The bio mechanics of injecting foreign material by penetrating the largest organ in our body has to have negative consequences since the immune system is the sentinel that reacts when non-self toxins and pathogens invade.
What is not measured and discussed is the fact that the majority of Americans have a immune system that is dysfunctional to some degree, and in some cases greatly deficient, which makes them at a higher risk of having adverse reactions that are unpredictable! That was clearly expressed with the Pfizer research data that reported over 1000 different forms of side effects were noted. That alone should have shut down this push for RNA injections.
What we keep ignoring is the fact that big chemo drives big Agra that drives big Pharma because it’s all running on chemicals that we don’t need in our environment or our food system!
You are so right! In addition, if the medical school taught nutrition, they would have discovered that the function of the bloodstream is to carry nutrients from unprocessed food throughout the entire body to nourish the organs glands and cells; creating Energy and Good Health. I am almost 92 and have few wrinkles on my body...because I am aware that nutrients feed the largest organ our skin. Toxic drugs and vaccines don't cut the mustard...They poison the organs, glands and cells. I learned how the Immune System functions 50 years ago or more. The Immune System is comprised of lymph glands in different locations around the human body that propagate billions of white corpuscles, in order to keep the bloodstream clean, clear and free of impurities, such as. foreign proteins, miniscule particles of allergenic food, and any other elements that would endanger the organs, glands and cells.
Thanks for posting this. The aluminum in vaccines is alarming and a good reason to decline or at least minimize. The FDA is negligent to permit this. But since I just bought a Bialetti moka pot yesterday (aluminum - I have the stainless steel) I feel better about ingesting it with my coffee (I agonized over this decision!)-after reading your post!
Thank you, Dr. Malone, for making it clear just how dangerous “live” virus vaccines can be. Unbelievably, United and Delta Airlines still require all pilots to receive the Yellow Fever vaccine as a condition of employment. I’ve been screaming from 39,000 feet since Delta tried to force me to get the shot in 2010, just how dangerous this is. It puts ALL their pilots at risk of serious injury, including those who choose to fly domestic routes only. Not only are whole, replication competent viruses in the shots, the recipient has no idea how many are in that syringe before the plunger is pushed, nor how viable they are. I had a private conversation about the Yellow Fever shot requirement for pilots with Stephen Krahling, the Merck mumps vaccine whistleblower brought to light in the movie “Protocol-7”. He was shocked by that requirement and stated that vaccine manufacturers will overfill vaccine batches to make damn sure what is in them has more than the minimum amount before the product expires on the shelf. He asked me if I knew of any pilots that got severely ill after the shot. Indeed, I did, and one of them I spoke to in person almost died. I exempted myself medically from getting the shot and was subsequently restricted from flying trips to certain destinations. I would have gladly flown to any of those destinations without fear and without being vaccinated, as I had done in the past as a pilot for Eastern Airlines decades prior in the 80’s. Yeah, I’m that old.
Thank you for this review As a lay person, it raises a question re infants where multiple vaccines are given at one time. Will be watching for ACIP recommendations. Further assessments seem necessary. In the meantime spaced out innoculations?
Pediatricians are such an independant lot, one wonders the position they'll take.
If there are other measures (than vaccines) to protect against and treat these various diseases, it could help in deciding which/whether to pursue vaccinations. My impression is this is not within ACIPs charges.
- Covid Essential Links > KEY MEASLES & OTHER VACCINE RESOURCES + BIRD FLU + MENTAL HEALTH (other sections too within this page): https://tinyurl.com/4dsjan4f
Excellent! As ACIP, CDC and HHS advise their recommendationsvl for dealing with vaccine issues , this offers a companion strategy forbl pediatricians, attending physicians need to have available to counsel parents.IMO this is a vital knowledge needed to achieve an informed consent.
Thank you for this data, it is very helpful & much needed information to have. I know my Grand daughters will not be getting any vaccines again, as my Daughter opted-out for them getting vaccines this school year. Even though this is a long, hard read for me, & I am not a medical professional by any means, the basic Summary is extremely helpful, & a good list to have as a general reference for vaccines that contain aluminum-salt adjuvants.
yep, I mostly have given up sending stuff out. . .
The advent of vaccine PR on the arc of humankind is downright evil in overall motivation and scale indoctrinating virtually ALL of us to desire this "protection". In ironic fact, from infancy onward vaccines attack and reduce this robust shield God gave us.
To those who have found a degree of being awake to true evil this is no surprise. As monstrous and all encompassing as this situation is throughout the entire world though, the canary we now hear may be harkening the largest genocide perpetrated upon mankind by the People of the Lie(read M. Scott Peck)
I only needed to read the list of ingredients to know that hardly anyone taking these varieties of injections knows what's in them! The "oh so careful" about what goes into or on the body certainly need this information! I would love to see the faces of some people I know, who are "oh so careful." Now to get back to the rest of my higher learning, this is better than any college course that I never took!
How about putting as much effort into describing what’s known about the superior protection of natural immunity? I believe parents of young children need a lot more information on how healthy children and adults are when they have natural immunity instead of vaccinated immunity, and there are a wealth of peer reviewed studies on that topic.
I’d like to see ACIP discuss the benefits of natural immunity when deciding whether to approve a new vaccine. How about approving them only for undernourished infants and children?
I’m very fortunate that, back in the 1950s and 60s, my mom was very aware of the value of natural immunity, and she chose natural immunity for us. I’m now in my 70s, and I’m in excellent health, not on any pharmaceutical medications. I attribute my good fortune to my mother’s wise discernment regarding vaccines.
I feel for all children whose parents know nothing about natural immunity and the wisdom of letting a well-nourished body fend off diseases. I blame ALL of the doctors and other adults who continue to push vaccines and vaccine information instead of information on natural immunity for the very poor state of health that the majority of our defenseless children are in. It’s a tragic, multi-generational failure.
The world is full of topics. WE have written and published thousands of essays now. Natural immunity is a good topic. I will put it on the list for the future.
Although the world is full of important topics, I believe that helping parents understand how valuable natural immunity is will go a long way in helping end the senseless poisoning of our infants and young children. I base this on what’s happening with my sons and their many friends who are now young parents. They hear that vaccines can be harmful but they don’t know that natural immunity is a viable alternative.
The media, the doctors, and our government under the cloak of goodwill have gas-lighted the world to our detriment. The innocuous and far-reaching character of this massive false saviour is that the REST of the world follows the US.
The top 10 countries in health outcomes did not follow our example on childhood vaccinations nor on pesticides and other additives in foods. They followed the science, and their children are much better off. It’s literally insane what this country has done to its citizen’s/children’s health, and the AMA, FDA, CDC and USDA are still not correcting the problem.
I have a young friend whose pediatrician strongly recommended that she go on birth control at age 15, and even though she didn’t feel any need for birth control she followed his advice. Then, at age 30, she was told that she had fertility issues, likely due to the birth control she had been on! How insane is that? Fortunately, she was able to get pregnant and has a healthy child now, but it was heartbreaking to learn that the pills had harmed her.
I also have two friends who are 25 and are vaccine injured. One spends 6 hours per week getting expensive specialized medical treatments. Both spend much of their time doing what they can to improve their health. Both wonder whether they’ll ever have the opportunity to get married. Again, tragic. They both wish that their own parents and many more parents today understood the benefit of natural immunity.
I’d like to see a big huge campaign, right now, about the benefits of natural immunity, including the health outcomes in countries that don’t vaccinate nearly as heavily as we do.
I would like to see your source on those "top 10".
In my reading I have certainly gotten the understanding that, at least, the five eyes(UK, Austrailia, US, New Zealand, and Canada) follow US FDA guidelines. . . closely.
This top 10 ranking and the numbers it’s based on is harder to find in a web search these days. When Kennedy was running for President, he included statistics like the U.S. was ranked #69 in health outcomes, while Norway and Switzerland are ranked in the top 10. I was able to verify his claims with a simple Brave (really Google) search, and learned that the ranking was based on key measures like life expectancy and infant mortality rates. Today, I was able to verify that Norway has no vaccine requirements for children entering public school in Norway, and also that Norway ranks in the top 10 in health outcomes, but the site with the detailed statistics to support the health outcome ranking is behind a paywall.
I wish I’d saved the links from back in 2024. Perhaps one of the other readers of this substack, or Drs. Malone have those links. I’ll also reach out to a few others who might have them, and I’ll keep looking in case I can post the links here.
well, really, my ONLY point was that OTHER nations follow our poor example without having their OWN, independent assessment of the risks. I do NOT believe you can name another country's agency that organizes, controls, and is so ALL pervasive as the the US FDA / HHS and combined agencies. It's decisions and mandates go forth to the world.
Our taxes pay for this, we have sky-high pharmaceutical prices vs the rest of the world and the rest of the world sucks off our FDA like a remora on a shark. They also get what is IN that shark blood.
Yes, the other countries who follow our FDA and CDC guidelines are also doing a poor job of taking care of the health of their children. Switzerland and Japan are other examples of countries that don’t follow the CDC guidelines and are in the top 10 for health outcomes. It seems likely to me that none of the top 10 impose the CDC vaccination schedule on their infants and children.
The brief mention of subunit vaccines under the general comment of reduced effectiveness is lacking. Other social media presentations had put the Novavax COVID subunit vaccine in the same category as the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. But the Novavax subunit vaccine is not a gene therapy based vaccine and is free from a host of side effects, especially long term side effects of mRNA vaccines. The adjuvant in the Novavax vaccine is Matrix-MTM adjuvant containing saponins derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina). The modern vaccines mentioned as also having saponins, Shringrex especially, are very safe and very effective. So while the politically pumped dangerous vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer are giving a bad name to vaccines in general, Shringrex and Novavax vaccines are being unjustifiably suspected because they are also "new."
The use of alum is allowed because it is "old" and "old" is unjustifiably seen as safe. I once examined some alum in my analytical ultracentrifuge and found that it was highly polydiverse in the size of particles. If someone found the active immunogenic species in Alum there is a chance that those species would be different from the most toxic species. But I think the companies are afraid to do the more in depth tests because it is possible the immunogenic boosting species are also the toxic species that cause the side effects. So dirty old poorly characterized alum is used because the company doesn't have to spend money proving it is safe, it is used as generally regarded as safe because it is "old" and has been used before.
A complicating factor for all COVID vaccines is that spike protein is not just the entry protein for the COVID vaccine, it is also an immunotoxin. Myocarditis is listed as a possible side effect of Novavax COVID vaccine which indicates that the cause of Myocarditis could be the spike protein itself meaning that Myocarditis could be caused by the Pfizer, Moderna, or Novavax vaccines, as well as by the COVID virus itself. But again, since mRNA vaccines persist for months in multiple cell types, the mRNA vaccines would be the riskiest for long term exposure to spike protein.
So, David, if I understand correctly, you point out that the saponin agent may be getting a bad rap but, despite that fact, it is a mere ingredient in the carrier fluid that conveys spike protein which, in fact, you suspect being a really BAD agent -- a potential myocarditis catalyst.
I guess, IF I understand this, you express perhaps subliminally to us that there is still yet no reason to take any COVID "vaccines" as NONE of them retain redeeming value.
I will continue my plan to avoid ALL vaccines. To my mind when considering my chances for my immune system(if supported well and not abused) to protect me vs artificial human-meddling chemistries, I will go with God's gift.
All vaccines work by introducing an antigen to your immune system and priming it to fight off a disease. The vaccines work because your body "remembers" diseases by having some b cells turn into b memory cells making immune response quicker than if there were no b memory cells in your body. A full immune response affects more than just B cells and antibody formation, so a vaccine will never be as complete as getting a disease.
For people with weak immune systems, like every old person has a weaker immune system than whey had when young, and pre-mature infants have immune systems that have not yet formed, the benefits of vaccines can be reduced. In the end, with or without a vaccine, your immune system saves you, or nothing will.
Every vaccine will have some risk of adverse events, so your policy to avoid all vaccines is reasonable depending on your own personal situation. I go back and forth on the Shringrex vaccine for myself, but think it is worthwhile for my wife and father. I happen to have an over-active immune system and multiple antigen and food allergies, so I think I am higher risk for adverse events and don't think my immune system needs priming: it generally needs to calm down.
If there was a disease like smallpox going around, I would take the smallpox vaccination. The forced polio vaccinations were more problematic since the older polio vaccinations could cause cases of polio resulting in paralysis and death. If a disease like polio were around, I might not take the original style polio vaccine, though I expect these days we could make a safer one that I would take.
In the end, my message is that the effectiveness and safety of any individual vaccine is a risk assessment for each individual and blanket statements about vaccines are bound to be only generally applicable. The shingles vaccine being a good case study where one vaccine was not worth the risk and withdrawn from the market while the second vaccine was worth the risk, at least for most people, and is still on the market.
The Regeneron antibody against COVID and other antibody therapies avoid exciting the immune system while helping out by supplying antibodies against a particular disease. This is a partly natural mechanism of action because mothers supply antibodies to infants through breast milk and our bodies seem to be able to accept the help rather than reject it even after we are grown. For pre-mature infants, the anti-RSV antibody has definitely saved lives. I think the anti-COVID antibody saved one of my daughter's life when she had COVD. That is the insanity of the system: a dangerous set of vaccines using untested technology and ingredients from China was preferred to an antibody treatment using a mechanism of action proven mostly safe and getting safer over time with improved technology for 50 years. The vaccines take more time to be effective and their effect is mostly confined to making antibodies. But the antibody therapies deliver an antibody immediately, and not just any antibody, an antibody that is tested to be one of the best antibodies in effectiveness. It is just crazy how the business people really don't care about the patients, but only about the money and their own intellectual property.
The topical use (spreading alum on the surface of your gums) would have a much different and presumably better safety profile than intravenous injection. My criticism is that while Alum is generally regarded as safe, there is evidence that it is not 100% safe. Yet, the studies to try to make it safer are not done.
The AI summary of alum for canker sores is: You can use alum powder for mouth sores by making a paste with water or using it as a rinse, as its astringent properties help dry, shrink, and speed healing, but it causes a sharp stinging sensation. Apply a tiny amount of alum paste (powder + water) to the sore, leave for one minute, then rinse thoroughly, avoiding swallowing. Repeat daily, and if it's too intense, dilute it more or use as a mouthwash.
I gather from the AI summary that there is some evidence that swallowing the alum leads to adverse reactions, so they tell you to spit it out. But Alum is not highly toxic or they wouldn't let you put it in your mouth. But they really don't know if the small amount absorbed into the mouth is harmful or not.
For example, (also from an AI summary) Domeboro solution is a medicated astringent soak, made from aluminum sulfate and calcium acetate, used to relieve itching, inflammation, and oozing from minor skin irritations like poison ivy, insect bites, athlete's foot, and rashes from soaps or jewelry by drying the skin and soothing discomfort. You create it by dissolving the powder packets or tablets in cool or warm water and then applying as a wet compress or soak for 10-30 minutes, several times a day, for temporary relief. But what the AI doesn't tell you unless asked is Domeboro solution is toxic and you call poison control if swallowed. Yes, Domeboro solution is not for internal use and can be harmful if swallowed, potentially causing nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain; if ingested, you should get immediate medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away, as it's meant only for external skin relief. One of the main ingredients in Domeboro is aluminum sulfate, the same element that is in Alum which is Alum is a group of hydrated double sulfate salts, most commonly potassium aluminum sulfate. Chemistry is complicated.
OK, so long story short I should NOT discontinue this. No problemo since I leave it on a few seconds then wash it out with clear water and spit out the acrid tasting stuff. minutes later, no pain.
Again, Dr. Malone, your contributions to our knowledge base is fabulous. Thank you so much. I realize these are two completely different uses of aluminum; an ingredient in an injection and food cooking/packaging items. My wife, for decades, has always had us avoid aluminum at every opportunity. In our home we have absolutely no aluminum cooking or storage things. I guess the next big issue will be plastics.
I think you may have missed something here. Note, it is pointed out that #1 absorption of the orally TAKEN aluminum is less than 0.1%. Meaning: if you take in 100 mg, only 0.1 mg comes into your blood serum.
#2: the aluminum in aluminum pans is bound up by a variety of means making it next to impossible to be imparted to you, even orally. The aluminum is anodized on the outside of the pan; but the outside does not touch your food even. The interior is coated with teflon or other similar plastic. When it is scratched a bit there may be SOME tiny chance the aluminum oxide is exposed. However, oxidized aluminum highly binds the aluminum ions also but that is besides the point since they would not even be aluminum ions-- aluminum in a matrix of crystal atoms.
#3: only the aluminum ion is the bad actor here, mostly the Al 3+ ion.
the POINT: Aluminum cooking ware is NOT a problem. The idea is a complete conspiracy theory.
#4: Even IF you cooked with uncoated aluminum pans, the outside will be OXIDIZED highly binding any ions. The chance that you would have ANY aluminum toxicity from eating food prepared as such is so small. . . it really can't be expressed.
I know, you will continue to avoid aluminum pans. . . sigh.
Thank you for the explanation of aluminum around us. You are correct, no reason for us to switch out our cookware because of your information. Not sure about the "conspiracy theory" thing though. We have an under-sink water filter to a spigot for removing chlorine and such for cooking and drinking. I do use an aluminum non-stick coated fry pan. As far as other pots, pans or bake ware, all stainless. No reason now to get something different.
There was a wonderful study by S. Latha et al at the university of Bangladesh that demonstrated how aluminum causes fragile-x which presents with very similar symptoms to autism. Knockout mice with the premutation gene for fragile-X were given aluminum and when their levels reached a specific point the premutation genes in their fetuses were methylated and the babies were all born with fragile-X. I can’t remember the name of the journal it was published in and it was removed from the Internet very quickly but Latha is still researching the affects of aluminum in vaccines. Also the micronized form of aluminum that was used in the c-19 shots is much more dangerous as it crosses the BBB much more easily.
You used the word "micronized". Interesting word. Years ago in milling iron oxide for magnetic media we used a unique machine called a micronizer which blasted two tiny streams at each other under 60 to 80,000 psi. This process was a kind of milling process to refine the particle size. Very smooth PSD for high performance magnetic performance and targeting a particular diameter.
Very interesting! I just used the word “micronized” because it came out of Rochelle Wolensky’s mouth when she was testifying in front of the Senate. I was only familiar with “micellized” before that. It basically means to make the particles much smaller but I have no idea how they do that. I guess now I should try to find out. According to Guillemette (sp) Crepeaux the smaller the molecule of aluminum the easier it is to cross the BBB and is associated with greater brain damage and autism symptoms. Her statement sent waves of horror through me and I’d barely recovered before she announced that they never tested the C-19 shots for transmission!
I hate to say this but if Wolensky used this word it could be she used it in a state of hubris trying to inflate her demeanor to the world of the unwashed, inflating her stature. It very well could be she spoke the TRUE word or process and, in fact, was an unforced error revealing the industry's proprietary ability to create genocide-level aluminum ions.
Very interesting. Answered my long time question about why aluminum is used in vaccines in the first place. But it's very unsettling to know how little is really understood about its risks in light of how cavalierly it is used in our children and other loved ones. Seems someone ought to care about that.
The patent on the self-assembling nanotech instructs vitamin C and EDTA will help chelate the hydrogel. I add methylene blue to remove the graphene (antennae). Tuning in carrier and modulation is a big deal for me:
Aluminum is undeniably toxic, but it is "generally", ( whatever & whoever constitutes generally ), considered safe in limited amounts. So let's inject it, just as our ancestors did.
The bio mechanics of injecting foreign material by penetrating the largest organ in our body has to have negative consequences since the immune system is the sentinel that reacts when non-self toxins and pathogens invade.
What is not measured and discussed is the fact that the majority of Americans have a immune system that is dysfunctional to some degree, and in some cases greatly deficient, which makes them at a higher risk of having adverse reactions that are unpredictable! That was clearly expressed with the Pfizer research data that reported over 1000 different forms of side effects were noted. That alone should have shut down this push for RNA injections.
What we keep ignoring is the fact that big chemo drives big Agra that drives big Pharma because it’s all running on chemicals that we don’t need in our environment or our food system!
Boom!
Thank you!
YUP! Thanks!
And how much of that dysfunctional immunity is caused by all these infant/childhood jabs?
You are so right! In addition, if the medical school taught nutrition, they would have discovered that the function of the bloodstream is to carry nutrients from unprocessed food throughout the entire body to nourish the organs glands and cells; creating Energy and Good Health. I am almost 92 and have few wrinkles on my body...because I am aware that nutrients feed the largest organ our skin. Toxic drugs and vaccines don't cut the mustard...They poison the organs, glands and cells. I learned how the Immune System functions 50 years ago or more. The Immune System is comprised of lymph glands in different locations around the human body that propagate billions of white corpuscles, in order to keep the bloodstream clean, clear and free of impurities, such as. foreign proteins, miniscule particles of allergenic food, and any other elements that would endanger the organs, glands and cells.
Spot on!
Excellent!
I wrote an article on this subject, with a slightly different emphasis. It is entitled, "Comparing INJECTED versus INGESTED Aluminum…and the Serious Dangers of Injected Aluminum" https://danaullman.substack.com/p/comparing-ingested-versus-injected
Anyone interested in the subject of aluminum in vaccines will benefit from my short article.
Thank you for the attaboy, Dana
Homeopathy is so important and relevant to health!
Wonderful information, thank you!
Thanks for posting this. The aluminum in vaccines is alarming and a good reason to decline or at least minimize. The FDA is negligent to permit this. But since I just bought a Bialetti moka pot yesterday (aluminum - I have the stainless steel) I feel better about ingesting it with my coffee (I agonized over this decision!)-after reading your post!
Thank you, Dr. Malone, for making it clear just how dangerous “live” virus vaccines can be. Unbelievably, United and Delta Airlines still require all pilots to receive the Yellow Fever vaccine as a condition of employment. I’ve been screaming from 39,000 feet since Delta tried to force me to get the shot in 2010, just how dangerous this is. It puts ALL their pilots at risk of serious injury, including those who choose to fly domestic routes only. Not only are whole, replication competent viruses in the shots, the recipient has no idea how many are in that syringe before the plunger is pushed, nor how viable they are. I had a private conversation about the Yellow Fever shot requirement for pilots with Stephen Krahling, the Merck mumps vaccine whistleblower brought to light in the movie “Protocol-7”. He was shocked by that requirement and stated that vaccine manufacturers will overfill vaccine batches to make damn sure what is in them has more than the minimum amount before the product expires on the shelf. He asked me if I knew of any pilots that got severely ill after the shot. Indeed, I did, and one of them I spoke to in person almost died. I exempted myself medically from getting the shot and was subsequently restricted from flying trips to certain destinations. I would have gladly flown to any of those destinations without fear and without being vaccinated, as I had done in the past as a pilot for Eastern Airlines decades prior in the 80’s. Yeah, I’m that old.
Thank you for this review As a lay person, it raises a question re infants where multiple vaccines are given at one time. Will be watching for ACIP recommendations. Further assessments seem necessary. In the meantime spaced out innoculations?
Pediatricians are such an independant lot, one wonders the position they'll take.
If there are other measures (than vaccines) to protect against and treat these various diseases, it could help in deciding which/whether to pursue vaccinations. My impression is this is not within ACIPs charges.
Thanks for sharing!
The need for vaccinating should be between parent and physician with full disclosure of the risk of adverse effects. No mandates!
There are many resources regarding treatments and prevention for vaccine targeted diseases. Here are a few (hope these help!):
- Health Freedom Institute: https://healthfreedominstitute.com/blog/
- AAPS > Treatment search: https://aapsonline.org/?s=treatment
- Children's Health Defense Pediatric Perspectives: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/pediatric-perspectives-with-paul-thomas/
- Physicians for Informed Consent "Silver" Booklet:
-- Article: https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/silver-booklet/
-- Substack Note: https://tinyurl.com/ywdaevpv
-- Book: https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Diseases-They-Target-Epidemiology/dp/B0FK4262N3
More here:
- Covid Essential Links > KEY MEASLES & OTHER VACCINE RESOURCES + BIRD FLU + MENTAL HEALTH (other sections too within this page): https://tinyurl.com/4dsjan4f
- Resources > Health (other sections too within this page): https://tinyurl.com/wbw9376k
Excellent! As ACIP, CDC and HHS advise their recommendationsvl for dealing with vaccine issues , this offers a companion strategy forbl pediatricians, attending physicians need to have available to counsel parents.IMO this is a vital knowledge needed to achieve an informed consent.
Thank you so very much! Appreciate your thoughtful comment more than you can imagine.
Thank you!
You’re very welcome 😊
Thank you for this data, it is very helpful & much needed information to have. I know my Grand daughters will not be getting any vaccines again, as my Daughter opted-out for them getting vaccines this school year. Even though this is a long, hard read for me, & I am not a medical professional by any means, the basic Summary is extremely helpful, & a good list to have as a general reference for vaccines that contain aluminum-salt adjuvants.
Thank you for this information! I think it is best to eat healthy,get exercise, and take your supplements.
P.S. I sent this out to 7 or more people I know, I'll bet I won't get much of a response. I even said this isn't political... even tho it is!
yep, I mostly have given up sending stuff out. . .
The advent of vaccine PR on the arc of humankind is downright evil in overall motivation and scale indoctrinating virtually ALL of us to desire this "protection". In ironic fact, from infancy onward vaccines attack and reduce this robust shield God gave us.
To those who have found a degree of being awake to true evil this is no surprise. As monstrous and all encompassing as this situation is throughout the entire world though, the canary we now hear may be harkening the largest genocide perpetrated upon mankind by the People of the Lie(read M. Scott Peck)
I only needed to read the list of ingredients to know that hardly anyone taking these varieties of injections knows what's in them! The "oh so careful" about what goes into or on the body certainly need this information! I would love to see the faces of some people I know, who are "oh so careful." Now to get back to the rest of my higher learning, this is better than any college course that I never took!
How about putting as much effort into describing what’s known about the superior protection of natural immunity? I believe parents of young children need a lot more information on how healthy children and adults are when they have natural immunity instead of vaccinated immunity, and there are a wealth of peer reviewed studies on that topic.
I’d like to see ACIP discuss the benefits of natural immunity when deciding whether to approve a new vaccine. How about approving them only for undernourished infants and children?
I’m very fortunate that, back in the 1950s and 60s, my mom was very aware of the value of natural immunity, and she chose natural immunity for us. I’m now in my 70s, and I’m in excellent health, not on any pharmaceutical medications. I attribute my good fortune to my mother’s wise discernment regarding vaccines.
I feel for all children whose parents know nothing about natural immunity and the wisdom of letting a well-nourished body fend off diseases. I blame ALL of the doctors and other adults who continue to push vaccines and vaccine information instead of information on natural immunity for the very poor state of health that the majority of our defenseless children are in. It’s a tragic, multi-generational failure.
The world is full of topics. WE have written and published thousands of essays now. Natural immunity is a good topic. I will put it on the list for the future.
Wonderful! Thank you!!!
Although the world is full of important topics, I believe that helping parents understand how valuable natural immunity is will go a long way in helping end the senseless poisoning of our infants and young children. I base this on what’s happening with my sons and their many friends who are now young parents. They hear that vaccines can be harmful but they don’t know that natural immunity is a viable alternative.
I will second that! YES.
The media, the doctors, and our government under the cloak of goodwill have gas-lighted the world to our detriment. The innocuous and far-reaching character of this massive false saviour is that the REST of the world follows the US.
When the US falls down, so goes the world.
The top 10 countries in health outcomes did not follow our example on childhood vaccinations nor on pesticides and other additives in foods. They followed the science, and their children are much better off. It’s literally insane what this country has done to its citizen’s/children’s health, and the AMA, FDA, CDC and USDA are still not correcting the problem.
I have a young friend whose pediatrician strongly recommended that she go on birth control at age 15, and even though she didn’t feel any need for birth control she followed his advice. Then, at age 30, she was told that she had fertility issues, likely due to the birth control she had been on! How insane is that? Fortunately, she was able to get pregnant and has a healthy child now, but it was heartbreaking to learn that the pills had harmed her.
I also have two friends who are 25 and are vaccine injured. One spends 6 hours per week getting expensive specialized medical treatments. Both spend much of their time doing what they can to improve their health. Both wonder whether they’ll ever have the opportunity to get married. Again, tragic. They both wish that their own parents and many more parents today understood the benefit of natural immunity.
I’d like to see a big huge campaign, right now, about the benefits of natural immunity, including the health outcomes in countries that don’t vaccinate nearly as heavily as we do.
I would like to see your source on those "top 10".
In my reading I have certainly gotten the understanding that, at least, the five eyes(UK, Austrailia, US, New Zealand, and Canada) follow US FDA guidelines. . . closely.
This top 10 ranking and the numbers it’s based on is harder to find in a web search these days. When Kennedy was running for President, he included statistics like the U.S. was ranked #69 in health outcomes, while Norway and Switzerland are ranked in the top 10. I was able to verify his claims with a simple Brave (really Google) search, and learned that the ranking was based on key measures like life expectancy and infant mortality rates. Today, I was able to verify that Norway has no vaccine requirements for children entering public school in Norway, and also that Norway ranks in the top 10 in health outcomes, but the site with the detailed statistics to support the health outcome ranking is behind a paywall.
I wish I’d saved the links from back in 2024. Perhaps one of the other readers of this substack, or Drs. Malone have those links. I’ll also reach out to a few others who might have them, and I’ll keep looking in case I can post the links here.
well, really, my ONLY point was that OTHER nations follow our poor example without having their OWN, independent assessment of the risks. I do NOT believe you can name another country's agency that organizes, controls, and is so ALL pervasive as the the US FDA / HHS and combined agencies. It's decisions and mandates go forth to the world.
Our taxes pay for this, we have sky-high pharmaceutical prices vs the rest of the world and the rest of the world sucks off our FDA like a remora on a shark. They also get what is IN that shark blood.
Yes, the other countries who follow our FDA and CDC guidelines are also doing a poor job of taking care of the health of their children. Switzerland and Japan are other examples of countries that don’t follow the CDC guidelines and are in the top 10 for health outcomes. It seems likely to me that none of the top 10 impose the CDC vaccination schedule on their infants and children.
The brief mention of subunit vaccines under the general comment of reduced effectiveness is lacking. Other social media presentations had put the Novavax COVID subunit vaccine in the same category as the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. But the Novavax subunit vaccine is not a gene therapy based vaccine and is free from a host of side effects, especially long term side effects of mRNA vaccines. The adjuvant in the Novavax vaccine is Matrix-MTM adjuvant containing saponins derived from the soapbark tree (Quillaja saponaria Molina). The modern vaccines mentioned as also having saponins, Shringrex especially, are very safe and very effective. So while the politically pumped dangerous vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer are giving a bad name to vaccines in general, Shringrex and Novavax vaccines are being unjustifiably suspected because they are also "new."
The use of alum is allowed because it is "old" and "old" is unjustifiably seen as safe. I once examined some alum in my analytical ultracentrifuge and found that it was highly polydiverse in the size of particles. If someone found the active immunogenic species in Alum there is a chance that those species would be different from the most toxic species. But I think the companies are afraid to do the more in depth tests because it is possible the immunogenic boosting species are also the toxic species that cause the side effects. So dirty old poorly characterized alum is used because the company doesn't have to spend money proving it is safe, it is used as generally regarded as safe because it is "old" and has been used before.
A complicating factor for all COVID vaccines is that spike protein is not just the entry protein for the COVID vaccine, it is also an immunotoxin. Myocarditis is listed as a possible side effect of Novavax COVID vaccine which indicates that the cause of Myocarditis could be the spike protein itself meaning that Myocarditis could be caused by the Pfizer, Moderna, or Novavax vaccines, as well as by the COVID virus itself. But again, since mRNA vaccines persist for months in multiple cell types, the mRNA vaccines would be the riskiest for long term exposure to spike protein.
So, David, if I understand correctly, you point out that the saponin agent may be getting a bad rap but, despite that fact, it is a mere ingredient in the carrier fluid that conveys spike protein which, in fact, you suspect being a really BAD agent -- a potential myocarditis catalyst.
I guess, IF I understand this, you express perhaps subliminally to us that there is still yet no reason to take any COVID "vaccines" as NONE of them retain redeeming value.
I will continue my plan to avoid ALL vaccines. To my mind when considering my chances for my immune system(if supported well and not abused) to protect me vs artificial human-meddling chemistries, I will go with God's gift.
All vaccines work by introducing an antigen to your immune system and priming it to fight off a disease. The vaccines work because your body "remembers" diseases by having some b cells turn into b memory cells making immune response quicker than if there were no b memory cells in your body. A full immune response affects more than just B cells and antibody formation, so a vaccine will never be as complete as getting a disease.
For people with weak immune systems, like every old person has a weaker immune system than whey had when young, and pre-mature infants have immune systems that have not yet formed, the benefits of vaccines can be reduced. In the end, with or without a vaccine, your immune system saves you, or nothing will.
Every vaccine will have some risk of adverse events, so your policy to avoid all vaccines is reasonable depending on your own personal situation. I go back and forth on the Shringrex vaccine for myself, but think it is worthwhile for my wife and father. I happen to have an over-active immune system and multiple antigen and food allergies, so I think I am higher risk for adverse events and don't think my immune system needs priming: it generally needs to calm down.
If there was a disease like smallpox going around, I would take the smallpox vaccination. The forced polio vaccinations were more problematic since the older polio vaccinations could cause cases of polio resulting in paralysis and death. If a disease like polio were around, I might not take the original style polio vaccine, though I expect these days we could make a safer one that I would take.
In the end, my message is that the effectiveness and safety of any individual vaccine is a risk assessment for each individual and blanket statements about vaccines are bound to be only generally applicable. The shingles vaccine being a good case study where one vaccine was not worth the risk and withdrawn from the market while the second vaccine was worth the risk, at least for most people, and is still on the market.
The Regeneron antibody against COVID and other antibody therapies avoid exciting the immune system while helping out by supplying antibodies against a particular disease. This is a partly natural mechanism of action because mothers supply antibodies to infants through breast milk and our bodies seem to be able to accept the help rather than reject it even after we are grown. For pre-mature infants, the anti-RSV antibody has definitely saved lives. I think the anti-COVID antibody saved one of my daughter's life when she had COVD. That is the insanity of the system: a dangerous set of vaccines using untested technology and ingredients from China was preferred to an antibody treatment using a mechanism of action proven mostly safe and getting safer over time with improved technology for 50 years. The vaccines take more time to be effective and their effect is mostly confined to making antibodies. But the antibody therapies deliver an antibody immediately, and not just any antibody, an antibody that is tested to be one of the best antibodies in effectiveness. It is just crazy how the business people really don't care about the patients, but only about the money and their own intellectual property.
David, I use alum occasionally to apply to canker sores on my gums. It REALLY works well. Within hours, gone. Should I reconsider this?!
The topical use (spreading alum on the surface of your gums) would have a much different and presumably better safety profile than intravenous injection. My criticism is that while Alum is generally regarded as safe, there is evidence that it is not 100% safe. Yet, the studies to try to make it safer are not done.
The AI summary of alum for canker sores is: You can use alum powder for mouth sores by making a paste with water or using it as a rinse, as its astringent properties help dry, shrink, and speed healing, but it causes a sharp stinging sensation. Apply a tiny amount of alum paste (powder + water) to the sore, leave for one minute, then rinse thoroughly, avoiding swallowing. Repeat daily, and if it's too intense, dilute it more or use as a mouthwash.
I gather from the AI summary that there is some evidence that swallowing the alum leads to adverse reactions, so they tell you to spit it out. But Alum is not highly toxic or they wouldn't let you put it in your mouth. But they really don't know if the small amount absorbed into the mouth is harmful or not.
For example, (also from an AI summary) Domeboro solution is a medicated astringent soak, made from aluminum sulfate and calcium acetate, used to relieve itching, inflammation, and oozing from minor skin irritations like poison ivy, insect bites, athlete's foot, and rashes from soaps or jewelry by drying the skin and soothing discomfort. You create it by dissolving the powder packets or tablets in cool or warm water and then applying as a wet compress or soak for 10-30 minutes, several times a day, for temporary relief. But what the AI doesn't tell you unless asked is Domeboro solution is toxic and you call poison control if swallowed. Yes, Domeboro solution is not for internal use and can be harmful if swallowed, potentially causing nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain; if ingested, you should get immediate medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away, as it's meant only for external skin relief. One of the main ingredients in Domeboro is aluminum sulfate, the same element that is in Alum which is Alum is a group of hydrated double sulfate salts, most commonly potassium aluminum sulfate. Chemistry is complicated.
OK, so long story short I should NOT discontinue this. No problemo since I leave it on a few seconds then wash it out with clear water and spit out the acrid tasting stuff. minutes later, no pain.
Again, Dr. Malone, your contributions to our knowledge base is fabulous. Thank you so much. I realize these are two completely different uses of aluminum; an ingredient in an injection and food cooking/packaging items. My wife, for decades, has always had us avoid aluminum at every opportunity. In our home we have absolutely no aluminum cooking or storage things. I guess the next big issue will be plastics.
I think you may have missed something here. Note, it is pointed out that #1 absorption of the orally TAKEN aluminum is less than 0.1%. Meaning: if you take in 100 mg, only 0.1 mg comes into your blood serum.
#2: the aluminum in aluminum pans is bound up by a variety of means making it next to impossible to be imparted to you, even orally. The aluminum is anodized on the outside of the pan; but the outside does not touch your food even. The interior is coated with teflon or other similar plastic. When it is scratched a bit there may be SOME tiny chance the aluminum oxide is exposed. However, oxidized aluminum highly binds the aluminum ions also but that is besides the point since they would not even be aluminum ions-- aluminum in a matrix of crystal atoms.
#3: only the aluminum ion is the bad actor here, mostly the Al 3+ ion.
the POINT: Aluminum cooking ware is NOT a problem. The idea is a complete conspiracy theory.
#4: Even IF you cooked with uncoated aluminum pans, the outside will be OXIDIZED highly binding any ions. The chance that you would have ANY aluminum toxicity from eating food prepared as such is so small. . . it really can't be expressed.
I know, you will continue to avoid aluminum pans. . . sigh.
Thank you for the explanation of aluminum around us. You are correct, no reason for us to switch out our cookware because of your information. Not sure about the "conspiracy theory" thing though. We have an under-sink water filter to a spigot for removing chlorine and such for cooking and drinking. I do use an aluminum non-stick coated fry pan. As far as other pots, pans or bake ware, all stainless. No reason now to get something different.
There was a wonderful study by S. Latha et al at the university of Bangladesh that demonstrated how aluminum causes fragile-x which presents with very similar symptoms to autism. Knockout mice with the premutation gene for fragile-X were given aluminum and when their levels reached a specific point the premutation genes in their fetuses were methylated and the babies were all born with fragile-X. I can’t remember the name of the journal it was published in and it was removed from the Internet very quickly but Latha is still researching the affects of aluminum in vaccines. Also the micronized form of aluminum that was used in the c-19 shots is much more dangerous as it crosses the BBB much more easily.
You used the word "micronized". Interesting word. Years ago in milling iron oxide for magnetic media we used a unique machine called a micronizer which blasted two tiny streams at each other under 60 to 80,000 psi. This process was a kind of milling process to refine the particle size. Very smooth PSD for high performance magnetic performance and targeting a particular diameter.
any correlation to what you describe?
Very interesting! I just used the word “micronized” because it came out of Rochelle Wolensky’s mouth when she was testifying in front of the Senate. I was only familiar with “micellized” before that. It basically means to make the particles much smaller but I have no idea how they do that. I guess now I should try to find out. According to Guillemette (sp) Crepeaux the smaller the molecule of aluminum the easier it is to cross the BBB and is associated with greater brain damage and autism symptoms. Her statement sent waves of horror through me and I’d barely recovered before she announced that they never tested the C-19 shots for transmission!
I hate to say this but if Wolensky used this word it could be she used it in a state of hubris trying to inflate her demeanor to the world of the unwashed, inflating her stature. It very well could be she spoke the TRUE word or process and, in fact, was an unforced error revealing the industry's proprietary ability to create genocide-level aluminum ions.
. . . but I digress.
https://sturtevantinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Sturtevant_Micronizer_Brochure.pdf
Very interesting. Answered my long time question about why aluminum is used in vaccines in the first place. But it's very unsettling to know how little is really understood about its risks in light of how cavalierly it is used in our children and other loved ones. Seems someone ought to care about that.
My favorite: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HApvy02Hu2cHJfyYtSrLyp8eJ4TWTatO
But I am a widower due to Parkinson's Disease. My wife's Dad was a "Roundup Dad" and before TV stole playtime, she had a lot of grass time.
Silicade: https://youtu.be/po8IuIXjCME
The patent on the self-assembling nanotech instructs vitamin C and EDTA will help chelate the hydrogel. I add methylene blue to remove the graphene (antennae). Tuning in carrier and modulation is a big deal for me:
https://drive.google.com/drive/search?q=glyphosate
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1otSQfznZJW5TdAsagQkDI3kJlllLoaVK
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bWjtP1Haqb2tizlxybEWVLzt0Tn7Km-v
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HG8VxEnFtkt53UNFfjzZ5MhV12MEflb6
Aluminum is undeniably toxic, but it is "generally", ( whatever & whoever constitutes generally ), considered safe in limited amounts. So let's inject it, just as our ancestors did.
The fact that the CDC has quietly changed the definition of a vaccine twice in the past ten years should give everyone pause.