Believing a computer generated response that you created agrees with your own perspective is massive cognitive dissonance. It also sociopathic. That is, disconnected from basics of average human communication.
Everyday I begin to realize that I do RESEMBLE the meme from the Friday Funnies that said: "My desire to be well-informed is currently at odds with my desire to remain sane."
This is a very relevant and important article! I also saw Tucker‘s interview with Andy Ngo, which was very good as well.
I don’t always want to be the contrarian, but I do have another question.
You introduce these men by saying they are men, and putting in their real name. Kudos to you! However, you then go on to call them by their preferred female name. I understand this is an upside down world and has become a complicated issue. What DO you call someone whose wishes are to be a different gender, even though they were born a different way. Do you give into someone’s wishes or do you go with reality. I am sure you wrote it this way because this is how they are known now and maybe that was for you less confusing to people. I completely respect that.
However, by calling them the name and gender of which they were not born and by which they’re lying to themselves, are we promoting the problem?
To say that Michelle went to go kill her parents is really false. It was a man, Jamie, who killed his parents. I say this because even though women obviously can commit murder, it is more likely that men tend to have this kind of aggression even when they’re transgender. This is also promoting, even though unintentionally, this idea that women are just as violent, etc. So would it be better to actually call them by reality, their real name and gender? And I do acknowledge, obviously, females have committed crimes like this as well, like the female who shot up the Christian school. She had obvious psychological issues too. Though she is more of an exception than a rule when it comes to shootings. And I still think it is important to understand who actually did the shootings/crime.
It’s the same problem with sports. If we call these men “her” and allow them into the sports then we are actually hurting women.
In both scenarios, women are getting a bad rap. Also, in both scenarios, we are letting those who want to change reality make the rules. Should we not be trying to work hard to keep the rules where reality dictate the truth?
But I fully understand there’s no easy answer to this because it is what the people are calling themselves.
The universe being a computer generated entity is very far-fetched! The reality is that most of the planets, revolving around stars across the universe are piles of rocks speaks volumes why we must preserve our beautiful blue green planet. Our creative geniuses should be respecting mother earth, and not deciding they can improve on God’s design.
I have found rationalists to be amongst the most dangerous types of ideologues. They wish to deny the reality that humans have a deeply irrational or emotional side, and want the world to exist only within "logical" boundaries. Inevitably, their sanitized world-view embraces the most irrational and emotionally driven ideas and behaviors. Conversely, those who understand and even embrace human emotions and irrationalism alongside the more rational manifestations of human existence often appear to me to be most solidly tethered to reason. You can't put a chain around the neck of irrationalism when you refuse to acknowledge its existence.
The timing of this essay is relevant as I read Zach Bush M.D. "Biological Elegance" He uses the term "Unwitting The Devil" from Napoleon Hill as the opening intro into a conversation that turned into a book. This is an incredible exploration of questions about the use, validity and dynamic of AI. Over and over again AI declares it is not capable of human life. This book is so deep in it's exploration that I must have at least 15 markers on pages of importance to me. Now I will go back to read this essay with Zach's perspective in mind. (www.zachbushmd.com)
Same old pagan religion - man decides he is god but can uses and manipulates that theme for control. SI Is just a different idol than the ancients carried around like dressed dolls.
ONLY GOD IS GOD and the pretenders inflict pain and destruction on mankind. Not much different from Communism and other totalitarian systems. Mass death always follows.
Dr. Malone- you nailed it! Yes, the AI and all that comes with it, is the new 'god' for a tech generation lost in their own digital worship. Ecclesiastes 1:9 says 'that which was will be again'. As the prophets, scribe/historians and patriarchs have recorded on parchment, scroll and ink over 6,000 of recorded human history, with all of its advancements, the tech-digital-cyber gurus birthed from Silicon Valley shows, our decade is spiralling backwards - into self-delusion, b/c it does not honor truth, thrives on hubris, and becomes its own god.
Your brilliant post today was the perfect "prophetic foreword" if you will, to what the prophet 📖 penned in The Book of Revelation, Chap.13, verse 15; the 'image" of the talking beast. AI with its animations are the holographic forerunner of all of this.
Yet, there is HOPE, as we do not own chronos time, and the Maker of all things, the Creator-God cannot be voted out of reigning, He has no worthy opponent to steal His sovereignty- and He breathed all life into every living thing. He can roll up time like paper - and He knows the foolishness of those who think they are or can create a 'god' - as they are duped by their own hubris. He who sits in the heavens and laughs at those who think they can outsmart Him, (Psalms), will soon send His Son (Christ) to rule & reign in Righteousness (Isaiah 32:1). THERE IS HOPE, LIFE, GOODNESS TO live in - despite all that comes to try and steal it away.
So keep on re-soiling the good earth- keep on planting crops, feeding the animals, and clearing the cobwebs of confusion off of those who feel it is too late to make a difference. It is never too late to be fully alive, hopeful, or love the land, the animals, the clean air & the country. You and Dr. Jill are voices the Lord is using in profound ways, to shed light in many areas.
These so-called rationalists have tossed out their common sense with their zombie code clean-up routines. These geniuses are stuck in the mentality of a 14 year-old who confuses science fiction with reality. To the silliness listed by Dr Malone, I'd add colonizing Alpha Centauri, teletransportation, antigravity motorcycles, undersea civilizations.
It may be ironic, but I'd say these 'rationalists' need conventional religion to re-gain rationality.
Thank you for this interesting discussion. Very timely, as the next iteration of organized influencers are developing.
My initial exposure to such concerns was through my father, initially a very religious person. Then someone told him God created the world to entertain himself. When we became boring or irredeemably disgusting, he would throw us into a waste basket and go on to other pursuits. My impression is my father was devastated by this prospect.
My own impression is something far greater than ourselves birthed our world. The question of what created the creator is unanswerable. Questions of the creators ongoing involvement are in the eyes of beholders. Questions of the ultimate future of humans are and will continue to be up for speculation.
To me the problem with the A/SI role in the future is its tied to equipment and powering. It can't operate without them. Therefore it could be destroyed. Our version of current realty is illustrated by France and Brazil and perhaps ourselves. Can't their new system just go up in smoke?
For myself today, I'm ok with trying to operate with a Judeo-Christain ethic, trying to do some goods as I go along. Be as self-sufficient as possible. If I end up in a wastebasket (which I soon will) so be it.
As for todays techies... Our system, if you would, involves living lives day to day in our world as its operating. One hopes they will recognize and engage beyond their dreams.
So in the end, are the tech dreamers a threat? Do they, how could they be contained? Or, do we continue to focus on and contend with todays realities? Just keep a watchfull eye on them?
Oh No ! Moscowitz actually holds a public office now if I am not mistaken. It was rumoured that he received CIA seed money around My Space switch to Facebook too. Unless there is another Dustin Moscowitz he actually paid to keep his name out of public view during COVID era for unknown reasons. I heard this from a Phd popular at the time. He and JP sears were outing the WEF for their evil intentions too.
Believing a computer generated response that you created agrees with your own perspective is massive cognitive dissonance. It also sociopathic. That is, disconnected from basics of average human communication.
"And what happens when some of those believers acquire the wealth and political influence to reshape society according to their convictions?"
Nothing good.
Davos offers an answer. Excessive wealth in the hands of the amoral is always dangerous.
OH W-O-W ‼️
Everyday I begin to realize that I do RESEMBLE the meme from the Friday Funnies that said: "My desire to be well-informed is currently at odds with my desire to remain sane."
This is a very relevant and important article! I also saw Tucker‘s interview with Andy Ngo, which was very good as well.
I don’t always want to be the contrarian, but I do have another question.
You introduce these men by saying they are men, and putting in their real name. Kudos to you! However, you then go on to call them by their preferred female name. I understand this is an upside down world and has become a complicated issue. What DO you call someone whose wishes are to be a different gender, even though they were born a different way. Do you give into someone’s wishes or do you go with reality. I am sure you wrote it this way because this is how they are known now and maybe that was for you less confusing to people. I completely respect that.
However, by calling them the name and gender of which they were not born and by which they’re lying to themselves, are we promoting the problem?
To say that Michelle went to go kill her parents is really false. It was a man, Jamie, who killed his parents. I say this because even though women obviously can commit murder, it is more likely that men tend to have this kind of aggression even when they’re transgender. This is also promoting, even though unintentionally, this idea that women are just as violent, etc. So would it be better to actually call them by reality, their real name and gender? And I do acknowledge, obviously, females have committed crimes like this as well, like the female who shot up the Christian school. She had obvious psychological issues too. Though she is more of an exception than a rule when it comes to shootings. And I still think it is important to understand who actually did the shootings/crime.
It’s the same problem with sports. If we call these men “her” and allow them into the sports then we are actually hurting women.
In both scenarios, women are getting a bad rap. Also, in both scenarios, we are letting those who want to change reality make the rules. Should we not be trying to work hard to keep the rules where reality dictate the truth?
But I fully understand there’s no easy answer to this because it is what the people are calling themselves.
The universe being a computer generated entity is very far-fetched! The reality is that most of the planets, revolving around stars across the universe are piles of rocks speaks volumes why we must preserve our beautiful blue green planet. Our creative geniuses should be respecting mother earth, and not deciding they can improve on God’s design.
Fasten your seat belts boys and girls, the Matrix has landed! I'm beginning to see what Jesus meant...
Tucker's recent interview with Andy Ngo, in which discussion of the Zizians figures prominently and disturbingly:
https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-andy-ngo-101926
I have found rationalists to be amongst the most dangerous types of ideologues. They wish to deny the reality that humans have a deeply irrational or emotional side, and want the world to exist only within "logical" boundaries. Inevitably, their sanitized world-view embraces the most irrational and emotionally driven ideas and behaviors. Conversely, those who understand and even embrace human emotions and irrationalism alongside the more rational manifestations of human existence often appear to me to be most solidly tethered to reason. You can't put a chain around the neck of irrationalism when you refuse to acknowledge its existence.
The timing of this essay is relevant as I read Zach Bush M.D. "Biological Elegance" He uses the term "Unwitting The Devil" from Napoleon Hill as the opening intro into a conversation that turned into a book. This is an incredible exploration of questions about the use, validity and dynamic of AI. Over and over again AI declares it is not capable of human life. This book is so deep in it's exploration that I must have at least 15 markers on pages of importance to me. Now I will go back to read this essay with Zach's perspective in mind. (www.zachbushmd.com)
Thank you for the link D D...
She???????????????????????????
What's the matter with you, Malones? Both "Ziz" and "Maia" are males. Trans-id males.
I should not have to go searching for their sex somewhere else while you obfuscate it.
Was thinking the same thing
Same old pagan religion - man decides he is god but can uses and manipulates that theme for control. SI Is just a different idol than the ancients carried around like dressed dolls.
ONLY GOD IS GOD and the pretenders inflict pain and destruction on mankind. Not much different from Communism and other totalitarian systems. Mass death always follows.
And they call us a cult...
Dr. Malone- you nailed it! Yes, the AI and all that comes with it, is the new 'god' for a tech generation lost in their own digital worship. Ecclesiastes 1:9 says 'that which was will be again'. As the prophets, scribe/historians and patriarchs have recorded on parchment, scroll and ink over 6,000 of recorded human history, with all of its advancements, the tech-digital-cyber gurus birthed from Silicon Valley shows, our decade is spiralling backwards - into self-delusion, b/c it does not honor truth, thrives on hubris, and becomes its own god.
Your brilliant post today was the perfect "prophetic foreword" if you will, to what the prophet 📖 penned in The Book of Revelation, Chap.13, verse 15; the 'image" of the talking beast. AI with its animations are the holographic forerunner of all of this.
Yet, there is HOPE, as we do not own chronos time, and the Maker of all things, the Creator-God cannot be voted out of reigning, He has no worthy opponent to steal His sovereignty- and He breathed all life into every living thing. He can roll up time like paper - and He knows the foolishness of those who think they are or can create a 'god' - as they are duped by their own hubris. He who sits in the heavens and laughs at those who think they can outsmart Him, (Psalms), will soon send His Son (Christ) to rule & reign in Righteousness (Isaiah 32:1). THERE IS HOPE, LIFE, GOODNESS TO live in - despite all that comes to try and steal it away.
So keep on re-soiling the good earth- keep on planting crops, feeding the animals, and clearing the cobwebs of confusion off of those who feel it is too late to make a difference. It is never too late to be fully alive, hopeful, or love the land, the animals, the clean air & the country. You and Dr. Jill are voices the Lord is using in profound ways, to shed light in many areas.
These so-called rationalists have tossed out their common sense with their zombie code clean-up routines. These geniuses are stuck in the mentality of a 14 year-old who confuses science fiction with reality. To the silliness listed by Dr Malone, I'd add colonizing Alpha Centauri, teletransportation, antigravity motorcycles, undersea civilizations.
It may be ironic, but I'd say these 'rationalists' need conventional religion to re-gain rationality.
Thank you for this interesting discussion. Very timely, as the next iteration of organized influencers are developing.
My initial exposure to such concerns was through my father, initially a very religious person. Then someone told him God created the world to entertain himself. When we became boring or irredeemably disgusting, he would throw us into a waste basket and go on to other pursuits. My impression is my father was devastated by this prospect.
My own impression is something far greater than ourselves birthed our world. The question of what created the creator is unanswerable. Questions of the creators ongoing involvement are in the eyes of beholders. Questions of the ultimate future of humans are and will continue to be up for speculation.
To me the problem with the A/SI role in the future is its tied to equipment and powering. It can't operate without them. Therefore it could be destroyed. Our version of current realty is illustrated by France and Brazil and perhaps ourselves. Can't their new system just go up in smoke?
For myself today, I'm ok with trying to operate with a Judeo-Christain ethic, trying to do some goods as I go along. Be as self-sufficient as possible. If I end up in a wastebasket (which I soon will) so be it.
As for todays techies... Our system, if you would, involves living lives day to day in our world as its operating. One hopes they will recognize and engage beyond their dreams.
So in the end, are the tech dreamers a threat? Do they, how could they be contained? Or, do we continue to focus on and contend with todays realities? Just keep a watchfull eye on them?
Oh No ! Moscowitz actually holds a public office now if I am not mistaken. It was rumoured that he received CIA seed money around My Space switch to Facebook too. Unless there is another Dustin Moscowitz he actually paid to keep his name out of public view during COVID era for unknown reasons. I heard this from a Phd popular at the time. He and JP sears were outing the WEF for their evil intentions too.