100 Comments
User's avatar
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Those at risk are more likely to have a dysfunctional immune system and other health issues. Consequently they are at a higher risk of having a detrimental health outcome when injected. Let's fix the root causes of ill health and not inject with mRNA's which are designed to trick the immune system and reprogram cellular function. It is a failed band aid approach that has harmed millions and millions in the USA and has delivered death. Let's stop ignoring the root causes of ill health with a marginalized immune system being a key component that needs to be fixed. Start by boosting everyone's blood value of the active form of vitamin D to over 50 ng's. It is a hormone that controls 3000 gene expressions. The science is there and ignored. ADA needs to stop protecting their members income!

Expand full comment
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

I am pedaling the little tricycle I have been allocated as fast as I can....

Expand full comment
Jennifer Beebe's avatar

God bless you Dr. Malone! We are so grateful for you! You truly were born FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS! 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

The medical citadel is entrenched..

Expand full comment
Melanie Reynolds's avatar

Thank you

Expand full comment
D A KESTER's avatar

👏👏👏😋

Expand full comment
Carla Nelson's avatar

LOL!

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

Keep your Creatine levels up Dr. Malone, it's all uphill.

Ask Lance Armstrong! While touring De-France. Hah.

Expand full comment
Steve S6's avatar

I thought vaccinations were medically (as opposed to insurance) contraindicated in cases of poor health. At least we do that for animals.

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

I reply, No Sh*t!

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

A+ Compilation analysis Thomas!

Expand full comment
Patricia's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
KEITH's avatar

🤷🏼‍♀️50 ng = ???

Expand full comment
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Blood value of the active form of D in the body.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Strange things are afoot at the Circle K. Sorry CDC.

RFK needs a couple of good investigators, with arrest powers, to go track down those involved and arrest them when said nefarious evil doers refuse subpoenas, records or just interfere with Policing functions.

Obstructing arrests are stand alone (more or less) and can GREATLY enhance and encourage compliance.

Pick off the odd CEO of big pharma at his kids soccer game for obstructing and pretty sure they will fall all over themselves to follow lawful court orders.

Expand full comment
Randall Stoehr's avatar

Whoa....nicely stated! Military grade theatrics.

A Whacka- mole style summer cleaning of crusty non-trusty creatures.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Hey it works really well with sex offenders, especially the ones that refuse to register or violate.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

I’m still not understanding how injecting this into sick kids is a good thing. I would imagine the adverse reactions would be greater in sick child.

I would bet the data will show the people involved in these decisions to approve this showed a steep incline in their investment portfolio, I’m sure along with their friends. It’s disgusting to me to watch so many people I know, family, friends and business associates be horribly harmed but yet we’re still going down the same dark road.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

The idea is that an immunocompromised kid cannot launch an adequate response to neutralize KP3II or whatever it is, some variant of Omicron, so the shot will stimulate an antibody response strong enough to clear the virus. That's the idea, but there are consequences to these mRNA shots beyond stimulating the immune system for a few weeks. I actually don't know how long the immunity lasts, if it is a few weeks, then what is the point at all, that would mean the kid needs boosters every few weeks, and will the virus mutate beyond the scope of coverage by boosters. It's all about money really.

Expand full comment
James Goodrich's avatar

Yes I get it. It seems like the risk is 1000 times (at least) greater than the reward, especially in immunocompromised kids. For the 2-4 weeks that it may help, which is questionable, I believe it may harm the child for years. It is incredible that the MRNA injections may have negatively affected every member of my family and most got Covid at one time or another. So for me, as you say, it’s all so certain select people can profit.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

I was just watching on YouTube a really annoying guy Dave Farina whose podcast is Professor Dave Explains the title was RFK Jr. is dangerously stupid. He blamed Kennedy for the deaths of the Mennonite children in Texas who went to the hospital with measles and were not treated properly for secondary bacterial infections. He says the risks of glyphosate are exaggerated as are risks of Fluoride and Atrazine. He gives false information saying it has been scientifically proven that vaccines are not related to autism and that aluminum in the shots is no big deal. I could not believe it. He has a BA in chemistry and a master's in science ed, I guess he needs more education.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

It seems to me that it must first be established that these mRNA products are not vaccines, which are themselves, problematic. They are gene therapy & were filed as such with the SEC. Simply because the CDC changed the definition of a vaccine on 9/1/2021 to match the product that they were pushing on everyone, does not change that fact. As a result, the producers of these products should not be protected with the liability shield, which needs to be ended anyway. Further, why would anyone want to inject anyone, including "at-risk" children, with a product that forces your body to produce a toxic protein, by the billions. How many studies have to be produced before it is admitted that these products are very dangerous & often lethal? I read the reports of these studies everyday. Every. Single. Day. Covid was & still is a treatable illness. A "vaccine" was never needed in the first place, whether it was a conventional vaccine or an mRNA genetic injection. Our primary mission, at this point, needs to be this admission or we will otherwise continue to injure & kill people by the thousands. Again, I ask, "What is it going to take"?

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

Debra, you raise a very important point: these mRNA shots are a gene therapy vs a vaccine! They certainly covered their a’s by changing the definition but many of us received the shot before 9/1/2021. Would that fact change the liability status for those that got them before that date? Just curious 🧐

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

You can be sure that changing the definition of a vaccine was done with this liability shield in mind. The liability shield was not intended to cover adverse events from gene therapy. One would think that those who have been injured by these genetic injections would have a good case to make legally as well as the families of those who have been killed by them. You can also be sure that the lawyers for the makers of these mRNA genetic injections will consider the change in definition to be a matter of semantics & unimportant, knowing full-well that the average person/family does not have the financial resources to challenge their fancy legal footwork. I wish a law firm would pursue this, as this may be key to getting some kind of financial help & recognition for the harm these genetic injections have caused.

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

Attorney Aaron Siri, from ICAN/The Highwire, is very knowledgeable about vaccines and the mRNA injections. His law firm has been the one getting all the data released from the CDC, FDA etc. I follow that show every Thursday and they send out updates via email frequently. I’m going to email them and get their take on the “semantics “.

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Good idea, Jane. I too, have followed Aaron Siri & he would definitely be the one to pursue this. So many people have been injured & killed. It saddens me beyond measure - & all for a treatable infection with a 99+% recovery rate, which was known by the spring of 2020. Here we are 4.5 years after these injections were first foisted on the population & they're still pushing & promoting them.

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

My opinion now is that they should be removed and banned immediately! I’m sure that won’t be an easy task as so many of the population are totally brainwashed and believe that they are protecting themselves. If or when they have an adverse reaction or a loved one does, then they may change their minds.

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

I received an answer from ICAN:

Hi Jane,

Thank you for your email and question. Aaron Siri, ICAN's legal representative, answers this question on episode 404 at the 1:39:43 mark which you can find here: https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/siri-testifies-new-hampshire-the-transmission-paradox/

We hope you find this helpful.

Respectfully,

Kari Black

ICAN

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

I just received an email from ICAN, with a link to further info regarding EAU :

https://info.icandecide.org/rd/9z4zo5p5ghm3ni9i1jdk7jg0oiucb9ft8gn56opsp98_rp22sh2s8imap71c9jmepb24no

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

I also asked my question about liability and will post my answer, if I receive one. Also, I’m correcting EAU to EUA

Expand full comment
Jane Tracy's avatar

Debra, see my post below

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

Thanks, Jane. I will watch it.

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

What a total waste of money and time in all this debate on mRNA injections, which have injured and killed multi-millions. Isn't it wonderful that the Society of Pediatricians are up in arms, because these vaxes were stopped for pregnant women and healthy children...It would affect their million dollar incomes. Its all about money, power, control and global depopulation. The ACIP needs to stand up to the FDA which works hand in glove with Big Pharma. It needs to follow through and get rid of these vile vaccines. .

Expand full comment
Geoff's avatar

Has there been any news coverage of Hannah Anderson running her car into Kennedy's intentionally after being fired? Seems like a big deal. I have not seen anything about this.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Arrested would be nice...and appropriate

Expand full comment
AFistFullOfGizzards's avatar

This gave me pause so I looked it up and found nothing but then fell down this wormhole.

https://archive.org/details/chappaquiddickde0000will/page/n5/mode/2up

Expand full comment
Annette Petrone's avatar

This whole subject nauseates me. Children are such guinea pigs with adults who should CARE better. Depravity. Indifference. Sacrifice the innocent. Lies, deceptions, murder - kind of like the abortion brainwashing, actually. All for the sake of selfishness and the almighty dollar.

Expand full comment
Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

What I find most perplexing is there is no evidence I am aware of showing the attenuated strains of this manufactured beast are anywhere near as dangerous as any of the jabs that would justify their use. They potentially are orders of magnitude more dangerous

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Thank you for trying to clear this a bit. I think instead of approving these dangerous products, they should immediately be taken off the market. Teach everyone to eat healthy again, instead of feeding children coloured rings, give them home baked bread and eggs!

Take all these unhealthy 'formerly known as food' items off the market. Children will be way healthier. PS. I am old enough to remember the times when we only got poxx and polio vaxx' and they were not in jabs. I was born 2 months premature and lived through all the childhood diseases and a pharmacy salesman doctor and almost 68 now. On no meds at all, only using herbals and homeopathics. (only go to doc when all else fails)

Expand full comment
KEITH's avatar

Yep I’m 77 and we all got the measles mumps and chickenpox. Group treatment! Polio vax was given to us in Michigan as some of the first recipients. I don’t get flu shots either. Took the first two doses of Pfizer’s vaccine no booster and my AFIB returned the following month. Big Pharma is a war machine.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

oh my, I hope you get back to your old healty self! you are absolutely right. Pharma makes everyone sick and then sells us all more drugs. I just read a recall on tens of thousands of bottles of cholesterol drugs laced with some grub. Last month, something I took shortly for blood pressure, same thing and the govt already knew 6 years ago, that it was contaminated with cancer causing agents. They gave the company 2 years, then another 2 years, and then obviously forgot about it. I had thankfully already quit the stuff !

Expand full comment
Handsome Pristine Patriot's avatar

Big Pharma's billions enable them to buy some very long, deep state tentacles.

They REALLY, REALLY need their wings clipped.

Expand full comment
VictorDianne Watson's avatar

Thank you for explaining what is going on. I was surprised at this decision, as well. I am glad that at least one person was held accountable for it. I am hoping that the COVID-19 shots will be removed completely. I know people who are being told to get their boosters, and they are. I worry for their overall health, but they do not appreciate anything I say. I suspect it’s going to take time to get to where we need to be, and there are those who wish to impede it. We have to have patience and continue to fight for goals that have been set.

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

Yes, I think it's a big understatement to imagine people will quit the boosters unless the product is taken off the market. As long as the false fear is promoted about the disease there will be adherents to the next "cure" or safety drug.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

Cigarettes are still on the market, but doctors no longer tell patients they help with asthma. Doctors are the interface, and they are the ones poisoning people.

Expand full comment
KEITH's avatar

Doctors need to learn more about nutrition and vitamin supplements as opposed to prescribing the pills. Read folks!!

Expand full comment
KEITH's avatar

Why can’t it just be taken off the market?

Expand full comment
D D's avatar

So simple a question, like, no problem. You must be kidding. $$$$

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

The more things change the more they stay the same. Somebody is bowing down to Big Pharma and it has to come from the top. I really had hope when RFK jr. became the Sec. of HHS. and the food dye ban is great but why is it taking 2 years when the recipes already exist for products? The fact is our Govt no longer works for us and we either need a revolution to make the people have the power again or just check out and worry about ourselves individually. I’m close to checking out.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

We have the power of the purse. I think we should avoid doctors, and when we need one, go to a functional medical doctor, most likely having to pay out of pocket, but worth it.

Expand full comment
KEITH's avatar

So true!!!

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

The wife and me use a concierge Dr. You have to pay a yearly “membership” fee. The scripts are covered and we pay the out of network for his visits but our health data isn’t at some group that is owned by a hedge fund or hospital network. It’s great though as he runs his practice like the old time Drs. He will just call in scripts for simple things. Also, does house calls. Many Drs are doing this now and it is expensive. I’d never go back to what we used to have.

Expand full comment
Roisin Dubh's avatar

My insurance covered my visits to the Functional Medical doctor, then she shifted to a concierge model. $15,000 for four visits a year. I was very irritated over that. Then I joined another concierge with a low payment, that did take insurance, they missed putting my insurance through and took the money from my bank account without asking, and I had to change my account to stop it, because I couldn't reach anyone on their portal which does not have immediate human contact only a chatbot. Now I just pay out of pocket for a functional doctor, less hassle, but still have to pay high premiums for insurance that I don't use. The AMA has it all sewn up. Most cannot afford to pay out of pocket and insurance. Crazy greedy world.

Expand full comment
James Schwartz's avatar

Yea the AMA is a good deal.

Expand full comment
Michael Heath's avatar

Thank you, Dr. Malone, for keeping us informed as to the shady acts of the criminals who still remain withing these organizations that have been orchestrating all of these crimes against humanity for many years~! I hope that folks are seeing just how these criminals play their game of dirty tricks, including how they intentionally set the good folks up to be blamed for their evil deeds. Very interesting and educational. Have a great day and thanks again for the clarity that you bring to these dark forces within our society~! Sincerely, Mike

Expand full comment
Stephen Decatur's avatar

The e u a may have given big pharma companies freedom from liability for vaccine injuries, but I' it did not include freedom from liability for fraud. Some law firm willl make a killing by suing based on the fraud that was committed by not including the risks and potential damage from taking the vaccine. Advertising that the vaccine was safe and effective was a fraudulent statement.

Expand full comment
Steve S6's avatar

Lay person here. The FDA, et al "trust us we're the experts" always reminds me of "Top. Men." (Raiders of the Lost Ark).

So with these mRNA vaccines being approved, does that mean they solved the toll receptor issue? A question that was asked way back when with the only answer to silence and cancel those professionals that were asking. Odd kind of answer.

There certainly seems to be differing opinions on the meaning of "informed" in informed consent.

Perhaps a bit trite, but as the meme says, all products pulled by the FDA were once approved by the FDA. So yes, peer reviewed and open source data would be appropriate. Science is about replicating results after all.

Expand full comment
Sheila Barkofske's avatar

As with the larger Federal Bureaucratic Blob, I suspect this is the result of a downstream effect. Short of completely shutting down HHS/FDA/CDC, people/parents are going to continue to be at the mercy of unknown & unknowable agenda/s. You can only do so much at any one time.

Expand full comment