The one thing that I didn't see accounted for was vaccine record. If this study was able to account for vaccine records of either child or mother, we could then see if these drugs are still associated with autism or not. The only reason vaccines are called out is because they're the one procedure every child gets, so it could also play a factor in ASD: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling
There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children.
This study is very straightforward in design.
My opinion: most vaccine injury is probably additive and also compounding to the toxicity from drugs and environmental poisons, such as glyphosate.
"There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children." Agreed. Just due to process of how things are convoluted, in addition to the perception of possibility, and just so much more, from lack of medical codes, to understanding what is occurring, I'd venture there's even more unknown cases that could be occurring that aren't getting captured. Documentation is key. If at least parents knew what to look for and how to document, familiarizing themselves with signs from vaccine injuries, that would increase the data capturing of such events, before its too late and gets lost in the medical records: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/a-black-friday-gift-that-could-actually
If the onset of autism diagnosis were available, that might help clear the picture a bit. I suspect that the drug induced autism in these patients is noticed much earlier than the vaccine induced. I say that because from personal friends with affected children, and lots reported by parents, their babies were FINE until after the vaccines right around 3. And since the incidence of ASD has ballooned over the last 30 years, maybe this is just another nail in the coffin, another source of insult. No matter how many causes, we must track them down and stop it!!
Yes, it seems most children are diagnosed with autism in their preschool years, after multiple 'vaccines'. I don't know why pregnant women would be on any medications when trying to get pregnant. I thought that was taboo. I thought proper prenatal care was no smoking, no drinking, no drugs (even prescriptions), eat well, get good sleep, and moderate exercise. You know, take care of yourself. Is that no longer prescribed?
Timing of exposure and length of exposure are important—both are unstated in this summary—many women may have been on these medications before becoming pregnant, eg, and/or been placed on medication before they knew they were pregnant.
I literally just got off the phone with my wife as she was telling me how she ran into another mother who doesn't have vaccinated children. This mother chose not to vaccinate her children after seeing her family members daughter get vaccinated, regress, and couldn't speak for almost 10 years, all after the vaccine, echoing the story you paint here.
I've covered this story from all angles, from the diagnoses, to the medical jargon, and media propaganda on this topic. Fascinating piece, but there's so much work to not associate vaccines with injury, when there's so much data there: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-complete-vaccine-harm-profile
As to regression, any demonstration of primary or secondary vaccine-associated inflammation in the child’s brain (by examination of the cerebrospinal fluid,eg) that could be shown to cause interference with that “sterol/cholesterol” pathway in brain development and function could then “seal” a final common pathogenesis to this condition along with birth onset/ drug exposure cases.
yes. could be demonstrated by a CSF test.. I would not allow that on my child.. ever. Extremely painful test.. and could traumatize the child.. for life. Children are HUMANS TOO. So there has to another way.
That is part of the problem. women should not take those kinds of drugs while pregnant.. PERIOD. Reminds me of the song: EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE I WILL WATCHING YOU.,, OMG.. women being monitored by the "MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS" and being put in a database. I experienced some of that since I was 35 w/ my second son.. I told them to BACK OFF. and leave me alone.. let's put it way
Best I can tell this study does not consider vaccines. So would we generally assume that vaccine-induced symptoms are additive to this? Or do we think vaccine studies and results showing autism are confounded by this effect?
There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children.
This study is very straightforward in design.
My opinion: most vaccine injury is probably additive and also compounding to the toxicity from drugs and environmental poisons - such as glyphosate.
I was hoping that this study would have accounted for vaccine utilization because we could then say if or if not, we’re seeing that this is also additive to ASD, but since it doesn’t touch on that, it may lose some impact.
If I were having a baby today, I would not let doctors inject my infant with anything. I also would be skeptical about what was in any injection. I don't think doctors are themselves 'corrupt' as much as no one is honest anymore and we never know who to trust. I am grateful none of my family got COVID shots and none of us have ever gotten on board with flu shots or any other of the many money making 'shots'.
Good point. Since there is evidence that there is a link it should have been noted. Perhaps every person that took one of these 'enabling' drugs also took a certain vaccine and it is really the vaccine that is the culprit. It could just as much be the other way around and vaccines have nothing to do with it because one of these drugs was taken at the same time.
It is a complex matrix of data that could easily be understood if there was less resistance to discovering the truth. There are big forces not wanting the truth to come out and that in itself is very suspicious.
Indeed. I've explored this topic from so many angles and the one angle that makes sense is that there must be a religious, cult-like, spiritual drive to protect the idea of vaccines as safe and effective. And when you go down that rabbit hole, and learn the history of vaccines, there's a ritualistic agenda here. Here's an article if anyone's interested in such a perspective: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
Aaron Siri, "Vaccines, Amen". He has been litigating vaccine injuries for ten years and he observes that doctors, immunologists, and others have a "belief" in vaccines just like a religion. It's so ingrained that when shown the studies and the statistics, they still can't wrap their heads around it. Then you take someone like Dr. Paul Thomas whose license to practice medicine in Oregon was removed because he was informing parents of risks as well as benefits. The Oregon Medical Board said he was endangering children!
And there are more well-known doctors who face the same charges--for giving informed consent.
Yes, it is a religion, and doctors are the high priests.
It seems we live in a world where Big Pharmaceutical is perfectly allowed to treat human life as test subjects in their human trials. How do you go up against these massive companies and prove they harmed your new born? With nearly full immunity to any and all liability, and companies that mainly just seek profit, what other result could be possible. As we see Big Pharma is not alone in getting away with killing, harming or robbing people or children, this is the world we live in. It seems there are multiple tiers of justice depending on a persons wealth, status or just who they know. I think it’s way overdue that Big Pharma loses its immunity. Delegating justice to people and businesses that harm others, especially infants and families, is the first step in fixing this broken system.
This is a heartbreaking true video of Big Pharma harming infants, killing a family, with no consequence.
The good news is, James, that many people are being educated to look deeper and not take everything spewed as Gospel. Critical thinking is being taught and this applies to the profound schism happening in the previously hypnotized. Think Tucker and his brother Buckley...
I completely agree DD. People need to educate themselves and advocate for family and friends. I honestly have never idolized anyone though I see it daily. I can’t see how anything can ever be truly fixed when no one pays a price for heinous and deviant crimes they have committed. I think after the next two elections we will all get to witness what happens to a society when a corrupt party gets back in power after never paying a price for its crimes. We are living in frightening times. I pray things go differently.
Unfortunately there are two corrupt parties, in different arenas. Marty M has a few weak responses as well as others... if you are in politics, don't ever question Trump or you will be sorry. Name calling and worse.
Frankly, I don't understand why a pregnant woman would take any medication, prescribed or OTC. I went to nursing school in the 70's, in the shadow of the Thalidomide disaster, and the risks of drugs for pregnancy was already well known. I didn't even drink caffeinated coffee during any of my five pregnancies. This is the 21st century. How in the world did this happen?
"What happens next depends on whether we are willing to follow the answer wherever it leads" is more than a nice observation. It is crucial to integrity, humbleness and a variety of other moral directions. Many in the gov. could use this as a guideline for so many decisions!
Seems plausible and hope more look into it. Used to be that we avoided giving pregnant women meds unless absolutely necessary because we respected the limits of our knowledge regarding effects on pregnancy, but that changed and around that time we saw this increase in autism.
The increased use of medications such as SSRIs, antipsychotics, beta blockers, statins, as well as the other medications mentioned, have risen exponentially in recent decades, as has the childhood vaccine schedule. It may be that the interference of cholesterol, while pregnant, coupled with the harms associated with most vaccines given to the mother while pregnant & to her child soon afterwards, creates the perfect storm for the incidence of autism. The assaults are too many for the child to overcome. Additionally, nearly every vaccine on the schedule, according to recent scrutiny, is unnecessary. Books such as "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries, MD & "Vaccines, Amen", by Attorney Aaron Siri are very telling & revealing.
My theory about glyphosate and its disruption of MT proteins explains why there is a connection between the rise in autism and vaccines, since MT proteins are the main protection from toxic metals (such as the aluminum in vaccines) at the blood/brain barrier. It also explains the rise in so many other health issues, such as gluten intolerance and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Stephanie Senef (out of MIT) has written about her belief in a glyphosate/autism connection. A quick AI search: "Glyphosate exposure is linked to significant disruptions in cholesterol metabolism and broader lipid disorders”,
Interesting
There is also a comment about the possible efficacy of statins as an herbicide...
Thank you Dr. Malone for presenting this information to us. The medical institutions in the US are fundamentally broken as "do no harm" has been replaced by "make more money". We are all on our own to try and protect ourselves so the help offered like this from trustworthy sources, like yourself, are very highly valued.
I did scan that.. and it is stunning, a good word, to me as a mother that women would take drugs like that.. when pregnant. I have a load of stuff to do.. so I won't comment at length. Yes, that could be it. maybe. I think that autism includes the lack of nurture compounded by the use of drugs which are used for Bipolar or moderate neurosis and or anxiety disorders which would indicate those mothers not be able to be well rounded caregivers to their infants. The mother child bonding is critical for a healthy human being. I agree w/ your answer about the vaccine schedule for infants and children I agree w/ Kennedy on this. and also the ability to conduct a retrospective study.. ON WHOM.. the data would over the top. I never took any drugs.. ZERO.. nothing, no alcohol.. I was taught in med school (tech) that the Blood chemistry of a pregnant women during pregnancy changes and I remember experiencing that change with both of sons.. especially my oldest when I developed allergies to everything and stopped drinking coffee because I didn't like the taste or smell of it.. and I have loved coffee my whole life.. and still do. That is what all those cravings are about. I really feel sorry the infants, children and women now days who are being carefully scrutinized.. by the medical community which does not help with women who are pregnant at all if they had anxiety before. I am sure it is compounded by all this attention.
"Autism was diagnosed in 3.8 percent of children overall
That rate rose to about 5 percent in exposed pregnancies"
The autism rate was once 0.01% (1 per 10,000 children). The extra 1.2% in exposed children is in addition to the 3.8% evidently caused by the large number of vaccinations prior to age 6.
It's almost as though medical practice has come to be waging a war against children.
And why are so many young women of child-bearing age taking
anyway? These young women should be in near the prime of health. One doubts women today are more fragile than they were, say, in 1990.
The underlying condition seems to be degraded medical practice and, it may be, ablation of medical ethics. Patients are a become, perhaps, first and foremost a vehicle for income.
And another underlying condition is the brainwashing that is directed to the young, "be afraid, be very afraid, you live in a risky world, we'll take care of you, you don't have to think for yourself anymore because the experts are doing it for you." Our government is complicit.
Thanks for getting this information out there about the total mishandling of the role of cholesterol in the body. All over the body in membranes as is pointed out. The so called cholesterol pathway is the testosterone, estrogen steroid pathway. Very mislabeled pathway I assume for $ reasons I assume. Also 30 step pathway inhibited at step5 with many important additional molecules that are important for muscles and molecules important for membrane structure. HOW DID We get to this horrifying state calling cholesterol a menace molecule!!
"H.R. 7973 establishes a federally coordinated $715 million system (within a $2.46 billion bill) that:
identifies specific populations of pregnant and postpartum women for increased vaccination
tracks their medical status in real time during pandemics
ategorizes individuals by demographic characteristics
integrates data across labs, hospitals, and government systems
centralizes authority during declared emergencies
"Not only does H.R. 7973 threaten the freedom and privacy of pregnant women, but there are numerous health concerns for the developing fetus as well. Recent government data shows that, since the rollout of COVID vaccines, infants are dying at a 77% excess rate. A 2017 study published in JAMA Pediatrics identified a heightened risk of autism in the children of mothers who received a flu shot during the first trimester of pregnancy. Since 2012, pregnant women have been pushed to get an aluminum-containing Tdap shot, despite evidence that aluminum – a powerful neurotoxin – crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue."
There's more, but again it seems like people in Congress are working for Pharma instead of for us. They are so brainwashed that, as Aaron Siri says in "Vaccines, Amen", they look at vaccines as a religious rite.
When I was young, pregnant women were NEVER vaccinated or given drugs because they didn't know the outcome for the fetus. They still don't know, but now they do it anyway! Biology hasn't changed, knowledge of this complex system has increased only a tiny bit, but the hubris has risen exponentially!
Not sure where you are getting your mechanism of action information. It’s not taught anywhere that SSRI’s, atypical antipsychotics, TCA’s, etc interfere with cholesterol synthesis. I have reservations about mother to be taking any pharmaceutical drug during pregnancy. That used to be the standard for medical practice. The mind altering drugs do have a negative effect on pregnancy. But this is not documented as interfering with cholesterol synthesis. References were not included in the email. I would need to see the data before I accept this hypothesis about the non-statin drugs.
"The sterol biosynthesis pathway can also be disrupted by commonly prescribed medications [40,41,42,43]. In 2013, several individuals - nearly all of which had developmental delays and/or behavioral abnormalities - were noted to have SLOS-like elevation of 7-DHC levels [44]. However, genetic testing revealed no pathogenic variants in the DHCR7 gene. Instead, all patients were receiving aripiprazole or trazodone. The ability of these medications to inhibit DHCR7 and block the conversion of 7-DHC to cholesterol was later confirmed in vitro and in vivo in mouse models [45,46,47], human dermal fibroblasts [9], and postmortem brain analyses [48]. Follow-up studies identified several other commonly prescribed sterol biosynthesis inhibiting medications (SBIM), including haloperidol, sertraline, aripiprazole, cariprazine, trazodone, bupropion, buspirone, fluoxetine, propranolol, nebivolol and metoprolol [40,41,42,43, 49]. Most of these findings have been consistently validated across various in vitro and in vivo models, including in human biomaterials [50, 51]. Despite a 2016 study by Bolland and Tatonetti [9] concluding that first-trimester exposure to pharmaceuticals with DHCR7-inhibitory effects resulted in outcomes similar to those of known teratogens, there has been no comprehensive investigations into the outcomes of prenatal sterol biosynthesis inhibition."
Now look for a demonstrable effect on csf biochemistry re cholesterol metabolism associated with vaccine “reactions” as well as the possible effects of glyphosates, etc on that molecular process. Final common pathogenic pathways are crucial to sort out actual disease from multifactorial syndromes.
The findings beg the question about other downstream consequences of medications which treat (as opposed to cure) conditions that are labeled as chronic. Are there better (though perhaps not as fast) ways to treat these conditions?
The one thing that I didn't see accounted for was vaccine record. If this study was able to account for vaccine records of either child or mother, we could then see if these drugs are still associated with autism or not. The only reason vaccines are called out is because they're the one procedure every child gets, so it could also play a factor in ASD: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling
There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children.
This study is very straightforward in design.
My opinion: most vaccine injury is probably additive and also compounding to the toxicity from drugs and environmental poisons, such as glyphosate.
"There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children." Agreed. Just due to process of how things are convoluted, in addition to the perception of possibility, and just so much more, from lack of medical codes, to understanding what is occurring, I'd venture there's even more unknown cases that could be occurring that aren't getting captured. Documentation is key. If at least parents knew what to look for and how to document, familiarizing themselves with signs from vaccine injuries, that would increase the data capturing of such events, before its too late and gets lost in the medical records: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/a-black-friday-gift-that-could-actually
Interesting this study barely predates the nomination of an ardent proponent of jabs and mandates for heading CDC.
I agree w/ that.
If the onset of autism diagnosis were available, that might help clear the picture a bit. I suspect that the drug induced autism in these patients is noticed much earlier than the vaccine induced. I say that because from personal friends with affected children, and lots reported by parents, their babies were FINE until after the vaccines right around 3. And since the incidence of ASD has ballooned over the last 30 years, maybe this is just another nail in the coffin, another source of insult. No matter how many causes, we must track them down and stop it!!
Yes, it seems most children are diagnosed with autism in their preschool years, after multiple 'vaccines'. I don't know why pregnant women would be on any medications when trying to get pregnant. I thought that was taboo. I thought proper prenatal care was no smoking, no drinking, no drugs (even prescriptions), eat well, get good sleep, and moderate exercise. You know, take care of yourself. Is that no longer prescribed?
Timing of exposure and length of exposure are important—both are unstated in this summary—many women may have been on these medications before becoming pregnant, eg, and/or been placed on medication before they knew they were pregnant.
Absolutely!
Thank you Brandy. My thoughts but you said it better than I would.
I literally just got off the phone with my wife as she was telling me how she ran into another mother who doesn't have vaccinated children. This mother chose not to vaccinate her children after seeing her family members daughter get vaccinated, regress, and couldn't speak for almost 10 years, all after the vaccine, echoing the story you paint here.
I've covered this story from all angles, from the diagnoses, to the medical jargon, and media propaganda on this topic. Fascinating piece, but there's so much work to not associate vaccines with injury, when there's so much data there: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-complete-vaccine-harm-profile
As to regression, any demonstration of primary or secondary vaccine-associated inflammation in the child’s brain (by examination of the cerebrospinal fluid,eg) that could be shown to cause interference with that “sterol/cholesterol” pathway in brain development and function could then “seal” a final common pathogenesis to this condition along with birth onset/ drug exposure cases.
yes. could be demonstrated by a CSF test.. I would not allow that on my child.. ever. Extremely painful test.. and could traumatize the child.. for life. Children are HUMANS TOO. So there has to another way.
wow. that is horrible story.
That is part of the problem. women should not take those kinds of drugs while pregnant.. PERIOD. Reminds me of the song: EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE I WILL WATCHING YOU.,, OMG.. women being monitored by the "MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS" and being put in a database. I experienced some of that since I was 35 w/ my second son.. I told them to BACK OFF. and leave me alone.. let's put it way
Best I can tell this study does not consider vaccines. So would we generally assume that vaccine-induced symptoms are additive to this? Or do we think vaccine studies and results showing autism are confounded by this effect?
There has been no medical code for vaccine injury, so conducting a retrospective study is very difficult without a way to record when vaccine damage occurs... in infants and children.
This study is very straightforward in design.
My opinion: most vaccine injury is probably additive and also compounding to the toxicity from drugs and environmental poisons - such as glyphosate.
Are there any records from other countries that might help shed a light on these issues?
From my experience, I’d want to say that this study would be additive to the vaccine correlation. The data on vaccine and autism has been established numerous times, even though it’s still considered “fringe” : https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-a-congressional-hearing-revealed
I was hoping that this study would have accounted for vaccine utilization because we could then say if or if not, we’re seeing that this is also additive to ASD, but since it doesn’t touch on that, it may lose some impact.
If I were having a baby today, I would not let doctors inject my infant with anything. I also would be skeptical about what was in any injection. I don't think doctors are themselves 'corrupt' as much as no one is honest anymore and we never know who to trust. I am grateful none of my family got COVID shots and none of us have ever gotten on board with flu shots or any other of the many money making 'shots'.
Good point. Since there is evidence that there is a link it should have been noted. Perhaps every person that took one of these 'enabling' drugs also took a certain vaccine and it is really the vaccine that is the culprit. It could just as much be the other way around and vaccines have nothing to do with it because one of these drugs was taken at the same time.
It is a complex matrix of data that could easily be understood if there was less resistance to discovering the truth. There are big forces not wanting the truth to come out and that in itself is very suspicious.
Indeed. I've explored this topic from so many angles and the one angle that makes sense is that there must be a religious, cult-like, spiritual drive to protect the idea of vaccines as safe and effective. And when you go down that rabbit hole, and learn the history of vaccines, there's a ritualistic agenda here. Here's an article if anyone's interested in such a perspective: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/rich-people-do-magic
Aaron Siri, "Vaccines, Amen". He has been litigating vaccine injuries for ten years and he observes that doctors, immunologists, and others have a "belief" in vaccines just like a religion. It's so ingrained that when shown the studies and the statistics, they still can't wrap their heads around it. Then you take someone like Dr. Paul Thomas whose license to practice medicine in Oregon was removed because he was informing parents of risks as well as benefits. The Oregon Medical Board said he was endangering children!
And there are more well-known doctors who face the same charges--for giving informed consent.
Yes, it is a religion, and doctors are the high priests.
I agree w/ that. for sure. I know.. what is with this ZEAL to vaccinate every human being.. one size fit all medicine.
It seems we live in a world where Big Pharmaceutical is perfectly allowed to treat human life as test subjects in their human trials. How do you go up against these massive companies and prove they harmed your new born? With nearly full immunity to any and all liability, and companies that mainly just seek profit, what other result could be possible. As we see Big Pharma is not alone in getting away with killing, harming or robbing people or children, this is the world we live in. It seems there are multiple tiers of justice depending on a persons wealth, status or just who they know. I think it’s way overdue that Big Pharma loses its immunity. Delegating justice to people and businesses that harm others, especially infants and families, is the first step in fixing this broken system.
This is a heartbreaking true video of Big Pharma harming infants, killing a family, with no consequence.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18JDbSsiRp/?mibextid=wwXIfr
The good news is, James, that many people are being educated to look deeper and not take everything spewed as Gospel. Critical thinking is being taught and this applies to the profound schism happening in the previously hypnotized. Think Tucker and his brother Buckley...
I completely agree DD. People need to educate themselves and advocate for family and friends. I honestly have never idolized anyone though I see it daily. I can’t see how anything can ever be truly fixed when no one pays a price for heinous and deviant crimes they have committed. I think after the next two elections we will all get to witness what happens to a society when a corrupt party gets back in power after never paying a price for its crimes. We are living in frightening times. I pray things go differently.
Unfortunately there are two corrupt parties, in different arenas. Marty M has a few weak responses as well as others... if you are in politics, don't ever question Trump or you will be sorry. Name calling and worse.
I just heard about that. I didn't he even had a brother. well I need to go.
I have a lot to do. and don't feel like doing anything :)
WOW. I can't look at not on fb but I know about that.
Frankly, I don't understand why a pregnant woman would take any medication, prescribed or OTC. I went to nursing school in the 70's, in the shadow of the Thalidomide disaster, and the risks of drugs for pregnancy was already well known. I didn't even drink caffeinated coffee during any of my five pregnancies. This is the 21st century. How in the world did this happen?
oh I remember that. I studied about.
"What happens next depends on whether we are willing to follow the answer wherever it leads" is more than a nice observation. It is crucial to integrity, humbleness and a variety of other moral directions. Many in the gov. could use this as a guideline for so many decisions!
Seems plausible and hope more look into it. Used to be that we avoided giving pregnant women meds unless absolutely necessary because we respected the limits of our knowledge regarding effects on pregnancy, but that changed and around that time we saw this increase in autism.
I think this is a key point, Laura. We could even say that a pregnancy is a holy time, and must be respected.
Who do you think it changed? Could it be big pharma looking for more profits?
The increased use of medications such as SSRIs, antipsychotics, beta blockers, statins, as well as the other medications mentioned, have risen exponentially in recent decades, as has the childhood vaccine schedule. It may be that the interference of cholesterol, while pregnant, coupled with the harms associated with most vaccines given to the mother while pregnant & to her child soon afterwards, creates the perfect storm for the incidence of autism. The assaults are too many for the child to overcome. Additionally, nearly every vaccine on the schedule, according to recent scrutiny, is unnecessary. Books such as "Dissolving Illusions" by Suzanne Humphries, MD & "Vaccines, Amen", by Attorney Aaron Siri are very telling & revealing.
https://betsyshanley.substack.com/p/glyphosate-and-its-disruption-of?r=5okhkn&utm_medium=ios
My theory about glyphosate and its disruption of MT proteins explains why there is a connection between the rise in autism and vaccines, since MT proteins are the main protection from toxic metals (such as the aluminum in vaccines) at the blood/brain barrier. It also explains the rise in so many other health issues, such as gluten intolerance and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Stephanie Senef (out of MIT) has written about her belief in a glyphosate/autism connection. A quick AI search: "Glyphosate exposure is linked to significant disruptions in cholesterol metabolism and broader lipid disorders”,
Interesting
There is also a comment about the possible efficacy of statins as an herbicide...
Thank you Dr. Malone for presenting this information to us. The medical institutions in the US are fundamentally broken as "do no harm" has been replaced by "make more money". We are all on our own to try and protect ourselves so the help offered like this from trustworthy sources, like yourself, are very highly valued.
I did scan that.. and it is stunning, a good word, to me as a mother that women would take drugs like that.. when pregnant. I have a load of stuff to do.. so I won't comment at length. Yes, that could be it. maybe. I think that autism includes the lack of nurture compounded by the use of drugs which are used for Bipolar or moderate neurosis and or anxiety disorders which would indicate those mothers not be able to be well rounded caregivers to their infants. The mother child bonding is critical for a healthy human being. I agree w/ your answer about the vaccine schedule for infants and children I agree w/ Kennedy on this. and also the ability to conduct a retrospective study.. ON WHOM.. the data would over the top. I never took any drugs.. ZERO.. nothing, no alcohol.. I was taught in med school (tech) that the Blood chemistry of a pregnant women during pregnancy changes and I remember experiencing that change with both of sons.. especially my oldest when I developed allergies to everything and stopped drinking coffee because I didn't like the taste or smell of it.. and I have loved coffee my whole life.. and still do. That is what all those cravings are about. I really feel sorry the infants, children and women now days who are being carefully scrutinized.. by the medical community which does not help with women who are pregnant at all if they had anxiety before. I am sure it is compounded by all this attention.
"Autism was diagnosed in 3.8 percent of children overall
That rate rose to about 5 percent in exposed pregnancies"
The autism rate was once 0.01% (1 per 10,000 children). The extra 1.2% in exposed children is in addition to the 3.8% evidently caused by the large number of vaccinations prior to age 6.
It's almost as though medical practice has come to be waging a war against children.
And why are so many young women of child-bearing age taking
fluoxetine, sertraline
aripiprazole, haloperidol
metoprolol, propranolol, nebivolol
atorvastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin
trazodone, bupropion, buspirone
anyway? These young women should be in near the prime of health. One doubts women today are more fragile than they were, say, in 1990.
The underlying condition seems to be degraded medical practice and, it may be, ablation of medical ethics. Patients are a become, perhaps, first and foremost a vehicle for income.
And another underlying condition is the brainwashing that is directed to the young, "be afraid, be very afraid, you live in a risky world, we'll take care of you, you don't have to think for yourself anymore because the experts are doing it for you." Our government is complicit.
Thanks for getting this information out there about the total mishandling of the role of cholesterol in the body. All over the body in membranes as is pointed out. The so called cholesterol pathway is the testosterone, estrogen steroid pathway. Very mislabeled pathway I assume for $ reasons I assume. Also 30 step pathway inhibited at step5 with many important additional molecules that are important for muscles and molecules important for membrane structure. HOW DID We get to this horrifying state calling cholesterol a menace molecule!!
This article was so timely!
I just got an email from a friend asking me to write to my representatives in Congress about H.R. 7973, the ‘Momnibus’ Bill. According to C.H.D., https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/oppose-h-r-7973-the-momnibus-bill,
"H.R. 7973 establishes a federally coordinated $715 million system (within a $2.46 billion bill) that:
identifies specific populations of pregnant and postpartum women for increased vaccination
tracks their medical status in real time during pandemics
ategorizes individuals by demographic characteristics
integrates data across labs, hospitals, and government systems
centralizes authority during declared emergencies
"Not only does H.R. 7973 threaten the freedom and privacy of pregnant women, but there are numerous health concerns for the developing fetus as well. Recent government data shows that, since the rollout of COVID vaccines, infants are dying at a 77% excess rate. A 2017 study published in JAMA Pediatrics identified a heightened risk of autism in the children of mothers who received a flu shot during the first trimester of pregnancy. Since 2012, pregnant women have been pushed to get an aluminum-containing Tdap shot, despite evidence that aluminum – a powerful neurotoxin – crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue."
There's more, but again it seems like people in Congress are working for Pharma instead of for us. They are so brainwashed that, as Aaron Siri says in "Vaccines, Amen", they look at vaccines as a religious rite.
When I was young, pregnant women were NEVER vaccinated or given drugs because they didn't know the outcome for the fetus. They still don't know, but now they do it anyway! Biology hasn't changed, knowledge of this complex system has increased only a tiny bit, but the hubris has risen exponentially!
Not sure where you are getting your mechanism of action information. It’s not taught anywhere that SSRI’s, atypical antipsychotics, TCA’s, etc interfere with cholesterol synthesis. I have reservations about mother to be taking any pharmaceutical drug during pregnancy. That used to be the standard for medical practice. The mind altering drugs do have a negative effect on pregnancy. But this is not documented as interfering with cholesterol synthesis. References were not included in the email. I would need to see the data before I accept this hypothesis about the non-statin drugs.
"The sterol biosynthesis pathway can also be disrupted by commonly prescribed medications [40,41,42,43]. In 2013, several individuals - nearly all of which had developmental delays and/or behavioral abnormalities - were noted to have SLOS-like elevation of 7-DHC levels [44]. However, genetic testing revealed no pathogenic variants in the DHCR7 gene. Instead, all patients were receiving aripiprazole or trazodone. The ability of these medications to inhibit DHCR7 and block the conversion of 7-DHC to cholesterol was later confirmed in vitro and in vivo in mouse models [45,46,47], human dermal fibroblasts [9], and postmortem brain analyses [48]. Follow-up studies identified several other commonly prescribed sterol biosynthesis inhibiting medications (SBIM), including haloperidol, sertraline, aripiprazole, cariprazine, trazodone, bupropion, buspirone, fluoxetine, propranolol, nebivolol and metoprolol [40,41,42,43, 49]. Most of these findings have been consistently validated across various in vitro and in vivo models, including in human biomaterials [50, 51]. Despite a 2016 study by Bolland and Tatonetti [9] concluding that first-trimester exposure to pharmaceuticals with DHCR7-inhibitory effects resulted in outcomes similar to those of known teratogens, there has been no comprehensive investigations into the outcomes of prenatal sterol biosynthesis inhibition."
Thank you for your follow up. I will review this new information and study. Nice work.
The peer reviewed paper itself: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-026-03610-7
Now look for a demonstrable effect on csf biochemistry re cholesterol metabolism associated with vaccine “reactions” as well as the possible effects of glyphosates, etc on that molecular process. Final common pathogenic pathways are crucial to sort out actual disease from multifactorial syndromes.
The findings beg the question about other downstream consequences of medications which treat (as opposed to cure) conditions that are labeled as chronic. Are there better (though perhaps not as fast) ways to treat these conditions?
Homeopathy, herbs, EFT, diet, exercise, meditation, not necessarily in that order.