Everyday Americans are blessed with having choices to make, this is our free will. Unlike places like China, we carry much more power over our lives. These choices determine the direction we go. If we open the door and push aside what is right, evil is sure to enter our world.
If I were sick and went to the hospital. The doctor prescribes a drug that he knows can potentially harm me, but he is paid. He knows that chances are, I will end up on a machine that forced breath into my lungs, but inevitably I will die, the doctor had pushed God aside. I could have been the best God fearing person in the world but bad things happened to me.
An innocent six month old child who’s parents are coerced into giving their child a vaccine that the medical establishment knows may harm that child, the medical establishment has pushed God aside.
Why do bad things happen to good people? Could it be someone has pushed God aside, and because God gave us free will, God had stepped back. Love, real love is also found with free will. This is the daily battle. When people choose to push God aside evil enters this world.
MRNA injections, glyphosate, remdesivir, pedophilia, solar geoengineering, childhood vaccine schedules, plastics in our water, a courts decision, all decisions that affect us. Others choices can affect us sometimes in horrific ways. Maybe bad things happen to good people because God has been pushed aside.
God only wants our heart. If we give it to Him we have chosen a wise path.
Thanks Drs. Malone for standing up for us and consistently making right choices!
I knew a feminist who'd burst into tears when pulled over by a cop for speeding or running a stop sign. And perhaps getting off the hook. She was big into girl power GI Jane fiction that has become official policy. You can't have it both ways.
James, your lead sentence said it all -- we are blessed with having choices to make, this is our free will. People's true character comes out when life pushes us to the mat. I don't think God has pushed us aside. God allows evil to exist for us to find Him -- of our own free will. Jesus knew his fate before he was born on this planet. God had a grand purpose, but even Jesus cried out, why have you forsaken me? God didn't forsake Him and He hasn't forsaken the rest of us. Take heart in the fact that God has a a grand plan that we are not privy to. I feel your pain with the same intensity. I'm human too. Keep the faith. Your last sentence: "God only wants our heart. If we give it to Him we have chosen a wise path."
I agree with you Barbara, and believe there is purpose in bad things happening to good people. And by the way I am not the most God fearing person on earth, I know that for sure. I didn’t say God pushed us aside I said people push God aside. I said God steps back for probably the very reason you mentioned, perhaps so we will find him. Just as I believe God closes some doors in our life and opens others. This is all my opinion, I don’t claim to know all, I claim I don’t know all. I suppose it’s my way of explaining and understanding why bad things happen to good people and why we are given free will. It’s obvious bad things happen. It’s just my view on why God lets it happen. He is in control so He must be stepping back right? For a reason of course. Maybe so large groups of people like all of us see the evil and try to correct it. It makes sense to me.
I sometimes think of the holocaust, and the war it created. All the people that suffered and died. Where was God. Did He step back? Why did all those people have to die? Was there a reason for it? My father was shot in the back in the Battle of the Bulge. Although he suffered with the results of being shot his whole life he did survive and had 4 kids and a lifetime of mostly peace. Many questions and it’s only my answer and opinion.
OMG, you brought home the horror of leftism in all its ugly forms.
Idaho is fighting a similar abortion bill as Virginia. The evil never stops! May our midterm votes stop it in both states. Conservatives who value life and America, DO NOT SIT AT HOME! VOTE.
Thank you for the video of dogs herding ducks and the memories of Gonzo, Gizmo, and Robert in the Peaceable Kingdom. We need more of that to restore our souls in these dark times.
The lamestream is in full Chicken Little mode now for the midterms. Expect a New York Times blurb urging us to vote for the DSAs (communists) because if Republicans win it will be $50 gas, the Yellowstone polar bears will die off and the Texas glaciers will melt.
I saw a clip of some left-wing politician saying how the military with guns will be present at the polls. Let’s hope this scares the lefties enough to make them stay home.
No. The U.S. military has no plans to deploy armed troops to polling places for the 2026 midterm elections.
Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the highest-ranking U.S. military officer), stated this explicitly in a letter to Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) in late August 2026. He wrote that “the Joint Force has no plans to send Federal military personnel or Federalized members of the National Guard to polling places during the 2026 elections” and has “no plans to use such personnel to seize ballots, voting machines, or other election-related material.” He also said he has neither received nor anticipates any unlawful order on this.
Election administration and security are the responsibility of state and local officials. Federal law (including 18 U.S.C. § 592) generally prohibits members of the armed forces from ordering, keeping, or having troops or armed men at places where general or special elections are held, except when “necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States.” The Posse Comitatus Act further restricts the use of federal military forces for domestic law enforcement.
Concerns have been raised by some Democrats and others about possible federal involvement (including National Guard under certain authorities, ICE, or other agents), and some Trump allies have advocated for it. Messaging from parts of the administration on non-military federal agents has sometimes been mixed or non-committal. However, the military’s top officer has directly ruled out troops at the polls, and no evidence of such plans has emerged.
In short, armed military presence at the polls is not planned and is restricted by longstanding law. Polling-place security remains a civilian/local matter.
When will we have a discussion and agree on solutions on the root causes of these issues concerning the over the top abortion pushes., PPD and preemies and so much more. It begins with restructuring prenatal care, eliminating negative life styles and boosting nutritional health of the mother to be without introducing toxins from many sources including RX drugs. Each year, over 1 million fetuses do not see the beauty of life on this blue green planet. In the meantime the medicine men keep dreaming up band aid solutions. Harvesting of stem cells from the fetus is now driving this nutty behavior. The wheels are coming of the medicine man's ambulance. Top AP Medical man in the pocket of Big Pharma just did a clever hit piece, praising GLP-1 and discrediting RFK Jr. and so much more.
I've been thinking about that phrase "No Pain, No Gain" a lot lately. I mentioned back a few weeks here my husband fell while visiting our youngest in HI (w/o me). I think both he and my son learned some interesting and valuable lessons during the 3 weeks he was incapacitated there. Won't go into details, but it made me think that many people must endure the Very Worst possible scenario at a particular time in their life to finally make the effort to change.
Maybe we as a nation will have to endure some really, really bad SH** before the country as a whole will finally wake up to what we use to have and what we are now undergoing, with the path forward looking grim. Would having a majority of Demoncratic Socialists be that? Do we have to totally fail as a Free Nation to rise from the ashes? Will we end up living decades with a failed dream after only 250 years?
Excruciating pain, extreme hunger, dire consequences for actions and living thru them tend to wake more people up. Some of us see the writing on the wall before, and try with much frustration to turn the tide. We try to warn, cajole, plead, almost beg, but it's personal hurt (suffered by many) that seems to turn lost populations. Will enough gather/fight to overcome the pain of tyranny?
Right now I see a lazy, cushioned, blobby, sick, unhappy country ready to blame anyone but themselves for their condition. We, as a whole appear to have it easy compared to others in this world, but we are and have been a country of overall complacent complainers and non doers, probably in need of a lot more pain to gain.
Unfortunately, not all Americans are lazy complainers. But, as they say, misery loves company, so we will all be brought down by others. Conservatives who love this country need to stay 'awake' and do whatever we can to keep this country free. VOTE and don't let others tell you you are wrong.
But the lazy complainers & others with a victim complex are so LOUD... & that draws attention. Marvin Middleclass just goes about life doing what needs to be done to function. No headlines there. New reader's Digest came yesterday, Some GOOD POSITIVE articles. Hope Springs Eternal!
In Maryland my R vote will actually accomplish nothing. We have some of the most disgusting, subversive fed legislators in the nation. Today I put my vote date on my calendar. To let them know there are those of us out here that dont agree with them.
Hi Jean, same here. Voting for any Republican candidates is futile here in my district, but I am going for the 14 ballot initiatives on the Colorado ballot for the 2026 election.
The VOTE is only a fraction of a fraction of what it will take.
Learning the structure of Law that the Constitution sits on is quite a in depth study that will be a path to educating and making accountable our employees in DC (politicians and appointees and administrating).
It just occurred to me that President AOC will look at the budget deficit and compare it to how much money is spent on Medicare and come up with a Canadian-style solution. Unwanted pre-born children and useless eaters that need to be looked after, what could be clearer? Quiet termination. Problem solved.
800,000 people to hear the pope at the site in Paris where many lost their heads in 1793 gives encouragement to this Protestant. The times require of us courage to confront the ubiquitous lies of the left. To recognize that “public education” actually means “teachers’ unions” and that our kids are worth fighting for. When teachers’ unions first emerged, my mother, a retired teacher, reacted in horror, “What about the children?” We are many decades down that road, having sown the wind, now reaping the whirlwind of godlessness and greed. But there is hope, and it’s up to us.
I have come to believe that the lack of a belief in God and failure to engage in religious belief is a real problem for this country. I also believe that that has happened because life has became so easy for so many in this country. Religion seems to flourish where life is hard, lived on the edge of disaster, where the belief in a Paradise after death is a real goal that makes persevering worthwhile. When life is as good as it is for us, most people will not see Heaven as all that much better than what they have in the here-and-now. It seems as though prosperity will be our demise. The most devote religious people now are Muslims, almost all of whom live in difficult, marginal conditions, where tomorrow's meals and existence are much more tenuous and certainly less generous than here in the West. I think it's also why Christians in the Third World believe more strongly that those in the First.
I saw that stupid commercial of the female boxer boxer or whatever she is.. ..
No pain No gain.. take advil. .I was like NO that iS NOT BLOODY WELL HAPPENING.
What pile of crap.. the other one is as stupid is the DermaMend showing huge fat people.. older too falling down on tennis courts. and "bruising themselves" yeah right.. that is a fake A.I commercial. At my age. I have had to save several older people after they fell.. they had to go to the Hospital. Advil and Dermamend did not cut it. I will look that up later. I need to go.
Change is always coming. What type of change; Who is affected, Positive or Negative, Thoughtful or Calculated. Long term or Short. Change is not the problem, it's who, how, what we do with it.
This change is known by several names but they all mean the same - The Tribulation; Jacob's Trouble; The 70th Week. However, the Bride of Christ will not be here to witness this 'change', we just get to see the 'stage' being set.
I thought the four years of the previous administration was enough really, really bad sh!t for one lifetime. And that was after I'd lived and survived the Carter years.
I enjoy the Sunday Strip every week, but these Candace memes miss the mark for me.
I don't agree with everything Candace Owens says, and I don't pretend to know exactly what happened to Charlie Kirk. But I've listened to enough of Candace, Baron Coleman, Ian Carroll and others to know they're raising questions they believe remain unanswered. If they're wrong, show where they're wrong. Challenge the evidence. Challenge the reasoning. But mocking them isn't an answer.
The meme showing Candace counting money particularly bothers me. Yes, Candace makes money from her audience. So do Robert and Jill—and I'm one of the people who gladly pays for a Malone News subscription. I don't assume that means the Malones manufacture opinions to make money, so why should that insinuation be a substitute for addressing Candace's questions?
That's especially disappointing coming from Dr. Malone. I began following him during COVID and became a paying subscriber largely because he was willing to question an official narrative when questioning it could get you ridiculed, demonized or censored. He has since written extensively about propaganda, psychological operations and the manipulation of public opinion.
I don't need the Malones to agree with Candace. I just expect the same intellectual curiosity that made me respect Dr. Malone in the first place. Answer the questions. Challenge the evidence. But don't ridicule people simply because they refuse to stop asking.
Robert and Charlie were good friends and spoke often. Robert and I both find what she has done to Charlie's reputation and to his widow as repugnant and disgusting.
We watch a dear friend's widow get trashed on the national stage for money, monetization, and clickbait. We watch Candace drag Charlie's name and his organization's reputation through the mud.
Sorry - the questions she poses are silly, the evidence she presents is not only weak, it is also often made up.
Guess you haven’t seen the independent investigation that just came out. Very obvious Erika is one trashing Charlie’s organization for money. Think you should reconsider your position on Candace. She’s seeking truth.
The other thing that I find absurd is that Tyler Robinson sent his “Wordle” score out to his friends 55 minutes before he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. He took 3 tries to get the word “pouty”. This of course is going to make absolutely no difference as to guilt or innocence but….really…..1st time assassin and his prep is to finish the wordle and share it. This is just 1 of the minor inconsistencies.
Of course I don’t believe in a lone gunman or a magic bullet/neck.
Candace is looking for the truth. TPUSA organized the event, from the security, what area to have it, as well as, the ticket sales, not UVU! TPUSA is making $$$$ off of Charlie’s death. Before you accuse Candace, you need to watch for yourself.
My posts on this were being misunderstood and criticized but those criticizing me had apparently not read my original post so I am editing myself to be more clear. I used to follow Candace Owens for a long time (years), but I have not appreciated her for persistent comments concerning Charlie Kirk and Erika Kirk which I understand are distressing to Erika, and I do not listen currently because I disagree with her current comments which are journalistically unethical as I explained in my original post. I teach ethics at a college, so I know something about ethics, but in my original post I had queried an AI about journalism ethics and posted the AI's comments on ethics policies that journalists have agreed on which was in my earlier post which might be worth reading but I will not repeat all of that here. However, I have discovered this report from a research firm who has done and in-depth investigation of all of Candace's comments and concluded the following which I am pasting in below.
Now here is the short summary of the report, and the summary and the full report are at the link above. I am actually a researcher myself with a major project on deadline and thus I will not be back to further address this issue because I really do not have time, but this is some objective reason for concern, as well as the ethical violations I previously mentioned in a different post. I have nothing further to say.
"Permission to Kill: How Candace Owens Built a Digital Assassination Culture Targeting Erika Kirk" (By Network Contagion Research Institute)
"NCRI assesses that Candace Owens caused a measurable, statistically significant surge in death threats and calls for violence against Erika Kirk. Granger causality analysis of 1,034 explicit threats finds that Owens’ tweets targeting Erika Kirk predict those threats at a two-day lag (F=8.82, p=0.0002) over the full nine-month series. The mechanism is narrative targeting: tweets explicitly naming Erika forecast threats, while general, non-targeting content produces no comparable signal. NCRI further assesses that Owens functions as a dominant “permission structure” for violence against Erika Kirk. Across the 1,034 explicit threats in the dataset, Owens is referenced in approximately 1 in 11 cases, rising to about 1 in 6 in February 2026—the peak month of mentions—making her the most-cited individual in threat-related content. Followers invoke her name as authorization, attribution, and moral license. When Owens posts targeted content about Erika Kirk, threats from the audience tend to follow."
"NCRI assesses that Owens is generating conspiratorial narratives that contribute to permission structures for violence. Across the dataset, recurring claims such as “Erika killed Charlie,” “Erika–Epstein trafficking,” “Mossad operation,” and “organized hit” form a pattern: a named target, an accusation that may morally justify harm, and an audience that interprets the narrative as a call to act."
"NCRI also assesses that this activity constitutes a sustained influence operation targeting a private individual. Across approximately 627.7 million views and nine months of activity, a narrative ecosystem emerged that produced explicit threats at statistically predictable intervals. This ecosystem appears to have become self-sustaining, generating over 1,000 explicit threats and continuing to amplify beyond the original source. Finally, NCRI assesses that this pattern reflects broader dynamics associated with “assassination culture,” involving narrative targeting, conspiratorial framing, and audience mobilization. These mechanisms, previously identified in other contexts, appear to be present in the ecosystem surrounding Erika Kirk, with measurable real-world implications."
I can tell by your comment that you have not watched any of Candace’ podcasts. She in fact has given all kinds of information to the police. She has never accused Erika of killing Charlie. It’s funny how the people speaking against her don’t listen to what she has said. Just like people who hated Charlie. They actually never listened to him. Form an opinion when you do the research. Candace is going to come out on top of all this. She’s seeking truth. Why not listen to her latest show last Friday for a start. You might be surprised.
You have just engaged in insults and ad hominem attacks. I also don't beat my wife. This is beneath you. Engage honestly in the issues raised by people like Candace, Baron, Ian, etc., or be aware that you are hurting your reputation and damaging the respect people may have for you. Or perhaps just stay out of the fray, as you seem to be too emotionally invested in a particular narrative.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? is basically trying to get you to see that Owen's asks questions that, no matter how someone answers, they look guilty.
It is an old journalist trick.
Two answers:
No - (hence - I still beat my wife)
Yes, I beat my wife.
That was an honest engagement - if you actually thought what the question was about.
Dear Drs. Malone (because I'm not sure who I'm addressing here, but assuming RWM): Thank you for clarifying that the question about beating one's wife was rhetorical and not a direct implied insult. I was not familiar with this device, but your explanation did jog a memory. As I think you can see, though, a significant share of your readership does not agree with your position nor your approach.
I have an issue with your response, though, and that is because you have not addressed my major concerns of using insulting language (telling subscriber dennismeek to pound sand) and the ad hominem attacks (Candace Owens is evil [and the obvious corollary that those who believe she has genuine concerns and questions are implicated in "her evil"]). If you want to talk about "devices", I call the one you used here to be deflection. Also, as Gail Benton has queried, "Would you have an example of her presenting evidence or questions as such?"
I follow Candace Owens, ever since I became aware of her educating the public about MKUltra and the Covid crimes against humanity. I show my support by wearing a "Candace Unchained" t-shirt on numerous occasions. I have received a number of comments, and the vast majority are in solidarity with her crowd-sourced investigation. Very few support the federal and TPUSA narratives.
Now a few of the "evidence" and questions she and many others have brought up. One, why was the crime scene dug up and paved over within a few days of Charlie's execution? The contractor who paved it over held an interview and said he was told it was an "emergency paver" job (a Sunday) and that the order came from the governor's office, not even UVU. Two, why was the SUV that was used to take Charlie to the hospital cleaned and put up for auction shortly after? It should have been impounded as evidence. Three, why were so many items, such as the "bloody microphone", his cell phone, his necklace to name some, not impounded as evidence? Well-regarded forensic investigator Joseph Scott Morgan, on Julian Dorey's podcast, stated that these and other aspects of the investigations fall below well-established standards, especially in such a high profile case. Four, why did the prosecution present at the preliminary hearing a video that has been shown to have been altered (aspect ratio) to depict what seems to be a stockier man (who is claimed to be Tyler Robinson by the prosecution) in the parking garage as slimmer (you can see the vehicles in the background to also be scrunched)? Five, along with that, the grey Dodge Challenger that the individual -- claimed to be Tyler Robinson by the prosecution -- drove into the parking garage has quad exhaust pipes (could be a V-8), whereas the grey Dodge Challenger that was actually Tyler Robinson's has dual exhaust pipes (V-6?). Decoy? It's sus. Six, have you read the independent report released by UVU on Friday (https://www.uvu.edu/externalreview/docs/after-action-report.pdf)? It states that key players such as Brian Harpole and Dan Flood of Charlie's security team would not cooperate with the external review team (no response after repeated attempts to contact), along with key people at TPUSA also refusing to respond (such as the primary liaison from TPUSA headquarters who insisted that the event be held outside in the courtyard and that TPUSA would handle ticketing, even after UVU strongly advised against it because of their security concerns). Very sus. Seven, UVU's external report also contradicts many of the statements made by Brian Harpole in his appearance on Shawn Ryan's podcast -- inconsistencies and possibly overt "lies" that TPUSA refuses to address. More sus.
I've only outlined seven avenues of inquiry that point to holes in the "official" narrative and questionable behavior by TPUSA and CEO Erika Kirk. There are countless more. Instead of demonizing the people who doubt the official narrative and current trajectory of TPUSA, I would challenge you to affirm or disprove them, and quote objective source materials (not government "slop" or biased/bought media). That would be an honest response.
Here's the thing. The many people (such as myself) who supported you when you spoke out against the official Covid narrative and the toxic jabs, and saw how you were targeted, cancelled, smeared, etc. for bringing your knowledge and genuine beliefs to the public's attention, believe we are seeing the same thing being done to people like Candace Owens, and see you piling on. We see major propaganda and psy-ops being deployed, and find it ironic that someone (you) who has written extensively about military-grade psy-ops being used against us, are now aligning with the very same forces that continue to try and destroy you. What gives? Recently, you have been reporting how the "blob" has ostracized you, turned against you, and yet you are aligning with these same malign forces who are trying to shut down genuine inquiry into Charlie Kirk's execution.
Please let me be clear. I'm not going to unsubscribe from your substack due to this disagreement, because I believe you do valuable work, past and present and hopefully future. With this issue, though, I don't believe you are going to be on the right side of history, and don't believe that you are as objective and self-aware as you think you are. With the perspective that I -- and many others -- have, isn't that what an objective friend would call out?
To me, that seems a good thing. After our Covid saga and its impacts on them (including watching experts and governments betray them), they need folks that understand them, talk with them and show them ways for dealing with their worlds to make the future a better place. Too much of current campaigning is utter trash.It fails to reflect the return of production to the USA and the opportunities that will offer them.If the Zoomies may dictate who wins in Nov., best they be well informed.
I don’t think she is denigrating Charlie’s reputation at all. His organization…yes. He wanted to DOGE TPUSA before he died so possibly he wasn’t happy with them either. She posted a heart breaking tribute to him on 9/10/2026.
On the other hand I am glad that you both question the medical establishment and support fetal and newborns.
One of Candace’s sponsors is PreBorn an organization that gives free ultrasounds to mothers so that they can see and hear the life within them. Sometimes that is all that it takes.
Jill - please give us *one* example of Candace's evidence being made up. We'll wait.
Candace loved Charlie. She has not done one single thing to drag his name through the mud - quite the opposite, in fact. It is Erika who has trashed his organization.
Finally - I think you and Robert should each have your own account. I don't think Robert would tell a polite subscriber to "go pound sand" even if he disagreed with him/her. So I think you using his account and posting as him is misleading. If you want to lower the tone, do it under your own name.
Best regards
Dan McCarthy - loyal follower (of Robert Malone) since 2020
There is both a 3-paragraph abstract and a longer report in case you have not seen these and are interested. I pasted in the abstract further below in this thread.
Well, my respect for you, Jill, just multiplied tenfold! Robert, you married a good woman! The amount of people who still support Candace is mind boggling! She is an evil, psychotic narcissist! The fact that people don't see it is also mind boggling. (you can go pound sand was a favorite phrase of my mom also 😅)
I used to respect Candace. Now I wonder about her health that perhaps her thought processes are not working well. I recently read some analysis by an ethics scholar who explained some reasons why what she is doing is not good. I can't recap all that analysis now but it validated some of my own thinking which is:
1) Since everyone is presumed innocent UNTIL proven guilty, I assume that Erika Kirk is a grieving widow, which I do believe, & it's is cruel and lacking in Christian charity to add to her trauma, grief, and stress by constantly making public allegations against her.
2) I believe IF there is evidence it should be reported to law enforcement, FBI, etc. whoever is handing the investigation and/or the prosecution when it has gotten to that point.
I asked Google Gemini AI about the ethical principles involved. Gemini says:
1. The Principle of Non-Maleficence and Minimizing Harm
A core canon in professional communication and media ethics (such as the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics) is to minimize harm. This principle draws a sharp distinction between public figures who voluntarily enter the arena and private individuals or grieving family members thrust into the spotlight through tragedy. Accusing a surviving spouse of orchestrating or being complicit in her husband's murder inflicts severe psychological, social, and reputational harm. Beyond individual trauma, such claims can incite targeted harassment, doxxing, or threats from an audience numbering in the millions, creating real-world physical and safety risks for the accused and their surviving children.
2. Due Process and Investigative Ethics:
In any constitutional and rule-of-law framework, accusations of murder carry the highest standard of proof.
Appropriate Channels: If an individual genuinely possesses credible, actionable evidence regarding a violent crime, ethical and civic responsibility dictates turning that information over to the jurisdiction's investigating bodies (such as the police, state investigators, or federal authorities).
Contaminating Proceedings: Broadcasting speculative theories or unverified allegations on a monetized public platform circumvents standard standards of evidence. It risks tainting potential jury pools, diverting public resources, and obstructing official investigations that are bound by criminal law and evidentiary procedure.
3. Verification vs. Insinuation
Ethical commentary requires truthfulness and rigor:
Ethical analysis requires distinguishing clearly between verifiable facts, reasonable interpretation, and speculative conjecture.
When public figures leverage rhetoric that implies guilt through selective questions, innuendo, or debunked metadata claims without substantiated proof, it undermines the truth-seeking function of public discourse. Presenting suspicion as equivalent to material fact fails the duty of verification.
4. Audience Responsibility and Commercial Incentives
Modern independent commentators operate within algorithmic ecosystems that financially and socially reward outrage, conflict, and sensationalism.
Ethicists regularly warn of the moral hazard inherent in "audience capture" or monetized controversy, where high engagement (views, subscribers, superchats) disincentivizes restraint.
Broadcasters have a duty of care toward their followers to avoid leading them into believing unsubstantiated narratives that can warp public understanding and cause real harm to third parties.
Ethically and objectively, publicly leveling accusations of murder against an individual on social media—rather than submitting verifiable evidence to sworn investigators—fails basic standards of proportionality, harm minimization, and fairness.
Jill, I was respectful in my comment and explained why I've been a paying subscriber and why I've respected Robert's work for years. You're certainly entitled to disagree with me—and with Candace. But telling a paying subscriber who respectfully disagrees with you to “go pound sand” is disappointing.
I specifically invited you to challenge the evidence, the reasoning and the conclusions. “Go pound sand” does none of those things.
I completely agree. I am also a paying subscriber. And I am very concerned by the response "go pound sand" to your polite message. I thought we were dealing with grown-ups here (which was how I got into Robert Malone in the first place)...I may have to revise that opinion now.
Ok.. back to the Sunday Strip.. Ay-o-see's comment about Daylight Savings did Crack me up. I could hear her saying something like that!
Alan Murphy Gray Owl photo was pretty amazing.. looks like AI, but you included his credit, so have to assume nature is pretty amazing. Not so fooled by the subsequent photo haha!
One final thing.. I truly miss Charlie Kirk. I am angered that his assassination hasn't been investigated PROPERLY, which leaves TOO many to speculate some pretty wild stuff. I don't follow Candace or others, so know next to nothing other than I miss Charlie's wisdom, calm demeanor, talent for debating, his intellect & integrity.
I believe that people are more likely to question EVERYTHING these days, due in part to Covid & the "vaccines", Biden & Obama's lawfare against Trump & all that is still being discovered about that, & this has the American people on edge. Everything is suspect in current times. Look at the attempted assassination of then Candidate Trump & the information slowly filtering out. It's disheartening that there doesn't seem to be ANY "truth" that can be set in concrete these days. Something is always seemingly shifting, moving, gyrating what reality there is. Nothing is sacred. Too much is just.. evil. The lovers of money & power are despicable, regardless of whether D, R, or DSA. So many blatant lies! So many hidden agendas, as many of your meme collections today allude to.
Thanks for all that were laughable. We NEED some things to laugh at.. while we can!
AOC was also complaining on the House floor that having her staffer change all the clocks every six months gets expensive, and that throwing away the ones that worked perfectly fine is wasteful.
From Wikipedia: "Ocasio-Cortez graduated cum laude from Boston University in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree, double-majoring in international relations and economics."
Sometimes I think to myself later on that my made-up humor comes too close to being a false assertion. In this case, I presume that the AOC remark in the Strip about daylight savings was fictional, and my add-on is also fictional.
Yes, I understand that, & I’m sarcastic in my reply…AOC has been in the news lately, & I just don’t get why…! She needs to go back to a “Learing Center”, for a refresher’s course!
The memes in this Sunday's comic strip are especially meaningful to me as a citizen of Virginia. What Gov. Scambugger and her socialist demonic dumocrat cohorts are proposing as a constitutional amendment is essentially institutionalized murder and a crime against humanity and an insult to God. I fervently pray that their horrific amendment goes down in flames, amen!
I'd also like to add that although it may be true that "there isn't (or, may not be) enough healthcare in the world that could treat the mass mental illness of modern-day leftism," I have been encouraged from my long clinical experiences that the accurately prescribed constitutional homeopathic remedies, both individually administered, as well as dispersed in the public water supply, might just adequately awaken the submerged consciousness and conscience of the cognitively and morally impaired leftists as to foment a subtle, seismic shift in the collective, universal stream of consciousness. At the very least, it might make them self-aware enough of their enormous shallowness and stupidity, and, God willing, induce them to be inspired by their shame to transform. Just a thought....
The Virginia Constitutional amendment that is on the ballot goes much further than most people think. It's not merely abortion up to 9 months, but many believe that it will eliminate all guard rails. It says: protect the freedom to make personal decisions about...birth control, abortion... which does not place limits on age, thus, if you have a 14 year old daughter or granddaughter, the current parental consent law will no longer apply, and she will have freedom to obtain an abortion if she chooses, and probably also if a man who is abusing her so chooses.
People do not realize that abortion is often used by those who sexually abuse minors, to hide evidence of the crime. The man will never be charged for the sexual abuse if the evidence (the baby) is gone. And when it comes to "reproductive rights," "freedom" is always freedom, and since there is no age limit in the amendment, freedom would apply to all females, and a female of any age is free to agree to an abortion - whether she actually wants it or not - because when a young person is being abused she may not be "free" to express her true preference whether 14 or 17 and a half, but parental consent will not be a consideration because she has "freedom" under this amendment.
She can also be on birth control without parental involvement or morning after pill without parental knowledge, consent or oversight. Often men purchase the morning after pill for the female, and young women should not be taking the "morning after pill" every weekend or numerous times because the high dose hormones especially on a repeated basis have not been established as safe for an adolescent's health (if they are truly healthy for anyone).
Also, because of "freedom" if the woman has complete freedom, I wonder if normal "informed consent" will go out the window - though already the standard is inadequate. I know a woman who had an abortion who has stated, "I got better informed consent when my dog had surgery than what was provided when I had my abortion." That woman had her abortion in her teens, when clinic staff told her, "Don't worry, you'll have another baby later" but she never did. She never was able to have a child of her own after that which has been a source of grief for her -but now in her 50's looking back, she knows she was not given appropriate informed consent to even consider risks vs. benefits and options.
But with this amendment, it's the woman's complete freedom to decide for an abortion (or any type birth control) and freedom is free, and the health care professionals are totally EXEMPT from any consequences for participating in whatever she decides. So, if they fail to give proper informed consent or something goes wrong - it's a liability shield for any professional who prescribes birth control or provides abortion services.
Voting in a Constitutional amendment is a lot easier than getting rid of later. If you have concerns about this, many conservative organizations and many Christian organizations have concerns about the many harmful effects that will arise from this amendment, and you can get more info from Family Foundation of Virginia, Family Research Council, or Founding Freedoms
Law Center, which says “It will eliminate statutory rape laws for consenting minors,
since the amendment provides an unqualified ‘fundamental right to reproductive
freedom’ to every ‘individual,’ without any limitation on age.” Former Delegate Bob Marshall agreed with that statement, stating that this amendment "effectively nullifies any minimum legal age of sexual consent."
An article from the Washington Stand (a newsletter of Family Research Council says: "Note also that parents would be powerless to intervene or sue adult sexual predators, Planned Parenthood or similar groups from ‘changing’ the sex of minor children.”
As for the third trimester abortion, these are viable infants that would be able to be aborted up to the full 9 months. And while they say that the law "will allow" for regulation of 3rd trimester abortions, it does not say the state WILL regulate those abortions in any way, and in other states that do allow those late abortions up to 9 months, most of the time it is NOT for health reasons, and even when there are so-called health reasons, the abortion is generally not helpful to the woman but since this is now so long, I will write separately about those "up to 9 months" abortions. But just know that there are many non-profit organizations and Christian organizations that say the language of this proposed Constitutional amendment is VERY deceptive and I agree, and the public should be educated before they make the decisions - because doesn't it sound nice and American to say that women should be free to make their own decisions about childbirth and post-partum care and multiple different things where - sure, Americans are all about choice - and sure, doctors and nurses should be free to do as the woman wishes, that sounds nice too - but the nice image is not what this will do, this same amendment will let a 14 year old sexually abused female have an abortion without her parents knowing, because it would be her "choice" when the abuser wants her to hide the evidence via abortion.
Remarkable how that owl blends with the background. I think it's an owl. Or if not, maybe Tolkien's Ents of Middle Earth are real. No, it's gotta be just an owl.
Living as an owl is dangerous, you know. Nature is beautiful, yes, but also hostile. An owl always has to have its head on a swivel.
What nobody talks about on the left is how the mother is basically used by this evil ideology; once the abortion is performed, the mother is thrown away like trash, figuratively speaking. There is no support, because the act is evil, and every human being knows innately that it is, regardless of what ideology they might buy into. And of course, a murder has been committed as well. A lose-lose situation, on all levels.
All good, Branco on the money as per, and the abortion issue seems to be in need of a concise definition of what is a human being taken from the hands of idiots,that cannot define what is a woman
I just researched abortions by state. It's pretty disgusting that seven states and D.C. have NO gestational limits. And what really yanks my chain is there are so many, many ways to prevent pregnancy in the first place, including the morning-after-pill in cases of rape. Abortions were Margaret Sanger's way of ridding the world of black and brown babies. Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League In 1921, which morphed into Planned Parenthood in 1942. Margaret Sanger was a Eugenicist, you know, like Gates and Fauci.
Dear Doctors Malone - can't tell you how I am blessed to get your e-mails! I have learned so much about what's really happening now in our country! Although I'm 88, my earlier years were spent raising cattle and horses and living the good life in the Sierra Nevadas! Please be blessed this wonderful Sunday morning and give Jade a hug for me!
What the so-called elites have done to Europe/the West....
This recent mini-speech by Afroditi Latinopolou of Greece has probably already been seen by many here. But for those who haven't seen her eviscerate Ursula von der Leyen to her face, it's a real treat.
The whole abortion thing at any stage is simply a continuation of the “reduce the population to 500B” by the eugenics folks, approved by the “it’s inconvenient right now” folks. I was almost seduced when in my 20’s…I had a LOT to lose, and did. But the Words of Christ came back to me and I was horrified at my “modern” thinking. Raised a beautiful, beloved, and academically gifted son.
Everyday Americans are blessed with having choices to make, this is our free will. Unlike places like China, we carry much more power over our lives. These choices determine the direction we go. If we open the door and push aside what is right, evil is sure to enter our world.
If I were sick and went to the hospital. The doctor prescribes a drug that he knows can potentially harm me, but he is paid. He knows that chances are, I will end up on a machine that forced breath into my lungs, but inevitably I will die, the doctor had pushed God aside. I could have been the best God fearing person in the world but bad things happened to me.
An innocent six month old child who’s parents are coerced into giving their child a vaccine that the medical establishment knows may harm that child, the medical establishment has pushed God aside.
Why do bad things happen to good people? Could it be someone has pushed God aside, and because God gave us free will, God had stepped back. Love, real love is also found with free will. This is the daily battle. When people choose to push God aside evil enters this world.
MRNA injections, glyphosate, remdesivir, pedophilia, solar geoengineering, childhood vaccine schedules, plastics in our water, a courts decision, all decisions that affect us. Others choices can affect us sometimes in horrific ways. Maybe bad things happen to good people because God has been pushed aside.
God only wants our heart. If we give it to Him we have chosen a wise path.
Thanks Drs. Malone for standing up for us and consistently making right choices!
J.Goodrich
The Schrödinger equation meme was the best today, first time to see this one.
I knew a feminist who'd burst into tears when pulled over by a cop for speeding or running a stop sign. And perhaps getting off the hook. She was big into girl power GI Jane fiction that has become official policy. You can't have it both ways.
James, your lead sentence said it all -- we are blessed with having choices to make, this is our free will. People's true character comes out when life pushes us to the mat. I don't think God has pushed us aside. God allows evil to exist for us to find Him -- of our own free will. Jesus knew his fate before he was born on this planet. God had a grand purpose, but even Jesus cried out, why have you forsaken me? God didn't forsake Him and He hasn't forsaken the rest of us. Take heart in the fact that God has a a grand plan that we are not privy to. I feel your pain with the same intensity. I'm human too. Keep the faith. Your last sentence: "God only wants our heart. If we give it to Him we have chosen a wise path."
I agree with you Barbara, and believe there is purpose in bad things happening to good people. And by the way I am not the most God fearing person on earth, I know that for sure. I didn’t say God pushed us aside I said people push God aside. I said God steps back for probably the very reason you mentioned, perhaps so we will find him. Just as I believe God closes some doors in our life and opens others. This is all my opinion, I don’t claim to know all, I claim I don’t know all. I suppose it’s my way of explaining and understanding why bad things happen to good people and why we are given free will. It’s obvious bad things happen. It’s just my view on why God lets it happen. He is in control so He must be stepping back right? For a reason of course. Maybe so large groups of people like all of us see the evil and try to correct it. It makes sense to me.
I sometimes think of the holocaust, and the war it created. All the people that suffered and died. Where was God. Did He step back? Why did all those people have to die? Was there a reason for it? My father was shot in the back in the Battle of the Bulge. Although he suffered with the results of being shot his whole life he did survive and had 4 kids and a lifetime of mostly peace. Many questions and it’s only my answer and opinion.
Thanks James. I needed this today.
Thank You MrsMc!!
Thank you, James, I appreciate your words of wisdom this morning. Have a wonderful & Blessed day.
Thank You Patricia! Hope you had a wonderful Sunday.
I
OMG, you brought home the horror of leftism in all its ugly forms.
Idaho is fighting a similar abortion bill as Virginia. The evil never stops! May our midterm votes stop it in both states. Conservatives who value life and America, DO NOT SIT AT HOME! VOTE.
Thank you for the video of dogs herding ducks and the memories of Gonzo, Gizmo, and Robert in the Peaceable Kingdom. We need more of that to restore our souls in these dark times.
The lamestream is in full Chicken Little mode now for the midterms. Expect a New York Times blurb urging us to vote for the DSAs (communists) because if Republicans win it will be $50 gas, the Yellowstone polar bears will die off and the Texas glaciers will melt.
The only way the left can be right is if we all stay home in fright.
I saw a clip of some left-wing politician saying how the military with guns will be present at the polls. Let’s hope this scares the lefties enough to make them stay home.
Not sure that clip was accurate. We asked Grok.
No. The U.S. military has no plans to deploy armed troops to polling places for the 2026 midterm elections.
Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (the highest-ranking U.S. military officer), stated this explicitly in a letter to Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) in late August 2026. He wrote that “the Joint Force has no plans to send Federal military personnel or Federalized members of the National Guard to polling places during the 2026 elections” and has “no plans to use such personnel to seize ballots, voting machines, or other election-related material.” He also said he has neither received nor anticipates any unlawful order on this.
Election administration and security are the responsibility of state and local officials. Federal law (including 18 U.S.C. § 592) generally prohibits members of the armed forces from ordering, keeping, or having troops or armed men at places where general or special elections are held, except when “necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States.” The Posse Comitatus Act further restricts the use of federal military forces for domestic law enforcement.
Concerns have been raised by some Democrats and others about possible federal involvement (including National Guard under certain authorities, ICE, or other agents), and some Trump allies have advocated for it. Messaging from parts of the administration on non-military federal agents has sometimes been mixed or non-committal. However, the military’s top officer has directly ruled out troops at the polls, and no evidence of such plans has emerged.
In short, armed military presence at the polls is not planned and is restricted by longstanding law. Polling-place security remains a civilian/local matter.
Source at https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMi1jb3B5_d888fde5-5e2e-4bfd-87c4-b04374cc4e3c
If there is $50 gas, I still will not vote for communism.
When will we have a discussion and agree on solutions on the root causes of these issues concerning the over the top abortion pushes., PPD and preemies and so much more. It begins with restructuring prenatal care, eliminating negative life styles and boosting nutritional health of the mother to be without introducing toxins from many sources including RX drugs. Each year, over 1 million fetuses do not see the beauty of life on this blue green planet. In the meantime the medicine men keep dreaming up band aid solutions. Harvesting of stem cells from the fetus is now driving this nutty behavior. The wheels are coming of the medicine man's ambulance. Top AP Medical man in the pocket of Big Pharma just did a clever hit piece, praising GLP-1 and discrediting RFK Jr. and so much more.
The video of Gonzo, Gizmo & Dr. Malone enjoying their beautiful farm & animals, was so heart-warming! Very relaxing too!Thank you.
And, the "extreme" right mentioned also includes condoning the slaughtering people around the world based on war propaganda.
And, protects a class in positions of power that rapes, torture, kill, and even eats children.
Then, not one indictment of anyone that created, allowed, and participated in the invasion.
I say both "sides" are pretty stuck.
Amen 🙏🏻
I've been thinking about that phrase "No Pain, No Gain" a lot lately. I mentioned back a few weeks here my husband fell while visiting our youngest in HI (w/o me). I think both he and my son learned some interesting and valuable lessons during the 3 weeks he was incapacitated there. Won't go into details, but it made me think that many people must endure the Very Worst possible scenario at a particular time in their life to finally make the effort to change.
Maybe we as a nation will have to endure some really, really bad SH** before the country as a whole will finally wake up to what we use to have and what we are now undergoing, with the path forward looking grim. Would having a majority of Demoncratic Socialists be that? Do we have to totally fail as a Free Nation to rise from the ashes? Will we end up living decades with a failed dream after only 250 years?
Excruciating pain, extreme hunger, dire consequences for actions and living thru them tend to wake more people up. Some of us see the writing on the wall before, and try with much frustration to turn the tide. We try to warn, cajole, plead, almost beg, but it's personal hurt (suffered by many) that seems to turn lost populations. Will enough gather/fight to overcome the pain of tyranny?
Right now I see a lazy, cushioned, blobby, sick, unhappy country ready to blame anyone but themselves for their condition. We, as a whole appear to have it easy compared to others in this world, but we are and have been a country of overall complacent complainers and non doers, probably in need of a lot more pain to gain.
Unfortunately, not all Americans are lazy complainers. But, as they say, misery loves company, so we will all be brought down by others. Conservatives who love this country need to stay 'awake' and do whatever we can to keep this country free. VOTE and don't let others tell you you are wrong.
But the lazy complainers & others with a victim complex are so LOUD... & that draws attention. Marvin Middleclass just goes about life doing what needs to be done to function. No headlines there. New reader's Digest came yesterday, Some GOOD POSITIVE articles. Hope Springs Eternal!
I appreciate anything Good Positive as long as there is Honest Effort attached. : > )
I didn’t know they still put out Readers Digest! The staple of every doctor and dentist’s waiting room.
People can tune out the complainers. No need to listen.
In Maryland my R vote will actually accomplish nothing. We have some of the most disgusting, subversive fed legislators in the nation. Today I put my vote date on my calendar. To let them know there are those of us out here that dont agree with them.
Hi Jean, same here. Voting for any Republican candidates is futile here in my district, but I am going for the 14 ballot initiatives on the Colorado ballot for the 2026 election.
The VOTE is only a fraction of a fraction of what it will take.
Learning the structure of Law that the Constitution sits on is quite a in depth study that will be a path to educating and making accountable our employees in DC (politicians and appointees and administrating).
wethepeople2.us
It just occurred to me that President AOC will look at the budget deficit and compare it to how much money is spent on Medicare and come up with a Canadian-style solution. Unwanted pre-born children and useless eaters that need to be looked after, what could be clearer? Quiet termination. Problem solved.
Can we all say "grim"?
800,000 people to hear the pope at the site in Paris where many lost their heads in 1793 gives encouragement to this Protestant. The times require of us courage to confront the ubiquitous lies of the left. To recognize that “public education” actually means “teachers’ unions” and that our kids are worth fighting for. When teachers’ unions first emerged, my mother, a retired teacher, reacted in horror, “What about the children?” We are many decades down that road, having sown the wind, now reaping the whirlwind of godlessness and greed. But there is hope, and it’s up to us.
https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1/messages/AANRKRx4Vi8oXG3vEbktZbphHp8?reason=invalid_cred
Absolutely, again as I said, "Will enough gather/fight to overcome the pain of tyranny?"
PS: wouldn't let me see your link as I don't subscribe to Yahoo.
PPSS: I abhor Public Education! Not to say there are Not dedicated educators focused on teaching. They too are being overcome.
The encouraging thing about the Pope's visit was the huge number of young people turning out.
I have come to believe that the lack of a belief in God and failure to engage in religious belief is a real problem for this country. I also believe that that has happened because life has became so easy for so many in this country. Religion seems to flourish where life is hard, lived on the edge of disaster, where the belief in a Paradise after death is a real goal that makes persevering worthwhile. When life is as good as it is for us, most people will not see Heaven as all that much better than what they have in the here-and-now. It seems as though prosperity will be our demise. The most devote religious people now are Muslims, almost all of whom live in difficult, marginal conditions, where tomorrow's meals and existence are much more tenuous and certainly less generous than here in the West. I think it's also why Christians in the Third World believe more strongly that those in the First.
Bravissimo LB!
I saw that stupid commercial of the female boxer boxer or whatever she is.. ..
No pain No gain.. take advil. .I was like NO that iS NOT BLOODY WELL HAPPENING.
What pile of crap.. the other one is as stupid is the DermaMend showing huge fat people.. older too falling down on tennis courts. and "bruising themselves" yeah right.. that is a fake A.I commercial. At my age. I have had to save several older people after they fell.. they had to go to the Hospital. Advil and Dermamend did not cut it. I will look that up later. I need to go.
The world, as it is, is not going to last for decades, there is a change coming.
Change is always coming. What type of change; Who is affected, Positive or Negative, Thoughtful or Calculated. Long term or Short. Change is not the problem, it's who, how, what we do with it.
This change is known by several names but they all mean the same - The Tribulation; Jacob's Trouble; The 70th Week. However, the Bride of Christ will not be here to witness this 'change', we just get to see the 'stage' being set.
'We' will have no control once it starts.
I thought the four years of the previous administration was enough really, really bad sh!t for one lifetime. And that was after I'd lived and survived the Carter years.
I enjoy the Sunday Strip every week, but these Candace memes miss the mark for me.
I don't agree with everything Candace Owens says, and I don't pretend to know exactly what happened to Charlie Kirk. But I've listened to enough of Candace, Baron Coleman, Ian Carroll and others to know they're raising questions they believe remain unanswered. If they're wrong, show where they're wrong. Challenge the evidence. Challenge the reasoning. But mocking them isn't an answer.
The meme showing Candace counting money particularly bothers me. Yes, Candace makes money from her audience. So do Robert and Jill—and I'm one of the people who gladly pays for a Malone News subscription. I don't assume that means the Malones manufacture opinions to make money, so why should that insinuation be a substitute for addressing Candace's questions?
That's especially disappointing coming from Dr. Malone. I began following him during COVID and became a paying subscriber largely because he was willing to question an official narrative when questioning it could get you ridiculed, demonized or censored. He has since written extensively about propaganda, psychological operations and the manipulation of public opinion.
I don't need the Malones to agree with Candace. I just expect the same intellectual curiosity that made me respect Dr. Malone in the first place. Answer the questions. Challenge the evidence. But don't ridicule people simply because they refuse to stop asking.
Robert and Charlie were good friends and spoke often. Robert and I both find what she has done to Charlie's reputation and to his widow as repugnant and disgusting.
We watch a dear friend's widow get trashed on the national stage for money, monetization, and clickbait. We watch Candace drag Charlie's name and his organization's reputation through the mud.
Sorry - the questions she poses are silly, the evidence she presents is not only weak, it is also often made up.
Go pound sand.
JGM
Guess you haven’t seen the independent investigation that just came out. Very obvious Erika is one trashing Charlie’s organization for money. Think you should reconsider your position on Candace. She’s seeking truth.
The independent investigation was really damming.
The other thing that I find absurd is that Tyler Robinson sent his “Wordle” score out to his friends 55 minutes before he allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. He took 3 tries to get the word “pouty”. This of course is going to make absolutely no difference as to guilt or innocence but….really…..1st time assassin and his prep is to finish the wordle and share it. This is just 1 of the minor inconsistencies.
Of course I don’t believe in a lone gunman or a magic bullet/neck.
Is it the government and media that says Tyler sent his "Wordle" score out to his friends.
Anyone could hack into his account to make him the patsy.
All other evidence doesn't line up, either.
I could see from the start that it was a military grade assassination.
Have you seen the video on instagram that @wearforbidden just dropped? It’s hysterical.
Candace is looking for the truth. TPUSA organized the event, from the security, what area to have it, as well as, the ticket sales, not UVU! TPUSA is making $$$$ off of Charlie’s death. Before you accuse Candace, you need to watch for yourself.
My posts on this were being misunderstood and criticized but those criticizing me had apparently not read my original post so I am editing myself to be more clear. I used to follow Candace Owens for a long time (years), but I have not appreciated her for persistent comments concerning Charlie Kirk and Erika Kirk which I understand are distressing to Erika, and I do not listen currently because I disagree with her current comments which are journalistically unethical as I explained in my original post. I teach ethics at a college, so I know something about ethics, but in my original post I had queried an AI about journalism ethics and posted the AI's comments on ethics policies that journalists have agreed on which was in my earlier post which might be worth reading but I will not repeat all of that here. However, I have discovered this report from a research firm who has done and in-depth investigation of all of Candace's comments and concluded the following which I am pasting in below.
Many of Candace's followers will not want to believe this report, but the research report was posted online on July 6, 2026, so it's pretty recent and comprehensive up to that date, and for those who are interested in why some have concerns about Candace - you can read the report. What I am posting here is a short summary, the "abstract" but there is a much longer report online at this link: https://networkcontagion.us/reports/permission-to-kill-how-candace-owens-built-a-digital-assassination-culture-targeting-erika-kirk/
Now here is the short summary of the report, and the summary and the full report are at the link above. I am actually a researcher myself with a major project on deadline and thus I will not be back to further address this issue because I really do not have time, but this is some objective reason for concern, as well as the ethical violations I previously mentioned in a different post. I have nothing further to say.
"Permission to Kill: How Candace Owens Built a Digital Assassination Culture Targeting Erika Kirk" (By Network Contagion Research Institute)
"NCRI assesses that Candace Owens caused a measurable, statistically significant surge in death threats and calls for violence against Erika Kirk. Granger causality analysis of 1,034 explicit threats finds that Owens’ tweets targeting Erika Kirk predict those threats at a two-day lag (F=8.82, p=0.0002) over the full nine-month series. The mechanism is narrative targeting: tweets explicitly naming Erika forecast threats, while general, non-targeting content produces no comparable signal. NCRI further assesses that Owens functions as a dominant “permission structure” for violence against Erika Kirk. Across the 1,034 explicit threats in the dataset, Owens is referenced in approximately 1 in 11 cases, rising to about 1 in 6 in February 2026—the peak month of mentions—making her the most-cited individual in threat-related content. Followers invoke her name as authorization, attribution, and moral license. When Owens posts targeted content about Erika Kirk, threats from the audience tend to follow."
"NCRI assesses that Owens is generating conspiratorial narratives that contribute to permission structures for violence. Across the dataset, recurring claims such as “Erika killed Charlie,” “Erika–Epstein trafficking,” “Mossad operation,” and “organized hit” form a pattern: a named target, an accusation that may morally justify harm, and an audience that interprets the narrative as a call to act."
"NCRI also assesses that this activity constitutes a sustained influence operation targeting a private individual. Across approximately 627.7 million views and nine months of activity, a narrative ecosystem emerged that produced explicit threats at statistically predictable intervals. This ecosystem appears to have become self-sustaining, generating over 1,000 explicit threats and continuing to amplify beyond the original source. Finally, NCRI assesses that this pattern reflects broader dynamics associated with “assassination culture,” involving narrative targeting, conspiratorial framing, and audience mobilization. These mechanisms, previously identified in other contexts, appear to be present in the ecosystem surrounding Erika Kirk, with measurable real-world implications."
I can tell by your comment that you have not watched any of Candace’ podcasts. She in fact has given all kinds of information to the police. She has never accused Erika of killing Charlie. It’s funny how the people speaking against her don’t listen to what she has said. Just like people who hated Charlie. They actually never listened to him. Form an opinion when you do the research. Candace is going to come out on top of all this. She’s seeking truth. Why not listen to her latest show last Friday for a start. You might be surprised.
It's a decentralized investigation involving the world.
The centralized "investigation" doesn't pan out.
Like most all in the past.
The UVU investigation from a 3rd party, that came out last Friday, doesn't look good for TPUSA.
https://candaceowens.com/video/we-were-right-uvu-releases-their-independent-review-ep-394/
I've only started listening to Candace since her friend was taken out.
She admits that she's not perfect, and asks for those to counter what she is presenting so we can get to the truth.
JGM, my sentiments EXACTLY!
You have just engaged in insults and ad hominem attacks. I also don't beat my wife. This is beneath you. Engage honestly in the issues raised by people like Candace, Baron, Ian, etc., or be aware that you are hurting your reputation and damaging the respect people may have for you. Or perhaps just stay out of the fray, as you seem to be too emotionally invested in a particular narrative.
Have you stopped beating your wife yet? is basically trying to get you to see that Owen's asks questions that, no matter how someone answers, they look guilty.
It is an old journalist trick.
Two answers:
No - (hence - I still beat my wife)
Yes, I beat my wife.
That was an honest engagement - if you actually thought what the question was about.
Dear Drs. Malone (because I'm not sure who I'm addressing here, but assuming RWM): Thank you for clarifying that the question about beating one's wife was rhetorical and not a direct implied insult. I was not familiar with this device, but your explanation did jog a memory. As I think you can see, though, a significant share of your readership does not agree with your position nor your approach.
I have an issue with your response, though, and that is because you have not addressed my major concerns of using insulting language (telling subscriber dennismeek to pound sand) and the ad hominem attacks (Candace Owens is evil [and the obvious corollary that those who believe she has genuine concerns and questions are implicated in "her evil"]). If you want to talk about "devices", I call the one you used here to be deflection. Also, as Gail Benton has queried, "Would you have an example of her presenting evidence or questions as such?"
I follow Candace Owens, ever since I became aware of her educating the public about MKUltra and the Covid crimes against humanity. I show my support by wearing a "Candace Unchained" t-shirt on numerous occasions. I have received a number of comments, and the vast majority are in solidarity with her crowd-sourced investigation. Very few support the federal and TPUSA narratives.
Now a few of the "evidence" and questions she and many others have brought up. One, why was the crime scene dug up and paved over within a few days of Charlie's execution? The contractor who paved it over held an interview and said he was told it was an "emergency paver" job (a Sunday) and that the order came from the governor's office, not even UVU. Two, why was the SUV that was used to take Charlie to the hospital cleaned and put up for auction shortly after? It should have been impounded as evidence. Three, why were so many items, such as the "bloody microphone", his cell phone, his necklace to name some, not impounded as evidence? Well-regarded forensic investigator Joseph Scott Morgan, on Julian Dorey's podcast, stated that these and other aspects of the investigations fall below well-established standards, especially in such a high profile case. Four, why did the prosecution present at the preliminary hearing a video that has been shown to have been altered (aspect ratio) to depict what seems to be a stockier man (who is claimed to be Tyler Robinson by the prosecution) in the parking garage as slimmer (you can see the vehicles in the background to also be scrunched)? Five, along with that, the grey Dodge Challenger that the individual -- claimed to be Tyler Robinson by the prosecution -- drove into the parking garage has quad exhaust pipes (could be a V-8), whereas the grey Dodge Challenger that was actually Tyler Robinson's has dual exhaust pipes (V-6?). Decoy? It's sus. Six, have you read the independent report released by UVU on Friday (https://www.uvu.edu/externalreview/docs/after-action-report.pdf)? It states that key players such as Brian Harpole and Dan Flood of Charlie's security team would not cooperate with the external review team (no response after repeated attempts to contact), along with key people at TPUSA also refusing to respond (such as the primary liaison from TPUSA headquarters who insisted that the event be held outside in the courtyard and that TPUSA would handle ticketing, even after UVU strongly advised against it because of their security concerns). Very sus. Seven, UVU's external report also contradicts many of the statements made by Brian Harpole in his appearance on Shawn Ryan's podcast -- inconsistencies and possibly overt "lies" that TPUSA refuses to address. More sus.
I've only outlined seven avenues of inquiry that point to holes in the "official" narrative and questionable behavior by TPUSA and CEO Erika Kirk. There are countless more. Instead of demonizing the people who doubt the official narrative and current trajectory of TPUSA, I would challenge you to affirm or disprove them, and quote objective source materials (not government "slop" or biased/bought media). That would be an honest response.
Here's the thing. The many people (such as myself) who supported you when you spoke out against the official Covid narrative and the toxic jabs, and saw how you were targeted, cancelled, smeared, etc. for bringing your knowledge and genuine beliefs to the public's attention, believe we are seeing the same thing being done to people like Candace Owens, and see you piling on. We see major propaganda and psy-ops being deployed, and find it ironic that someone (you) who has written extensively about military-grade psy-ops being used against us, are now aligning with the very same forces that continue to try and destroy you. What gives? Recently, you have been reporting how the "blob" has ostracized you, turned against you, and yet you are aligning with these same malign forces who are trying to shut down genuine inquiry into Charlie Kirk's execution.
Please let me be clear. I'm not going to unsubscribe from your substack due to this disagreement, because I believe you do valuable work, past and present and hopefully future. With this issue, though, I don't believe you are going to be on the right side of history, and don't believe that you are as objective and self-aware as you think you are. With the perspective that I -- and many others -- have, isn't that what an objective friend would call out?
Would you have an example of her presenting evidence or questions as such?
Not to mention the Kirck operation is sorely needed to lead the Zoomers to voting and voting for those most likely to act in their best interests.
It's become an organization for children.
Beware
To me, that seems a good thing. After our Covid saga and its impacts on them (including watching experts and governments betray them), they need folks that understand them, talk with them and show them ways for dealing with their worlds to make the future a better place. Too much of current campaigning is utter trash.It fails to reflect the return of production to the USA and the opportunities that will offer them.If the Zoomies may dictate who wins in Nov., best they be well informed.
Thank you Dr. Jill. I am perplexed about what has happened to Candace and Tucker. It seems dystopian.
Wake up, Nancy. It's the opposite. You've been misled.
I don’t think she is denigrating Charlie’s reputation at all. His organization…yes. He wanted to DOGE TPUSA before he died so possibly he wasn’t happy with them either. She posted a heart breaking tribute to him on 9/10/2026.
On the other hand I am glad that you both question the medical establishment and support fetal and newborns.
One of Candace’s sponsors is PreBorn an organization that gives free ultrasounds to mothers so that they can see and hear the life within them. Sometimes that is all that it takes.
Jill - please give us *one* example of Candace's evidence being made up. We'll wait.
Candace loved Charlie. She has not done one single thing to drag his name through the mud - quite the opposite, in fact. It is Erika who has trashed his organization.
Finally - I think you and Robert should each have your own account. I don't think Robert would tell a polite subscriber to "go pound sand" even if he disagreed with him/her. So I think you using his account and posting as him is misleading. If you want to lower the tone, do it under your own name.
Best regards
Dan McCarthy - loyal follower (of Robert Malone) since 2020
You are soooo wrong. Obviously you haven’t been watching Candace. Have you really looked into TPUSA?
Hi, just fyi, I posted further below about this report from a research firm that investigated and concluded that Canadace's statements have made Erika a target. In case you are interested this is the link to the research report: https://networkcontagion.us/reports/permission-to-kill-how-candace-owens-built-a-digital-assassination-culture-targeting-erika-kirk/
There is both a 3-paragraph abstract and a longer report in case you have not seen these and are interested. I pasted in the abstract further below in this thread.
Well, my respect for you, Jill, just multiplied tenfold! Robert, you married a good woman! The amount of people who still support Candace is mind boggling! She is an evil, psychotic narcissist! The fact that people don't see it is also mind boggling. (you can go pound sand was a favorite phrase of my mom also 😅)
Let me guess, Karen...you're an Israel-Firster?
Why would you assume that?
think you might have skipped the "pound sand" at the close of your response otherwise I agree completely.
Robert never would have written that. It was the tell that his wife was high on impersonating him again. No wonder she loves Erika so much…
Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
I used to respect Candace. Now I wonder about her health that perhaps her thought processes are not working well. I recently read some analysis by an ethics scholar who explained some reasons why what she is doing is not good. I can't recap all that analysis now but it validated some of my own thinking which is:
1) Since everyone is presumed innocent UNTIL proven guilty, I assume that Erika Kirk is a grieving widow, which I do believe, & it's is cruel and lacking in Christian charity to add to her trauma, grief, and stress by constantly making public allegations against her.
2) I believe IF there is evidence it should be reported to law enforcement, FBI, etc. whoever is handing the investigation and/or the prosecution when it has gotten to that point.
I asked Google Gemini AI about the ethical principles involved. Gemini says:
1. The Principle of Non-Maleficence and Minimizing Harm
A core canon in professional communication and media ethics (such as the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics) is to minimize harm. This principle draws a sharp distinction between public figures who voluntarily enter the arena and private individuals or grieving family members thrust into the spotlight through tragedy. Accusing a surviving spouse of orchestrating or being complicit in her husband's murder inflicts severe psychological, social, and reputational harm. Beyond individual trauma, such claims can incite targeted harassment, doxxing, or threats from an audience numbering in the millions, creating real-world physical and safety risks for the accused and their surviving children.
2. Due Process and Investigative Ethics:
In any constitutional and rule-of-law framework, accusations of murder carry the highest standard of proof.
Appropriate Channels: If an individual genuinely possesses credible, actionable evidence regarding a violent crime, ethical and civic responsibility dictates turning that information over to the jurisdiction's investigating bodies (such as the police, state investigators, or federal authorities).
Contaminating Proceedings: Broadcasting speculative theories or unverified allegations on a monetized public platform circumvents standard standards of evidence. It risks tainting potential jury pools, diverting public resources, and obstructing official investigations that are bound by criminal law and evidentiary procedure.
3. Verification vs. Insinuation
Ethical commentary requires truthfulness and rigor:
Ethical analysis requires distinguishing clearly between verifiable facts, reasonable interpretation, and speculative conjecture.
When public figures leverage rhetoric that implies guilt through selective questions, innuendo, or debunked metadata claims without substantiated proof, it undermines the truth-seeking function of public discourse. Presenting suspicion as equivalent to material fact fails the duty of verification.
4. Audience Responsibility and Commercial Incentives
Modern independent commentators operate within algorithmic ecosystems that financially and socially reward outrage, conflict, and sensationalism.
Ethicists regularly warn of the moral hazard inherent in "audience capture" or monetized controversy, where high engagement (views, subscribers, superchats) disincentivizes restraint.
Broadcasters have a duty of care toward their followers to avoid leading them into believing unsubstantiated narratives that can warp public understanding and cause real harm to third parties.
Ethically and objectively, publicly leveling accusations of murder against an individual on social media—rather than submitting verifiable evidence to sworn investigators—fails basic standards of proportionality, harm minimization, and fairness.
She has presented evidence to the government.
Crickets
Jill, I was respectful in my comment and explained why I've been a paying subscriber and why I've respected Robert's work for years. You're certainly entitled to disagree with me—and with Candace. But telling a paying subscriber who respectfully disagrees with you to “go pound sand” is disappointing.
I specifically invited you to challenge the evidence, the reasoning and the conclusions. “Go pound sand” does none of those things.
I’ll come pound sand with you. #️⃣⌛️
I just think that Candace pulled at a few threads and the whole sweater unraveled. The most consistent thing about this case is its inconsistencies.
Well said! Thank-you
I completely agree. I am also a paying subscriber. And I am very concerned by the response "go pound sand" to your polite message. I thought we were dealing with grown-ups here (which was how I got into Robert Malone in the first place)...I may have to revise that opinion now.
Ok.. back to the Sunday Strip.. Ay-o-see's comment about Daylight Savings did Crack me up. I could hear her saying something like that!
Alan Murphy Gray Owl photo was pretty amazing.. looks like AI, but you included his credit, so have to assume nature is pretty amazing. Not so fooled by the subsequent photo haha!
One final thing.. I truly miss Charlie Kirk. I am angered that his assassination hasn't been investigated PROPERLY, which leaves TOO many to speculate some pretty wild stuff. I don't follow Candace or others, so know next to nothing other than I miss Charlie's wisdom, calm demeanor, talent for debating, his intellect & integrity.
I believe that people are more likely to question EVERYTHING these days, due in part to Covid & the "vaccines", Biden & Obama's lawfare against Trump & all that is still being discovered about that, & this has the American people on edge. Everything is suspect in current times. Look at the attempted assassination of then Candidate Trump & the information slowly filtering out. It's disheartening that there doesn't seem to be ANY "truth" that can be set in concrete these days. Something is always seemingly shifting, moving, gyrating what reality there is. Nothing is sacred. Too much is just.. evil. The lovers of money & power are despicable, regardless of whether D, R, or DSA. So many blatant lies! So many hidden agendas, as many of your meme collections today allude to.
Thanks for all that were laughable. We NEED some things to laugh at.. while we can!
AOC was also complaining on the House floor that having her staffer change all the clocks every six months gets expensive, and that throwing away the ones that worked perfectly fine is wasteful.
Dim Bulb.
The light’s on but nobody’s home.
From Wikipedia: "Ocasio-Cortez graduated cum laude from Boston University in 2011 with a Bachelor of Arts degree, double-majoring in international relations and economics."
Weird.
Hmmm, Wikipedia. Hmmmm, Boston U. Hmmmm, College Ed, vs Common Sense?
She needs to go back to making drinks at a local bar!
Oh my word: “throw out the clocks that worked”??? AOC is definitely shy of a full load!
Sometimes I think to myself later on that my made-up humor comes too close to being a false assertion. In this case, I presume that the AOC remark in the Strip about daylight savings was fictional, and my add-on is also fictional.
Yes, I understand that, & I’m sarcastic in my reply…AOC has been in the news lately, & I just don’t get why…! She needs to go back to a “Learing Center”, for a refresher’s course!
The memes in this Sunday's comic strip are especially meaningful to me as a citizen of Virginia. What Gov. Scambugger and her socialist demonic dumocrat cohorts are proposing as a constitutional amendment is essentially institutionalized murder and a crime against humanity and an insult to God. I fervently pray that their horrific amendment goes down in flames, amen!
I'd also like to add that although it may be true that "there isn't (or, may not be) enough healthcare in the world that could treat the mass mental illness of modern-day leftism," I have been encouraged from my long clinical experiences that the accurately prescribed constitutional homeopathic remedies, both individually administered, as well as dispersed in the public water supply, might just adequately awaken the submerged consciousness and conscience of the cognitively and morally impaired leftists as to foment a subtle, seismic shift in the collective, universal stream of consciousness. At the very least, it might make them self-aware enough of their enormous shallowness and stupidity, and, God willing, induce them to be inspired by their shame to transform. Just a thought....
The Virginia Constitutional amendment that is on the ballot goes much further than most people think. It's not merely abortion up to 9 months, but many believe that it will eliminate all guard rails. It says: protect the freedom to make personal decisions about...birth control, abortion... which does not place limits on age, thus, if you have a 14 year old daughter or granddaughter, the current parental consent law will no longer apply, and she will have freedom to obtain an abortion if she chooses, and probably also if a man who is abusing her so chooses.
People do not realize that abortion is often used by those who sexually abuse minors, to hide evidence of the crime. The man will never be charged for the sexual abuse if the evidence (the baby) is gone. And when it comes to "reproductive rights," "freedom" is always freedom, and since there is no age limit in the amendment, freedom would apply to all females, and a female of any age is free to agree to an abortion - whether she actually wants it or not - because when a young person is being abused she may not be "free" to express her true preference whether 14 or 17 and a half, but parental consent will not be a consideration because she has "freedom" under this amendment.
She can also be on birth control without parental involvement or morning after pill without parental knowledge, consent or oversight. Often men purchase the morning after pill for the female, and young women should not be taking the "morning after pill" every weekend or numerous times because the high dose hormones especially on a repeated basis have not been established as safe for an adolescent's health (if they are truly healthy for anyone).
Also, because of "freedom" if the woman has complete freedom, I wonder if normal "informed consent" will go out the window - though already the standard is inadequate. I know a woman who had an abortion who has stated, "I got better informed consent when my dog had surgery than what was provided when I had my abortion." That woman had her abortion in her teens, when clinic staff told her, "Don't worry, you'll have another baby later" but she never did. She never was able to have a child of her own after that which has been a source of grief for her -but now in her 50's looking back, she knows she was not given appropriate informed consent to even consider risks vs. benefits and options.
But with this amendment, it's the woman's complete freedom to decide for an abortion (or any type birth control) and freedom is free, and the health care professionals are totally EXEMPT from any consequences for participating in whatever she decides. So, if they fail to give proper informed consent or something goes wrong - it's a liability shield for any professional who prescribes birth control or provides abortion services.
Voting in a Constitutional amendment is a lot easier than getting rid of later. If you have concerns about this, many conservative organizations and many Christian organizations have concerns about the many harmful effects that will arise from this amendment, and you can get more info from Family Foundation of Virginia, Family Research Council, or Founding Freedoms
Law Center, which says “It will eliminate statutory rape laws for consenting minors,
since the amendment provides an unqualified ‘fundamental right to reproductive
freedom’ to every ‘individual,’ without any limitation on age.” Former Delegate Bob Marshall agreed with that statement, stating that this amendment "effectively nullifies any minimum legal age of sexual consent."
An article from the Washington Stand (a newsletter of Family Research Council says: "Note also that parents would be powerless to intervene or sue adult sexual predators, Planned Parenthood or similar groups from ‘changing’ the sex of minor children.”
As for the third trimester abortion, these are viable infants that would be able to be aborted up to the full 9 months. And while they say that the law "will allow" for regulation of 3rd trimester abortions, it does not say the state WILL regulate those abortions in any way, and in other states that do allow those late abortions up to 9 months, most of the time it is NOT for health reasons, and even when there are so-called health reasons, the abortion is generally not helpful to the woman but since this is now so long, I will write separately about those "up to 9 months" abortions. But just know that there are many non-profit organizations and Christian organizations that say the language of this proposed Constitutional amendment is VERY deceptive and I agree, and the public should be educated before they make the decisions - because doesn't it sound nice and American to say that women should be free to make their own decisions about childbirth and post-partum care and multiple different things where - sure, Americans are all about choice - and sure, doctors and nurses should be free to do as the woman wishes, that sounds nice too - but the nice image is not what this will do, this same amendment will let a 14 year old sexually abused female have an abortion without her parents knowing, because it would be her "choice" when the abuser wants her to hide the evidence via abortion.
Remarkable how that owl blends with the background. I think it's an owl. Or if not, maybe Tolkien's Ents of Middle Earth are real. No, it's gotta be just an owl.
Living as an owl is dangerous, you know. Nature is beautiful, yes, but also hostile. An owl always has to have its head on a swivel.
Definitely an owl. Sets a good example for us. Be and stay alert!
James, As do we gun toting Americans!
What nobody talks about on the left is how the mother is basically used by this evil ideology; once the abortion is performed, the mother is thrown away like trash, figuratively speaking. There is no support, because the act is evil, and every human being knows innately that it is, regardless of what ideology they might buy into. And of course, a murder has been committed as well. A lose-lose situation, on all levels.
While profiteering off baby parts
All good, Branco on the money as per, and the abortion issue seems to be in need of a concise definition of what is a human being taken from the hands of idiots,that cannot define what is a woman
I just researched abortions by state. It's pretty disgusting that seven states and D.C. have NO gestational limits. And what really yanks my chain is there are so many, many ways to prevent pregnancy in the first place, including the morning-after-pill in cases of rape. Abortions were Margaret Sanger's way of ridding the world of black and brown babies. Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League In 1921, which morphed into Planned Parenthood in 1942. Margaret Sanger was a Eugenicist, you know, like Gates and Fauci.
Dear Doctors Malone - can't tell you how I am blessed to get your e-mails! I have learned so much about what's really happening now in our country! Although I'm 88, my earlier years were spent raising cattle and horses and living the good life in the Sierra Nevadas! Please be blessed this wonderful Sunday morning and give Jade a hug for me!
What the so-called elites have done to Europe/the West....
This recent mini-speech by Afroditi Latinopolou of Greece has probably already been seen by many here. But for those who haven't seen her eviscerate Ursula von der Leyen to her face, it's a real treat.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4UYhL2mlars
Man! She is a pistol. Good get there
That was great! We need eloquent speakers to do the same to our corrupt politicians here.
I’m so happy to have raised my 3 right wing extremists who are now raising their own far right extremists
The whole abortion thing at any stage is simply a continuation of the “reduce the population to 500B” by the eugenics folks, approved by the “it’s inconvenient right now” folks. I was almost seduced when in my 20’s…I had a LOT to lose, and did. But the Words of Christ came back to me and I was horrified at my “modern” thinking. Raised a beautiful, beloved, and academically gifted son.
Favorites: Videos -
Herding Dogs. I need a new dog. (I love/cherish you, Stella, but really, you could try just a little!)
Gizmo/Gonzo. Sweet memories. Love Can conquer all.