A good outcome of this would be a return to GPs for treating the entire family including kids. Pediatrics is or was a specialty and specialists should only be seen for special problems not surrogate parenthood.
Pediatrics, it must be a licence to print money...
Children captured for the lucrative vaccine market under coercion and mandates.
What a dire situation, practitioners violating their personal duty to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent, or to respect the choice to decline the intervention if people so wish.
Here's the key: Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
Cannot Ethically Proceed. Well said, Elizabeth. In my opinion, neither can any PARENT, Ethically Proceed, who has a working brain, and no doubt, is capable of Knowing all this - as they can certainly swipe and type on their cells, all day every day!
In the face of everything that’s coming out about the childhood vaxxes, the AAP, with malice and contempt for the children of our country, went against the CDC. It was like time stood still - their treachery was exposed and all the world could see how far they were willing to go. Give them their day in court - that’s more of a chance than they gave the children. Lethal injections would be a fitting end for the AAPers, but a RICO conviction doesn’t offer that remedy.
Depending on which sources you use, (and I have very lazily used Wikipedia), 53,402 US army personnel died in in combat or were MIA, during World War 1. And the reason that stands out to me is that that is a similar number of vaccine dead mentioned in the article. And when you consider the VAERS vaccine deaths are probably 1-10% of the total, that is a LOT more deaths. As in.. that final tally for the army is probably pretty accurate as they had a full list going in and going out, and they were motivated to keep them accurately and not under-report because they were going to need more people to feed into that frontline. So the under-reporting is probably greatest on in the context of the vaccine injuries for which records are badly kept and dispersed in numerous private systems.
What makes me sad is to think how the message we were told as children that we should be grateful that we now lived in a time of peace. So WE wouldn't be bearing the horror of losing sons, brothers, uncles and fathers to the frontline of war. But actually, the death is just more evenly spread and so less visible. Now our schools and day centres are being decimated by the scale and cost of catering to the vaccine-injured. And it has taken so many years to wake up to this. Even worse, because of the global reach of these products, so many of the new immigrants we are seeing have similar injuries. So that cynical repopulation programme so beloved of the government that had exhausted its own people with war and devastation, is no longer an option. We have the same issues with learning difficulties, ASD, ADHD, genetic injuries coming from the new influx who were injured in their country of origin by the exact same company peddling the exact same product. Putting even more pressure on our public services.
The West needs to clean house completely, and rid ourselves of these corporate parasites. We have the legal framework. The threat is now existential. And doing the right thing in this context is a matter of legacy.
What a profound observation and sad.. well I better go to bed on a good note. :) say some prayers. :) I will look at your site.. where are you from?. I see from your spelling you are not American. always interested in opinions of the experienced and compassionate.
To me, this looks like it could have implications for whether power actually lies in corporations or the rule of law/ Constitution. If recent history holds true, these lawsuits will be dismissed over some technicality or an outright decision without even bothering for justification. “Health” data is a cornerstone for the upcoming social credit score management system. Eliminating mandates is key to foil this, but the privacy of one’s choice is even more important. These lawsuits will definitely be a litmus test.
As you say Kim, "Eliminating mandates is key to foil this..."
Hold the practitioners to account, those who for years have violated their personal obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary consent, by collaborating with coercion and mandates.
Insist that: Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
Demand that practitioners do their ethical duty, and coercion and mandates will fall away.
I have a problem with informed consent - not because it isn’t desirable, but because I wonder if it can truly be achieved. So much cannot possibly be known, plus there’s the thorny issue of being able to prove information was intentionally withheld. That’s why I like forbidding mandates up front - because then the trump card is held with the individual. They always have the option to simply decline and corporations cannot forcibly capture them.
But without informed consent, what info do parents possess to refuse jabs, particularly when the pediatrician is in their face,telling them their kid will likely die if he cannot jab him?
Just think about how parents are threatened to comply.
They'll be denied education for their children if they refuse vaccination.
There are doctors who actually 'sack' parents from their clinics if they don't comply with the vaccination schedule.
The community has been trained to accept vaccination - but how many people know how many vaccine products, multi-component shots, and revaccinations are on the schedule? Precious few I would wager.
Children are fodder for this regular medical intervention foisted upon mass populations.
And it's a rote process, there's really no pretence of authentic 'informed consent'. The practitioners are just following the schedule, with no real expertise in the interventions they are administering...without ethically valid voluntary informed consent.
The fact is the mandates are in place, and have been for years - how could this happen?
The fundamental problem is that the practitioners have collaborated with coercion and mandates - this needs to come under the spotlight, it must be exposed in the court of public opinion.
Get this out in the open, demand ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and that will open up a huge can of worms. Because the practitioners know little or nothing about the vaccine products and the diseases they are claimed to prevent. How can practitioners obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccine products they are barely trained to understand?
Docs need to be made liable for failing to provide info needed for informed consent. For that to happen the censor machine needs to be broken. Maybe these lawsuits will provide the first step.
Well start with bringing to account the practitioners who collaborated with coercion and mandates, violating their own obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, or to respect the individual's decision to decline the intervention if they so wish.
Get the ball rolling with this, and work up the rotten system.
To me the problem extends beyond the practitioners. The parties that developed, gained approvals and approved use, contracted for production, set out purchase, authorized and engineered distribution and guilds that enforced compliance played major roles. Local docs were at best poorly informed, then coerced and threatened.
Yes, of course the problem is huge - but it would have been stopped in its tracks if the practitioners had done their ethical duty and not collaborated with coercion and mandates.
Think about this! In a supposed 'free country', doctors and nurses were injecting people who were being threatened with penalties if they did not comply - it's mind-blowing!!!
This has been going on for years - how could this happen?
When the lid ever blows off this thing, it's the practitioners who will be thrown under the bus, responsibility will be pushed downwards, because ultimately the responsibility will rest with them, they stuck the needle in the arm.
They should not have collaborated with coercion and mandates.
Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
My understanding is that at the outset no useful information was provided. The product insert was not informative. All were advised no product could be used for an analysis of content. WHO and HHS (Experts) recommended it. Industries, educational facilities and corporations/businesses required it. I agree physicians could have advised that Experts recommended it, that beyond that they had no information to share! So if the patient allowed injection they did so consenting to the info offered?
For years it's been so difficult to challenge vaccination, way before Covid. There's been a determined effort to shut down any criticism of vaccination policy and practice.
This is an enormous scandal waiting to explode.
And a significant part of this scandal is that the physicians were so cowed with fear of the system, they didn't ask questions.
It's a bloody shambles.
And here we are...there's no valid consent.
What is this going to mean when the penny drops?
Who is going to bear the responsibility? Seems to me the ones wielding the needle will be in the frame.
Imo it starts with the approvers of Wuhan. All that followed have unclean hands. For many years we've all been counseled we're to limited to risk thinking for ourselves. We need to trust the experts. In this case Fauci, et al. All the way down to the masses, this held true. Then rough and ready carrot and stick. The faithful got little rewards. Those opposing - lost jobs, defamed, disgraced, banned, destroyed. Much blame to go around. As for the masses should not we demanded evidence supporting "safe and effective"? Proof there was no alternative? Doesn't every participant bear some degree of guilt?
Just had an interesting thought. Pediatricians who push jabs NOT on the CDC approved schedule are opening up the manufacturers to liability since no immunity applies. This could make pharma wake up and,smell,some coffee.
Excellent article and gut-wrenching if you, like me, know children who have juvenile diabetes or autism or peanut allergies. I am thankful for the CHD and doctors who are standing up. My children are standing up for their children by saying no to vaccines.
Thank you.
Add this to the list of major corrective actions needed to bring our country back to what it should be.
The rash of peanut allergies, they are reluctantly beginning to admit, is largely due,to them telling parents not to expose their kids,to peanuts, so,their immune systems evolve sans that antigen and therefore consider it toxic.
The extraordinary thing is, doctors and nurses collaborated with coercion and mandates.
How could they do this?
Do they not understand their personal obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination?
Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
These pediatric clinics, comfortably established with a captured market of children as fodder for the ever-increasing lucrative vaccination schedule.
It's appalling to think of children being exploited in this way, with parents being threatened with penalties if they refuse to comply with coercion and mandates.
Another wild hair. Remember how a blood pressure of 120/80 was golden, and then suddenly it was not? Given what we are seeing with these jabs, would it be outrageous to wonder if the new guidelines are not more intended for pharma to sell more b.p. meds? There is that scepticism of mine again DD.
Thank God! Not only do pediatricians and nurses lie right to your face, they have a conflict of interest because they get paid to give vaxes! The insurance companies are also complicit for setting the reimbursement terms. All the conflicts of interest need to be legislated out of existence! We saw an anti-vax D.O. for years, then suddenly she was forcing every vax there is on us! I was seriously "WTF is wrong with you??", and she sheepishly explained she would lose her job if her patients weren't vaxed, and we definitely weren't! Insane!
What has been the % pattern of change over the last ten or twenty years of pediatricians who are women vs. those who are men? Could that be relevant, somehow, within AAP? Just wondering.
"a system designed to hide harm" is true, but incomplete. Newborn human infants, upon taking their first breaths, are subjected to mandatory and coincidentally industry profitable toxic injections. When those toxic injections contribute chronic disease, which they often do, the industry profitability window just opened wide. Treating the symptoms of chronic illness is a constant and repetitive cash register ring for industry. Soon we will have vaccines for the vaccines, ( what might the shingles vaccine be ? ). This does seem, sound and is sinister, but when you accept the fact that all major vaccine producers are repeat convicted felons, is it a surprize ? How many pharmaceutical companies are famous for a cure of anything ? How and why did practicing naturopathic medicine become archaic witch doctoring ? Last question; could the profitability of patents have anything to do with why vitamins, minerals, DMSO, ivermectin, et all are not commonly recommended ? Mandate vegetables !
Thank you for bringing us up to speed on these vital issues, particularly for parents. Have shared it!
Unfortunately there is clearly much blame to be spread around. This is made all the more egregious by both the AAP and CDC/Federal participants (prior) posture of unassailable expertise.
In the past few days I've come across many articles in the msm covering the (AAP) vaccination schedule. While there have been two notable state affiliations agreeing to implement the AAP scheme, at least in this afflicted state there has been no widely shared acknowledgement or discussion of this or the relevant issues.
In view of the potential harms the full AAP schedule could inflict, I'm hoping these issues will be brought to parents attention and including discussions as to the parents options for addressing any related mandates.
Again thank you to yourself and Mr Ji for bringing this to our attention.
AAP was the engine, but the driver of the Medical Hearse was the vaccine manufacturers and the four wheels were the Congressman in DC who keep their mouth shut for the $$, the Mass Media who promoted the vaccines for $$, the Physicians & Hospitals who received bonus for achieve high vaccine rates for the $$ and NIH employees like the female physician who went to head up Merck's vaccine division with a MILLION $$$$ salary. They are all complicit and valued the dollar more than the lives of all the children that have been harmed over the last 5 decades. Since 1975 the number of our children in special education classes has doubled from 3.5 million to 7 million. Vaccine injuries is a major contributor. In addition, the 2.7 million injuries reported are minimal and do not reflect the total number harmed. Finally, the last Surgeon General that was not a political appointee approved by Big Pharma was Dr. Koop. The whole system needs to be taken down to the studs and rebuilt for the health of our children and not the demise.
A good outcome of this would be a return to GPs for treating the entire family including kids. Pediatrics is or was a specialty and specialists should only be seen for special problems not surrogate parenthood.
Pediatrics, it must be a licence to print money...
Children captured for the lucrative vaccine market under coercion and mandates.
What a dire situation, practitioners violating their personal duty to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent, or to respect the choice to decline the intervention if people so wish.
Here's the key: Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
See my open letter to the AAP President: The vital medical ethical principle that was abandoned - and must now be restored: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-vital-medical-ethical-principle
Cannot Ethically Proceed. Well said, Elizabeth. In my opinion, neither can any PARENT, Ethically Proceed, who has a working brain, and no doubt, is capable of Knowing all this - as they can certainly swipe and type on their cells, all day every day!
Our family of 9 had Dr. Stella. Her office was in her home, in a not fancy, suburban neighborhood. She would come to our home sometimes too.
OMG! I could not agree more.
In the face of everything that’s coming out about the childhood vaxxes, the AAP, with malice and contempt for the children of our country, went against the CDC. It was like time stood still - their treachery was exposed and all the world could see how far they were willing to go. Give them their day in court - that’s more of a chance than they gave the children. Lethal injections would be a fitting end for the AAPers, but a RICO conviction doesn’t offer that remedy.
100.0%
I agree that is a fitting punishment for the crime.
Depending on which sources you use, (and I have very lazily used Wikipedia), 53,402 US army personnel died in in combat or were MIA, during World War 1. And the reason that stands out to me is that that is a similar number of vaccine dead mentioned in the article. And when you consider the VAERS vaccine deaths are probably 1-10% of the total, that is a LOT more deaths. As in.. that final tally for the army is probably pretty accurate as they had a full list going in and going out, and they were motivated to keep them accurately and not under-report because they were going to need more people to feed into that frontline. So the under-reporting is probably greatest on in the context of the vaccine injuries for which records are badly kept and dispersed in numerous private systems.
What makes me sad is to think how the message we were told as children that we should be grateful that we now lived in a time of peace. So WE wouldn't be bearing the horror of losing sons, brothers, uncles and fathers to the frontline of war. But actually, the death is just more evenly spread and so less visible. Now our schools and day centres are being decimated by the scale and cost of catering to the vaccine-injured. And it has taken so many years to wake up to this. Even worse, because of the global reach of these products, so many of the new immigrants we are seeing have similar injuries. So that cynical repopulation programme so beloved of the government that had exhausted its own people with war and devastation, is no longer an option. We have the same issues with learning difficulties, ASD, ADHD, genetic injuries coming from the new influx who were injured in their country of origin by the exact same company peddling the exact same product. Putting even more pressure on our public services.
The West needs to clean house completely, and rid ourselves of these corporate parasites. We have the legal framework. The threat is now existential. And doing the right thing in this context is a matter of legacy.
What a profound observation and sad.. well I better go to bed on a good note. :) say some prayers. :) I will look at your site.. where are you from?. I see from your spelling you are not American. always interested in opinions of the experienced and compassionate.
The UK.
To me, this looks like it could have implications for whether power actually lies in corporations or the rule of law/ Constitution. If recent history holds true, these lawsuits will be dismissed over some technicality or an outright decision without even bothering for justification. “Health” data is a cornerstone for the upcoming social credit score management system. Eliminating mandates is key to foil this, but the privacy of one’s choice is even more important. These lawsuits will definitely be a litmus test.
As you say Kim, "Eliminating mandates is key to foil this..."
Hold the practitioners to account, those who for years have violated their personal obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary consent, by collaborating with coercion and mandates.
Insist that: Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
Demand that practitioners do their ethical duty, and coercion and mandates will fall away.
This should have been addressed years ago.
I have a problem with informed consent - not because it isn’t desirable, but because I wonder if it can truly be achieved. So much cannot possibly be known, plus there’s the thorny issue of being able to prove information was intentionally withheld. That’s why I like forbidding mandates up front - because then the trump card is held with the individual. They always have the option to simply decline and corporations cannot forcibly capture them.
But without informed consent, what info do parents possess to refuse jabs, particularly when the pediatrician is in their face,telling them their kid will likely die if he cannot jab him?
Just think about how parents are threatened to comply.
They'll be denied education for their children if they refuse vaccination.
There are doctors who actually 'sack' parents from their clinics if they don't comply with the vaccination schedule.
The community has been trained to accept vaccination - but how many people know how many vaccine products, multi-component shots, and revaccinations are on the schedule? Precious few I would wager.
Children are fodder for this regular medical intervention foisted upon mass populations.
And it's a rote process, there's really no pretence of authentic 'informed consent'. The practitioners are just following the schedule, with no real expertise in the interventions they are administering...without ethically valid voluntary informed consent.
The fact is the mandates are in place, and have been for years - how could this happen?
The fundamental problem is that the practitioners have collaborated with coercion and mandates - this needs to come under the spotlight, it must be exposed in the court of public opinion.
Get this out in the open, demand ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and that will open up a huge can of worms. Because the practitioners know little or nothing about the vaccine products and the diseases they are claimed to prevent. How can practitioners obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccine products they are barely trained to understand?
For more background, see for example: "We have a very wobbly health professional front-line, that is starting to question vaccines and the safety of vaccines..." https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/we-have-a-very-wobbly-health-professional
Docs need to be made liable for failing to provide info needed for informed consent. For that to happen the censor machine needs to be broken. Maybe these lawsuits will provide the first step.
Well, don't we actually need to guilt the full line up?
Pharma/Vax formulators
Government approvers
Pharma/Government insert message developers
Those mandating
Guild enforcers
Etc ?
Well start with bringing to account the practitioners who collaborated with coercion and mandates, violating their own obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, or to respect the individual's decision to decline the intervention if they so wish.
Get the ball rolling with this, and work up the rotten system.
To me the problem extends beyond the practitioners. The parties that developed, gained approvals and approved use, contracted for production, set out purchase, authorized and engineered distribution and guilds that enforced compliance played major roles. Local docs were at best poorly informed, then coerced and threatened.
Yes, of course the problem is huge - but it would have been stopped in its tracks if the practitioners had done their ethical duty and not collaborated with coercion and mandates.
Think about this! In a supposed 'free country', doctors and nurses were injecting people who were being threatened with penalties if they did not comply - it's mind-blowing!!!
This has been going on for years - how could this happen?
When the lid ever blows off this thing, it's the practitioners who will be thrown under the bus, responsibility will be pushed downwards, because ultimately the responsibility will rest with them, they stuck the needle in the arm.
They should not have collaborated with coercion and mandates.
Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
My understanding is that at the outset no useful information was provided. The product insert was not informative. All were advised no product could be used for an analysis of content. WHO and HHS (Experts) recommended it. Industries, educational facilities and corporations/businesses required it. I agree physicians could have advised that Experts recommended it, that beyond that they had no information to share! So if the patient allowed injection they did so consenting to the info offered?
There's a whole can of worms to be exposed Jean.
For years it's been so difficult to challenge vaccination, way before Covid. There's been a determined effort to shut down any criticism of vaccination policy and practice.
This is an enormous scandal waiting to explode.
And a significant part of this scandal is that the physicians were so cowed with fear of the system, they didn't ask questions.
It's a bloody shambles.
And here we are...there's no valid consent.
What is this going to mean when the penny drops?
Who is going to bear the responsibility? Seems to me the ones wielding the needle will be in the frame.
Imo it starts with the approvers of Wuhan. All that followed have unclean hands. For many years we've all been counseled we're to limited to risk thinking for ourselves. We need to trust the experts. In this case Fauci, et al. All the way down to the masses, this held true. Then rough and ready carrot and stick. The faithful got little rewards. Those opposing - lost jobs, defamed, disgraced, banned, destroyed. Much blame to go around. As for the masses should not we demanded evidence supporting "safe and effective"? Proof there was no alternative? Doesn't every participant bear some degree of guilt?
I know very hard to get a RICO .. we shall see. !! Sunlight helps
Just had an interesting thought. Pediatricians who push jabs NOT on the CDC approved schedule are opening up the manufacturers to liability since no immunity applies. This could make pharma wake up and,smell,some coffee.
Dr Nash, I think they HAVE smelled the coffee and have decided the safest course of action (for them) is to take down RFK, HHS and MAHA.
Excellent article and gut-wrenching if you, like me, know children who have juvenile diabetes or autism or peanut allergies. I am thankful for the CHD and doctors who are standing up. My children are standing up for their children by saying no to vaccines.
Thank you.
Add this to the list of major corrective actions needed to bring our country back to what it should be.
The rash of peanut allergies, they are reluctantly beginning to admit, is largely due,to them telling parents not to expose their kids,to peanuts, so,their immune systems evolve sans that antigen and therefore consider it toxic.
The extraordinary thing is, doctors and nurses collaborated with coercion and mandates.
How could they do this?
Do they not understand their personal obligation to obtain ethically valid voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination?
Without voluntary informed consent, a practitioner cannot ethically proceed.
These pediatric clinics, comfortably established with a captured market of children as fodder for the ever-increasing lucrative vaccination schedule.
It's appalling to think of children being exploited in this way, with parents being threatened with penalties if they refuse to comply with coercion and mandates.
This happens in a supposed 'free country'...
I challenged the President of the American Academy of Pediatrics about this dire situation in an open letter, see my article: The vital medical ethical principle that was abandoned - and must now be restored: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-vital-medical-ethical-principle
Another wild hair. Remember how a blood pressure of 120/80 was golden, and then suddenly it was not? Given what we are seeing with these jabs, would it be outrageous to wonder if the new guidelines are not more intended for pharma to sell more b.p. meds? There is that scepticism of mine again DD.
Another very emotional read. We ALL KNOW children harmed by this Evil Cabal.
Prayers for these Reckoning lawsuits: 1/21/2026 - pdf of the RICO lawsuit. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/aap-lawsuit-complaint-redacted.pdf 8/15/2025 - pdf of the Thomas v Monarez (former CDC Director) https://rickjaffeesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/complaint2.pdf
Another related Link - The Former CDC Dir. Monarez, where is she now? She was hired by CA crazy Newsome, for their Anti- HHS/CDC thing, "..because of CDC's retreat from science". https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/12/15/governor-newsom-announces-top-former-cdc-officials-to-lead-public-health-innovation-collaboration/
Thanks for the stack share.
SAVE the Children has Always been HHS Director's RFKJr's MO. 2026 is THE ACTION year!
YES!
Thank God! Not only do pediatricians and nurses lie right to your face, they have a conflict of interest because they get paid to give vaxes! The insurance companies are also complicit for setting the reimbursement terms. All the conflicts of interest need to be legislated out of existence! We saw an anti-vax D.O. for years, then suddenly she was forcing every vax there is on us! I was seriously "WTF is wrong with you??", and she sheepishly explained she would lose her job if her patients weren't vaxed, and we definitely weren't! Insane!
What has been the % pattern of change over the last ten or twenty years of pediatricians who are women vs. those who are men? Could that be relevant, somehow, within AAP? Just wondering.
No idea, but I was lied to by both! In fact, 100% of our doctors!
It's good that light is being shed on this, and on so much other institutional failure that we've experienced over the past 50 years.
First, exposure.
Then, accountability.
Please
"I Have An Immune System, No Vaccines Needed", by Dr. Kevin Stillwagon...https://open.substack.com/pub/drkevinstillwagon/p/i-have-an-immune-system-no-vaccines?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
"a system designed to hide harm" is true, but incomplete. Newborn human infants, upon taking their first breaths, are subjected to mandatory and coincidentally industry profitable toxic injections. When those toxic injections contribute chronic disease, which they often do, the industry profitability window just opened wide. Treating the symptoms of chronic illness is a constant and repetitive cash register ring for industry. Soon we will have vaccines for the vaccines, ( what might the shingles vaccine be ? ). This does seem, sound and is sinister, but when you accept the fact that all major vaccine producers are repeat convicted felons, is it a surprize ? How many pharmaceutical companies are famous for a cure of anything ? How and why did practicing naturopathic medicine become archaic witch doctoring ? Last question; could the profitability of patents have anything to do with why vitamins, minerals, DMSO, ivermectin, et all are not commonly recommended ? Mandate vegetables !
Thank you for bringing us up to speed on these vital issues, particularly for parents. Have shared it!
Unfortunately there is clearly much blame to be spread around. This is made all the more egregious by both the AAP and CDC/Federal participants (prior) posture of unassailable expertise.
In the past few days I've come across many articles in the msm covering the (AAP) vaccination schedule. While there have been two notable state affiliations agreeing to implement the AAP scheme, at least in this afflicted state there has been no widely shared acknowledgement or discussion of this or the relevant issues.
In view of the potential harms the full AAP schedule could inflict, I'm hoping these issues will be brought to parents attention and including discussions as to the parents options for addressing any related mandates.
Again thank you to yourself and Mr Ji for bringing this to our attention.
AAP was the engine, but the driver of the Medical Hearse was the vaccine manufacturers and the four wheels were the Congressman in DC who keep their mouth shut for the $$, the Mass Media who promoted the vaccines for $$, the Physicians & Hospitals who received bonus for achieve high vaccine rates for the $$ and NIH employees like the female physician who went to head up Merck's vaccine division with a MILLION $$$$ salary. They are all complicit and valued the dollar more than the lives of all the children that have been harmed over the last 5 decades. Since 1975 the number of our children in special education classes has doubled from 3.5 million to 7 million. Vaccine injuries is a major contributor. In addition, the 2.7 million injuries reported are minimal and do not reflect the total number harmed. Finally, the last Surgeon General that was not a political appointee approved by Big Pharma was Dr. Koop. The whole system needs to be taken down to the studs and rebuilt for the health of our children and not the demise.