I continually learn new, unexpected things about you, Dr. Malone! I never thought I'd see Murray Rothbard and the Austrian School of Economics mentioned in your Substack. I stand (happily) corrected.
I often listen to Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (Darkhorse podcast) and they have been extremely vocal about what science is and is not, and how the scientific method has been all but overthrown For this, of course, they are attacked and vilified. No matter, they're all about truth and especially truth in science.
I have long believed that the government does not belong in the funding business, not for science, not for the arts. We've seen how it turns out: government picks winners and losers, often to the detriment of the public. I've heard arguments that it's better than funding by the private sector (the history is rich in the Florentine era) because being "public money", it's actually funded by the public (taxpayers). It is not. It is funded by the bureaucrats who wield the money, and as pointed out, it's doomed to corruption.
"Rothbard understood that the state’s natural condition is to seek out, and where necessary manufacture, crises that justify emergency expansions of its authority." Oh, how well we've seen this over the past many decades! And we're seeing it again in Iran. What is the next crisis? And what is it being manufactured to hide? Central banks were formed to serve the state's wars, and they've done a smashing job of that, selling arms to both sides, selling each state into poverty, taking the citizenry with them.
There's a reason--many reasons--that our founders wanted a limited federal government. Unfortunately, we've ignored them, both the founders and the reasons, and ended up where they told us we should not go.
My big question for the libertarians has always been: Why do you expect "non-government" human organizations (businesses) to function that much differently than government ones ("the state")? They are both human organizations, and it would seem to me would both be likely to fall into the same - or similar - traps. Businesses - especially very large ones - have many functions and concerns that overlap with those of The State. They employ large numbers of people, control many resources (land, water, buildings, machines), and make economic (and indeed political) decisions that affect the masses, not just their customers. They have their own bureaucracies and command structures.
So, how will minimizing The State really solve our biggest human problems? It seems to me The State is just a convenient whipping boy.
The state's function is to get bigger, and as corporations are a creation of the state, they tend to function the same way. It's called fascism.
Yes, both government and businesses are run by humans, but they have different motivations. Churches are also run by humans but charity doesn't usually extend to buying their houses and providing them with food for the rest of their lives.
There will always be humans that seek to do good and those who look out for Number One. What I've found is that those with libertarian leanings aren't so likely to tell someone else how they should live. Most of the libertarians I know do not believe that we can live without any government structure (though anarco-libertarians definitely exist), but believe in extremely limited government.
Libertarians count on competition with reasonable oversight in what they call 'The Marketplace of Ideas'. Trust humans they say, but mostly trust competition and the people's power of choosing. Or not choosing. It is not perfect, but it is much better than one entity with all the powers of the country, to make those decisions or even run that process. That's insane....and that's what we have.
But we DON'T have "one entity with all the powers." Not in America. We still have a lot of power held at state and local levels, but also in the corporate world. What we do have - and have had for a long time - is a rather unfair game. Some competitors are favored much more than others. But we also have criminal elements that "game the system" to the point now where they are nearly out of control.
Politicians will respond - when they do - with either an anti-crime program (more favored by conservatives) or a welfare program (more favored by liberals). But this usually only results in the expansion of government. These are both incorrect solutions to the problem of organized crime.
I'm not saying that libertarian ideas are not appealing. I'm just saying that they don't adequately confront the reality of the situation. Neither do conservative or liberal ideas. They all fall short.
The state's function IS NOT to expand itself! That's a corporate function. Governments have often been the creation of corporate interests, and when they are, their main purpose is to control the populace, as corporate practices tend to be unpopular.
Where does it say in the U.S. Constitution (for instance) that the federal government must expand itself? It doesn't say that because the original intention was to create a government that would protect us against corporate interests. I think it is fairly clear that our government has been largely taken over by corporate interests. Most governments are. I don't see The State on the top of the heap here, and I don't understand why so many want to put it there.
I think governments are wanted by people to protect them from organized crime. And that organized crime, unfortunately, includes many corporations. The criminals then obviously have an interest in taking over government and quite often succeed to a greater or lesser degree.
And I don't think a belief in limited government, by itself, will protect us from the vagaries of organized crime, particularly when it appears as corporate entities that supply us with things we all need.
In general I agree. As you said they’re both human institutions so why would be expect otherwise? If I recall, as a physician, I’m considered to be a “professional” which has lost its original meaning. People like me, lawyers, teachers, legislators etc who have power over the vulnerable are called to “profess” that they will use that power for the benefit of others and not their own. One expects businessmen to look out for themselves but professionals are called to a higher standard. This seems to have been corrupted or at least, totally forgotten in our culture.
Eventually: all adults get to ECONOMIC THEORY.. either VON MISES and the Austrian school or the OTHER SCHOOL aka MARXIST.. I did after I met a LEFT WING ECONOMIST.. who went to American U. totally brainwashed as young student and got into BIG TROUBLE w/ SDS. I didn't know him when he went to American U.. we met as adults long story RIP. (Students for a Democratic Society in DC).. I stayed away. :)
When COVID hit in early 2020, I was seeing an elderly hospice patient in her son's home. He advised me, with a severe countenance, that what was happening was related to the "deep state". I didn't even know what that was, and as you can imagine, I looked at him like he was a bit crazy. He told me that in his past life, he had been an event planner who had sometimes organized meetings for them throughout the world (often on remote islands) for planning sessions related to the things like we were then experiencing. At the time I took what he said with a grain of salt (whatever that means), but within a year or two, with what I learned from listening to you, Dr. Peter McCullough, RFK Jr, and many others, I slowly came to realize that he really knew what he was talking about. I have to admit that if the underlying secular humanistic "ethics" I imbibed from my training, the one that currently pervades medicine and our culture (that often justifies the killing of the innocent through abortion and euthanasia), does not return to the natural law contained within an authentic Christian ethics, the one that was proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights..." (see a recent book by John G. West, called The Bible, Science, and the Battle for America's Soul) then I am very pessimistic about what can be done to truly remedy the situation, but applaud your efforts. Being a hospice physician, who's had to review the situation of patients and advise them on their prognosis and viable options, the only way forward that I can see is that we need a sincere revival in Christ!
Yes, the point about the Hippocratic oath was that at his time back then in Greece, patients couldn’t be sure if their physician would try to cure or kill them. We’ve returned to those times.
People still act surprised to hear that the Hippocratic oath is no longer in force. It had been gone from almost all med schools by the 80s specifically to accommodate the abortion and euthanasia.
Yes, without even being given the oath beforehand, being made aware of what was contained within it, and how it differed from the Hippocratic oath, my medical class from the University of Toronto in 1978 swore to the Oath of Geneva. At that time, being an agnostic, I didn't appreciate the significance of what it really meant to take an oath. Now I do, and I realize that I was totally dependent on those who were my teachers to lead me in the right path. But what happens when the blind are leading the blind?
Doc---- a comment on your last sentence about the blind leading the blind. Sometimes those in positions of power are not blind but.....they are truly evil so.......you have the evil leading the blind which results in something worse than the blind leading the blind.
Graduating from a Catholic medical school (St. Louis University) in 1977, weeks got & sas I’d the Hippocratic oath for which I have been increasingly grateful.
A revival in Christ is truly the answer, as this is a spiritual war against the forces of darkness. Dr. Malone points out that he does not believe this was an orchestrated event to allow authoritarianism, which may be correct. However, Satan will exploit these human weaknesses to promote its agenda, which is the destruction and division of humanity. Most of the world does not believe in the Enemy, which enables its success. For those who don't believe in the devil, read The War Against Humanity by Anonymous Patriot. For those who do, read the book to learn how to defeat it.
If you haven't done so you might want to check out the Exorcist Files podcast with Father Carlos Martins and also Father Dan Reehil and Father Chad Ripperger.
I have, and they know what most of the world does not. The book I recommended uses the same principles of demonology that Father Ripperger outlines in his book Dominion. The author applies those principles to the last two thousand years of human history to demonstrate that this is another period of darkness due to man's collective sins and lack of faith. The book uses the Old Testament to show the pattern, and the New Testament to provide the solution.
Mr. Quick----a couple of facts that anyone who spends much time to reading the Bible can attest as true.
1. God determined what was right and correct/wrong since the time he created earth and he is unchanged since then.
2. If you study the New Testament it is clear that Jesus spent quite a lot of time dealing with demons and the trouble they cause. But...... I think if you would inquire among people who consider themselves to be Christians and ask them if there are still demons loose on this earth, I believe most and possibly a very high % would say that demons are no longer any issue and do not currently exist. But....if the devil has dominion over the earth at this time----which I understand the devil, we will have him and his demons with us until Christ returns so......I also believe that a lot of the issues surrounding us today are because of demons and.....like they did in the early Church after Christ's death and his rise from the dead we need to actively fight against them with the assistance and support of the Holy Spirit.
Correct. The book The War Against Humanity by Anonymous Patriot was written expressly to convince Christians that demons are real, still currently exist and are responsible for most of the issues surrounding us today. The author takes just about every reference to Satan and demons in the Old and New Testament and combines them to argue that we need to actively fight them with the support of the Holy Spirit. Hopefully the book will achieve its purpose, which is to increase the number of Christians who believe and understand Evil, thereby enabling them to fight actively against it. You can only defeat the Enemy if you believe in the Enemy.
I agree, Howard. Science with no soul cannot be true science. The Rothbardian denouement is one of a spiritually bankrupt civilization, or one that has translocated the aim of its worship from where it should be to Mammon.
The Covid era was a catastrophe indeed: a man-made catastrophe. I’m not talking about any virus that may or may not have been made or existed. The catastrophe was the collective reaction by the govt(s), media, and fellow citizens.
Great read Doc! The indictment of Morens has me hoping he is shitting his pants at the time he might get from his possible sentence if found guilty (which should be a slam dunk) and has him singing like a canary so he can weasel out of his sentence but finally shows how Daszak and Collins were integral for Fauci to pull off what he did to us Americans. I want these three sitting in a cell for the rest of their lives for what they did. Getting Fauci of course seems slim as he parades around with that Auto-pen pardon he received when Biden was driving across town to Trumps inauguration. I think it should be challenged though and he surely has done illegal things even before Covid that most likely could get him indicted. There isn’t any reason for these three to be free men. Fauci by the way is doing the exact same thing right now living in Italy. Yup, for those that don’t know he’s over there running their version of the HHS. Still making sure everyone gets their Covid shots as they get produced. It’s appalling really. Keep up the good fight Doc. It’s a hard thing to do especially when it seems pointless because nobody is being held accountable for the scam they pulled on us all.
Mr. Schwartz----I would also be perfectly fine with the 3 people you mention, hanging from a light pole in the middle of DC so everyone can see these evil people get their just rewards.
This would not be considered revenge but justice for all of their evil deeds.
Thank you Dr. Malone! Clarity of analysis of the greatest affront to humanities existence is a seminal moment in time that must be ceased and acted upon. The question is how do we stop this race to oblivion wrapped in scientism? How do we awaken our Executive branch and our Legislative branch to this medical travesty that is still actively being expanded and controlled for the profit motive over good health decisions which should be based on the scientific method that has been side tracked. The gate keepers must be awakened from their long sleep. NOW!
biden pardoned him. whether or not the pardon was legal or not is the first step to determine what the 2nd step is. This country has gone after his number 1 man. I'm sure they will go after many more. I just hope it all happens in time for Fauci to realize his reputation and legacy have been trashed beyond repair. Nothing hits a narcissists any harder.
Prior to fauci's aids flapdoodle we had Nixon' s war on cancer. Bunches of money handed over to wannabe scientific amateurs who after a decade or so had not saved a single life but blew thru millions.. In my mind this was the beginning of what you describe here as I was watching in unfold working as a tech in a major cancer treatment institute.
Kudos to Dr. Malone for writing this from a peaceful place. I cannot read it from one.
First:
A modest suggestion for the benefit of all: no paywall on taxpayer-funded research. Hat tip to William F. Buckley: “I’d rather get medical advice and insights from Dr. Malone’s posse than the entire population of the DC medical bureaucracy.
The 1955 Cutter event simultaneously explains why Salk never received a Nobel Prize, how tumor-inducing/causing African Green Monkey Simian Virus 40 was intentionally placed in the unnecessary Polio Vaccine, and why ace researcher and SV-40 whistleblower Bernice Eddy was airbrushed out of the bureaucratic history. (The same SV-40 that McKernan, Spiecher, and Rose found in Pfizer and Moderna vax). Psych test: Don’t think about Turbo-cancer.
It is the Rosetta Stone for the PharmaBlob and Gubmint business model: hype an unnecessary solution to a problem the solution caused and sell an unsuccessful cure.
No accountability no penalty for failure as the Blob is handing out Sovereign Immunity like party favors - they will do it again.
I just got back from lunch at a Tibetan restaurant and read a quote from the Dali Lama about peace. A great directive, maintaining peace inside while the outside goes nuts. Practice, practice.
So much to think about and understand. During 70s, 80s,90s, 2010s, basic science was undergoing massive changes first isolating enzymes from biological sources and getting not large amounts, then DNA sequencing, then producing large amounts of protein enzymes in E. Coli from their piece of DNA, then getting enzyme X-ray structures in our case at Argonne National Labs. Then doing site directed mutagenesis to understand reaction mechanisms.
So not in the realm you are describing as evolving in the same period. However, subsequently experiencing via Covid shot, impairments, I know we get what you are explaining. Especially helpful some of the bibliography describing legislation and naming groups such as Gates influencing vaccination, etc.
I can hardly believe Kennedy has survived this to Fight it! And others such as yourself. What about Rand Paul taking on Fauci in hearings. Great to watch.
I think many of us have gotten the message as to what we are dealing with. As far as our docs, often ok if fixing a broken bone or dealing with a pretty well understood organ, but telling you cholesterol is bad for you, when it is in the same pathway as estrogen and testosterone and all over your body purposefully in membranes, no way. How much money has been made by Pharma with this fantasy problem. We taught med students who really don’t recall their biochemistry.
At any rate I will study this material you provided to solidify my understanding of the process which moved us into a pretty dangerous governmental setup over the decades.
As a physician, I have one basic rule if called to testify before Congress: do not scream at a publicly elected official. Fauci’s outburst at Senator Paul was disgraceful. His defense — that the work was not “gain-of-function” research — was weak at best.
I am not citing my nearly three-decade-old article to promote it: Smith SM, Markham RB, Jeang KT. Conditional reduction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by a gain-of-herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. I cite it only to establish my bona fides on the meaning of “gain of function.”
As I remember Fauci’s argument, it was essentially this: because the investigators already had a molecular clone of the virus, swapping in envelope genes from other biological clones did not constitute gain-of-function research. But that argument fails the obvious test: if the experiment was not intended to improve function, why do it?
Perhaps the better term would be IOF — improvement-of-function — rather than GOF. Either way, the biological point is the same. In the 2017 Wuhan paper, the investigators were trying to make a better molecular clone. They did not hide it.
A quick explanation may help. Biological clones are not perfectly uniform. They are populations of closely related viruses grown in culture media. The viruses are of the same general type, but they contain subtle differences that may allow some variants to grow better in tissue culture. A molecular clone, by contrast, is produced by taking viral DNA from a biological clone, inserting that DNA into a plasmid, and hoping that the plasmid contains the right viral sequence. And make viruses, all identical, from that DNA. Once a usable molecular clone is obtained, investigators can then manipulate it.
When a molecular clone is weak, one common approach is to swap out portions of the genome, especially env, the gene encoding the envelope protein, using sequences from biological clones. The modified molecular clones are then tested to see whether they grow better than the original construct.
That is what the Wuhan investigators were doing in 2017. They were trying to generate a “better” molecular clone — one that functioned more effectively than the starting construct. To insist that this was not gain-of-function research is, at best, semantic gamesmanship. Whether one calls it gain-of-function, improvement-of-function, or something else, the scientific point is the same: the experiment was designed to produce a molecular clone of virus with improved functional properties.
The broader point is simpler. A physician should not shout at a United States senator during congressional testimony, especially when that physician is a federal employee.
Doctors and others complain about American's lost of faith in Medicine. Well, it was well earn.
Stephen M. Smith, M.D.
P.S. - That article I cited was done at NIAID, in the building across the street from Dr. Fauci's.
After reading about the AIDS times relating to Fauci and where/how he pushed a "medicine" for money (*AZT) and which was killing patients earlier than without treatment, and discovered how he followed the EXACT same pattern with covid and remdesivir, and which took more than 8 years for the truth to finally be revealed, well.... I can only say he's one of the top most evil men to hold position in this country. Whether he pays here on earth or not, when Judgment Day comes he will pay a very, very great price I'm afraid. Frankly, as much as I despise the man I still wouldn't wish all eternity in hell on anyone. I pray he finds salvation before it's too late. But I don't think he's searching for it...
And I pray for more in the sewer, of money instead of science and truth, will come to the truth. I have grandkids I'm concerned for should the Lord tarry.
*There is a great article by Celia Farber in Spin Magazine about Fauci and the AZT scandal. I believe the original article has been revised to reduce Fauci's corruption compared to when I first read it years ago. But I can't prove that.
OMG! What a great & needed post. Now this is what ‘facism’ really is. The indictment of Morens brought back to my mind all the impressions I had during his testimony before Congress. Aside from the total disregard for the law (FOIA), I found it hard to believe Morens was capable of being the janitor, much less 2nd in command. Whatever Fauci’s failings, at least, there was a sense of some smarts. “What Fauci did, which the institutional pressures of his role forced him to do, and which his particular temperament made him exceptionally effective at doing”. & therein lies the inevitable poison pill of all the ‘-isms”. In order to keep the narrative going you have to have a bunch of ‘useful idiots’ & that is when the tower collapses - when the institution itself becomes the end game. The real culprit here though is the underlying assumption/cause that there is anything good that could come from or thru the collective. The outlier component here is academia. Wonder how long it will take Morens to flip on Fauci?
Your description of the research environment of 3 and 4 decades ago comports pretty well with my memories of the time. The feeling that newer researchers could still falsify previously respected edifices of 'science' did still exist during my research years.
But I also had the strong impression that many grad students, post doctoral fellows, and professors were like extreme groupies, or religious cult members. This behavior at the associated med school seemed even more pronounced. Sucking up seemed to be the way to get ahead.
Remembering Fauci though the HIV phase of his career, I can't say that he's a creature of his environment, acting as it directed him to do. I do hold him responsible for a good deal of immoral agency. A lot of what Rothbard says about the downsides of fostering and regulating research is true. My tiny brain hooks his forecasting with that of Eisenhower and the military industrial complex.
How do we retain the self regulatory spirit exhibited at Asilomar, without quashing the spirit of free inquiry?
Sadly it seems the cycles of creation and destruction will always occur on account of human nature. Lengthening the creative portion of the cycle is outside of the purview of science.
It has to do with our view of ourselves as creations with intrinsic worth and obligations.
I don't think the Fauci-like individuals see the rest of us this way.
The Fauci NIH approved experiments on hundreds of New York City orphans. Government agencies and pharmaceutical companies used the orphans in deadly AIDS drug trials.
In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.
They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used). [LINK]
A hospital nurse later spoke out to reporters about the testing. She reported that children would immediately get sick, break out or throw up during the testing.
They were orphans at the Incarnation Children’s Center in New York City.
On Tuesday The Gateway Pundit reported on Dr. Fauci’s torture and medical murder of at least 85 orphan minority children in New York, children who were vulnerable, could not consent, and who would not be missed.
John Guy: Everything you wrote above is true. The documentation is correct and is all there for anyone to read.
My heart just breaks for those poor, defenseless children!!
You wonder how a person like Dr. Fauci can continue all those years doing those terrible things to people and to animals and get away with it. It seems as though no one can touch him. As though someone were protecting him.
Being given immunity by the EPI – PEN will not survive the legality test of the Supreme Court. My prayer is that someone in the DOJ is currently collecting evidence on Dr. Fauci now. And that we will hear about an indictment against him sometime in 2026.
For those that love the truth, it would give us some hope that our government is moving in the right direction to right all of these wrongs that took place between 2020 and 2024.
If I had been reading the incredible list of references you display instead of philosophy and inner reflections, (which was my path, instead of science) I would be more knowledgeable of people like Rothbard. "We will be a generation rebuilding what was destroyed" gives me hope for the determination and possibility of humanity taking another step towards awakening out of the self-induced slumber that seems so hard to shake off. Never stop learning, inside and out.
I liked the article. I have one area I disagree with:
" The first claim, which I do not make, is that the COVID pandemic was itself deliberately engineered as a pretext for an authoritarian power grab. The evidence I have seen is consistent with a research accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, of a kind whose probability was raised (perhaps to near-certainty) by the funding and structure of the gain-of-function research program that Fauci and Peter Daszak collaboratively built. That is a serious enough indictment without inflating it."
I am all for never extending the claims beyond the facts. That happens too often these days. I don't believe that this is one of those cases.
1) WEF held a practice coronavirus pandemic the same month as it started to spread.
2) The claims of the accident were months later. If you are going to claim an accident, why not be truthful in all accounts.
3) The response was authoritarian when it didn't need to be. 98% chance of survival with an initial R0 of 2.5 does not warrant anything more than a strong flu. You don't need remsivire to make it worse. You don't send people to nursing homes with common ventilation systems unless you want to make it worse.
4) Everything they did was to create hysteria and the governments place is to keep people calm.
5) The WHO 2019 pandemic playbook was not followed at all (open borders, don't vaccinate during a pandemic, protect the vulnerable and let the strong 'burn out the virus'.
I believe that all of these prove that this was intentional, not an accident they would want to hide.
Mike Myhre: you make excellent points. Well it is true, they would carry little weight in a court of law, for the rest of us 99%, it's brilliant logic, wisdom, and deduction.
I looked up "what is a pandemic", at the time. Turns out a world pandemic kills 20% of the population. I then did the research and figured out how many people died from Covid, and it was less than 98%.
It does not take a metal giant to reach the conclusion of truth, that's something doesn't add up. There's some other agenda going on. It was at this point my husband and I refused to take the vaccination. He was threatened with job loss. We still refused. We prayed. We waited on the Lord. A few months later the Supreme Court handed down a decision that the government could not make corporations fire people because they wouldn't take the shot. My husband kept his job.
As we started studying and researching other aspects of the corona-19 virus, we begin to see the "take over" of science, which probably began 100 years ago or so. Gradually, is more men and women took the easy way out, or became corrupt, and lost their Christian morals and integrity----the majority of doctors and scientists could easily be bought by government grant money or pharmaceutical grant money.
The only reason they got away with all of it, and that's including Bill Gates, the club of Rome, and the WEC, is because people trusted their government.
That trust is no longer there. Only to truly stupid in the gullible still trust in the medical establishment, the pharmaceutical companies, Microsoft, Apple, Silicon Valley, and the eventual total control they will exert over every human being.
I followed & listened to Dr. Vladimir Zelenko early-on. When he reported on his success treating his patients with covid with HCQ/Zinc & Azithromycin, with nearly every one of them recovering, unless they came to him late in the infection, &/or had other serious co-morbidities, I knew it was a treatable infection. Soon thereafter, it was known that the infection had a 99+% recovery rate. Even for those 70+ years, the recovery was 94.5%. At that point, I decided to research Fauci's history & realized that he was using the same exact playbook as he did in the 80s with AIDS. I then knew that we were all being played, BIG TIME. Dr. Zelenko even sent a letter to Trump, outlining his protocol & success, which is why Trump started to promote the use of HCQ. I actually have a copy of that letter. By itself, HCQ was limited in its effectiveness. They key was the addition of the zinc. This was all known in the spring of 2020. At the same time, I also found an article in the journal, Virology, produced by the NIH, from Aug, 2005, the title of which states that chloroquine (& by extension, that would include hydroxychlotoquine) is a potent inhibitor of coronavirus. The lies, by both omission & by commission, were truly breathtaking in their scope.
While I tend to agree with your conclusion, Mike, please remember that evidence, even a compilation of indications, is not proof. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." [Carl Sagan, cf. Occam's Razor] Which is why, to maintain their professional integrity, Drs. Malone, must refrain from echoing the plandemic claim.
Finally, it is best to, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." [Hanlon's Razor]
I agree with you entirely. There is however middle ground and that is investigate the 'compilation of indications' rather than continue to claim accident. Or at least claim there is enough evidence that a thorough investigation is required. We have one indictment and Fauci should be another. These things are knowable, but the resistance to discover is suppressed (another indication to add to the compilation).
Malice/Stupidity - If someone is constantly 'stupid' they should be removed from their position for the same reason as 'malice' because they have the same result.
Fascinating. The insight you provide into what I've accepted as "corporate capture" goes so much deeper. Thank you for revealing in detail "the long game".
For a brilliant, chilling and at times hilarious literary imagining of the soul of scientism, read "That Hideous Strength" by C S Lewis. Better still, listen to it (Geoffrey Howard's performance/Blackstone Audio Books.) You don't have to read the previous 2 in the the trilogy to appreciate it. John Wither and Professor Augustus Frost together provide a prescient preview of high priest Dr Anthony Fauci. From Wiki:
John Wither – Long-winded bureaucrat and Deputy Director of the N.I.C.E. He is the true leader of the N.I.C.E. (National Institute for Co-ordinated Experiments) and a servant of the Macrobes. Long association with them has "withered" his mind, and his speech and thinking are characterized by thought-deadening vagueness and jargon.
Professor Augustus Frost – A psychologist and assistant to Wither, he is the only other N.I.C.E initiate who knows the true nature of the Head and of the Macrobes. He is coldhearted and unemotional and he has an exact, precise manner of speech and thinking.
I continually learn new, unexpected things about you, Dr. Malone! I never thought I'd see Murray Rothbard and the Austrian School of Economics mentioned in your Substack. I stand (happily) corrected.
I often listen to Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (Darkhorse podcast) and they have been extremely vocal about what science is and is not, and how the scientific method has been all but overthrown For this, of course, they are attacked and vilified. No matter, they're all about truth and especially truth in science.
I have long believed that the government does not belong in the funding business, not for science, not for the arts. We've seen how it turns out: government picks winners and losers, often to the detriment of the public. I've heard arguments that it's better than funding by the private sector (the history is rich in the Florentine era) because being "public money", it's actually funded by the public (taxpayers). It is not. It is funded by the bureaucrats who wield the money, and as pointed out, it's doomed to corruption.
"Rothbard understood that the state’s natural condition is to seek out, and where necessary manufacture, crises that justify emergency expansions of its authority." Oh, how well we've seen this over the past many decades! And we're seeing it again in Iran. What is the next crisis? And what is it being manufactured to hide? Central banks were formed to serve the state's wars, and they've done a smashing job of that, selling arms to both sides, selling each state into poverty, taking the citizenry with them.
There's a reason--many reasons--that our founders wanted a limited federal government. Unfortunately, we've ignored them, both the founders and the reasons, and ended up where they told us we should not go.
My big question for the libertarians has always been: Why do you expect "non-government" human organizations (businesses) to function that much differently than government ones ("the state")? They are both human organizations, and it would seem to me would both be likely to fall into the same - or similar - traps. Businesses - especially very large ones - have many functions and concerns that overlap with those of The State. They employ large numbers of people, control many resources (land, water, buildings, machines), and make economic (and indeed political) decisions that affect the masses, not just their customers. They have their own bureaucracies and command structures.
So, how will minimizing The State really solve our biggest human problems? It seems to me The State is just a convenient whipping boy.
The state's function is to get bigger, and as corporations are a creation of the state, they tend to function the same way. It's called fascism.
Yes, both government and businesses are run by humans, but they have different motivations. Churches are also run by humans but charity doesn't usually extend to buying their houses and providing them with food for the rest of their lives.
There will always be humans that seek to do good and those who look out for Number One. What I've found is that those with libertarian leanings aren't so likely to tell someone else how they should live. Most of the libertarians I know do not believe that we can live without any government structure (though anarco-libertarians definitely exist), but believe in extremely limited government.
Libertarians count on competition with reasonable oversight in what they call 'The Marketplace of Ideas'. Trust humans they say, but mostly trust competition and the people's power of choosing. Or not choosing. It is not perfect, but it is much better than one entity with all the powers of the country, to make those decisions or even run that process. That's insane....and that's what we have.
But we DON'T have "one entity with all the powers." Not in America. We still have a lot of power held at state and local levels, but also in the corporate world. What we do have - and have had for a long time - is a rather unfair game. Some competitors are favored much more than others. But we also have criminal elements that "game the system" to the point now where they are nearly out of control.
Politicians will respond - when they do - with either an anti-crime program (more favored by conservatives) or a welfare program (more favored by liberals). But this usually only results in the expansion of government. These are both incorrect solutions to the problem of organized crime.
I'm not saying that libertarian ideas are not appealing. I'm just saying that they don't adequately confront the reality of the situation. Neither do conservative or liberal ideas. They all fall short.
The state's function IS NOT to expand itself! That's a corporate function. Governments have often been the creation of corporate interests, and when they are, their main purpose is to control the populace, as corporate practices tend to be unpopular.
Where does it say in the U.S. Constitution (for instance) that the federal government must expand itself? It doesn't say that because the original intention was to create a government that would protect us against corporate interests. I think it is fairly clear that our government has been largely taken over by corporate interests. Most governments are. I don't see The State on the top of the heap here, and I don't understand why so many want to put it there.
I think governments are wanted by people to protect them from organized crime. And that organized crime, unfortunately, includes many corporations. The criminals then obviously have an interest in taking over government and quite often succeed to a greater or lesser degree.
And I don't think a belief in limited government, by itself, will protect us from the vagaries of organized crime, particularly when it appears as corporate entities that supply us with things we all need.
Joy, you might be interested in perusaling some of Dr. Malone's other writings where he mentions Rothbard here and there.
In general I agree. As you said they’re both human institutions so why would be expect otherwise? If I recall, as a physician, I’m considered to be a “professional” which has lost its original meaning. People like me, lawyers, teachers, legislators etc who have power over the vulnerable are called to “profess” that they will use that power for the benefit of others and not their own. One expects businessmen to look out for themselves but professionals are called to a higher standard. This seems to have been corrupted or at least, totally forgotten in our culture.
I'm assuming you were responding to Larry?
Yes, oops. How did that happen?
If you address who you are replying to, that helps clarify. The responses don't automatically correspond to the addressee.
Eventually: all adults get to ECONOMIC THEORY.. either VON MISES and the Austrian school or the OTHER SCHOOL aka MARXIST.. I did after I met a LEFT WING ECONOMIST.. who went to American U. totally brainwashed as young student and got into BIG TROUBLE w/ SDS. I didn't know him when he went to American U.. we met as adults long story RIP. (Students for a Democratic Society in DC).. I stayed away. :)
fascinating post. but I can't sit at my computer much longer.
Dr. Malone
An anecdote if I may.
When COVID hit in early 2020, I was seeing an elderly hospice patient in her son's home. He advised me, with a severe countenance, that what was happening was related to the "deep state". I didn't even know what that was, and as you can imagine, I looked at him like he was a bit crazy. He told me that in his past life, he had been an event planner who had sometimes organized meetings for them throughout the world (often on remote islands) for planning sessions related to the things like we were then experiencing. At the time I took what he said with a grain of salt (whatever that means), but within a year or two, with what I learned from listening to you, Dr. Peter McCullough, RFK Jr, and many others, I slowly came to realize that he really knew what he was talking about. I have to admit that if the underlying secular humanistic "ethics" I imbibed from my training, the one that currently pervades medicine and our culture (that often justifies the killing of the innocent through abortion and euthanasia), does not return to the natural law contained within an authentic Christian ethics, the one that was proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights..." (see a recent book by John G. West, called The Bible, Science, and the Battle for America's Soul) then I am very pessimistic about what can be done to truly remedy the situation, but applaud your efforts. Being a hospice physician, who's had to review the situation of patients and advise them on their prognosis and viable options, the only way forward that I can see is that we need a sincere revival in Christ!
Yaaaaa, mixing the killing and the healing goes against the natural law, and against the intrinsic worth that our Creator instilled in us.
Jesus had the hardest teachings of all, that we should not even think about decreased human worth nor about any harm nor murder.
Yes, the point about the Hippocratic oath was that at his time back then in Greece, patients couldn’t be sure if their physician would try to cure or kill them. We’ve returned to those times.
Yaaaaa,
(Proclaiming that got me cancelled years ago.)
People still act surprised to hear that the Hippocratic oath is no longer in force. It had been gone from almost all med schools by the 80s specifically to accommodate the abortion and euthanasia.
Yes, without even being given the oath beforehand, being made aware of what was contained within it, and how it differed from the Hippocratic oath, my medical class from the University of Toronto in 1978 swore to the Oath of Geneva. At that time, being an agnostic, I didn't appreciate the significance of what it really meant to take an oath. Now I do, and I realize that I was totally dependent on those who were my teachers to lead me in the right path. But what happens when the blind are leading the blind?
Doc---- a comment on your last sentence about the blind leading the blind. Sometimes those in positions of power are not blind but.....they are truly evil so.......you have the evil leading the blind which results in something worse than the blind leading the blind.
Seems the oath was just window dressing at the time, maybe to appease those who funded or fostered the education of a lot of the medical students.
It could be beneficial for people to learn about the changes in your thinking over the course of your career and life.
Graduating from a Catholic medical school (St. Louis University) in 1977, weeks got & sas I’d the Hippocratic oath for which I have been increasingly grateful.
That’s for sure.
A revival in Christ is truly the answer, as this is a spiritual war against the forces of darkness. Dr. Malone points out that he does not believe this was an orchestrated event to allow authoritarianism, which may be correct. However, Satan will exploit these human weaknesses to promote its agenda, which is the destruction and division of humanity. Most of the world does not believe in the Enemy, which enables its success. For those who don't believe in the devil, read The War Against Humanity by Anonymous Patriot. For those who do, read the book to learn how to defeat it.
Thanks Christopher! I agree totally.
If you haven't done so you might want to check out the Exorcist Files podcast with Father Carlos Martins and also Father Dan Reehil and Father Chad Ripperger.
Incredible stories.
I have, and they know what most of the world does not. The book I recommended uses the same principles of demonology that Father Ripperger outlines in his book Dominion. The author applies those principles to the last two thousand years of human history to demonstrate that this is another period of darkness due to man's collective sins and lack of faith. The book uses the Old Testament to show the pattern, and the New Testament to provide the solution.
Mr. Quick----a couple of facts that anyone who spends much time to reading the Bible can attest as true.
1. God determined what was right and correct/wrong since the time he created earth and he is unchanged since then.
2. If you study the New Testament it is clear that Jesus spent quite a lot of time dealing with demons and the trouble they cause. But...... I think if you would inquire among people who consider themselves to be Christians and ask them if there are still demons loose on this earth, I believe most and possibly a very high % would say that demons are no longer any issue and do not currently exist. But....if the devil has dominion over the earth at this time----which I understand the devil, we will have him and his demons with us until Christ returns so......I also believe that a lot of the issues surrounding us today are because of demons and.....like they did in the early Church after Christ's death and his rise from the dead we need to actively fight against them with the assistance and support of the Holy Spirit.
Correct. The book The War Against Humanity by Anonymous Patriot was written expressly to convince Christians that demons are real, still currently exist and are responsible for most of the issues surrounding us today. The author takes just about every reference to Satan and demons in the Old and New Testament and combines them to argue that we need to actively fight them with the support of the Holy Spirit. Hopefully the book will achieve its purpose, which is to increase the number of Christians who believe and understand Evil, thereby enabling them to fight actively against it. You can only defeat the Enemy if you believe in the Enemy.
I agree, Howard. Science with no soul cannot be true science. The Rothbardian denouement is one of a spiritually bankrupt civilization, or one that has translocated the aim of its worship from where it should be to Mammon.
AMEN to that :)
The Covid era was a catastrophe indeed: a man-made catastrophe. I’m not talking about any virus that may or may not have been made or existed. The catastrophe was the collective reaction by the govt(s), media, and fellow citizens.
Great read Doc! The indictment of Morens has me hoping he is shitting his pants at the time he might get from his possible sentence if found guilty (which should be a slam dunk) and has him singing like a canary so he can weasel out of his sentence but finally shows how Daszak and Collins were integral for Fauci to pull off what he did to us Americans. I want these three sitting in a cell for the rest of their lives for what they did. Getting Fauci of course seems slim as he parades around with that Auto-pen pardon he received when Biden was driving across town to Trumps inauguration. I think it should be challenged though and he surely has done illegal things even before Covid that most likely could get him indicted. There isn’t any reason for these three to be free men. Fauci by the way is doing the exact same thing right now living in Italy. Yup, for those that don’t know he’s over there running their version of the HHS. Still making sure everyone gets their Covid shots as they get produced. It’s appalling really. Keep up the good fight Doc. It’s a hard thing to do especially when it seems pointless because nobody is being held accountable for the scam they pulled on us all.
Mr. Schwartz----I would also be perfectly fine with the 3 people you mention, hanging from a light pole in the middle of DC so everyone can see these evil people get their just rewards.
This would not be considered revenge but justice for all of their evil deeds.
I’ve fantasized about their heads on pikes but a public hanging would also be acceptable.
Thank you Dr. Malone! Clarity of analysis of the greatest affront to humanities existence is a seminal moment in time that must be ceased and acted upon. The question is how do we stop this race to oblivion wrapped in scientism? How do we awaken our Executive branch and our Legislative branch to this medical travesty that is still actively being expanded and controlled for the profit motive over good health decisions which should be based on the scientific method that has been side tracked. The gate keepers must be awakened from their long sleep. NOW!
Why Oh Why can't we put FAUCI = Doctor Death in PRISON ?
biden pardoned him. whether or not the pardon was legal or not is the first step to determine what the 2nd step is. This country has gone after his number 1 man. I'm sure they will go after many more. I just hope it all happens in time for Fauci to realize his reputation and legacy have been trashed beyond repair. Nothing hits a narcissists any harder.
Ask Murray Rothbard.
Prior to fauci's aids flapdoodle we had Nixon' s war on cancer. Bunches of money handed over to wannabe scientific amateurs who after a decade or so had not saved a single life but blew thru millions.. In my mind this was the beginning of what you describe here as I was watching in unfold working as a tech in a major cancer treatment institute.
Kudos to Dr. Malone for writing this from a peaceful place. I cannot read it from one.
First:
A modest suggestion for the benefit of all: no paywall on taxpayer-funded research. Hat tip to William F. Buckley: “I’d rather get medical advice and insights from Dr. Malone’s posse than the entire population of the DC medical bureaucracy.
The 1955 Cutter event simultaneously explains why Salk never received a Nobel Prize, how tumor-inducing/causing African Green Monkey Simian Virus 40 was intentionally placed in the unnecessary Polio Vaccine, and why ace researcher and SV-40 whistleblower Bernice Eddy was airbrushed out of the bureaucratic history. (The same SV-40 that McKernan, Spiecher, and Rose found in Pfizer and Moderna vax). Psych test: Don’t think about Turbo-cancer.
It is the Rosetta Stone for the PharmaBlob and Gubmint business model: hype an unnecessary solution to a problem the solution caused and sell an unsuccessful cure.
No accountability no penalty for failure as the Blob is handing out Sovereign Immunity like party favors - they will do it again.
I just got back from lunch at a Tibetan restaurant and read a quote from the Dali Lama about peace. A great directive, maintaining peace inside while the outside goes nuts. Practice, practice.
So much to think about and understand. During 70s, 80s,90s, 2010s, basic science was undergoing massive changes first isolating enzymes from biological sources and getting not large amounts, then DNA sequencing, then producing large amounts of protein enzymes in E. Coli from their piece of DNA, then getting enzyme X-ray structures in our case at Argonne National Labs. Then doing site directed mutagenesis to understand reaction mechanisms.
So not in the realm you are describing as evolving in the same period. However, subsequently experiencing via Covid shot, impairments, I know we get what you are explaining. Especially helpful some of the bibliography describing legislation and naming groups such as Gates influencing vaccination, etc.
I can hardly believe Kennedy has survived this to Fight it! And others such as yourself. What about Rand Paul taking on Fauci in hearings. Great to watch.
I think many of us have gotten the message as to what we are dealing with. As far as our docs, often ok if fixing a broken bone or dealing with a pretty well understood organ, but telling you cholesterol is bad for you, when it is in the same pathway as estrogen and testosterone and all over your body purposefully in membranes, no way. How much money has been made by Pharma with this fantasy problem. We taught med students who really don’t recall their biochemistry.
At any rate I will study this material you provided to solidify my understanding of the process which moved us into a pretty dangerous governmental setup over the decades.
Hello Jennifer,
As a physician, I have one basic rule if called to testify before Congress: do not scream at a publicly elected official. Fauci’s outburst at Senator Paul was disgraceful. His defense — that the work was not “gain-of-function” research — was weak at best.
I am not citing my nearly three-decade-old article to promote it: Smith SM, Markham RB, Jeang KT. Conditional reduction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by a gain-of-herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. I cite it only to establish my bona fides on the meaning of “gain of function.”
As I remember Fauci’s argument, it was essentially this: because the investigators already had a molecular clone of the virus, swapping in envelope genes from other biological clones did not constitute gain-of-function research. But that argument fails the obvious test: if the experiment was not intended to improve function, why do it?
Perhaps the better term would be IOF — improvement-of-function — rather than GOF. Either way, the biological point is the same. In the 2017 Wuhan paper, the investigators were trying to make a better molecular clone. They did not hide it.
A quick explanation may help. Biological clones are not perfectly uniform. They are populations of closely related viruses grown in culture media. The viruses are of the same general type, but they contain subtle differences that may allow some variants to grow better in tissue culture. A molecular clone, by contrast, is produced by taking viral DNA from a biological clone, inserting that DNA into a plasmid, and hoping that the plasmid contains the right viral sequence. And make viruses, all identical, from that DNA. Once a usable molecular clone is obtained, investigators can then manipulate it.
When a molecular clone is weak, one common approach is to swap out portions of the genome, especially env, the gene encoding the envelope protein, using sequences from biological clones. The modified molecular clones are then tested to see whether they grow better than the original construct.
That is what the Wuhan investigators were doing in 2017. They were trying to generate a “better” molecular clone — one that functioned more effectively than the starting construct. To insist that this was not gain-of-function research is, at best, semantic gamesmanship. Whether one calls it gain-of-function, improvement-of-function, or something else, the scientific point is the same: the experiment was designed to produce a molecular clone of virus with improved functional properties.
The broader point is simpler. A physician should not shout at a United States senator during congressional testimony, especially when that physician is a federal employee.
Doctors and others complain about American's lost of faith in Medicine. Well, it was well earn.
Stephen M. Smith, M.D.
P.S. - That article I cited was done at NIAID, in the building across the street from Dr. Fauci's.
After reading about the AIDS times relating to Fauci and where/how he pushed a "medicine" for money (*AZT) and which was killing patients earlier than without treatment, and discovered how he followed the EXACT same pattern with covid and remdesivir, and which took more than 8 years for the truth to finally be revealed, well.... I can only say he's one of the top most evil men to hold position in this country. Whether he pays here on earth or not, when Judgment Day comes he will pay a very, very great price I'm afraid. Frankly, as much as I despise the man I still wouldn't wish all eternity in hell on anyone. I pray he finds salvation before it's too late. But I don't think he's searching for it...
And I pray for more in the sewer, of money instead of science and truth, will come to the truth. I have grandkids I'm concerned for should the Lord tarry.
*There is a great article by Celia Farber in Spin Magazine about Fauci and the AZT scandal. I believe the original article has been revised to reduce Fauci's corruption compared to when I first read it years ago. But I can't prove that.
OMG! What a great & needed post. Now this is what ‘facism’ really is. The indictment of Morens brought back to my mind all the impressions I had during his testimony before Congress. Aside from the total disregard for the law (FOIA), I found it hard to believe Morens was capable of being the janitor, much less 2nd in command. Whatever Fauci’s failings, at least, there was a sense of some smarts. “What Fauci did, which the institutional pressures of his role forced him to do, and which his particular temperament made him exceptionally effective at doing”. & therein lies the inevitable poison pill of all the ‘-isms”. In order to keep the narrative going you have to have a bunch of ‘useful idiots’ & that is when the tower collapses - when the institution itself becomes the end game. The real culprit here though is the underlying assumption/cause that there is anything good that could come from or thru the collective. The outlier component here is academia. Wonder how long it will take Morens to flip on Fauci?
one can dream...
Your description of the research environment of 3 and 4 decades ago comports pretty well with my memories of the time. The feeling that newer researchers could still falsify previously respected edifices of 'science' did still exist during my research years.
But I also had the strong impression that many grad students, post doctoral fellows, and professors were like extreme groupies, or religious cult members. This behavior at the associated med school seemed even more pronounced. Sucking up seemed to be the way to get ahead.
Remembering Fauci though the HIV phase of his career, I can't say that he's a creature of his environment, acting as it directed him to do. I do hold him responsible for a good deal of immoral agency. A lot of what Rothbard says about the downsides of fostering and regulating research is true. My tiny brain hooks his forecasting with that of Eisenhower and the military industrial complex.
How do we retain the self regulatory spirit exhibited at Asilomar, without quashing the spirit of free inquiry?
Sadly it seems the cycles of creation and destruction will always occur on account of human nature. Lengthening the creative portion of the cycle is outside of the purview of science.
It has to do with our view of ourselves as creations with intrinsic worth and obligations.
I don't think the Fauci-like individuals see the rest of us this way.
Cluster B personalities will do Cluster B stuff.
in a nutshell…..
That teaching about the millstones is for a huge reason.
Josef Mengele / AKA Fauci-funded research
—is he the worst monster America has ever known or is he a hero, as the Democrat Party would like us to believe?
Forgotten Monument to Dead Orphans from Fauci’s Torturous and Deadly AIDS Testing Is Located in New York State — HEART-BREAKING PHOTOS
RFK JR.: FAUCI Killed 85 kids, Fauci Killed, Tortured, Poor Minority Orphans in 1980s
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/guinea-pig-kids-aids-fauci-experiments/
In 2004 Dr. Fauci’s NIH was also caught funding experiments on AIDS orphans at a New York City hospital.
Fauci tested harsh chemotherapy drugs on orphan children in order to determine its use for AIDS treatments in the 1980s
Fauci got control of foster homes in 7 states
Children were tortured to death
Children were denied guardians and any kind of legal protector
Children who refused to take Fauci’s drugs had feeding tubes installed so drug companies could administer the drugs even when the kids fought back
Most of the children did not have HIV/AIDS, they were just used as guinea pigs to see if they could survive the harsh drug regimen
At least 85 kids died as part of these experiments
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/guinea-pig-kids-faucis-legacy-of-cruel-experiments-on-children-dead-babies-and-mass-graves/
The Fauci NIH approved experiments on hundreds of New York City orphans. Government agencies and pharmaceutical companies used the orphans in deadly AIDS drug trials.
In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials. VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.
They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used). [LINK]
https://iccinvestigation.wordpress.com/
A hospital nurse later spoke out to reporters about the testing. She reported that children would immediately get sick, break out or throw up during the testing.
They were orphans at the Incarnation Children’s Center in New York City.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyJLYPh9pxY&t=1471s
On Tuesday The Gateway Pundit reported on Dr. Fauci’s torture and medical murder of at least 85 orphan minority children in New York, children who were vulnerable, could not consent, and who would not be missed.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/shocking-rfk-jr-claims-fauci-killed-tortured-poor-minority-orphans-1980s/
Ann Rosen at LifeSiteNews wrote a good recap of Fauci’s crimes against children earlier this month.
John Guy: Everything you wrote above is true. The documentation is correct and is all there for anyone to read.
My heart just breaks for those poor, defenseless children!!
You wonder how a person like Dr. Fauci can continue all those years doing those terrible things to people and to animals and get away with it. It seems as though no one can touch him. As though someone were protecting him.
Being given immunity by the EPI – PEN will not survive the legality test of the Supreme Court. My prayer is that someone in the DOJ is currently collecting evidence on Dr. Fauci now. And that we will hear about an indictment against him sometime in 2026.
For those that love the truth, it would give us some hope that our government is moving in the right direction to right all of these wrongs that took place between 2020 and 2024.
Thanks for this unbelievable record of evil doings
If I had been reading the incredible list of references you display instead of philosophy and inner reflections, (which was my path, instead of science) I would be more knowledgeable of people like Rothbard. "We will be a generation rebuilding what was destroyed" gives me hope for the determination and possibility of humanity taking another step towards awakening out of the self-induced slumber that seems so hard to shake off. Never stop learning, inside and out.
So … am I just documenting this for the sake of the historical record, then? https://ageofdisinformation.substack.com/p/mkultra-lives-nimh-funds-unethical?r=maeol&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
excellent. I will cross-post later to try to help amplify your work.
Thank you so much, I appreciate you a ton ❤️🙏🏻
Is Congresswoman Anna Paulina the only one who does anything in DC?
I liked the article. I have one area I disagree with:
" The first claim, which I do not make, is that the COVID pandemic was itself deliberately engineered as a pretext for an authoritarian power grab. The evidence I have seen is consistent with a research accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, of a kind whose probability was raised (perhaps to near-certainty) by the funding and structure of the gain-of-function research program that Fauci and Peter Daszak collaboratively built. That is a serious enough indictment without inflating it."
I am all for never extending the claims beyond the facts. That happens too often these days. I don't believe that this is one of those cases.
1) WEF held a practice coronavirus pandemic the same month as it started to spread.
2) The claims of the accident were months later. If you are going to claim an accident, why not be truthful in all accounts.
3) The response was authoritarian when it didn't need to be. 98% chance of survival with an initial R0 of 2.5 does not warrant anything more than a strong flu. You don't need remsivire to make it worse. You don't send people to nursing homes with common ventilation systems unless you want to make it worse.
4) Everything they did was to create hysteria and the governments place is to keep people calm.
5) The WHO 2019 pandemic playbook was not followed at all (open borders, don't vaccinate during a pandemic, protect the vulnerable and let the strong 'burn out the virus'.
I believe that all of these prove that this was intentional, not an accident they would want to hide.
Mike Myhre: you make excellent points. Well it is true, they would carry little weight in a court of law, for the rest of us 99%, it's brilliant logic, wisdom, and deduction.
I looked up "what is a pandemic", at the time. Turns out a world pandemic kills 20% of the population. I then did the research and figured out how many people died from Covid, and it was less than 98%.
It does not take a metal giant to reach the conclusion of truth, that's something doesn't add up. There's some other agenda going on. It was at this point my husband and I refused to take the vaccination. He was threatened with job loss. We still refused. We prayed. We waited on the Lord. A few months later the Supreme Court handed down a decision that the government could not make corporations fire people because they wouldn't take the shot. My husband kept his job.
As we started studying and researching other aspects of the corona-19 virus, we begin to see the "take over" of science, which probably began 100 years ago or so. Gradually, is more men and women took the easy way out, or became corrupt, and lost their Christian morals and integrity----the majority of doctors and scientists could easily be bought by government grant money or pharmaceutical grant money.
The only reason they got away with all of it, and that's including Bill Gates, the club of Rome, and the WEC, is because people trusted their government.
That trust is no longer there. Only to truly stupid in the gullible still trust in the medical establishment, the pharmaceutical companies, Microsoft, Apple, Silicon Valley, and the eventual total control they will exert over every human being.
I followed & listened to Dr. Vladimir Zelenko early-on. When he reported on his success treating his patients with covid with HCQ/Zinc & Azithromycin, with nearly every one of them recovering, unless they came to him late in the infection, &/or had other serious co-morbidities, I knew it was a treatable infection. Soon thereafter, it was known that the infection had a 99+% recovery rate. Even for those 70+ years, the recovery was 94.5%. At that point, I decided to research Fauci's history & realized that he was using the same exact playbook as he did in the 80s with AIDS. I then knew that we were all being played, BIG TIME. Dr. Zelenko even sent a letter to Trump, outlining his protocol & success, which is why Trump started to promote the use of HCQ. I actually have a copy of that letter. By itself, HCQ was limited in its effectiveness. They key was the addition of the zinc. This was all known in the spring of 2020. At the same time, I also found an article in the journal, Virology, produced by the NIH, from Aug, 2005, the title of which states that chloroquine (& by extension, that would include hydroxychlotoquine) is a potent inhibitor of coronavirus. The lies, by both omission & by commission, were truly breathtaking in their scope.
I am on the same page. Helped others write their exemption letters and they kept their jobs.
I think you meant 98% survived not died.
"If this keeps up, only 98% of us will remain!"
Yes, I meant less than 2% died. Some figures reported less than 1% died.
Sorry, I didn't word that very well.
The news and government and WHO and hospitals were acting like it was a 90% fatality rate. Too bad they aren't feeling the shame for being so wrong...
While I tend to agree with your conclusion, Mike, please remember that evidence, even a compilation of indications, is not proof. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." [Carl Sagan, cf. Occam's Razor] Which is why, to maintain their professional integrity, Drs. Malone, must refrain from echoing the plandemic claim.
Finally, it is best to, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." [Hanlon's Razor]
I agree with you entirely. There is however middle ground and that is investigate the 'compilation of indications' rather than continue to claim accident. Or at least claim there is enough evidence that a thorough investigation is required. We have one indictment and Fauci should be another. These things are knowable, but the resistance to discover is suppressed (another indication to add to the compilation).
Malice/Stupidity - If someone is constantly 'stupid' they should be removed from their position for the same reason as 'malice' because they have the same result.
I made a very similar list in my own comment. The complete flipping of the WHO pandemic playbook was particularly telling.
Fascinating. The insight you provide into what I've accepted as "corporate capture" goes so much deeper. Thank you for revealing in detail "the long game".
For a brilliant, chilling and at times hilarious literary imagining of the soul of scientism, read "That Hideous Strength" by C S Lewis. Better still, listen to it (Geoffrey Howard's performance/Blackstone Audio Books.) You don't have to read the previous 2 in the the trilogy to appreciate it. John Wither and Professor Augustus Frost together provide a prescient preview of high priest Dr Anthony Fauci. From Wiki:
John Wither – Long-winded bureaucrat and Deputy Director of the N.I.C.E. He is the true leader of the N.I.C.E. (National Institute for Co-ordinated Experiments) and a servant of the Macrobes. Long association with them has "withered" his mind, and his speech and thinking are characterized by thought-deadening vagueness and jargon.
Professor Augustus Frost – A psychologist and assistant to Wither, he is the only other N.I.C.E initiate who knows the true nature of the Head and of the Macrobes. He is coldhearted and unemotional and he has an exact, precise manner of speech and thinking.