr. Malone for everything you’ve done!
Simply tell your doctor what I told mine back in 2021: I have no desire & no intension of turning my body into a spike protein factory. I also told him that if I got covid, I was planning to take either HCQ w/zinc & azithromycin or Ivermectin. He told me that those medications do not work for covid. I said that they do. We went back & forth like this for a minute or two. We silently agreed to disagree & the subject has not come up again.
"November 2025: Rubio told Vanity Fair: “If JD Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him.” ABC News subsequently reported that statement while covering efforts by some Republican donors to encourage a Rubio candidacy. ABC News
May 2026: Rubio made it even more explicit in an NBC interview: “If JD runs for president … I’ll be the first person to sign up and support him.” He called Vance a “very good friend” and said he thought Vance would be a “phenomenal candidate.”"
Yes, as long as I was able. Many on the left use this image to make fun of him, which I think is disgusting. He doesn't look like that. I'm sure he laughs it off because he knows that is the best way to handle it (don't give the wolves what they want - a reaction), but how would you like to see everyone making memes of you as an obese man?
Sorry I’m not liking some of JD’s remarks about Netanyahu (may appear antisemitism that I’m watching). I’m not crazy about his connection with Tucker Carlson.
Of course I love Netanyahu, so yes, I am always going to stand by him( to be fair he’s never disappointed me).
I am very supportive and impressed with Rubio. NEVER a complainer of the hats he’s given nor the job that lies a head of him. I’ve never heard him brag or not detected it. He is sound in his religion, at awe of Mother Teresa, devoted to the country, he’s critical along my lines, he get right to the point and moves on to the next matter, and he’s appears totally unafraid. I wish I had better words to describe him. So similar to you I’d say.
From the CHAT AI (for what it is worth)- but watch the Rogan interview; because what Vance said is taken out of context by social media:
"Vance's basic argument was that Israel should be treated as an ally, but as a normal sovereign ally whose interests sometimes diverge from America's. He told Rogan that the U.S.-Israel relationship should be based on "shared interest," rather than an assumption that the two countries' interests are always identical.
The sharp part concerned the Iran conflict and Trump's subsequent peace negotiations. Vance said he knew "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that people within the Israeli government were trying to move the Trump administration away from negotiations because they wanted the military campaign to continue. He also alleged efforts to manipulate American public opinion toward that end. Importantly, he did not say Netanyahu himself was directing this effort. CNN noted that distinction at the time.
And that's where his comments about Netanyahu personally become interesting. Later, during the Epstein discussion, Vance actually distinguished Netanyahu from what he described as other elements of the Israeli establishment. He said that Epstein appeared more closely connected to left-of-center elements of the Israeli "deep state", rather than Netanyahu's political right.
So I would boil Vance's position down this way:
He wasn't attacking Netanyahu so much as rejecting the idea that supporting Israel requires America to follow Israel's preferred policy. Vance was saying: Netanyahu and Israel can pursue what they believe is in Israel's interest; the American president has an obligation to pursue what is in America's interest. Sometimes those interests coincide, sometimes they don't.'
Hmm, well all I can say is this post combined with Ron Johnson's stuff before congress just seem to make your other post seem hyperbolic. We may not have all we want or need on health and we appreciate your keeping tabs on it, but I think we're making enormous headway. We aren't going to get it all right away and if we did, the backlash would set us back. I think this whole administration has been addressing what went wrong over Covid, and I'll be shocked if there is a mandate for covid vaccines nationwide (and I believe the blue states were still mandating it for school children anyway). But I'll be watching. I like JD, though his talk about demons and his close association with Tucker give me pause. And I have gone from thinking Tucker was the most critical thinker on the planet to thinking he's batshit crazy. I do like that JD will likely not be a war monger, though I don't believe Trump really is, either. I do like Marco Rubio a lot--I voted for him years ago against Trump in the primaries. So they are both good. But I'm glad at least to hear you don't plan to vote for the communists. :)
I recently saw that Tucker was interviewed on NPR of all places. I loved him during the 2024 campaign. He gave phenomenal speeches. I can’t get over how he has done a 180. If the Iran war ends soon and Trump is vindicated, I wonder how he will react?
I feel like Rubio is more of a known quantity. Can articulate freedom as well as anyone on the planet. Maybe better than Vance and we'd get some Hispanic vote. Vance may have a bit more charisma with young people, though. Electability matters. So I'll take either one of them. And Tucker? Must be some kind of personal crisis/mental breakdown is all I can figure. We have a very good personal friend -- my husband as village president hired this fiend as police chief -- and later he worked for TSA and he said Tucker came through when he was working-- and he was a total asshole. This was like at least six years ago he told us that and I didn't believe him. Now? Yep. He was right. Maybe always an asshole. Ha. Oh. I'm a woman I'm not gay. I write literary fiction and taught university under that pseudonym, but people on here think I'm a man all the time. I do have a masculine writing style often (and wanted to write from a male pov and did so successfully). Thought I better clarify I'm not a guy married to a man. :) AI does scare me, that plus transhumanism seem like some crazy dystopian novel -- but letting the government control it scares me far more. This pandora's box is open, so Dr. Malone was dead right on the regulatory capture angle for the tech companies and Democrats want a campaign issue and would love to control it and us--Trump has it right and if JD wants it unregulated, I'd say he's right on that. Trump was way ahead of them meeting with all of them and perhaps they are smart enough to keep tabs one ach other. Haven't heard JD's thoughts on it.
I love Rubio and his ability to apply direct clear communication, and shut down idiots. I love Vance too because he can argue to sway people to a different way of thinking. I would vote for either one, but actually would like to see Rubio continue his hands on quest to solve America's problems. He strikes me as a roll up the sleeves and get to work guy. Decisive direct and has a great mind.
Similar view. A lot of show casing for technology and creating new band aid approaches and not addressing the root causes dominated. Using AI to created new chemical entities in warp speed is not the answer. Prevention was used as the in word that says they are in support of MAHA, but their individual agendas speak otherwise. It was not what what was said, but what they avoided discussing. The fraud that has been created and perpetuated that is finally being addressed is a positive. The fact that NIH keeps funding RNA initiatives just makes no sense. A number of times it was stated "We have two years" meaning it will all be reversed with what little progress has been made when Trump leaves office. Then we can go back to doing what we have been doing. A lot of generalization and rhetoric. No real discussion of root causes. Bottom line: Maintaining a sick care system masquerading as a healthcare system is the most profitable way to go. Not for good health but ROI for the investors. The American way.
Exactly!
One last thought. The medical money boys run the system and the drive is to continually increase ROI to the investors. Equity investors are going all out to control the medical system. AI I have found is a positive. I have used Alter AI to validate my views and facts. Comes back positive most of the time. Tells the truth over the mainstream fake news. Used it in writing my book. Seven Innocents Tylenol Trail of Death. Author Braun Opened doors that connected events that were never identified as being related. Who controls AI will control the direction of mankind.
I have found Alter AI to be useful as well. It's all about what you ask, how you ask it, and managing your expectations.
Agree. It also depends on what data bases it has access
Exactly, the moneyed interests own AI....and I am afraid it will be more of the same...and the world will continue on its path downward. Money does not guarantee intelligence....AI providers are not philanthropists.. It's most likely, they .are looking for ways to make more.
I really think that the reason for the recent anti-AI push is another run at censorship with a Chinese assist because they want to get ahead of us.
The Chinese want to get ahead of us, but D.C. (on the left, primarily?) wants to take control of it.
And restrain competition, use it to effect censorship and milk it for political advantage and money.
On the nose!
Love Skynyrd. Rock on. 😂😂😂
😂😂😂 me TOO :) HIS CONCERTS ARE ON UTUBE :) AND i HAVE SOME OF HIS CDS
TURN IT UP.. SWEET HOME ALABAMA :)
So I am going to have to stand up against my PCP again in December! No poison! My body my choice. I’m disappointed the real fighter doctors weren’t part of today’s MAHA. Thanks Dr. Malone for everything you’ve done!
Simply tell your doctor what I told mine back in 2021: I have no desire & no intension of turning my body into a spike protein factory. I also told him that if I got covid, I was planning to take either HCQ w/zinc & azithromycin or Ivermectin. He told me that those medications do not work for covid. I said that they do. We went back & forth like this for a minute or two. We silently agreed to disagree & the subject has not come up again.
I appreciate VP Vance’s support re: the vax, but I will be supporting Marco Rubio for POTUS in 2028.
"November 2025: Rubio told Vanity Fair: “If JD Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him.” ABC News subsequently reported that statement while covering efforts by some Republican donors to encourage a Rubio candidacy. ABC News
May 2026: Rubio made it even more explicit in an NBC interview: “If JD runs for president … I’ll be the first person to sign up and support him.” He called Vance a “very good friend” and said he thought Vance would be a “phenomenal candidate.”"
Things may yet change, good Dr.
I hate images of "fat JD". This is not funny.
Did you watch the video? Vacne thinks it is the best Trump admin meme yet and suggests people search for it.
Yes, as long as I was able. Many on the left use this image to make fun of him, which I think is disgusting. He doesn't look like that. I'm sure he laughs it off because he knows that is the best way to handle it (don't give the wolves what they want - a reaction), but how would you like to see everyone making memes of you as an obese man?
Great way to turn the table on the Leftists. Just like ‘Deplorables’ started as an insult and became a rallying cry.
Well, that is one way of looking at it.
I liked the Crocs 😂
Sorry I’m not liking some of JD’s remarks about Netanyahu (may appear antisemitism that I’m watching). I’m not crazy about his connection with Tucker Carlson.
Of course I love Netanyahu, so yes, I am always going to stand by him( to be fair he’s never disappointed me).
I am very supportive and impressed with Rubio. NEVER a complainer of the hats he’s given nor the job that lies a head of him. I’ve never heard him brag or not detected it. He is sound in his religion, at awe of Mother Teresa, devoted to the country, he’s critical along my lines, he get right to the point and moves on to the next matter, and he’s appears totally unafraid. I wish I had better words to describe him. So similar to you I’d say.
From the CHAT AI (for what it is worth)- but watch the Rogan interview; because what Vance said is taken out of context by social media:
"Vance's basic argument was that Israel should be treated as an ally, but as a normal sovereign ally whose interests sometimes diverge from America's. He told Rogan that the U.S.-Israel relationship should be based on "shared interest," rather than an assumption that the two countries' interests are always identical.
The sharp part concerned the Iran conflict and Trump's subsequent peace negotiations. Vance said he knew "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that people within the Israeli government were trying to move the Trump administration away from negotiations because they wanted the military campaign to continue. He also alleged efforts to manipulate American public opinion toward that end. Importantly, he did not say Netanyahu himself was directing this effort. CNN noted that distinction at the time.
And that's where his comments about Netanyahu personally become interesting. Later, during the Epstein discussion, Vance actually distinguished Netanyahu from what he described as other elements of the Israeli establishment. He said that Epstein appeared more closely connected to left-of-center elements of the Israeli "deep state", rather than Netanyahu's political right.
So I would boil Vance's position down this way:
He wasn't attacking Netanyahu so much as rejecting the idea that supporting Israel requires America to follow Israel's preferred policy. Vance was saying: Netanyahu and Israel can pursue what they believe is in Israel's interest; the American president has an obligation to pursue what is in America's interest. Sometimes those interests coincide, sometimes they don't.'
I don’t like the Tucker Carlson connection or the subtle antisemitism either. But if Vance is the guy then he’s my guy.
Dr. Malone can you comment a bit on the work Dr. Oz has been doing? Thank you.
Just watched a video that brought me to tears--what we once were-
#FreeBird #LynyrdSkynyrd #NewMusicVideo
Hmm, well all I can say is this post combined with Ron Johnson's stuff before congress just seem to make your other post seem hyperbolic. We may not have all we want or need on health and we appreciate your keeping tabs on it, but I think we're making enormous headway. We aren't going to get it all right away and if we did, the backlash would set us back. I think this whole administration has been addressing what went wrong over Covid, and I'll be shocked if there is a mandate for covid vaccines nationwide (and I believe the blue states were still mandating it for school children anyway). But I'll be watching. I like JD, though his talk about demons and his close association with Tucker give me pause. And I have gone from thinking Tucker was the most critical thinker on the planet to thinking he's batshit crazy. I do like that JD will likely not be a war monger, though I don't believe Trump really is, either. I do like Marco Rubio a lot--I voted for him years ago against Trump in the primaries. So they are both good. But I'm glad at least to hear you don't plan to vote for the communists. :)
His Tucker association gives me pause too - but we all have that one friend...
That's funny.
I recently saw that Tucker was interviewed on NPR of all places. I loved him during the 2024 campaign. He gave phenomenal speeches. I can’t get over how he has done a 180. If the Iran war ends soon and Trump is vindicated, I wonder how he will react?
Tucker is absolutely looney these days. So disappointing! I’d prefer Rubio over Vance at this point too. I don’t care for how pro – AI Vance is.
I feel like Rubio is more of a known quantity. Can articulate freedom as well as anyone on the planet. Maybe better than Vance and we'd get some Hispanic vote. Vance may have a bit more charisma with young people, though. Electability matters. So I'll take either one of them. And Tucker? Must be some kind of personal crisis/mental breakdown is all I can figure. We have a very good personal friend -- my husband as village president hired this fiend as police chief -- and later he worked for TSA and he said Tucker came through when he was working-- and he was a total asshole. This was like at least six years ago he told us that and I didn't believe him. Now? Yep. He was right. Maybe always an asshole. Ha. Oh. I'm a woman I'm not gay. I write literary fiction and taught university under that pseudonym, but people on here think I'm a man all the time. I do have a masculine writing style often (and wanted to write from a male pov and did so successfully). Thought I better clarify I'm not a guy married to a man. :) AI does scare me, that plus transhumanism seem like some crazy dystopian novel -- but letting the government control it scares me far more. This pandora's box is open, so Dr. Malone was dead right on the regulatory capture angle for the tech companies and Democrats want a campaign issue and would love to control it and us--Trump has it right and if JD wants it unregulated, I'd say he's right on that. Trump was way ahead of them meeting with all of them and perhaps they are smart enough to keep tabs one ach other. Haven't heard JD's thoughts on it.
I love Rubio and his ability to apply direct clear communication, and shut down idiots. I love Vance too because he can argue to sway people to a different way of thinking. I would vote for either one, but actually would like to see Rubio continue his hands on quest to solve America's problems. He strikes me as a roll up the sleeves and get to work guy. Decisive direct and has a great mind.