70 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

TYPO FIXED! It should read:

"On a personal note, I have known James for a few years. He is a non-nonsense and honest person. He doesn’t embellish, and he doesn’t lie. He has put everything on the line to bring truth to power."

Big E's avatar

"non-nonsense" or "no-nonsense"? 😂

James Lord's avatar

Grateful to Mr. Erdman. To Dr. Malone. To Rand Paul. To Ron Johnson. To RFK Jr, who was way out in front on this subject matter with "The Real Anthony Fauci," which I count as one of the most important books of our time. The book has been out for more than 4 years, but evidently many in Congress remain willfully oblivious and/or mute on the institutional malice documented therein.

To the majority of Congress who have done little or nothing as the most devastating medical tyranny in human history has been rolled out globally: May you live with the fact that you chose contributions, self interest, and re-election prospects over the wellbeing of your constituents; men, women, children, infants.

Bruce Miller's avatar

Truly, mostly "a parliament of whores."

LoverOfHills's avatar

Exactly, Bruce and James.

Congress = Whores. None of them showed up for any of Sen. Ron Johnson's many Senate hearings, where LIFE-SAVING Truths were being made known: successful Treatments, Proof of Vaccine Injury! Congress continues the nonsense NOW, which seems Even Worse. THIS CONGRESS is the VERY Worst!

Americans have lost hope. Talk to even the Fox watchers, even they can SEE this is a ongoing, never-ending CORRUPT Congress.

A new party... it will take years to grow it, but we may as well start thinking of it now.

We are Tired of This Shit Party.

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Protecting the CIA ability to do covert operations is paramount to their existence.

Democrats see this as political and it is NOT! Transparency is required to keep this nation whole.

Carla Nelson's avatar

"On a personal note, I have known James for a few years. He is a non-nonsense and honest person. He doesn’t embellish, and he does lie."

I think "he does lie." is a typo.

Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

THANK YOU AND FIXED!!!

weedom1's avatar

It's funny that my brain automatically inserted 'not' in there due to context, causing me to miss the typo.

Cherylyn's avatar

I do that a lot... I read it logically...so I miss typos.

weedom1's avatar

Context helps a ton with lip reading too.

Cherylyn's avatar

True... that is what I mean by logically....

arrotsevni's avatar

When your modus operandi is to speak truth, there is no criticism that anyone can throw at you that sticks.

Bruce Miller's avatar

And of equal import, your story never varies.

arrotsevni's avatar

Truth is like that, steadfast over time.

Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Three points.

First, perhaps those dems who did not show should have,finances investigated for ties to the chinese.

Second, Sen. Johnson made a great response to rpthe c.i.a.spokespersons charge of theater by saying he had decades of frustration introduced by alphabet agencies ducking congressional oversight and giving him a big thick middle,finger

Third, where in blazes did c.i.a. get the muscle,to,wrest 40 boxes of files from alleged boss?

Betty Galloway's avatar

Your third question is EXACTLY what I would like to know. Further, how do they continually manage to duck the authority over them of the ODNI and President?

Nicholas Edward Bednarski, MD's avatar

Is it not illegal for the CIA operate in any fashion domestically? Since when do they have “police powers”. ( raiding offices and seizing materials)?

M. Blake's avatar

Factions of the CIA appear to be (though books I've read, the material of which I will never "un-know," whether or not it's completely accurate) officially sanctioned mafia, with "national security" as unquestionable rationale of the highest order.

Bruce Miller's avatar

Remember what Chuckie Schumer said about the spook agencies? Of course, if you're not compromised, corrupt and Chinese owned, you have no reason to fear them. But our Congress is all of that. and worse. So the CIA owns them.

ron's avatar

Good question on taking boxes from the boss, and now I hear it didn't actually happen. Which is it?

Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

And who said it didn't happen? Tulsi, no... So who?

What probably didn't happen was a "raid," but that wasn't what Erdman said. He said the CIA took back the boxes before they could be processed.

ron's avatar

Who said it did happen - was that Tulsi?

Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

Rep. Luna said it was a raid in her letter- and then clarified that it wasn't a raid - but it is true that the CIA took back the boxes. The press is running with that the whole thing is false.. More psyops.

"Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) initially highlighted the issue on NewsNation and posted a letter demanding that CIA Director John Ratcliffe preserve all related records (threatening subpoenas or hearings). She later clarified her own statements: it was not technically a "raid," it did not occur on the day of the hearing (May 13), and it involved documents under ODNI jurisdiction rather than a surprise physical seizure that day

"

Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

I just read her statement - she didn't use the word "raid" - Fox News did...

ron's avatar

But these are all second- or third-hand reports. Has anyone at DNI said one way or the other? Has anyone at CIA (officially, I mean - believe it or not, there are plenty of people with an agenda at all these agencies and in Congress) said one way or the other? It certainly could have happened and I missed it.

There is no doubt CIA and DNI and every other agency were all operating in a very sordid fashion during the last "administration," and I'm sure falsi was doing this intervention with their glad participation.

I would be interested in their official declarations, now that supposedly adult and ethical people are in charge. AFAIK, there has been none. The implication is that CIA people took from DNI, under some form of duress, boxes of documents. It doesn't make much sense, since CIA is subordinate to DNI.

Next, I would ask who has "40 boxes of documents" these days. Most everything except the most sensitive things are done electronically. Why were these in hard-copy form?

Dr. Robert W. Malone's avatar

Files on Kennedy and MKULTRA - go back to the 1950 and 60s. Yes, originals would be kept in paper form.

Erdman still works for the CIA/DNI and was under oath.

Yes, there is a direct person in the CIA who said this.

Yes, a representative from Congress also said this.

Tulsi and the CIA have not confirmed or denied... That is how intelligence rolls.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

Unfortunately, even when there are "adult and ethical people...in charge", those in charge are ignored and undermined. Just look at the thousands employed by HHS who are actively working again Kennedy. There are always snakes slithering around and striking when most advantageous to themselves.

D D's avatar

My dad always said that, from a radio program.

Matthew Koch's avatar

The CIA is acting like they are above Congress (which they unfortunately are). The CIA needs to be destroyed.

Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

Actually it should' never have been formed. Created by a pro commie progressive (OSS) and staffed by a pack of yale progressives.

Matthew Koch's avatar

The CIA has been involved in countless coups against lawfully elected governments, terrorist attacks, false flags, etc over the last three quarters of a century.

How can anyone support, believe, or defend them?

Bruce Miller's avatar

Fauci was serving his Chi Com masters. We still need a reckoning and reparations for their role in loosing the COVID virus on an unsuspecting world.

Of equal importance - the report that the CIA raided Tulsi Gabbard's office. If this is accurate, every puke involved in that operation should be fired and charged with a multitude of crimes. Trump needs to come down hard on this. If Ratcliffe knew or was involved, he needs to be sacked immediately.

Abuelo Doug's avatar

The one upside to the absence of Democrats at the hearing was that there were no attempts to impugn the character or credibility of Mr. Erdman.

Micheal Nash, Ph. D.'s avatar

They probably did that in the non public meeting.

weedom1's avatar

Sad to know that the CIA has this much control over our lives, and that elected officials answer to them and not to us.

When the hearing headlines popped up after May 11, I just sighed.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

What's most frustrating is that they are not authorized to work within our national borders, but they do it all the time.

weedom1's avatar
2hEdited

Non-stop internal surveillance, extortion and disinformation.

I want the CIA to know that the public perception of it has become worse than that of the CDC and FDA.

Garry Blankenship's avatar

The corruption and lying is revolting. I long for accountability and ,via our current administration, I am slowly getting it. My dream of dreams is for Biden's, ( ? ), auto-pen pardons to be vacated. Then the stench of Fauci and the Biden family / Ukraine corruption could be finally cleared from our air.

Joy Metcalf's avatar

I think many have that dream, but until someone actually files a complaint, it'll never happen. My question is, WHY hasn't it happened?

Teresa's avatar

Thank you Jesus that there are many people who we're able to bring the "does lie" typo to Dr Malones' attention so it could be quickly corrected and not manipulated by nefarious actors

Ross Bausone's avatar

When will the current Administration fully reign in the CIA? What is going on that these POS' continue to make up stories, leak information and steer the MSM to the edge of truth/fiction?

FIX IT NOW PLEASE! (Not a Dr. Malone fault! Only providing a vehicle for communication). I hope this isn't misplaced or misunderstood! As an aside, I read once where the CIA Director said "I'll know I've done my job, when I can print a lie and people will believe it"!

Jean's avatar

Thank you so much for sharing this! I had hoped to watch, but had a doctors appointment I couldn't reschedule.

It appears, to me, that JFKs desire to shatter the CIA into a million (?) pieces continues to have merit. That the CIA would go into Gabbard's office and walk off with boxes of JFK and MKUltra documents is well beyond the pale.

Years of loose permissive management, indeed direction seem to have resulted in the Agencies self serving pursuits and coverups.

One is concerned that with our President reordering the world, this CIA operation sees itself as supreme. That it can not and will not be held accountable. And - It can steam ahead with further covert influences and actions to direct US initiatives as it sees fit.

To rapidly identify who is setting CIA visions and what their present visions are seems vital to me. I don't see we have any assurance they have our nation's interests at heart.

A veritable Panora's box, on a grand scale, sorely needing to be timely addressed.

David Pare's avatar

My question: who is the CIA working for? Clearly not us. But who?