A Declaration of the Rights of Persons for an age that can read the mind, edit the genome, and switch off your access to daily life. Read it. Sign it. Pass it on.
Magnetoencephalography can now read thoughts with 60% accuracy, ultrasound targeted at the nucleus accumbens can eliminate addictive behavior. It won't be long before we will have the technology to read and correct wrongthink. The CCP certainly has plans for this, which way will our elites go?
I use Alter AI and like it, but it some times lies to me and it apologies when I point out the deficiency! A disclaimer about Alter says. Sorry! some times I hallucinate! Love it!
John John John, you’re overstating what MEG can and cannot do. Decoding simple images a person is LOOKING at if far different from decoding what a person is thinking/dreaming about.
What might scare people is I can see MEG tech being used as a sophisticated truth-untruth-deception "detector." The brain lights up differently - more areas used, when lying than telling/recalling truth. A careful questioner using words and images would be able to separate out deception.
Will we be able to look at a person’s brain’s electrical signaling as in a SciFi program, who knows, maybe; might this tech be used in the near future to treat mental / cognitive disease (PTSD, anxiety, etc.)? I sure hope so. Will it be abused? Yeah {sigh} probably.
John John John 🤣 😉— MEG is not reading words, it’s "reading" your response to certain words - hence my assertion MEG tech could probably be used as a next gen lie detector.
🧐 did some further reading and I stand behind what I said, tho I can understand what you’re asserting. The best example that I came across, a program using non-invasive MEG tech was able to determine the words a participant was typing from a memorized sentence. Individual character accuracy was poor (~18%) but word accuracy was better (~60%). But this wasn’t reading the persons thoughts, it’s reading the electrical signals associated with TYPING in a carefully chosen phrase. By itself, this amazing but it is NOT reading thoughts.
AND this would only work with typing - the brain activity associated with typing is relatively minor. It’s why taking notes in, say class on a laptop is ineffective compared to taking notes by longhand where brain participation skyrockets.
When this tech can extract what a person is writing, by hand, then it’ll truly be reading thoughts. Who knows, maybe I’ll be using that tech to dictate what I’m seeing as I witness the "fireworks" display, on the mall, at America300 😊
Is it that much of a leap from today's technology to effective mind-reading? Detecting wrongthink won't require anything more than detecting an unspoken response to words. A next-gen lie detector indeed.
No, it’s not, but it’s not on the near horizon - yes, that is MY opinion.
But what’s happening in the brain is complex. Detecting an electrical signal from pressing the ‘l’ key and associating that muscle control with the letter (remember, 18%, after training) is a far cry from deciphering a purely cognitive event. [ I’m using an invasive form of this tech in one of the stories I’m working on (by the way, I appreciate this interaction as it helped gel that proposed tech 😉)]. But thinking involves multiple areas of the brain all cooperating - that’s why typing notes on a laptop is relatively ineffective since fewer brain regions are used.
My body and mind is my temple and you may not be entering it without my permission. 100 year ago, the average American died when they were 70 years old, and 100 years later it is almost 10 years longer, but all the life saving tools that have been created has not improved the quality of health of the American citizens. Too many of the medical tools have been miss used and the lack of voices from the medical community expressing the fact that the root causes of our bloated medical system are not being address is unacceptable. The Whitehouse website shows the chart that is up to date that shows the health of Americans on average is about in the 50th per centile in the world and we have a medical system per capita which is about twice as expensive. In the meantime, the medical community is rally against the goals of RFK Jr who wants to address the root causes that have been ignored and growing since WWII. As long as the mass media and our politicians and our medical leadership embrace the status quo I see nothing changing. I have rallied against the mRNA and did not get the injections because I knew they were experimental. The fact that over 500 mRNA injections are being developed speaks volumes we keep looking for profitable band-aid solutions and not address the root causes. There are pockets of ethnic groups that have rejected the negative lifestyle issues including over treating in the medical arena and enjoy longer life spans, but the reasons for their longevity is ignored. It doesn't grow the current allopathic medicine model. Happy 4th!
I’ll wager the Ugers In China, wish that they’re healthy subpopulation WAS ignored. What unsurpassed barbarism Is committed against them by the CCP BECAUSE of the Uger’s healthy lifestyle.
As the Heidelberg catechism puts it : "I am not my own but belong, body and soul, both in life and in death to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood and has set me free...." I belong to God not to man and not to myself.
I feel a since of urgency about this effort for the simple fact that there are currently three members of the U S SUPREME COURT that are unwilling to admit that they know what a woman is!
Thank you for taking on another worthy task, I support this effort with all my being!
Maybe I'm overthinking this but, "and you may not be taken" could be used by some to mean a person can't be imprisoned for a crime, or a person can't be removed from a country for being there illegally. Any thoughts?
This is going to have to be edited, and reduced to legislation and, hopefully, a treaty. For now, we tried to keep it simple and high level. Baby steps.
While you are editing this, please consider that there is a fundamental omission in this. We must designate human persons specifically. Science considers the human a species of primate, categorizing human vs. non-human primates. Meanwhile, for decades scientists in technology who deny the existence of a soul have been developing non-human persons. We are beginning to see the emergence of these efforts now. These rights stated in this declaration only pertain to human persons, not non-human persons and so must be specifically designated as such. This needs to be taken seriously.
The declaration is, and must be, partisan. It will divide between those with a broad definition of person and those who continue to insist on a narrow definition. Blacks are persons, whites are persons, the mentally feeble are persons, the aged and infirm are persons, the unborn are persons.
Coerced is another word for forced. And it’s absolutely accurate. They can fire us as a patient if we don’t go along with their forced recommendation. Or deny us services.
If we carry this out to the goal of true freedom, then no one should be coerced, forced or otherwise made to do anything for anybody else if they choose not to. Just as you are free to decide which doctor you will entrust your care to, so should he/she be able to decide who they will offer their services to on an individual basis.
I think back to the Masterpiece cake shop case. Just because you hang a shingle out saying you will perform a service, shouldn’t mean that you have to accept orders from anyone who walks through the door. And, if asked why the refusal, an acceptable answer should be, I didn’t want to and that should be the end of it.
Unfortunately over the years from a legal standpoint the word 'person' has different meanings than just a single human being. It can even mean a corporation. I wish this declaration used 'natural person', 'human being', or 'the individual person' instead.
“The word ‘person’ is not always considered the best term for human rights because it is a legal and philosophical concept that can include entities other than human beings, such as corporations, and its meaning has been debated. Human rights are intended to belong to every human being simply by virtue of being human, so many people consider ‘human being’ to be the clearer and more appropriate term.”
Magnetoencephalography can now read thoughts with 60% accuracy, ultrasound targeted at the nucleus accumbens can eliminate addictive behavior. It won't be long before we will have the technology to read and correct wrongthink. The CCP certainly has plans for this, which way will our elites go?
Yep! This tech is scarier than the intrusive stuff - and companies are investing tens of billions to develop this tech.
And there is no legislation now or pending to protect us.
Right to privacy so far -tech companies seem to get a free pass.
When Congress passed a law that said corporations had the same rights as an individual....game over.
AI agents will be given personhood as well.
I use Alter AI and like it, but it some times lies to me and it apologies when I point out the deficiency! A disclaimer about Alter says. Sorry! some times I hallucinate! Love it!
John John John, you’re overstating what MEG can and cannot do. Decoding simple images a person is LOOKING at if far different from decoding what a person is thinking/dreaming about.
What might scare people is I can see MEG tech being used as a sophisticated truth-untruth-deception "detector." The brain lights up differently - more areas used, when lying than telling/recalling truth. A careful questioner using words and images would be able to separate out deception.
Will we be able to look at a person’s brain’s electrical signaling as in a SciFi program, who knows, maybe; might this tech be used in the near future to treat mental / cognitive disease (PTSD, anxiety, etc.)? I sure hope so. Will it be abused? Yeah {sigh} probably.
60% accuracy on words now, not just pictures. After being trained where those words reside in a person's brain.
John John John 🤣 😉— MEG is not reading words, it’s "reading" your response to certain words - hence my assertion MEG tech could probably be used as a next gen lie detector.
🧐 did some further reading and I stand behind what I said, tho I can understand what you’re asserting. The best example that I came across, a program using non-invasive MEG tech was able to determine the words a participant was typing from a memorized sentence. Individual character accuracy was poor (~18%) but word accuracy was better (~60%). But this wasn’t reading the persons thoughts, it’s reading the electrical signals associated with TYPING in a carefully chosen phrase. By itself, this amazing but it is NOT reading thoughts.
AND this would only work with typing - the brain activity associated with typing is relatively minor. It’s why taking notes in, say class on a laptop is ineffective compared to taking notes by longhand where brain participation skyrockets.
When this tech can extract what a person is writing, by hand, then it’ll truly be reading thoughts. Who knows, maybe I’ll be using that tech to dictate what I’m seeing as I witness the "fireworks" display, on the mall, at America300 😊
Is it that much of a leap from today's technology to effective mind-reading? Detecting wrongthink won't require anything more than detecting an unspoken response to words. A next-gen lie detector indeed.
No, it’s not, but it’s not on the near horizon - yes, that is MY opinion.
But what’s happening in the brain is complex. Detecting an electrical signal from pressing the ‘l’ key and associating that muscle control with the letter (remember, 18%, after training) is a far cry from deciphering a purely cognitive event. [ I’m using an invasive form of this tech in one of the stories I’m working on (by the way, I appreciate this interaction as it helped gel that proposed tech 😉)]. But thinking involves multiple areas of the brain all cooperating - that’s why typing notes on a laptop is relatively ineffective since fewer brain regions are used.
What happens in the brain is physics and chemistry, combined with “free will”.
My body and mind is my temple and you may not be entering it without my permission. 100 year ago, the average American died when they were 70 years old, and 100 years later it is almost 10 years longer, but all the life saving tools that have been created has not improved the quality of health of the American citizens. Too many of the medical tools have been miss used and the lack of voices from the medical community expressing the fact that the root causes of our bloated medical system are not being address is unacceptable. The Whitehouse website shows the chart that is up to date that shows the health of Americans on average is about in the 50th per centile in the world and we have a medical system per capita which is about twice as expensive. In the meantime, the medical community is rally against the goals of RFK Jr who wants to address the root causes that have been ignored and growing since WWII. As long as the mass media and our politicians and our medical leadership embrace the status quo I see nothing changing. I have rallied against the mRNA and did not get the injections because I knew they were experimental. The fact that over 500 mRNA injections are being developed speaks volumes we keep looking for profitable band-aid solutions and not address the root causes. There are pockets of ethnic groups that have rejected the negative lifestyle issues including over treating in the medical arena and enjoy longer life spans, but the reasons for their longevity is ignored. It doesn't grow the current allopathic medicine model. Happy 4th!
I’ll wager the Ugers In China, wish that they’re healthy subpopulation WAS ignored. What unsurpassed barbarism Is committed against them by the CCP BECAUSE of the Uger’s healthy lifestyle.
As the Heidelberg catechism puts it : "I am not my own but belong, body and soul, both in life and in death to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood and has set me free...." I belong to God not to man and not to myself.
The need for this is paramount. Let's make this move mountains!
I feel a since of urgency about this effort for the simple fact that there are currently three members of the U S SUPREME COURT that are unwilling to admit that they know what a woman is!
Thank you for taking on another worthy task, I support this effort with all my being!
Signed!
Just signed it! Will share, share, share...
Maybe I'm overthinking this but, "and you may not be taken" could be used by some to mean a person can't be imprisoned for a crime, or a person can't be removed from a country for being there illegally. Any thoughts?
BTW - I signed.
This is going to have to be edited, and reduced to legislation and, hopefully, a treaty. For now, we tried to keep it simple and high level. Baby steps.
While you are editing this, please consider that there is a fundamental omission in this. We must designate human persons specifically. Science considers the human a species of primate, categorizing human vs. non-human primates. Meanwhile, for decades scientists in technology who deny the existence of a soul have been developing non-human persons. We are beginning to see the emergence of these efforts now. These rights stated in this declaration only pertain to human persons, not non-human persons and so must be specifically designated as such. This needs to be taken seriously.
Thank you for your work. Please let us know what else we can do to support this effort before it’s too late. 🙏🏻
The declaration is, and must be, partisan. It will divide between those with a broad definition of person and those who continue to insist on a narrow definition. Blacks are persons, whites are persons, the mentally feeble are persons, the aged and infirm are persons, the unborn are persons.
but it is neither pro-left or pro-right. It is pro-individual persons.
One may hope it will divide along different lines than party. One may hope.
Are the signatories of this declaration by default US citizens, or can anyone sign it?
all persons are welcome to endorse!
Coerced is another word for forced. And it’s absolutely accurate. They can fire us as a patient if we don’t go along with their forced recommendation. Or deny us services.
Wait…. What?
If we carry this out to the goal of true freedom, then no one should be coerced, forced or otherwise made to do anything for anybody else if they choose not to. Just as you are free to decide which doctor you will entrust your care to, so should he/she be able to decide who they will offer their services to on an individual basis.
I think back to the Masterpiece cake shop case. Just because you hang a shingle out saying you will perform a service, shouldn’t mean that you have to accept orders from anyone who walks through the door. And, if asked why the refusal, an acceptable answer should be, I didn’t want to and that should be the end of it.
WOW. THIS SPEECH IS HISTORIC. PLEASE SHARE THIS WIDELY. https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/trump-pays-tribute-to-us-founders-for-250th-celebration-at-mount-rushmore-6055596?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2026-07-04&src_cmp=mb-2026-07-04&utm_medium=email&est=0q7yHpmdmkgYUtwirpTUlrHEJZAyZhBe13kFEgSeHgFPVt1b1c4gHnXGZIl0UwlHDguX 🇺🇸
1:50 in is where it starts rolling....
If I lived in America I would sign it. 👍
if you are a person, you are welcome to sign
Unfortunately over the years from a legal standpoint the word 'person' has different meanings than just a single human being. It can even mean a corporation. I wish this declaration used 'natural person', 'human being', or 'the individual person' instead.
we did a very deep dive into the legal context before choosing this wording.
“The word ‘person’ is not always considered the best term for human rights because it is a legal and philosophical concept that can include entities other than human beings, such as corporations, and its meaning has been debated. Human rights are intended to belong to every human being simply by virtue of being human, so many people consider ‘human being’ to be the clearer and more appropriate term.”