Why would a medical professional who was responsible for injecting an individual with an mRNA injection which caused death report it through the system? When VAers reports 47.000 deaths which is probably less than 5% of total deaths actually occurring over the last 4 years not cause our medical leadership to demand an immediate moratorium on all injections until they are proven to be safe and actually have a positive treatment outcome over cheap repurposed drugs. That is the study NIH should demand.
According to Harvard Pilgrim, which did a VAERS study several years ago, the actual percentage of reported harms is less than 1%. You're being very generous. Harvard Pilgrim also created an easy-to-use system that would capture reported vaccine events. Not surprisingly, though maddeningly, the CDC refused to adopt it.
The workload and pressure from management dissuades the reporting of all sorts of adverse reactions. For example, stroke and DVT admissions of women on B.C. hormones largely went unreported, due to workload.
I used openvaers.com (which made data more accessible) in 2021. It helped me to make the decision to counsel others to avoid those mRNA jabs. I started with advising avoidance for 0-19 yo first, then 0-30 yo, and as data gathered, I determined that all would do well to avoid it.
I'm hoping the newer proposed systems allow more searchability and analysis, because the old systems are not good.
A more relevant reason, one that surprisingly doesn’t seem to be mentioned much, is not that doctors were knowingly complicit in evil, which is what you seem to imply, but a far more “practical” reason:
It’s a thankless task for any medical professional to enter a report into the database. There’s no reward for doing so; and even if there was, that alone should raise suspicion that they were being paid to enter data, thus increasing the risk of bogus records.
The same logic applies if there is a negative reward, or a punishment. This, I assert, is more often the case. At the very least, a person spends time to enter the information. Presumably he’s doing so on paid time. But this alone means he’s had to take time away from more valuable tasks, like actually treating patients. There are social and professional risks, too. Faultfinders and whistleblowers are seldom well received, even by their own (supposedly) teams, even if what they sound the alarm about might be a rather important issue. I won’t even get into the powerful institutional incentives for keeping mum about unfavorable events or information; you can find these for yourself. All told, Doc has powerful incentives to forget the whole thing ever happened. Other than some sense of altruistic duty, he has scant incentives to enter records into the database.
This, among other factors, is why we read about the claims that only 20%, or even as few as 1%, of incidents are ever reported.
Correct analysis. Many factors. All we need to acknowledge is that statical analysis confirms that any reporting system is a sample analysis with validity. Deniability keeps the great harm rolling.
They have played many games over the decades to minimize public knowledge over the harm that drugs and injections have been responsible for. FDA and CDC have been captivated by those they are responsible to monitor for safety.
The existing data was available in CSV files. However, they split the columns of the database into 3 separate files. But you can't easily merge them back together into one spreadsheet because the rows don't line up. In one CSV file a patient report may take up 1 row but in the corresponding CSV file the same patient report takes up 3 rows. So to even do basic column filters using excel you need a sophisticated statistical analysis software code to match up all of the rows to get one patient report per row. I assume that this was being done on purpose.
No.. it is because the most incompetent people work there.. and do not have clue as to who to set up a database of that scope.. that is a framework.. CSV files are nonsense.
In the ‘90s Barbara Lowe Fisher had a conference in Washington DC. A statistician who wrote books used in colleges worked for 3 years with his Representative to gain access to VAERS.
His daughter had reacted to the Hep B injection at birth (Dr insisted it wasn’t the vaccine!) She died in the drs office when given the Hep B at two months.
His closing statement about the VAERS statistics: “If any major corporation manipulated their statistics the way they do at VAERS, all of the officials would be in prison.”
He didn’t blame it on old outdated computers; he said deliberate manipulation of the statics.
I’m glad we have different people in charge of the data.
Barbara Loe Fisher, from the NVIC? She did a somewhat recent, in-depth interview, detailing the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. She was told, it was going through, no matter what and she did what she could to try to warn people and still does! So sad so many millions of Americans, have no idea... https://www.nvic.org/about/history
BTW, thehighwire.com is the broadcast arm of Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), and they've been suing the federal government for years--and winning--to get the information that they want to hide.
Thanks for sharing this amazing resource, Mrs. Itolaya! I just read their 30pg article on Measles. Can't wait to dive in more to their content. Found NVIC on Apple podcasts too. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nvic/id1363304170
I like their grassroots activity too. You can setup alerts for your state & be able to monitor bills & get their details, for issues affecting you at home. Truly an amazing resource!
Dr Malone: in a short time the FDA is going to pull the natural thyroid meds from the market. This was determined before the current administration. The only reason is so Big Pharma gets all the business. Many thousands of people depend on natural thyroid because they cannot tolerate the synthetic T4 drugs and that will be it for us. I don't know if Makary is even aware of all this and the nightmare that is about to hit so many. Can you bring this to his attention? We just want to be allowed to keep taking what has saved us
Yes. I have been taking a natural (Armour) thyroid for decades. Cannot take the artificial drug. Each time I renew my RX it gets harder to find. My insurance won’t cover it anymore unless my dr jumps through hoops with letters explaining why I need it. Sigh!
The problem is that an application that could be produced by 5 DBAs, 2 programmers, and 2 UI designers with one coordinator in 3 months will be created by 10 health administrators, 20 assistants and a barista in 5 months, reviewed by congressional committee for a month, another 3 months to adjust for suggestions and objections submitted by our technically literate representatives (can we require an IQ test?), back for review of a month, final product 2 months later. The result is the horse designed by a committee -- a camel. And it will be produced in the newest database interface language spoken by a total of 12 people who all reside in India. I really can't wait.
My last similar project was 3 DBAs, 2 programmers, 2 data importer/translate people and plenty of hardware and support folks. All very good. Supervised by 2 government attorneys (???). The teckies had a workable system in a couple months, not complete but adequate. Attorneys said can you add a couple things? Sure, in the next release. No, gotta be now or no approval. 3 months later, same routine, exactly. A year later, I'd left for another project but called a friend from the group and he said the scope creep continued.
Spot on, Alan. Maybe the IMA/FLCCC will have her host one of their Wednesday weekly video updates on this new FDA announcment. She's now a Senior IMAhealth Felllow.
I can understand your hesitancy around the actual outcomes promised. These departments are quick to make statements of change for the better, while not implementing them satisfactorily. Thomas has an excellent point about the incentives to report. There aren't many for the average doctor or healthcare provider. We'll see is so appropriate.
I am re-posting this from another post since it complements your point:
The Real Proof that Transparency has been achieved:
will be when:
-- "signals" are automatically calculated in real time with pre-set p's[ p = 0.01, for example]
-- signals exceeding a PRE-set limit will be automatically sent out on a news wire, not being managed by a government employee, nor capable of being managed . . .
Or something equivalent to this concept.
The idea being no bureaucrat preventing the bad sxxt from coming out.
The Real Proof that this data entry system can work:
-- sentences for non-compliance with data entry of any Severe adverse event automatically include one year in prison, and $10,000 fine for all involved: physician, nurse, admins.
-- prosecutions follow in weeks not years; prison happens in less than one year.
-- no wiggle room for judges to sweep a prosecution under the rug.
The idea being EVERY, SINGLE instance is reported: there is no sense in creating another system with a non-reporting factor like VAERS in which you have to guess how many multiples of 10 the signal is "off".
If I was a Pharma Phlunkie, and wanted to skew results to my benefit, I would program my AI to pretend to be thousands of reporters to send in bogus stats that are untraceable. Hopefully there is a mechanism in place to anticipate this type of nefarious behavior.
Makes one a bit dizzy. Good show though. Will be watching for reports from those early users.
As an every man/woman it may be further useful for us to⁹ learn about supplements.
Depending on ease of use, it could be very helpful fir lawyers in deciding whether to take cases, as well as developing evidence. It will be interesting to see how the courts regard it.
Another interesting aspect will be whether it will be useful for practicing physicians - as a supplement to their computerized practice guidance. Maybe for new therapeutics and informed consent purposes?
Surely congratulations to Trump, Kennedy, HHS and the computer engineers! Fingers crossed its a full scale success.
The Real Proof that Transparency has been achieved:
When:
-- "signals" are automatically calculated in real time with pre-set p's[ p = 0.01, for example]
-- signals exceeding a PRE-set limit will be automatically sent out on a news wire, not being managed by a government employee, nor capable of being managed . . .
Or something equivalent to this concept.
The idea being no bureaucrat preventing the bad sxxt from coming out.
The Real Proof that this data entry system can work:
-- sentences for non-compliance with data entry of any Severe adverse event automatically include one year in prison, and 10,000 fine for all involved: physician, nurse, admins.
-- prosecutions follow in weeks not years; prison happens in less than one year.
-- no wiggle room for judges to sweep a prosecution under the rug.
The idea being EVERY, SINGLE instance is reported: there is no sense in creating another system with a non-reporting factor like VAERS in which you have to guess how many multiples of 10 the signal is "off".
Allow me to rain a bit on this parade. I made this case over at Coffee & Covid, but it needs saying here, too. Folks, this database is going to be a monumental cock-up and there are more reasons than I can give. I have a background in IT and also government so I have more than a passing familiarity with the issues. Many of them don’t even deal (directly) with IT systems. A basic “rule” of computer science is often phrased “Garbage in, garbage out.” The fundamental issue is the reliability of the data set. If you propose a system where most anyone can enter most any type of information, including complaints, that pretty much guarantees the first part of the axiom stated above. There is always a need to preen the data, to assure its quality, to remove errors, and so forth. But who decides what information will be allowed, and under what circumstances? A second, more sinister problem is that of insider attempts to manipulate the data. Even if all the input data are “true,” there will always be special interests that for one motive or another seek to remove unfavorable data, insert fake records, and otherwise edit the data set for their own ends. A blatant example of this MAY have occurred in early 2022. You may recall Senator Johnson’s whistleblowers claiming that the military saw spikes in many illnesses after the mandated mRNA shots from 2021. To the day, the DoD took the DMED database offline and adjusted it, claiming that thousands of patient records from recent years had not been entered into it. I admit I’ve not followed up on this, but I’ve not heard of any investigations into this most irregular activity. Perhaps there was some legitimate error but an outside observer might well conclude this a transparent attempt (apparently, a successful one) at covering up embarrassing data.
A final point there: DMED is an example of a database that was designed specifically so that epidemiological studies could be conducted. The proposed new FDA database, broadly speaking, would be intended for much the same.
Let’s face it; the average person is an idiot, the last person on Earth you’d want entering detailed data into what purports to be a central repository of information. How many of those records are going to be spurious complaints? A lot. Some of them might even be true, but irrelevant, e.g. somebody unhappy with their doctor who may have done nothing wrong. Or routine drug and treatment side effects that are already well known. These alone will horribly clutter the database. I’ve not even gotten to deliberate malicious actors. Are you familiar with the term “bot farm”? There have always been incentives to try and game a system, and less than noble entities who will attempt to do so by means legal or otherwise.
All the above, and probably much more I don’t even know about, forecast a poor future for any such database’s value.
Why would a medical professional who was responsible for injecting an individual with an mRNA injection which caused death report it through the system? When VAers reports 47.000 deaths which is probably less than 5% of total deaths actually occurring over the last 4 years not cause our medical leadership to demand an immediate moratorium on all injections until they are proven to be safe and actually have a positive treatment outcome over cheap repurposed drugs. That is the study NIH should demand.
According to Harvard Pilgrim, which did a VAERS study several years ago, the actual percentage of reported harms is less than 1%. You're being very generous. Harvard Pilgrim also created an easy-to-use system that would capture reported vaccine events. Not surprisingly, though maddeningly, the CDC refused to adopt it.
The workload and pressure from management dissuades the reporting of all sorts of adverse reactions. For example, stroke and DVT admissions of women on B.C. hormones largely went unreported, due to workload.
I used openvaers.com (which made data more accessible) in 2021. It helped me to make the decision to counsel others to avoid those mRNA jabs. I started with advising avoidance for 0-19 yo first, then 0-30 yo, and as data gathered, I determined that all would do well to avoid it.
I'm hoping the newer proposed systems allow more searchability and analysis, because the old systems are not good.
A more relevant reason, one that surprisingly doesn’t seem to be mentioned much, is not that doctors were knowingly complicit in evil, which is what you seem to imply, but a far more “practical” reason:
It’s a thankless task for any medical professional to enter a report into the database. There’s no reward for doing so; and even if there was, that alone should raise suspicion that they were being paid to enter data, thus increasing the risk of bogus records.
The same logic applies if there is a negative reward, or a punishment. This, I assert, is more often the case. At the very least, a person spends time to enter the information. Presumably he’s doing so on paid time. But this alone means he’s had to take time away from more valuable tasks, like actually treating patients. There are social and professional risks, too. Faultfinders and whistleblowers are seldom well received, even by their own (supposedly) teams, even if what they sound the alarm about might be a rather important issue. I won’t even get into the powerful institutional incentives for keeping mum about unfavorable events or information; you can find these for yourself. All told, Doc has powerful incentives to forget the whole thing ever happened. Other than some sense of altruistic duty, he has scant incentives to enter records into the database.
This, among other factors, is why we read about the claims that only 20%, or even as few as 1%, of incidents are ever reported.
Correct analysis. Many factors. All we need to acknowledge is that statical analysis confirms that any reporting system is a sample analysis with validity. Deniability keeps the great harm rolling.
They have played many games over the decades to minimize public knowledge over the harm that drugs and injections have been responsible for. FDA and CDC have been captivated by those they are responsible to monitor for safety.
Transparency always does and always will depend on who’s controlling the information.
The existing data was available in CSV files. However, they split the columns of the database into 3 separate files. But you can't easily merge them back together into one spreadsheet because the rows don't line up. In one CSV file a patient report may take up 1 row but in the corresponding CSV file the same patient report takes up 3 rows. So to even do basic column filters using excel you need a sophisticated statistical analysis software code to match up all of the rows to get one patient report per row. I assume that this was being done on purpose.
No.. it is because the most incompetent people work there.. and do not have clue as to who to set up a database of that scope.. that is a framework.. CSV files are nonsense.
In the ‘90s Barbara Lowe Fisher had a conference in Washington DC. A statistician who wrote books used in colleges worked for 3 years with his Representative to gain access to VAERS.
His daughter had reacted to the Hep B injection at birth (Dr insisted it wasn’t the vaccine!) She died in the drs office when given the Hep B at two months.
His closing statement about the VAERS statistics: “If any major corporation manipulated their statistics the way they do at VAERS, all of the officials would be in prison.”
He didn’t blame it on old outdated computers; he said deliberate manipulation of the statics.
I’m glad we have different people in charge of the data.
Barbara Loe Fisher, from the NVIC? She did a somewhat recent, in-depth interview, detailing the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. She was told, it was going through, no matter what and she did what she could to try to warn people and still does! So sad so many millions of Americans, have no idea... https://www.nvic.org/about/history
Barbara Lowe Fisher gave a long interview (2 hrs) with Del Bigtree on The Highwire where she told the whole story of the 1986 Act. https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/1986-the-untold-story/.
BTW, thehighwire.com is the broadcast arm of Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), and they've been suing the federal government for years--and winning--to get the information that they want to hide.
And thank God for Aaron!!
That’s where I saw it! Lol. Couldn’t remember the source. BIG supporter of ICAN here & have been a “Warrior mom” for over a decade! 💪❤️
Thanks for sharing this amazing resource, Mrs. Itolaya! I just read their 30pg article on Measles. Can't wait to dive in more to their content. Found NVIC on Apple podcasts too. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nvic/id1363304170
I like their grassroots activity too. You can setup alerts for your state & be able to monitor bills & get their details, for issues affecting you at home. Truly an amazing resource!
Again, thanks, Mrs. Itoldya! I found the link on their site, and just completed Alerts for my state!
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/
I guess..
Dr Malone: in a short time the FDA is going to pull the natural thyroid meds from the market. This was determined before the current administration. The only reason is so Big Pharma gets all the business. Many thousands of people depend on natural thyroid because they cannot tolerate the synthetic T4 drugs and that will be it for us. I don't know if Makary is even aware of all this and the nightmare that is about to hit so many. Can you bring this to his attention? We just want to be allowed to keep taking what has saved us
Yes. I have been taking a natural (Armour) thyroid for decades. Cannot take the artificial drug. Each time I renew my RX it gets harder to find. My insurance won’t cover it anymore unless my dr jumps through hoops with letters explaining why I need it. Sigh!
Maybe NP Thyroid would be more available and less expensive? I have no trouble getting it.
The problem is that an application that could be produced by 5 DBAs, 2 programmers, and 2 UI designers with one coordinator in 3 months will be created by 10 health administrators, 20 assistants and a barista in 5 months, reviewed by congressional committee for a month, another 3 months to adjust for suggestions and objections submitted by our technically literate representatives (can we require an IQ test?), back for review of a month, final product 2 months later. The result is the horse designed by a committee -- a camel. And it will be produced in the newest database interface language spoken by a total of 12 people who all reside in India. I really can't wait.
My last similar project was 3 DBAs, 2 programmers, 2 data importer/translate people and plenty of hardware and support folks. All very good. Supervised by 2 government attorneys (???). The teckies had a workable system in a couple months, not complete but adequate. Attorneys said can you add a couple things? Sure, in the next release. No, gotta be now or no approval. 3 months later, same routine, exactly. A year later, I'd left for another project but called a friend from the group and he said the scope creep continued.
yep.
Bureaucracy.
So somewhere between buzkashi and bacha bazi?!
Thanks for posting Docs.
Trust and verify. I’ll suspend comment until I hear from my favorite Safety Signal Sleuthing Surfer - Dr. Jessica Rose.
Spot on, Alan. Maybe the IMA/FLCCC will have her host one of their Wednesday weekly video updates on this new FDA announcment. She's now a Senior IMAhealth Felllow.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-fdas-new-transparency-database?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
One small step for an agency; one great leap for transparency (hopefully).
I can understand your hesitancy around the actual outcomes promised. These departments are quick to make statements of change for the better, while not implementing them satisfactorily. Thomas has an excellent point about the incentives to report. There aren't many for the average doctor or healthcare provider. We'll see is so appropriate.
I am re-posting this from another post since it complements your point:
The Real Proof that Transparency has been achieved:
will be when:
-- "signals" are automatically calculated in real time with pre-set p's[ p = 0.01, for example]
-- signals exceeding a PRE-set limit will be automatically sent out on a news wire, not being managed by a government employee, nor capable of being managed . . .
Or something equivalent to this concept.
The idea being no bureaucrat preventing the bad sxxt from coming out.
The Real Proof that this data entry system can work:
-- sentences for non-compliance with data entry of any Severe adverse event automatically include one year in prison, and $10,000 fine for all involved: physician, nurse, admins.
-- prosecutions follow in weeks not years; prison happens in less than one year.
-- no wiggle room for judges to sweep a prosecution under the rug.
The idea being EVERY, SINGLE instance is reported: there is no sense in creating another system with a non-reporting factor like VAERS in which you have to guess how many multiples of 10 the signal is "off".
Yes, reporting eats into the time for patient care and insurance paperwork. And DEI meetings, which have been given other names. 😎
Your average chain pharmacist and hospital pharmacist also has negative time for these things.
There have been no external incentives to do the reporting, but often disincentives.
If I was a Pharma Phlunkie, and wanted to skew results to my benefit, I would program my AI to pretend to be thousands of reporters to send in bogus stats that are untraceable. Hopefully there is a mechanism in place to anticipate this type of nefarious behavior.
Makes one a bit dizzy. Good show though. Will be watching for reports from those early users.
As an every man/woman it may be further useful for us to⁹ learn about supplements.
Depending on ease of use, it could be very helpful fir lawyers in deciding whether to take cases, as well as developing evidence. It will be interesting to see how the courts regard it.
Another interesting aspect will be whether it will be useful for practicing physicians - as a supplement to their computerized practice guidance. Maybe for new therapeutics and informed consent purposes?
Surely congratulations to Trump, Kennedy, HHS and the computer engineers! Fingers crossed its a full scale success.
Thanks so much for sharing!
I cannot wait until @Datarepublican, gets their hands on this data base!!
The Real Proof that Transparency has been achieved:
When:
-- "signals" are automatically calculated in real time with pre-set p's[ p = 0.01, for example]
-- signals exceeding a PRE-set limit will be automatically sent out on a news wire, not being managed by a government employee, nor capable of being managed . . .
Or something equivalent to this concept.
The idea being no bureaucrat preventing the bad sxxt from coming out.
The Real Proof that this data entry system can work:
-- sentences for non-compliance with data entry of any Severe adverse event automatically include one year in prison, and 10,000 fine for all involved: physician, nurse, admins.
-- prosecutions follow in weeks not years; prison happens in less than one year.
-- no wiggle room for judges to sweep a prosecution under the rug.
The idea being EVERY, SINGLE instance is reported: there is no sense in creating another system with a non-reporting factor like VAERS in which you have to guess how many multiples of 10 the signal is "off".
I expect to see some of those who know to use AI to have a field day creating tools to take advantage of this
My thoughts exactly. It's being scooped up into one pile, so to be, AI us, aka, Control us.
More data manipulation to “merge” the files, hmmm—sounds like DMED 2.0
Allow me to rain a bit on this parade. I made this case over at Coffee & Covid, but it needs saying here, too. Folks, this database is going to be a monumental cock-up and there are more reasons than I can give. I have a background in IT and also government so I have more than a passing familiarity with the issues. Many of them don’t even deal (directly) with IT systems. A basic “rule” of computer science is often phrased “Garbage in, garbage out.” The fundamental issue is the reliability of the data set. If you propose a system where most anyone can enter most any type of information, including complaints, that pretty much guarantees the first part of the axiom stated above. There is always a need to preen the data, to assure its quality, to remove errors, and so forth. But who decides what information will be allowed, and under what circumstances? A second, more sinister problem is that of insider attempts to manipulate the data. Even if all the input data are “true,” there will always be special interests that for one motive or another seek to remove unfavorable data, insert fake records, and otherwise edit the data set for their own ends. A blatant example of this MAY have occurred in early 2022. You may recall Senator Johnson’s whistleblowers claiming that the military saw spikes in many illnesses after the mandated mRNA shots from 2021. To the day, the DoD took the DMED database offline and adjusted it, claiming that thousands of patient records from recent years had not been entered into it. I admit I’ve not followed up on this, but I’ve not heard of any investigations into this most irregular activity. Perhaps there was some legitimate error but an outside observer might well conclude this a transparent attempt (apparently, a successful one) at covering up embarrassing data.
A final point there: DMED is an example of a database that was designed specifically so that epidemiological studies could be conducted. The proposed new FDA database, broadly speaking, would be intended for much the same.
Let’s face it; the average person is an idiot, the last person on Earth you’d want entering detailed data into what purports to be a central repository of information. How many of those records are going to be spurious complaints? A lot. Some of them might even be true, but irrelevant, e.g. somebody unhappy with their doctor who may have done nothing wrong. Or routine drug and treatment side effects that are already well known. These alone will horribly clutter the database. I’ve not even gotten to deliberate malicious actors. Are you familiar with the term “bot farm”? There have always been incentives to try and game a system, and less than noble entities who will attempt to do so by means legal or otherwise.
All the above, and probably much more I don’t even know about, forecast a poor future for any such database’s value.