Similar view. A lot of show casing for technology and creating new band aid approaches and not addressing the root causes dominated. Using AI to created new chemical entities in warp speed is not the answer. Prevention was used as the in word that says they are in support of MAHA, but their individual agendas speak otherwise. It was not what what was said, but what they avoided discussing. The fraud that has been created and perpetuated that is finally being addressed is a positive. The fact that NIH keeps funding RNA initiatives just makes no sense. A number of times it was stated "We have two years" meaning it will all be reversed with what little progress has been made when Trump leaves office. Then we can go back to doing what we have been doing. A lot of generalization and rhetoric. No real discussion of root causes. Bottom line: Maintaining a sick care system masquerading as a healthcare system is the most profitable way to go. Not for good health but ROI for the investors. The American way.
One last thought. The medical money boys run the system and the drive is to continually increase ROI to the investors. Equity investors are going all out to control the medical system. AI I have found is a positive. I have used Alter AI to validate my views and facts. Comes back positive most of the time. Tells the truth over the mainstream fake news. Used it in writing my book. Seven Innocents Tylenol Trail of Death. Author Braun Opened doors that connected events that were never identified as being related. Who controls AI will control the direction of mankind.
This is my essential beef with AI. Agentic AI or AI at any level still depends on the inputs, and who controls that matters. It CAN compile, organize and analyze from the inputs. But is not super intelligent in all things and artificial better describes it because it does not "live" in objective reality where it would suffer from the results of what happens when it is wrong. It can be used to manipulate and control us. For example, if we were all required to follow some medical mandate of an AI system whose inputs were based on the current groupthink of the current medical establishment or not receive "healthcare", and if the particular agent(s) were wrong, we are the ones who would suffer as a result, not the machine agent(s). I just use that as an example of over-reliance upon an artificial system. It can help us to analyze things in a closed system, but I don't see it as the Second Coming as some do. I hope it doesn't result in us becoming artificially unintelligent through over-reliance. Like any technology, it may be used for good or it may be used for bad.
So true. Today I asked AI about German New Medicine's take on turbo cancers. It's initial reply was a mainstream analysis of how GNM is unproven, blah, blah, blah. I rephrased the question, gave explicit instructions that I wanted no pontificating, no opinions from mainstream medicine, and only the approach that GNM takes toward turbo cancers. THEN (TAOT) I got a decent reply. I have to do the same thing when I'm looking up any information on homeopathy, EFT, or other alternative approached.
AI is built by people with mainstream views and we always have to remember that and to ask for explicit answers within the realm of the modality itself. If I want conventional medicine's point of view, I'll ask for it.
China is already ahead of us with DeepSeek AI and others like it. They're working on a different model, open source (or open weight), which is actually better than what American companies are putting out.
Why do we think we have to be #1 in everything? Why is it a threat if another country does something better than us?
Well, Joy, granted I AM a guy, but note the recent image of Trumpie and all the AI CEO-- "guys"-- after signing his Constitution for AI. . . oops! sorry, SI(Super) in the White house. another Trump "re-named" term. . .
Among about 50 CEO's of tech companies only ONE was a woman. This is no coincidence, nothing to do with bias against women. It IS reality that MEN are naturally more aggressive and better at such stuff. . . so, gee, yeah. . . WE do have to be #1 at "everything".
WE are guys.
and, to boot, all these guys surround guy #1. In the #1 Country of the world.
To your specific question: It is a threat, in fact, if another country seems to be doing better in such a critical area because of national security.
Really, that should be obvious with Super Intelligence(the new SI !!)
Exactly, the moneyed interests own AI....and I am afraid it will be more of the same...and the world will continue on its path downward. Money does not guarantee intelligence....AI providers are not philanthropists.. It's most likely, they .are looking for ways to make more.
just wait. There will always be room for MORE innovation to OUT-AI, AI.
before 5 years are out there will be political versions of SI(Super Intelligence!) to suss out both conservative and liberal leanings; versions to suss out facts from theory-heavy conclusions like climate change, quantum nutso theories, etc.
There will be SI versions whose JOB will be to objectify the AI models now out there and to dynamically do so with newer versions.
Prediction:
-- users will simply state the rules up front or tell the model to use rule book such and such.
-- users will be able to say, use my background and experience here on earth and come up with an answer that does not (or DOES) conflict.
Corporate mind is about bottomline management and has no interest in the humans it is supposed to help. I am experiencing this first hand as I prepare for hip surgery. Example: first question on survey - can you do five hours of hard labor? Right.
So I am going to have to stand up against my PCP again in December! No poison! My body my choice. I’m disappointed the real fighter doctors weren’t part of today’s MAHA. Thanks Dr. Malone for everything you’ve done!
I'm 89 and tested positive for Covid 10 days ago. Three days later, Xrays showed I had pneumonia. My PCP had nothing but Paxlovid. I said no. The PCP then perscribed two antibiotics. I put myself on Vitamin C, Zinc, and D. Unfortunately, I couldn't find anyone that would compound Ivermectin. Many are praying for me and God is listening. My blood oxygen is improving and hopefully, I'll still be around for a while longer. I have taken Novavax but didn't this year. Might have been a contributor. My point is, here we are, 6 YEARS LATER and in addition to a Pfizer mRNA vaccine that doesn't work, we only have a Pfizer anti viral that most druggists privately advise against, not to say anything about it's cost-$800+ even with Medicare Part D. I will buy a kit from the Wellness Company that contains Ivermectin and some other products. And I fault the medical community as well. There are still few with the guts to speak out against mRNA vaccines and even fewer that are willing to perscribe things that actually work. I
According to Dr. Pierre Kory, at 10 days you're well past the stage where COVID s the culprit. It's most likely bacterial pneumonia. Don't mention COVID and you'll get better care.
Yes. As a Retired RN, we had MD orders for blood, urine and sputum cultures if the patient was hospitalized. Meanwhile a “broad-spectrum antibiotic” could be ordered until the cultures came back. Respiratory therapy also. Now I have been retired 14 years in November but I don’t think that would change.
As to the word “Covid” it should have already been thrown out. It’s either a cold or a flu of some sort. They love that word! How long did they use “swine flu “? Hello!
This is one of those times to seek medical relief. My sister visited me back in March. She came sick, but insisted it was her ongoing asthma. I trusted her to know, but she kept getting worse even using a variety of over the counter plus her prescription inhalers. We barely got her to Emergency after one week of her trying to get better. She was in hospital 10 days with Bacterial Pneumonia, very sick.
Early treatment is critical and the most important factor in managing this disease. COVID-19 is a clinical diagnosis; a confirmed antigen or PCR test is not required. Treatment should be initiated immediately after the onset of flu-like symptoms. The multiple therapies and drugs in this protocol have different mechanisms of action and work synergistically during various phases of the disease.
then manually look or search for Protocol. . . "i-prevent" etc.
He's right in that as the disease advances the protcols for treatment must change to have an effect. For example, IVM is most effective in the first five days.
It's actually very easy to get compounded Ivermectin these days. If you need some help just hit me up. I suggest having it around always just incase. Early treatment is best. I take 65 mg a day which I thought was insane but my doctor is really into it and I trust him. I don't take it for Convid prevention I take it for cancer prevention and whatever else happens that's great too! I Hope you feel better soon.
Simply tell your doctor what I told mine back in 2021: I have no desire & no intension of turning my body into a spike protein factory. I also told him that if I got covid, I was planning to take either HCQ w/zinc & azithromycin or Ivermectin. He told me that those medications do not work for covid. I said that they do. We went back & forth like this for a minute or two. We silently agreed to disagree & the subject has not come up again.
Covid hit me hard in 2022. 16 hours sleep the first day. Then Ivermectin knocked it out within 3 days. I had a bit of a relapse 2 days later but it passed. I stovcked up on Ivermectin then for others and at least 5 people told me I saved lives. Covid hit me again, milder this time, and Ivermectin again knocked it out fast.
Sorry I’m not liking some of JD’s remarks about Netanyahu (may appear antisemitism that I’m watching). I’m not crazy about his connection with Tucker Carlson.
Of course I love Netanyahu, so yes, I am always going to stand by him( to be fair he’s never disappointed me).
I am very supportive and impressed with Rubio. NEVER a complainer of the hats he’s given nor the job that lies a head of him. I’ve never heard him brag or not detected it. He is sound in his religion, at awe of Mother Teresa, devoted to the country, he’s critical along my lines, he get right to the point and moves on to the next matter, and he’s appears totally unafraid. I wish I had better words to describe him. So similar to you I’d say.
From the CHAT AI (for what it is worth)- but watch the Rogan interview; because what Vance said is taken out of context by social media:
"Vance's basic argument was that Israel should be treated as an ally, but as a normal sovereign ally whose interests sometimes diverge from America's. He told Rogan that the U.S.-Israel relationship should be based on "shared interest," rather than an assumption that the two countries' interests are always identical.
The sharp part concerned the Iran conflict and Trump's subsequent peace negotiations. Vance said he knew "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that people within the Israeli government were trying to move the Trump administration away from negotiations because they wanted the military campaign to continue. He also alleged efforts to manipulate American public opinion toward that end. Importantly, he did not say Netanyahu himself was directing this effort. CNN noted that distinction at the time.
And that's where his comments about Netanyahu personally become interesting. Later, during the Epstein discussion, Vance actually distinguished Netanyahu from what he described as other elements of the Israeli establishment. He said that Epstein appeared more closely connected to left-of-center elements of the Israeli "deep state", rather than Netanyahu's political right.
So I would boil Vance's position down this way:
He wasn't attacking Netanyahu so much as rejecting the idea that supporting Israel requires America to follow Israel's preferred policy. Vance was saying: Netanyahu and Israel can pursue what they believe is in Israel's interest; the American president has an obligation to pursue what is in America's interest. Sometimes those interests coincide, sometimes they don't.'
well summarized. Ver important nuance. Each country has their own national perspective (with large variation within each). Much overlaps, but not everything. We are allies, NOT same. There is SO MUCH energy (propaganda) trying to create wedge and division and fear! I reject that.
It’s a given no two allies are alike. But when your friend needs you most you don’t make yourself look better. Thats how I still take it in simplistic terms. I see Netanyahu take the higher ground.
1. From Google search AI: "Intelligence Connections: Vance asserted that Epstein clearly had ties to the highest levels of American and Israeli intelligence."
Does Vance know that he is Vice President of the USA, not a blogger. Did he acknowledge that Trump administration hides clear information about Epstein ties to the highest levels of American and Israeli intelligence
Not for the first time, and likely not for the last, Vice President JD Vance has declared that the United States “cannot let our Middle Eastern foreign policy be subservient to the State of Israel.”
The use of the word “subservient” has an unpleasant smell in this context, redolent of the groyper conspiracy theories that would have us believe that the real controllers of policymaking are “the Zionists” and not the politicians we elect.
It is also a strawman argument. U.S. foreign policy has never been “subservient” to the State of Israel, if we understand that to mean that American leaders make decisions that go against our national interest in favor of Jerusalem.
The way I see it, if it weren't for Israel, we wouldn't be in Iran. So, sorry, I disagree.
And don't tell me about how awful Iran is. We took out Saddam Hussein, and at that time Iraq and Iran counterbalanced each other. Once he was gone, it left a vacuum, which Iran moved right into. We need to be OUT of the Middle East and let them solve their own problems. Our hegemony is hurting Americans.
I hope and pray Trumpie can find a way out of the Iran war before he leaves office. Not holding out much hope for this year. I think the only way it will be resolved politically in the US favor is to go in and get what is left of the nuclear crapp and walk away-- entirely.
Let the Saudi's and Israeli's handle what is left.
I agree if Israel would not be so successful in Operation Rising Lion, Trump would not join. I'm not sure I understand how the current war is hurting Americans.
"November 2025: Rubio told Vanity Fair: “If JD Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him.” ABC News subsequently reported that statement while covering efforts by some Republican donors to encourage a Rubio candidacy. ABC News
May 2026: Rubio made it even more explicit in an NBC interview: “If JD runs for president … I’ll be the first person to sign up and support him.” He called Vance a “very good friend” and said he thought Vance would be a “phenomenal candidate.”"
Actually, after I wrote that, I knew that it wasn't what I meant. I would love to have President Trump continue to annoy democommies for the next 10 years!
We have something in common that goes back a long way. We both graduated from the University of California, Davis, although my path there was a little different. I came through 4-H leadership at seventeen in 1963. Much later I built and operated a nursery in Rumsey. That was a long time ago—back when things were a little different.
I have followed your work since you first began writing about what I call the “plandemic” or “scamdemic”, depending on my mood. ” I have also followed Reiner Fuellmich and what has and is happening to him. Whatever one thinks of every detail, there is no question that he has been effectively removed from the public arena. You, on the other hand, have managed to remain out in the open and continue speaking.
I want to acknowledge something else I admire about your work: the breadth of your knowledge. You have an unusually eclectic range of interests and seem willing to follow evidence wherever it leads.
Now for what concerns me.
I know you have considered the possibility that there are people or forces in the world who would prefer that you stop talking. Perhaps some of them are closer than you think. I have no special information suggesting that anything is imminent, and I am not trying to frighten you. I am simply an old man who has spent enough time watching the world to know that sometimes prudence is not paranoia.
I admire what you have done, and I would like to see you around for another thirty years, if you can stand it.
There is an old saying I like: God helps those who help themselves. I suspect you know exactly where I am going with that.
So here is my unsolicited advice from one UC Davis graduate to another: consider having a bolt hole. Somewhere safe, private, and ready to use if circumstances ever make it seem necessary. I hope you never need it. But having one costs considerably less than wishing you had one.
Take care of yourselves. There are a lot of people who value what you are doing—and quite a few who are praying for you.
But you still need time to be able to use it. Advance warning and security gives that.
I live at the end of a long lane(nearly half a mile) and use a "Dakota Alert" to send a radio signal to my home when a vehicle starts down the lane. By the time a vehicle arrives I can be "ready" in whatever manner I see fit-- depending mostly on how dark it is!
To me Vance is a very able and very well prepared to effectively carry on. He knows the issues and the people he would be dealing with (and particularly on the global stage). He has the more forceful image. I wholely respect Rubio. I feel he is a bit short on the forcefulness in his own right and this maybe why he indicates he wont run if Vance runs. Providing DeS stays clear of the Bushes and maybe Cruz and his current associates - IMO the strongest contender is DeSantis. He demonstrates effective directions and leadership. He lacks the facetime intimacy with global concerns and people. Just hope we can manage to get to 2028 with a good interim behind us.
Hmm, well all I can say is this post combined with Ron Johnson's stuff before congress just seem to make your other post seem hyperbolic. We may not have all we want or need on health and we appreciate your keeping tabs on it, but I think we're making enormous headway. We aren't going to get it all right away and if we did, the backlash would set us back. I think this whole administration has been addressing what went wrong over Covid, and I'll be shocked if there is a mandate for covid vaccines nationwide (and I believe the blue states were still mandating it for school children anyway). But I'll be watching. I like JD, though his talk about demons and his close association with Tucker give me pause. And I have gone from thinking Tucker was the most critical thinker on the planet to thinking he's batshit crazy. I do like that JD will likely not be a war monger, though I don't believe Trump really is, either. I do like Marco Rubio a lot--I voted for him years ago against Trump in the primaries. So they are both good. But I'm glad at least to hear you don't plan to vote for the communists. :)
I recently saw that Tucker was interviewed on NPR of all places. I loved him during the 2024 campaign. He gave phenomenal speeches. I can’t get over how he has done a 180. If the Iran war ends soon and Trump is vindicated, I wonder how he will react?
I always watched Tucker when he was in Fox. But one time he had Kristi Noem on when she was Governor of South Dakota. They were talking about men in women's sports. He accused her of not carrying through on her stance and rudely interrupted her.
Later I read about her work to protect women. She was going about it in a way that it would have legal enforcement. Ticket would not let her explain.
After that, I had a lot less respect for Tucker. He couldn't really shake off his own conviction that he always knew best.
…. I wonder how you and many in this comment section will react if the Iran war (which has been ongoing now for 6 months) DOESN’T end soon, and the younger generations, that supported Trump in 2024, abandon him and the Republicans this November in favor of the Marxists? 🤔
I love Rubio and his ability to apply direct clear communication, and shut down idiots. I love Vance too because he can argue to sway people to a different way of thinking. I would vote for either one, but actually would like to see Rubio continue his hands on quest to solve America's problems. He strikes me as a roll up the sleeves and get to work guy. Decisive direct and has a great mind.
Aren't we conservatives so lucky to have a deep bench with not just one but two or three great people teed up to be the next leader?!
Look at the liberal bench of nutjobs by comparison. I can only hope and pray the undecided voters in the middle wake up enough to see these stark differences in time to vote.
I feel like Rubio is more of a known quantity. Can articulate freedom as well as anyone on the planet. Maybe better than Vance and we'd get some Hispanic vote. Vance may have a bit more charisma with young people, though. Electability matters. So I'll take either one of them. And Tucker? Must be some kind of personal crisis/mental breakdown is all I can figure. We have a very good personal friend -- my husband as village president hired this fiend as police chief -- and later he worked for TSA and he said Tucker came through when he was working-- and he was a total asshole. This was like at least six years ago he told us that and I didn't believe him. Now? Yep. He was right. Maybe always an asshole. Ha. Oh. I'm a woman I'm not gay. I write literary fiction and taught university under that pseudonym, but people on here think I'm a man all the time. I do have a masculine writing style often (and wanted to write from a male pov and did so successfully). Thought I better clarify I'm not a guy married to a man. :) AI does scare me, that plus transhumanism seem like some crazy dystopian novel -- but letting the government control it scares me far more. This pandora's box is open, so Dr. Malone was dead right on the regulatory capture angle for the tech companies and Democrats want a campaign issue and would love to control it and us--Trump has it right and if JD wants it unregulated, I'd say he's right on that. Trump was way ahead of them meeting with all of them and perhaps they are smart enough to keep tabs each other. Haven't heard JD's thoughts on it.
Yes, as long as I was able. Many on the left use this image to make fun of him, which I think is disgusting. He doesn't look like that. I'm sure he laughs it off because he knows that is the best way to handle it (don't give the wolves what they want - a reaction), but how would you like to see everyone making memes of you as an obese man?
a liberal neighbor has a bunch of Dem signs in front of his house on our dead end road. (Nearly ALL this guy's neighbors are conservatives and he is new to the area.)
Get this: one of the signs actually reads: "Let's Go Brandon!"
apparently the delusional liberal mindset is one that believes somebody's name will get attention moreso than the infamous meme created years ago about Biden's dementia and a media talker's inability to coverup the factual statement . . .
I appreciate hearing that some good work is being done, and I realize meaningful change takes time. But I still find myself asking: how long?
Vaccines are still widely used. Grocery stores are still filled with highly processed foods, and so are the carts of most shoppers. I hear a great deal about what MAHA is changing, but in ordinary daily life, I have yet to see much of that change actually manifested.
Perhaps important work is happening behind the scenes. I hope so. For now, though, I remain cautiously hopeful—and still waiting to see the promises become visible results.
Anybody zoom in on the agricultural part of this summit? I was interested in some of the companies/products being touted, but not being a farmer, I hold my breath on how advances will play out. Soil Data Mapping? Turning off plant genome and replacement, called New Breeding Technique? The company Ohalo and related speaker (https://www.ohalo.com/)? Any comment of that part of the discussions, Drs. Malone? Anyone?
I've really drilled down on this since I feel our best bet to all being more healthy is the health of our food. Agriculture is very high on my list of 'needs to be changed'. I see this aligning more maybe with RFKJ possibly create a downstream effect on the Pharma businesses. If more and more people go (or are given fewer alternatives) with much healthier eating, it follows that the need for Pharma starts to drop out of the picture. Dominos falling?
Boy, that was short and sweet! Hard to find some rock solid promises of change, not just an executive order to no-where. "There must be somewhere out of here, said the joker to the thief, there's too much confusion, I can't get no relief." There it is again, my constant companion singing in my head.
Just because MAHA became captured by basically the same corporations that created the mess it shouldn’t mean we don’t hold out hope that change can come because as we all know the wheels of govt churn at a snails pace. I’d also suggest to use the info we’ve learned in our own lives to better our own health. Eat right. Ask questions. Challenge the answers. Spread the word. Thanks for leading us Dr.(s) Malone.
I'm holding optimism that some pain at the pumps will not send us off the rails. In 2028 I'm seeing J.D. Vance, Ron DeSantis and Marco Rubio all as viable POTUS candidates I could support. On the Communism side it looks pretty dismal. Harris, A.O.C., and Newsome look to be front runners; all having terrible resumes. Shapiro ? Jefferies ? The Dems are gonna have to dig deep.
Similar view. A lot of show casing for technology and creating new band aid approaches and not addressing the root causes dominated. Using AI to created new chemical entities in warp speed is not the answer. Prevention was used as the in word that says they are in support of MAHA, but their individual agendas speak otherwise. It was not what what was said, but what they avoided discussing. The fraud that has been created and perpetuated that is finally being addressed is a positive. The fact that NIH keeps funding RNA initiatives just makes no sense. A number of times it was stated "We have two years" meaning it will all be reversed with what little progress has been made when Trump leaves office. Then we can go back to doing what we have been doing. A lot of generalization and rhetoric. No real discussion of root causes. Bottom line: Maintaining a sick care system masquerading as a healthcare system is the most profitable way to go. Not for good health but ROI for the investors. The American way.
Exactly!
One last thought. The medical money boys run the system and the drive is to continually increase ROI to the investors. Equity investors are going all out to control the medical system. AI I have found is a positive. I have used Alter AI to validate my views and facts. Comes back positive most of the time. Tells the truth over the mainstream fake news. Used it in writing my book. Seven Innocents Tylenol Trail of Death. Author Braun Opened doors that connected events that were never identified as being related. Who controls AI will control the direction of mankind.
I have found Alter AI to be useful as well. It's all about what you ask, how you ask it, and managing your expectations.
Agree. It also depends on what data bases it has access
This is my essential beef with AI. Agentic AI or AI at any level still depends on the inputs, and who controls that matters. It CAN compile, organize and analyze from the inputs. But is not super intelligent in all things and artificial better describes it because it does not "live" in objective reality where it would suffer from the results of what happens when it is wrong. It can be used to manipulate and control us. For example, if we were all required to follow some medical mandate of an AI system whose inputs were based on the current groupthink of the current medical establishment or not receive "healthcare", and if the particular agent(s) were wrong, we are the ones who would suffer as a result, not the machine agent(s). I just use that as an example of over-reliance upon an artificial system. It can help us to analyze things in a closed system, but I don't see it as the Second Coming as some do. I hope it doesn't result in us becoming artificially unintelligent through over-reliance. Like any technology, it may be used for good or it may be used for bad.
So true. Today I asked AI about German New Medicine's take on turbo cancers. It's initial reply was a mainstream analysis of how GNM is unproven, blah, blah, blah. I rephrased the question, gave explicit instructions that I wanted no pontificating, no opinions from mainstream medicine, and only the approach that GNM takes toward turbo cancers. THEN (TAOT) I got a decent reply. I have to do the same thing when I'm looking up any information on homeopathy, EFT, or other alternative approached.
AI is built by people with mainstream views and we always have to remember that and to ask for explicit answers within the realm of the modality itself. If I want conventional medicine's point of view, I'll ask for it.
I really think that the reason for the recent anti-AI push is another run at censorship with a Chinese assist because they want to get ahead of us.
The Chinese want to get ahead of us, but D.C. (on the left, primarily?) wants to take control of it.
And restrain competition, use it to effect censorship and milk it for political advantage and money.
China is already ahead of us with DeepSeek AI and others like it. They're working on a different model, open source (or open weight), which is actually better than what American companies are putting out.
Why do we think we have to be #1 in everything? Why is it a threat if another country does something better than us?
Well, Joy, granted I AM a guy, but note the recent image of Trumpie and all the AI CEO-- "guys"-- after signing his Constitution for AI. . . oops! sorry, SI(Super) in the White house. another Trump "re-named" term. . .
Among about 50 CEO's of tech companies only ONE was a woman. This is no coincidence, nothing to do with bias against women. It IS reality that MEN are naturally more aggressive and better at such stuff. . . so, gee, yeah. . . WE do have to be #1 at "everything".
WE are guys.
and, to boot, all these guys surround guy #1. In the #1 Country of the world.
To your specific question: It is a threat, in fact, if another country seems to be doing better in such a critical area because of national security.
Really, that should be obvious with Super Intelligence(the new SI !!)
Exactly, the moneyed interests own AI....and I am afraid it will be more of the same...and the world will continue on its path downward. Money does not guarantee intelligence....AI providers are not philanthropists.. It's most likely, they .are looking for ways to make more.
just wait. There will always be room for MORE innovation to OUT-AI, AI.
before 5 years are out there will be political versions of SI(Super Intelligence!) to suss out both conservative and liberal leanings; versions to suss out facts from theory-heavy conclusions like climate change, quantum nutso theories, etc.
There will be SI versions whose JOB will be to objectify the AI models now out there and to dynamically do so with newer versions.
Prediction:
-- users will simply state the rules up front or tell the model to use rule book such and such.
-- users will be able to say, use my background and experience here on earth and come up with an answer that does not (or DOES) conflict.
and on and on.
" I have used Alter AI to validate my views and facts" It validates mine too. Maybe because you, me and Alter were trained by Steve Kirsh :-)
AI always validates one's views - that's the problem
No true with Alter AI.
Along with private equity gobbling up practices and hospitals.
Corporate mind is about bottomline management and has no interest in the humans it is supposed to help. I am experiencing this first hand as I prepare for hip surgery. Example: first question on survey - can you do five hours of hard labor? Right.
So I am going to have to stand up against my PCP again in December! No poison! My body my choice. I’m disappointed the real fighter doctors weren’t part of today’s MAHA. Thanks Dr. Malone for everything you’ve done!
I'm 89 and tested positive for Covid 10 days ago. Three days later, Xrays showed I had pneumonia. My PCP had nothing but Paxlovid. I said no. The PCP then perscribed two antibiotics. I put myself on Vitamin C, Zinc, and D. Unfortunately, I couldn't find anyone that would compound Ivermectin. Many are praying for me and God is listening. My blood oxygen is improving and hopefully, I'll still be around for a while longer. I have taken Novavax but didn't this year. Might have been a contributor. My point is, here we are, 6 YEARS LATER and in addition to a Pfizer mRNA vaccine that doesn't work, we only have a Pfizer anti viral that most druggists privately advise against, not to say anything about it's cost-$800+ even with Medicare Part D. I will buy a kit from the Wellness Company that contains Ivermectin and some other products. And I fault the medical community as well. There are still few with the guts to speak out against mRNA vaccines and even fewer that are willing to perscribe things that actually work. I
You need to take a regimen of steroids along with Azithromycin for your pneumonia. That helped me get over my pneumonia a year ago.
According to Dr. Pierre Kory, at 10 days you're well past the stage where COVID s the culprit. It's most likely bacterial pneumonia. Don't mention COVID and you'll get better care.
If bacterial . . . wouldn't the test results say so? I would think that is easier to test for than viral pneumonia, right?
Yes. As a Retired RN, we had MD orders for blood, urine and sputum cultures if the patient was hospitalized. Meanwhile a “broad-spectrum antibiotic” could be ordered until the cultures came back. Respiratory therapy also. Now I have been retired 14 years in November but I don’t think that would change.
As to the word “Covid” it should have already been thrown out. It’s either a cold or a flu of some sort. They love that word! How long did they use “swine flu “? Hello!
The point is that as soon as they hear Covid, they treat for that instead of pneumonia.
This is one of those times to seek medical relief. My sister visited me back in March. She came sick, but insisted it was her ongoing asthma. I trusted her to know, but she kept getting worse even using a variety of over the counter plus her prescription inhalers. We barely got her to Emergency after one week of her trying to get better. She was in hospital 10 days with Bacterial Pneumonia, very sick.
I fault you, My point is, after 6 YEARS LATER you still don't know about https://imahealth.org/protocol/i-prevent-covid-flu-rsv/https://imahealth.org/protocol/i-care-early-covid-treatment/
Early treatment is critical and the most important factor in managing this disease. COVID-19 is a clinical diagnosis; a confirmed antigen or PCR test is not required. Treatment should be initiated immediately after the onset of flu-like symptoms. The multiple therapies and drugs in this protocol have different mechanisms of action and work synergistically during various phases of the disease.
Jacob99, I couldn't open the link. Can you send the info in another way?
https://imahealth.org/
then manually look or search for Protocol. . . "i-prevent" etc.
He's right in that as the disease advances the protcols for treatment must change to have an effect. For example, IVM is most effective in the first five days.
Don't be slow, get ON this.
https://imahealth.org/protocol/i-prevent-covid-flu-rsv/
https://imahealth.org/protocol/i-care-early-covid-treatment/
It's actually very easy to get compounded Ivermectin these days. If you need some help just hit me up. I suggest having it around always just incase. Early treatment is best. I take 65 mg a day which I thought was insane but my doctor is really into it and I trust him. I don't take it for Convid prevention I take it for cancer prevention and whatever else happens that's great too! I Hope you feel better soon.
Simply tell your doctor what I told mine back in 2021: I have no desire & no intension of turning my body into a spike protein factory. I also told him that if I got covid, I was planning to take either HCQ w/zinc & azithromycin or Ivermectin. He told me that those medications do not work for covid. I said that they do. We went back & forth like this for a minute or two. We silently agreed to disagree & the subject has not come up again.
Covid hit me hard in 2022. 16 hours sleep the first day. Then Ivermectin knocked it out within 3 days. I had a bit of a relapse 2 days later but it passed. I stovcked up on Ivermectin then for others and at least 5 people told me I saved lives. Covid hit me again, milder this time, and Ivermectin again knocked it out fast.
Same for me in 2022 and I stocked up like you did. . .
IVM works.
You have my prayers, Jim Bianchi!
Thank you
My best PCP left the profession because she wasn't allowed to do what was best for her patients.
Other PCPs pretty much universally push procedures and meds according to their employer's protocols. They vary by how insistent they are.
In some ways, the PCP's Nurse Practitioner is more helpful.
Love Skynyrd. Rock on. 😂😂😂
Ok y’all. Here is the best live version ever. YouTube
Rockin Ronnie Vanzant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLhDF4E5c5o
😂😂😂 me TOO :) HIS CONCERTS ARE ON UTUBE :) AND i HAVE SOME OF HIS CDS
TURN IT UP.. SWEET HOME ALABAMA :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQNRKX8GwPo
THIS is great!
yeah, man that guy is great!
Sorry I’m not liking some of JD’s remarks about Netanyahu (may appear antisemitism that I’m watching). I’m not crazy about his connection with Tucker Carlson.
Of course I love Netanyahu, so yes, I am always going to stand by him( to be fair he’s never disappointed me).
I am very supportive and impressed with Rubio. NEVER a complainer of the hats he’s given nor the job that lies a head of him. I’ve never heard him brag or not detected it. He is sound in his religion, at awe of Mother Teresa, devoted to the country, he’s critical along my lines, he get right to the point and moves on to the next matter, and he’s appears totally unafraid. I wish I had better words to describe him. So similar to you I’d say.
From the CHAT AI (for what it is worth)- but watch the Rogan interview; because what Vance said is taken out of context by social media:
"Vance's basic argument was that Israel should be treated as an ally, but as a normal sovereign ally whose interests sometimes diverge from America's. He told Rogan that the U.S.-Israel relationship should be based on "shared interest," rather than an assumption that the two countries' interests are always identical.
The sharp part concerned the Iran conflict and Trump's subsequent peace negotiations. Vance said he knew "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that people within the Israeli government were trying to move the Trump administration away from negotiations because they wanted the military campaign to continue. He also alleged efforts to manipulate American public opinion toward that end. Importantly, he did not say Netanyahu himself was directing this effort. CNN noted that distinction at the time.
And that's where his comments about Netanyahu personally become interesting. Later, during the Epstein discussion, Vance actually distinguished Netanyahu from what he described as other elements of the Israeli establishment. He said that Epstein appeared more closely connected to left-of-center elements of the Israeli "deep state", rather than Netanyahu's political right.
So I would boil Vance's position down this way:
He wasn't attacking Netanyahu so much as rejecting the idea that supporting Israel requires America to follow Israel's preferred policy. Vance was saying: Netanyahu and Israel can pursue what they believe is in Israel's interest; the American president has an obligation to pursue what is in America's interest. Sometimes those interests coincide, sometimes they don't.'
well summarized. Ver important nuance. Each country has their own national perspective (with large variation within each). Much overlaps, but not everything. We are allies, NOT same. There is SO MUCH energy (propaganda) trying to create wedge and division and fear! I reject that.
Very astute doctor.
As for Tucker? Maybe too many COVID boosters? I understand some have psychological issues from mRNA, or whatever is in the snake venom.
It’s a given no two allies are alike. But when your friend needs you most you don’t make yourself look better. Thats how I still take it in simplistic terms. I see Netanyahu take the higher ground.
1. From Google search AI: "Intelligence Connections: Vance asserted that Epstein clearly had ties to the highest levels of American and Israeli intelligence."
Does Vance know that he is Vice President of the USA, not a blogger. Did he acknowledge that Trump administration hides clear information about Epstein ties to the highest levels of American and Israeli intelligence
2.
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2026/09/18/america-has-never-been-subservient-to-israel/
Not for the first time, and likely not for the last, Vice President JD Vance has declared that the United States “cannot let our Middle Eastern foreign policy be subservient to the State of Israel.”
The use of the word “subservient” has an unpleasant smell in this context, redolent of the groyper conspiracy theories that would have us believe that the real controllers of policymaking are “the Zionists” and not the politicians we elect.
It is also a strawman argument. U.S. foreign policy has never been “subservient” to the State of Israel, if we understand that to mean that American leaders make decisions that go against our national interest in favor of Jerusalem.
Really, read the rest.
The way I see it, if it weren't for Israel, we wouldn't be in Iran. So, sorry, I disagree.
And don't tell me about how awful Iran is. We took out Saddam Hussein, and at that time Iraq and Iran counterbalanced each other. Once he was gone, it left a vacuum, which Iran moved right into. We need to be OUT of the Middle East and let them solve their own problems. Our hegemony is hurting Americans.
I agree Joy.
I hope and pray Trumpie can find a way out of the Iran war before he leaves office. Not holding out much hope for this year. I think the only way it will be resolved politically in the US favor is to go in and get what is left of the nuclear crapp and walk away-- entirely.
Let the Saudi's and Israeli's handle what is left.
buh, bye!
I agree if Israel would not be so successful in Operation Rising Lion, Trump would not join. I'm not sure I understand how the current war is hurting Americans.
I don’t like the Tucker Carlson connection or the subtle antisemitism either. But if Vance is the guy then he’s my guy.
I appreciate VP Vance’s support re: the vax, but I will be supporting Marco Rubio for POTUS in 2028.
"November 2025: Rubio told Vanity Fair: “If JD Vance runs for president, he’s going to be our nominee, and I’ll be one of the first people to support him.” ABC News subsequently reported that statement while covering efforts by some Republican donors to encourage a Rubio candidacy. ABC News
May 2026: Rubio made it even more explicit in an NBC interview: “If JD runs for president … I’ll be the first person to sign up and support him.” He called Vance a “very good friend” and said he thought Vance would be a “phenomenal candidate.”"
VP Vance and Sec. Rubio would both be great as president. I've seen some people supporting the idea of a Vance/Rubio ticket.
I think both would be like President Trump on the issues, but without the "mean tweets" problem.
There is no "mean tweets" "problem". Trump 2028.
Actually, after I wrote that, I knew that it wasn't what I meant. I would love to have President Trump continue to annoy democommies for the next 10 years!
Things may yet change, good Dr.
yep, Rubio called it. . . and I agree. Marco hit the nail, baby.
Dear Drs. Malon,
We have something in common that goes back a long way. We both graduated from the University of California, Davis, although my path there was a little different. I came through 4-H leadership at seventeen in 1963. Much later I built and operated a nursery in Rumsey. That was a long time ago—back when things were a little different.
I have followed your work since you first began writing about what I call the “plandemic” or “scamdemic”, depending on my mood. ” I have also followed Reiner Fuellmich and what has and is happening to him. Whatever one thinks of every detail, there is no question that he has been effectively removed from the public arena. You, on the other hand, have managed to remain out in the open and continue speaking.
I want to acknowledge something else I admire about your work: the breadth of your knowledge. You have an unusually eclectic range of interests and seem willing to follow evidence wherever it leads.
Now for what concerns me.
I know you have considered the possibility that there are people or forces in the world who would prefer that you stop talking. Perhaps some of them are closer than you think. I have no special information suggesting that anything is imminent, and I am not trying to frighten you. I am simply an old man who has spent enough time watching the world to know that sometimes prudence is not paranoia.
I admire what you have done, and I would like to see you around for another thirty years, if you can stand it.
There is an old saying I like: God helps those who help themselves. I suspect you know exactly where I am going with that.
So here is my unsolicited advice from one UC Davis graduate to another: consider having a bolt hole. Somewhere safe, private, and ready to use if circumstances ever make it seem necessary. I hope you never need it. But having one costs considerably less than wishing you had one.
Take care of yourselves. There are a lot of people who value what you are doing—and quite a few who are praying for you.
Best,
David
UC Davis
Thank you for this. Yes, that is an excellent idea and one we are considering.
good advice.
But you still need time to be able to use it. Advance warning and security gives that.
I live at the end of a long lane(nearly half a mile) and use a "Dakota Alert" to send a radio signal to my home when a vehicle starts down the lane. By the time a vehicle arrives I can be "ready" in whatever manner I see fit-- depending mostly on how dark it is!
To me Vance is a very able and very well prepared to effectively carry on. He knows the issues and the people he would be dealing with (and particularly on the global stage). He has the more forceful image. I wholely respect Rubio. I feel he is a bit short on the forcefulness in his own right and this maybe why he indicates he wont run if Vance runs. Providing DeS stays clear of the Bushes and maybe Cruz and his current associates - IMO the strongest contender is DeSantis. He demonstrates effective directions and leadership. He lacks the facetime intimacy with global concerns and people. Just hope we can manage to get to 2028 with a good interim behind us.
Why does the Democrat Party support fraud, waste ,abuse and outright theft? I think we know why. But they really need their noses rubbed innit! If!
Hmm, well all I can say is this post combined with Ron Johnson's stuff before congress just seem to make your other post seem hyperbolic. We may not have all we want or need on health and we appreciate your keeping tabs on it, but I think we're making enormous headway. We aren't going to get it all right away and if we did, the backlash would set us back. I think this whole administration has been addressing what went wrong over Covid, and I'll be shocked if there is a mandate for covid vaccines nationwide (and I believe the blue states were still mandating it for school children anyway). But I'll be watching. I like JD, though his talk about demons and his close association with Tucker give me pause. And I have gone from thinking Tucker was the most critical thinker on the planet to thinking he's batshit crazy. I do like that JD will likely not be a war monger, though I don't believe Trump really is, either. I do like Marco Rubio a lot--I voted for him years ago against Trump in the primaries. So they are both good. But I'm glad at least to hear you don't plan to vote for the communists. :)
His Tucker association gives me pause too - but we all have that one friend...
I recently saw that Tucker was interviewed on NPR of all places. I loved him during the 2024 campaign. He gave phenomenal speeches. I can’t get over how he has done a 180. If the Iran war ends soon and Trump is vindicated, I wonder how he will react?
I always watched Tucker when he was in Fox. But one time he had Kristi Noem on when she was Governor of South Dakota. They were talking about men in women's sports. He accused her of not carrying through on her stance and rudely interrupted her.
Later I read about her work to protect women. She was going about it in a way that it would have legal enforcement. Ticket would not let her explain.
After that, I had a lot less respect for Tucker. He couldn't really shake off his own conviction that he always knew best.
…. I wonder how you and many in this comment section will react if the Iran war (which has been ongoing now for 6 months) DOESN’T end soon, and the younger generations, that supported Trump in 2024, abandon him and the Republicans this November in favor of the Marxists? 🤔
That's funny.
Tucker is absolutely looney these days. So disappointing! I’d prefer Rubio over Vance at this point too. I don’t care for how pro – AI Vance is.
I love Rubio and his ability to apply direct clear communication, and shut down idiots. I love Vance too because he can argue to sway people to a different way of thinking. I would vote for either one, but actually would like to see Rubio continue his hands on quest to solve America's problems. He strikes me as a roll up the sleeves and get to work guy. Decisive direct and has a great mind.
Aren't we conservatives so lucky to have a deep bench with not just one but two or three great people teed up to be the next leader?!
Look at the liberal bench of nutjobs by comparison. I can only hope and pray the undecided voters in the middle wake up enough to see these stark differences in time to vote.
Rubio was a real surprise to me, a very pleasant one. I went from thinking him a fool to being completely impressed.
I feel like Rubio is more of a known quantity. Can articulate freedom as well as anyone on the planet. Maybe better than Vance and we'd get some Hispanic vote. Vance may have a bit more charisma with young people, though. Electability matters. So I'll take either one of them. And Tucker? Must be some kind of personal crisis/mental breakdown is all I can figure. We have a very good personal friend -- my husband as village president hired this fiend as police chief -- and later he worked for TSA and he said Tucker came through when he was working-- and he was a total asshole. This was like at least six years ago he told us that and I didn't believe him. Now? Yep. He was right. Maybe always an asshole. Ha. Oh. I'm a woman I'm not gay. I write literary fiction and taught university under that pseudonym, but people on here think I'm a man all the time. I do have a masculine writing style often (and wanted to write from a male pov and did so successfully). Thought I better clarify I'm not a guy married to a man. :) AI does scare me, that plus transhumanism seem like some crazy dystopian novel -- but letting the government control it scares me far more. This pandora's box is open, so Dr. Malone was dead right on the regulatory capture angle for the tech companies and Democrats want a campaign issue and would love to control it and us--Trump has it right and if JD wants it unregulated, I'd say he's right on that. Trump was way ahead of them meeting with all of them and perhaps they are smart enough to keep tabs each other. Haven't heard JD's thoughts on it.
Great insight!
AI is a tool, nothing more. Don't buy into the doomsday rhetoric.
The only thing we need to make AI more viable is open access to startup companies, and Big Tech is doing their level best to put the kibosh on that.
I hate images of "fat JD". This is not funny.
Did you watch the video? Vacne thinks it is the best Trump admin meme yet and suggests people search for it.
I liked the Crocs 😂
Yes, as long as I was able. Many on the left use this image to make fun of him, which I think is disgusting. He doesn't look like that. I'm sure he laughs it off because he knows that is the best way to handle it (don't give the wolves what they want - a reaction), but how would you like to see everyone making memes of you as an obese man?
Great way to turn the table on the Leftists. Just like ‘Deplorables’ started as an insult and became a rallying cry.
and "let's go Brandon"! Ha!
Here's a good one for you:
a liberal neighbor has a bunch of Dem signs in front of his house on our dead end road. (Nearly ALL this guy's neighbors are conservatives and he is new to the area.)
Get this: one of the signs actually reads: "Let's Go Brandon!"
apparently the delusional liberal mindset is one that believes somebody's name will get attention moreso than the infamous meme created years ago about Biden's dementia and a media talker's inability to coverup the factual statement . . .
the irony here is precious.
Well, that is one way of looking at it.
I appreciate hearing that some good work is being done, and I realize meaningful change takes time. But I still find myself asking: how long?
Vaccines are still widely used. Grocery stores are still filled with highly processed foods, and so are the carts of most shoppers. I hear a great deal about what MAHA is changing, but in ordinary daily life, I have yet to see much of that change actually manifested.
Perhaps important work is happening behind the scenes. I hope so. For now, though, I remain cautiously hopeful—and still waiting to see the promises become visible results.
It's frustrating that more isn't happening in MAHA, but there's progress, and it's going against obstruction from the establishment.
One positive thing is the public interest in MAHA, and the demand for healthier selections.
Anybody zoom in on the agricultural part of this summit? I was interested in some of the companies/products being touted, but not being a farmer, I hold my breath on how advances will play out. Soil Data Mapping? Turning off plant genome and replacement, called New Breeding Technique? The company Ohalo and related speaker (https://www.ohalo.com/)? Any comment of that part of the discussions, Drs. Malone? Anyone?
I've really drilled down on this since I feel our best bet to all being more healthy is the health of our food. Agriculture is very high on my list of 'needs to be changed'. I see this aligning more maybe with RFKJ possibly create a downstream effect on the Pharma businesses. If more and more people go (or are given fewer alternatives) with much healthier eating, it follows that the need for Pharma starts to drop out of the picture. Dominos falling?
Boy, that was short and sweet! Hard to find some rock solid promises of change, not just an executive order to no-where. "There must be somewhere out of here, said the joker to the thief, there's too much confusion, I can't get no relief." There it is again, my constant companion singing in my head.
Just because MAHA became captured by basically the same corporations that created the mess it shouldn’t mean we don’t hold out hope that change can come because as we all know the wheels of govt churn at a snails pace. I’d also suggest to use the info we’ve learned in our own lives to better our own health. Eat right. Ask questions. Challenge the answers. Spread the word. Thanks for leading us Dr.(s) Malone.
Also, Secretary Noem states 15,000 farmers have taken advantage of Ag grants to try regenerative farming? More details, please!!
I'm holding optimism that some pain at the pumps will not send us off the rails. In 2028 I'm seeing J.D. Vance, Ron DeSantis and Marco Rubio all as viable POTUS candidates I could support. On the Communism side it looks pretty dismal. Harris, A.O.C., and Newsome look to be front runners; all having terrible resumes. Shapiro ? Jefferies ? The Dems are gonna have to dig deep.
Average progressive voters cannot read resumes. Many cannot even read a ballot.
A bit depressing to imagine the George Floyds of the world voting.