43 Comments

Re: Supreme Court:

Biden vs Dr Kheriaty,

& Drs Kory, & Marik b Board,:

———

“RFK HAS STANDING” and joined Missouri vs Biden Court case……

Judge Doughty said “They will now be forced to rule on the merits of the evidence against the government, which we believe is overwhelming”…... Dr Kheriaty reported in reference to the White House Censorship Campaign.

(Judge Doughty last week stated Biden had committed;

“the most egregious violation of the First Amendment in the history of the United States.”)

On the issue of Kennedy’s standing, U.S. District Court judge Terry Doughty last week ruled: “There is not much dispute that both Kennedy and CHD [Kennedy’s nonprofit Children’s Health Defense] were specifically targeted by the White House, the Office of Surgeon General, and CISA, and the content of Kennedy and CHD were suppressed.

Citing evidence we uncovered in Missouri v. Biden, Doughty explained:

“The Court finds that Kennedy is likely to succeed on his claim that suppression of content posted was caused by actions of Government Defendants (Biden White House).

Importantly: The noted reason Biden Censored the doctors was to block them from REVEALING

1. The dangers of the COVID VACCINE &

2. The inaccurate misinformation Fauci & CDC had been publishing.

3. This censoring was illegal AND AS WELL, it endangered the population(citizens)——————-/————————-These facts also have relevance to the case of Dr Kory & Dr Marik vs the Internal Medicine Board who removed their Certification: BECAUSE - These motivations of Biden set the stage to argue the reason Biden (The news & govt) AND THUS the Internal Medicine board was de-certifying them was because Biden, et al KNEW their arguments against Dr Kory, & Dr Marik, Malone,Kheriaty etc. were WRONG and inaccurate medically !……AND…..THEREFOR: Dr Kory can make the same argument that the Board of Internal medicine was acting on the supposition that Fauci, CDC & Biden’s arguments were scientifically correct ….. BUT THEY WERE NOT !!!….. Thus, the board had no reason to remove their board certification !!!!!!’

Yes ?!

Dr Del (UCLA MED)

Expand full comment

Excellent!

Expand full comment

The goals are great, but unachievable if we can't take apart the WEF types, the human self appointed "masters of the universe," banksters, and corrupt deep states of all the countries who do not work for the betterment of their citizens. Instead of human 2.0, we need human 1.0s that are moral, ethical, compassionate and honest. Since that also appears to be unachievable writ large, we must slog along trying to do this a bit at a time until we have reached a critical mass. But working all the points to control "steering the AIs in a pro-human direction".

Expand full comment

This is a valid point. It doesn't mean we should stop trying, though.

Expand full comment

I agree.

Expand full comment

I wonder how many people the mini-gods will have to jail or kill to succeed with their insane agenda. Over the course of a decade, I'm betting it will be a LOT. That's assuming the left maintains power for the next 4 years, of course. Praying they DON'T maintain it!

Expand full comment

I have always thought that Y2K was on track for being the event to bring in the new world order. I do know the prison camps they built all over the US were not used.

Expand full comment

The were converted to reeducation camps after 9/11.

Expand full comment

I really thought they had plans to take advantage of the camps during the plandemic but it fell apart too fast.

Expand full comment

Australia put its people in camps. The way the Robes were ruling they probably would have allowed it here.

Expand full comment

This brought back some old memories. Funny how, in the moment, even armed with irrefutable evidence, a claim can be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory'. Like in 1999 when eye witness reports and photographs confirmed that mysterious, guarded, gated facilities, looking much like prisons, were being constructed all over the US and those who had either seen the camps or believed they existed were summarily dismissed as nutcases.

In the same vein the chemtrail reports in the early 2000s, even from credentialed sources, was tossed off as the imaginations of tin foil hat wearing nimrods. Well, here we are 25 years later and what was treated as a joke turns out to be true. But that's okay now, you know. It's for the greater good, you know. Bill Gates is doing his best to cool off this planet that is doomed to burst into flame any day now. You know. We are not allowed to ask the question, if Bill Gates is so determined to save us, why is he also a proponent of reducing earth population by billions?

Expand full comment

This might be off topic, but years ago, you could purchase software for Word, Publisher, Excel, etc., and remain off line to protect your private files. Not now. You have to “update” the software in order to use it, which requires online activity and access to your computer.

🤔

I asked a programmer if it’s possible to create an alternative to Microsoft, which would allow offline usage for applications listed above. He said yes, but it would be a monumental task. Maybe now is the time to create that alternative, so our personal documents are safe guarded in the privacy of our homes. I assume that Big Tech would have a hissy fit, but who cares!

Expand full comment

I bought Office Suite 2024 on Amazon which is compatible with Microsoft Office for $12.99 I have that on a computer I am not currently using for the if/when the grid goes down or I decide to no longer use Microsoft, so I can do stuff off line. I do not back anything to the cloud. I use expansion drives to store documents. Always have a plan B, C.

Expand full comment

The current answer to this problem of "corporate-controlled computing" is the Free Software movement. Though it is populated mostly by left-leaning people, its goal is to achieve and maintain freedom in the computing space.

Software that fits their guidelines is in wide use across this planet. I use Libre Office, for example, as a replacement for Microsoft Office products. However, I have been unable to free myself from Windows; it is just too ubiquitous. There are some who insist on not using a corporate-controlled operating system, and it can be done with a little added effort.

However, the fact that we all use the internet, which is a corporate-controlled technology, may in the end present a barrier to freedom that could be very difficult to overcome. There is always telepathy - a free form of communication that cannot be centrally controlled. But only a few people on Earth (so far) have learned how to do that successfully.

Expand full comment

There was life before computers and the Internet. There still can be. Comes down to your/my priorities.

Expand full comment

People had better familiarize themselves with a connection to their inner voice. Intuition is the connection to the Spirit within. When I mentioned that I "thought" a Midwestern Doctor was female, Dr. Malone said no. Come to find out, there are a few people who help put together some of the essays. Intuition needs to be checked too, thoughts are not intuition. This may be the only way to check accuracy, it was mentioned in the Bible too.

Expand full comment

Truth! Humans were made in God's image, meaning triune beings, body, soul, spirit. AI is soulless and has no spirit so it can never be intuitive, which is the key to out of the box problem solving.

I know there are Christians who believe the beast in Revelation 13 is the 'antichrist' but, IMHO, it isn't a person, it's a cabal of persons. Maybe the head of the beast that everyone thought was dead is communism? Maybe the smaller beast is TECH and AI that makes it possible for the whole world to see and worship the beast. Internet? But the really disturbing verse is about the mark that one must have in order to buy and sell. CBDC? Why is it feeling strangely like we are a minute to midnight?

https://meemanator.substack.com/p/time-to-stand

Expand full comment

Chat GPT4 maybe can pass (cheat?) on the mcat but on this substack we were shown a Q&A session with that beast and it lied on every first question asked. So.......?

Expand full comment

Lots of food for thought here. Thanks for highlighting many of the social, ethical, political, and legal issues. I doubt that unbiased polling exists, but the rest of the recommendations are excellent. I’m afraid it’s going to be the Wild West until some of these policies take hold. In the meantime, I’ll be on the lookout for a market in “trustworthiness” to be developed.

Expand full comment

"Open the doors, Hal." 2001, A Space Odyssey

2024. We're almost there. I predict AI wars are on the horizon. The good, the bad, and the ugly, and none of it human.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting this comprehensive and thoughtful treatise! AND YET.....

Nevertheless, he concludes with his own version of the usual hollow platitudes and cliched call to action we encounter in so many cries of alarm in all fields of thought that can be found everywhere these days. They can only preach to the choir of us who are truly aware of what is happening:

"This is the time for humans to stand up and show future generations that we were forward-thinking enough to act appropriately during this era of massive technological change. It’s our choice. Freedom-loving humans are the most potent force in the world. It just takes us to stand up and let our voices be heard. Right now, we are fighting for our freedom and the future of humanity. Let's make sure we get this right today while we still have a fighting chance."

Sure - sounds good, but no one will stand up to what they are not aware of. We in this corner of the blogosphere can become easily deluded into believing that far more of humanity at large is aware of what is actually happening. Do we lapse into ignorance of the total control of ALL media that defines and maintains a worldview designed to perpetuate the nefarious Narrative?! A Narrative that countless smartphone gazers believe is an honest view of life on Earth!

The most important task at hand this moment is to inform anyone and everyone about censorship and control of information - that YES, the freedom of speech the DEFINES freedom is going away. We can no longer afford to care anymore whether we are red or blue, black or white, this or that - do you want to join us to assure this doesn't happen, fellow human?!

Yet most of us shoot ourselves in the foot EVERY DAY with partisan barbs, smears, and spite directed at "the other side" in cartoons, memes, and derisive media (sure is 'fun' isn't it?!). This year's election is the most dependable, bankable, distracting - yet meaningless clown show to maintain our division. The Machine will continue to crush us regardless of election outcomes unless we expose the Machine for all to see!

Our only hope is to recognize the monster descending on us all, clearly enough to set aside less important differences - differences that can only spark and maintain civil war. Let's unite our thoughts, words, and deeds behind the single cause of protecting our freedom of speech and diffuse the ruthless and relentless censorship of the truth. This is our only hope for a genuine revolution!! This is not a hollow platitude once we see ourselves in each other, everywhere!

============

"The majority of men... are not capable of thinking, but only of believing, and... are not accessible to reason, but only to authority." - Arthur Schopenhauer

Expand full comment

Thank for this worthy follow-up!

All this does so bring to mind HAL. At that point I was sorry it had to be destroyed.

As to the head proponents, WEF exists to further and manage the mission. IMO the Rockefeller cabal are the instigators. IMO the actions and articulated plans should alert us and help us understand their objectives - well described and heretofore discussed. If we want to, as suggested by Kennedy and Trump, choose a path to take us to healthy, freedom loving, potent forces for tomorrow, we do need to stand up and make the needed differences.

As to machine shortcomings, Kory illustrated one this morning. Innovations in understandings. Whether its an enhancement in treatment or innovation with enhancement of a theory - timely and useful adoption in machine answers seems unlikely. Advocating on behalf of a patient, a population may not be a part of a machine skill set. Will ethical concern be any part of a machines skill set?

One dare says this will prove a challenging and valuable pursuit.

Glad to hear our Censorship suit is gaining strength!

Looking forward to the next chapters in this pursuit!

♡♡♡

Expand full comment

One of the best ideas I've heard is that AI systems shouldn't be allowed to own resources. This means that a human actor must be positioned between the AI system and the resource being deployed. For instance, the rogue AI system says to bomb Montana. However, the AI system owns no bombs; the AI system can't launch bombs it doesn't own. So that "bomb Montana" suggestion must go through a human individual or organization that does own bombs. When it does, that individual should firmly refuse. If the person proceeds to bomb Montana, he/she will be the one responsible, just as they would be today.

https://incidentalinsights.substack.com

Expand full comment

It would be wonderful if the "positive ideas to steer AI in a pro-human direction" would be applied to our current human institutions.

Expand full comment

The antichrist is going to be an AI.

Expand full comment

I am going to connect some dots here. So AI will obsolete a lot of jobs done by people today. My wife is keen on Med Beds coming in the next decade and extending human lifespan (I am skeptical about med beds) and WEF/Bilderburg Group want to chop earth's population down to 500 million.

These dots seem to connect to me. Cut down the population to match the available jobs not able to be done by AI and AI robots. All I can say is F--- WEF/Bilderburg Group and AI. We need AI constrained to labs where its value can be utilized without harming people. Earths population is already forecast to peak around 2065 and decrease naturally after that due to less than replacement birthrate (already present in the US, Korea, etc).

Expand full comment

🤔 At projected pace AI should be able to eliminate all illnesses, achieve world peace, end hunger…nah, those who will control will only allow use for their lust of greed and power.

Expand full comment

I hope God intervenes as some point. I have had enough of Man's progressiveness. It needs to stop before it creates something to replace itself. First God became irrelevant, now man is all that's left to deem irrelevant.

Expand full comment